BestStart Pipiwai Road

Education institution number:
11565
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
45
Telephone:
Address:

Pipiwai Road, Kamo, Whangarei

View on map

ABC Pipiwai Road - 27/06/2017

1 Evaluation of ABC Pipiwai Road

How well placed is ABC Pipiwai Road to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

ABC Pipiwai Road in Kamo, Whangarei, is licensed for 50 children including up to 15 children up to two years of the age. The centre provides all day education and care in a modified house and grounds.

The centre is part of the national BestStart Education and Care Centres organisation, which provides an overarching governance and management framework as well as personnel to support individual centres. A centre manager, assistant manager and head teacher provide leadership. They are supported by a BestStart area manager and other BestStart management services. More than 80 percent of teachers employed at the centre are qualified. The centre also employs a cook and an administrator.

The centre philosophy is based on Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum. The programme is influenced by the Reggio Emilia philosophy that encourages children to lead their own learning. The programme for younger children, follows the RIE approach that promotes respect for infants and a primary caregiver approach.

Groups of children have designated teachers and separate indoor and outdoor areas. They transition to the Adventurers, at approximately two years old. Older children are invited to participate in the Explorers programme in a separate room at approximately four years of age.

The 2014 ERO review commented positively on the relationships and interactions of teachers, children and parents. It identified that the programme was responsive to children's interests. Key next steps included having a greater focus on learning through play and encouraging more parent involvement in planning and assessment. Good progress has been made in these areas.

This review was part of a cluster of six reviews in the BestStart Educare Limited organisation. 

The Review Findings

Teachers know the children and their families well. They regularly share information about the children with their parents. Parents share their aspirations for their children's learning and teachers are developing ways to include these into programme planning.

Much of the programme is led by children who have significant opportunities for sustained play. Teachers engage children in regular conversations, discussing and supporting their play well. Interactions are respectful and encouraging. Older children decide on their level of participation in the Explorers programme. The teacher who provides the programme also works in the Adventurers area and is known to the children.

Children up to two years of age are very well provided for. The primary caregiving approach ensures that there is good communication with parents, and teachers are aware of, and consider children's home routines. Relationships are very respectful and interactions strongly support children's sense of wellbeing and language learning.

Children's transitions into the centre, and within the centre are well supported. Teachers work well with parents to settle new children. A teacher works with two age groups to help support young children's sense of belonging when they are moving to the Adventurers group. Relationships with local schools are being strengthened through participation in a newly formed Community of Learning|Kāhui Ako (CoL).

Leaders and teachers actively promote bi-cultural perspectives across the centre. They include many aspects of Māori language and culture into the programme. Te reo Māori is used regularly by teachers in their interactions with children. Children's responses show their growing understanding.

Documenting programme planning and assessment continues to be a focus for development. Electronic portfolios were introduced in 2014 and teachers value the increased contributions to these by parents/whanau. There has been a greater focus on planning for individuals based on what the teachers observe.

The centre is well lead. BestStart centre leaders in Northland work closely with each other and with the area manager, reflecting on the quality of the service provided and how it can be improved. The ABC Pipiwai Road centre culture is collaborate with a collective focus on on-going development.

Performance management systems are effective. Professional learning and development is relevant and new learning is incorporated into teacher practice. Ongoing mentoring and coaching is used successfully to build teacher capacity. A new appraisal process encourages teachers to inquire more into the impact of their teaching practice and learning outcomes for children.

Governance systems and policies are effective in guiding centre operations. A sound policy base is implemented through procedures determined by centre staff. Staff follow routines and health and safety checks. Good systems are in place to check that there are followed. The area manager shares regular reports that identify strengths and any improvements needed. 

Key Next Steps

ERO and centre managers agreed that next steps for the centre include:

  • continuing to strengthen planning and assessment

  • regular documenting of strategic planning

  • reviewing the use of teachers' questions to increase the complexity of children's play.

Centre leaders intend to continue to focus on strengthening their leadership skills and those of other staff.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of ABC Pipiwai Road completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of ABC Pipiwai Road will be in three years.

Violet Tu’uga Stevenson

Deputy Chief Review Officer Northern (Acting)

27 June 2017

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning. 

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service 

Location

Kamo, Whangarei

Ministry of Education profile number

11565

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

50 children, including up to 15 aged under 2

Service roll

71

Gender composition

Girls 42 Boys 29

Ethnic composition

Māori
Pākehā
Pacific
other ethnicities

24
39
4
4

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%+

Based on funding rates

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

1:5

Meets minimum requirements

Over 2

1:10

Meets minimum requirements

Review team on site

April 2017

Date of this report

27 June 2017

Most recent ERO report(s)

 

Education Review

May 2014

Education Review

February 2011

Education Review

September 2007

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.

