BestStart Te Atatu Peninsula

Education institution number:
10060
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
80
Telephone:
Address:

5 Cellarmans Street, Te Atatu Peninsula, Auckland

View on map

ABC Te Atatu - 30/06/2017

1 Evaluation of ABC Te Atatu

How well placed is ABC Te Atatu to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

ABC Te Atatu is licensed for 100 children, including 25 up to two years of age. It provides education and care for children from a culturally diverse community. A high number of children who are of Māori heritage attend the centre. The centre operates in a purpose-built facility. The centre has two separate areas, one for children from birth to three years, and the other for children from three to five years of age. Children are grouped according to age in four interconnected rooms and two playgrounds.

The centre is part of the national BestStart Educare Limited organisation, which provides an overarching governance and management framework as well as personnel to support individual centres. A centre manager, assistant manager and three head teachers provide leadership and are supported by a professional services manager (PSM), a business manager and other BestStart management services.

Currently most of the teachers employed at the centre are qualified. Due to several staff changes a new team culture is still being established in some rooms.

The centre philosophy is based on Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum and promotes learning through play. A primary care giving approach for younger children helps teachers to build relationships with children and their parents.

The 2014 ERO report commented positively on the nurturing, friendly environment provided for children. The centre was well resourced and the environment adapted to reflect the ages of children. Purposeful leadership was focused on building teacher capability.

The report suggested that children's culture, language and identity should be acknowledged in the programme and portfolios, and that teachers should involve children in planning for their own learning. Further improvement is required in teaching and learning practices.

This review was part of a cluster of six reviews in the BestStart Educare Limited organisation.

The Review Findings

Children's education and care is well supported by teachers. Children generally settle easily at the start of the day and demonstrate a sense of wellbeing and belonging in the centre. The intention of teachers is to have respectful, reciprocal, responsive relationships with children. This is established in some rooms. The process of getting to know families and children is still developing in other rooms. The primary caregiving approach works well for the infants who are settled and confident with familiar adults.

Children have long periods of uninterrupted time during the day. They are able to make decisions about where they play and when they need to stop for meals. Children are supported by the teachers to successfully interact with others.

Children up to three years old are carefully nurtured. Teachers engage parents in conversations about their children's home routines and follow these as closely as possible. Teachers generally work with children, staying by them as they explore. It would be useful for teachers to review the frequency of meaningful conversations they have with infants and to increase the time they spend encouraging children's play.

Teachers follow flexible routines that allow them to support children's emerging ideas and interests. They should continue with their focus on improving assessment, including parent aspirations and recording these goals in children's portfolios. This could strengthen new teachers' understanding and knowledge about children and their families.

The centre environment is well resourced and thoughtfully arranged to encourage children to follow their interests. Children move freely between the indoor and outdoor areas. Teachers encourage children to challenge themselves physically and to play together. Children enjoy opportunities to share books and conversations with each other and with teachers. They seek teachers' support when investigating science and nature related interests.

Children have opportunities to hear and understand te reo Māori and to experience cultural protocols. Teachers have identified this as an area of the curriculum that they want to strengthen.

The manager plans to improve the quality of teaching and learning throughout the centre. She has identified the need to strengthen team relationships and collaboration, and to support teachers to take leadership roles. The PSM provides good support for teaching development.

Performance management systems are effective. Professional development is relevant and engages staff. New learning is often incorporated into teacher practice. Ongoing mentoring and coaching is used to build teacher capacity. A new appraisal process encourages teachers to inquire into the impact of their teaching practice on children's learning.

Governance systems are effective in guiding centre operations. Good systems are in place to ensure that staff follow routines and health and safety checks. The PSM shares regular reports that identify strengths and any improvements needed.

The BestStart PSM team has focused on improving assessment, planning and evaluation of programmes. PSMs are also working with teachers to strengthen their understanding of inquiry-based learning for children.

Key Next Steps

ERO identified development priorities that include:

  • leaders and teachers having a stronger focus on assessment and planning processes that link to parents' aspirations, and teachers' knowledge about the children

  • leaders supporting teachers to engage children in conversations to encourage more in depth oral language and thinking

  • teachers deepening their evaluation in order to determine the effectiveness of programmes for children.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of ABC Te Atatu completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of ABC Te Atatu will be in three years.

Steffan Brough

Deputy Chief Review Officer Northern (Acting)

30 June 2017

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning. 

