Alongside its refocused approach, ERO is developing an intervention logic, which will demonstrate the relationships and links between ERO’s evaluations and the desired results. Impacts 1 and 2 (below) and their associated measures should be considered in the context of the developing intervention logic.
ERO is working with Victoria University of Wellington to develop the intervention logic and to strengthen the associated measures. ERO will also consider research undertaken by the New Zealand Institute of Economic Research (NZIER) in the development of this work.
ERO’s system-wide evaluations will influence and advise on the development and implementation of education policy and practice.
The aggregation and analysis of national review data gives ERO an opportunity to provide a broader picture of the topical issues, initiatives or policies of interest to the sector and Government.
ERO’s national evaluations will promote debate and influence change to the education system. National evaluations and reports of good practice will add value to the sector’s policy decision-making processes when:
In the next three years ERO will evaluate and report on the effectiveness of specific education strategies intended to advance national education priorities, in particular:
ERO will work with the Ministry of Education and government agencies to identify the topics for national evaluations that will be useful and add value to the education sector.
ERO will also inform policy development in these government agencies by:
ERO’s national evaluations and reports of good practice will also be made available to parents, whānau, iwi, communities and education professionals – to raise their understanding and awareness of education issues and practice.
| Measure | 2011/12 Forecast | 2010/11 Estimated Actual | 2009/10 Actual | 2008/09 Actual |
| Education Evaluation Reports | Up to 20 | 15 | 13 | 18 |
| Cost ($000) | 1,979 | 1,986 | 1,998 | $2,184 |
To assess the effectiveness of its evaluations, ERO will collect feedback on:
A study of the use of national evaluation reports, undertaken in 2009, found that they provided high quality, relevant and useful information for the Ministry of Education. Ministry of Education officials used ERO’s evaluations and advice for policy development and briefings, planning, and the design of professional development for the education sector.
ERO will schedule a further study in 2011-12.
ERO collected data on the use of ERO’s evaluation reports and findings by schools and early childhood services in 2009-10. A further study will be undertaken in 2012-13.
ERO will provide reviews of schools and early childhood services that will support them to improve student achievement, the quality of teaching and learning, governance, self review and leadership.
The evaluations provide quality assurance to the Government and the community.
ERO’s evaluations and reports will have contributed to improvements in the education system when:
ERO expects to review approximately a third of all schools and early childhood services each year. In doing so ERO will take into account that:
ERO will make its reports on schools and early childhood services available to parents, whānau, iwi and communities. Through these reports ERO encourages their interest and participation in their children’s schools and early childhood services.
ERO will also make changes to its format for review reports to increase usability for parents, whānau, iwi and communities.
ERO’s aim to provide a cost-effective service is reflected in the above measures and trends. ERO aims to maintain its review frequency (one-third of schools and early childhood services reviewed annually) and high effectiveness rating (80 percent), while maintaining and/or reducing its service cost and input levels over the medium term.
To assess the impact of its reviews, ERO will seek feedback from schools and early childhood services about what actions have been taken on its recommendations and how the evaluation process has contributed to improvements in education delivery.
Table 1: Measures and trends
| Measure | 2011/12 Forecast | 2010/11 Estimated Actual | 2009/10 Actual | 2008/09 Actual |
|
| Reviews | Schools | 710-840 | 710-840 | 867 | 837 |
| Early childhood | 1,240-1,400 | 1,240-1,400 | 1,291 | 1,222 |
|
|
Cost | Schools | 14,854 | 15,387 | $16,099 | $16,030 |
| Early childhood | 10,048 | 10,115 | $9,071 | $9,334 |
|
| Frequency %
(reviews/ | Schools | 33% (target) | 33% (target) | 33% | 33% |
| Early childhood | 33% (target) | 33% (target) | 32% | 32% |
|
| Effectiveness % of schools evaluated that have used the evaluation process to make improvements | Schools | 80% (target) | 80% (target) | Achieved (80%) |
80% |
| Early childhood | 80% (target) | 80% (target) | Achieved (80%) |
87% |
|
| Review Staff (FTE) | 145 (target) | 145 (target) | 147 | 150 |
|
ERO has reduced review activity in Christchurch as a result of the earthquake in February 2011. This may continue to have an impact on the number and frequency of reviews undertaken in the Christchurch region.