ABC Pipiwai Road - 16/05/2014

1 Evaluation of ABC Pipiwai Road

How well placed is ABC Pipiwai Road to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

ABC Pipiwai Road in Kamo, Whangarei, is licensed to provide full day education and care for 50 children, aged from birth to school age. Infants and toddlers up to two years of age are catered for in a separate area. Two other age groups share an outdoor playground but have their own indoor areas. The Adventurers room provides for children between two and three-and-a half years of age. The Explorers room caters for older children, up to five years of age.

Formerly part of the ABC early childhood group, the centre is now part of the Kidicorp organisation. It operates alongside the Kamo Preschool Centre on the same site. This has resulted in new resources, including improvements to the indoor and outdoor environment. Kidicorp personnel work effectively with a newly appointed centre manager and staff to promote good quality education and care.

Kidicorp has recently initiated a van service to transport children who otherwise may not be able to attend an early childhood centre. This service is well used by Māori whānau and has increased the number of Māori children enrolled in the centre. Teachers continue to develop their understanding of te reo and tikanga Māori and to consider ways to foster the language, culture and identity of these children.

The teaching team comprises fully and provisionally registered teachers, with two teachers still in training. The centre manager leads by example and is highly respected by children, teachers and parents. Teachers are well supported to sustain the good practices identified in the 2011 ERO report and to continue lifting the quality of teaching to benefit children.

The Review Findings

Children are happy and settled and have a sense of belonging in the centre. They have warm and affectionate relationships with teachers and interact positively with their friends. Most children engage well with a good range of resources and activities and are responsive to teachers’ support for their play. They often share with others and sometimes work independently. Children benefit from the Kidicorp ‘Be School Ready’ programme, which fosters their resilience, independence and ability to be self-managing. As a result, children from a very young age are developing a sense of themselves as capable learners.

Teachers know children very well. Infants and toddlers are well cared for in a warm and nurturing environment. Teachers create an accessible area for babies to explore a selection of suitable resources and materials for play. There is a teacher designated to help these children transition to the over two area.

Teachers work well with children in the Adventurers room. They ask children questions and extend their ideas about their interests. Teachers have expectations that children will take responsibility for themselves and help each other. Children happily make choices about their play in groups or individually during activities, at meal times and mat times.

The Explorers room reflects the Reggio Emilia philosophy where pre-school children guide their own learning, based on their interests. Teachers set up resources in this room to provoke children’s curiosity. ERO and centre managers agree that this learning space needs to be more consistently available for all children to use.

Good professional development is provided by a visiting teacher who is fluent in te reo o Ngapuhi. Children at the centre have the opportunity to sing waiata with actions, say karakia and become familiar with phrases in te reo Māori. Teachers could now make better use of this opportunity to further develop their capability in te reo and tikanga Māori.

Teachers plan programmes that reflect children's emerging interests. They are committed to embracing the principles of Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum and making links with the key competencies in The New Zealand Curriculum (NZC). There is now a need for teachers to focus on using better questioning techniques to extend children’s thinking and knowledge. More open-ended use of resources would help to stimulate children’s exploration and creativity.

Parents can see and read about children's learning through some very good quality photo stories and narratives. An annual survey enables parents to provide feedback about their children’s interests and aspirations. Children’s assessment portfolios could be further improved with greater contributions from parents.

The centre manager and teachers are well supported by Kidicorp. Regular support visits, frequent professional development opportunities and systems to monitor standards help staff to improve centre practices. Detailed strategic and annual action plans for each room guide centre development. Teachers also take responsibility for reviewing practices within their own areas. Managers recognise the need for continued development in self review and are particularly focused on their ‘bicultural journey’ in 2014.

Key Next Steps

ERO and centre managers agree that, in order to further develop the quality of teaching practices and learning outcomes for children, teachers should:

  • continue to develop teaching practices that facilitate more sustained and complex play
  • ensure early literacy and numeracy concepts, and science and technology opportunities, are integrated in meaningful ways through play
  • increase parent contributions in programmes and portfolios.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of ABC Pipiwai Road completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of ABC Pipiwai Road will be in three years.

Dale Bailey

National Manager Review Services Northern Region

16 May 2014

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Kamo, Whangarei

Ministry of Education profile number

11565

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

50 children, including up to 12 aged under 2

Service roll

78

Gender composition

Boys 39

Girls 39

Ethnic composition

Māori

NZ European/Pākehā

other

28

45

5

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%

Based on funding rates

80%

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

1:5

Meets minimum requirements

 

Over 2

1:10

Meets minimum requirements

Review team on site

March 2014

Date of this report

16 May 2014

Most recent ERO report(s)

 

Education Review

February 2011

 

Education Review

September 2007

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.