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service 

Location

Te Atatu Peninsula, Auckland

Ministry of Education profile number

10060

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

100 children, including up to 25 aged under 2

Service roll

114

Gender composition

Boys 53% Girls 47%

Ethnic composition

Māori
Pākehā
Asian
Indian
Cook Islands Māori
Fijian
Latin American
other European
other

21%
40%
12%
5%
3%
2%
2%
4%
11%

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%+

Based on funding rates

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

1:5

Meets minimum requirements

Over 2

1:10

Meets minimum requirements

Review team on site

May 2017

Date of this report

30 June 2017

Most recent ERO report(s)

 

Education Review

April 2014

Education Review

March 2011

Education Review

March 2008

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.

ABC Te Atatu - 02/04/2014

1 Evaluation of ABC Te Atatu

How well placed is ABC Te Atatu to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

ABC Te Atatu, in West Auckland, provides full day care and education for up to 100 children from birth to five years of age, including up to 25 children under two years. The centre operates as four separate rooms catering for different age groups.

During 2012 ABC Te Atatu Tahi and ABC Te Atatu Rua had a change of ownership and were merged under one licence. The centre now operates under the administrative and management systems of Kidicorp Ltd. A professional support manager (PSM) and a business manager from Kidicorp provide ongoing support for the centre’s manager and staff.

The 2011 ERO reports noted that both centres provided good quality care and education for children. The centre manager and staff responded positively to the report’s recommendations for improvement, while continuing to prioritise areas for further development.

The Review Findings

Since the 2011 ERO report there has been a focus on building teacher professionalism and centre systems in order to promote improved outcomes for children. Over the past year Kidicorp support has had a positive influence on the centre’s development.

Teachers provide a nurturing, friendly environment where children learn with support from attentive adults. Teaching practices facilitate children’s exploration, language development and engagement in learning. Infants and toddlers benefit from individualised care and responsive attention from staff. Programmes and routines are flexible to cater for children’s interests, developmental stages and parents’ preferences.

The spacious learning environment is well resourced and adapted in response to children’s developmental ages and evolving interests. All children have ready access to outdoor areas that allow for a range of engaging activities.

Well-considered planning and assessment practices guide curriculum programmes. Planning approaches are flexible, allowing teachers to respond to children’s interests and to cater for the different age groups and children’s diverse needs. Planning is well documented and evaluated and visible for children and parents. Teachers are continuing to refine their planning processes to further support them to develop in-depth programmes that emerge from, and are shaped by, children’s ideas.

The centre’s bicultural practices are annually reviewed. The manager and teachers plan to further integrate te reo me ngā tikanga Māori into the programme. This should foster Māori children’s identity as Māori, while enabling all children to experience and learn about New Zealand’s bicultural history and context.

The centre manager demonstrates strong, purposeful leadership focused on building teacher capability and accountability. She promotes reflective staff teamwork and leadership. Together with staff she has successfully managed the transition to new centre ownership. The PSM and centre manager are supporting teachers to develop and document their reflective practice. Collaborative and consultative practices are resulting in considered changes to improve outcomes for children.

The Kidicorp organisation provides an efficient framework of administrative, personnel and support systems to guide centre operations. Personnel provide regular professional development for leaders and staff to grow in their roles. Useful processes for self review are followed to monitor licensing requirements and teacher effectiveness, and to promote the achievement of the centre’s strategic goals. These review processes appropriately include staff and parent perspectives and ideas.

Key Next Steps

ERO and centre managers agree that key next steps include further:

  • acknowledging children’s culture, language and identity in the programme and assessment portfolios
  • valuing and responding to children as capable learners by involving them in programme planning and evaluation
  • ensuring the ‘Be School Ready’ initiative reflects the principles of Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of ABC Te Atatu completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of ABC Te Atatu will be in three years.

Dale Bailey

National Manager Review Services Northern Region

2 April 2014

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Te Atatu Peninsula, Auckland

Ministry of Education profile number

10060

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

100 children, including up to 25 aged under 2

Service roll

133

Gender composition

Boys 61%

Girls 39%

Ethnic composition

Māori

NZ European/Pākehā

Asian

Indian

Pacific

Other

13%

71%

7%

4%

2%

3%

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%

Based on funding rates

80%

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

1:5

Meets minimum requirements

 

Over 2

1:10

Meets minimum requirements

Review team on site

February 2014

Date of this report

2 April 2014

Most recent ERO report(s)

Previous reports for:

ABC Te Atatu Tahi

 

Education Review

March 2011

 

Education Review

March 2008

 

Previous reports for:

ABC Te Atatu Rua

 

Education Review

March 2011

 

Education Review

March 2008

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.