Bula Centre

Education institution number:
45936
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Pacific Is. EC Service
Total roll:
17
Telephone:
Address:

40 R Cleek Road, Mangere East, Auckland

View on map

Bula Centre

ERO’s Akanuku | Assurance Review reports provide information about whether a service meets and maintains regulatory standards. Further information about Akanuku | Assurance Reviews is included at the end of this report.

ERO’s Judgement

Regulatory standards

ERO’s judgement

Curriculum

Meeting

Premises and facilities

Meeting

Health and safety

Meeting

Governance, management and administration

Meeting

Since the onsite visit the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed non-compliances and is now taking reasonable steps to meet regulatory standards.

Background

Bula Centre is owned by an incorporated society and governed by a board of trustees. Trustees and staff have worked with the Ministry of Education to improve the provision of education and care for children. The service reopened in 2019 after licence conditions were met and is the only Fijian community early childhood centre in New Zealand.

Summary of Review Findings

Children engage in meaningful, positive interactions with adults. The service curriculum is inclusive and supports the right of each child to be confident in their own culture. It encourages children to understand and respect each other. The curriculum is culturally responsive to the community. It is informed by assessment, planning, and evaluation that show an understanding of children’s learning, interests and whānau aspirations.

The board is working with centre leaders to support children’s wellbeing and learning. The centre community is engaged and actively contributes to centre events. Centre leaders have implemented effective internal evaluation processes that promote ongoing improvement.

Actions for Compliance

Since the onsite visit the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed the following non-compliance :

  • complete list of consideration of hazards on the centre’s daily checklist including the condition and placement of learning, play and other equipment, other areas of glass, and bodies of water (HS12).

Licensing criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Centre 2008.

Next ERO Review

The next ERO review is likely to be an Akarangi | Quality Evaluation.

Steve Tanner
Director Review and Improvement Services (Northern)
Northern Region | Te Tai Raki

25 February 2021 

Information About the Service

Early Childhood Service Name Bula Centre
Profile Number 45936
Location Mangere East, Auckland

Service type

Education and care service

Number licensed for

30 children, including up to 10 aged under 2.

Percentage of qualified teachers

50-79%

Service roll

21

Ethnic composition

Tongan  8
Samoan 4
Fijian 4

other ethnic groups 5

Review team on site

December 2020

Date of this report

25 February 2021

Most recent ERO report(s)

First ERO review of the service

General Information about Assurance Reviews

All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include the Licensing Criteria for Education and Care Services 2008.

Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a licence to operate.

ERO undertakes an Akanuku | Assurance Review process in any centre-based service:

  • having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation
  • previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development’
  • that has moved from a provisional to a full licence
  • that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership
  • where an Akanuku | Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulated standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher certification; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:

  • discussions with those involved in the service
  • consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems
  • observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice.

Bula Centre - 12/06/2017

1 Evaluation of Bula Centre

How well placed is Bula Centre to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Bula Centre is the only Fijian community early childhood centre in New Zealand. It is licensed for 30 children including a maximum of five up to two years old. Most children are Tongan, with fewer numbers of Fijian, Fiji Indian, Māori and Samoan.

The centre was established in 2012 and is governed by the elected board of the Fiji Community Association of Auckland Incorporated (FCAA). The FCAA receives funding from the Ministries of Education (MoE) and Social Development and Pacific Peoples, and from community funding grants.

There is potential conflict of interest in the board and the management committee, which consists of FCAA trustees and community members. The president of the FCAA is the licensee, and volunteers as the part-time general manager. The centre administrator and supervisor report directly to the licensee. Ongoing leadership and personnel changes include several long-term acting positions, including that of the general manager.

The centre employs five qualified teachers and two support staff. Five of these staff are new since the 2015 ERO review. The supervisor leads the teaching team, and is responsible for Fijian culture and language and the under-two group of children, Mokosoi. A head teacher leads Senitoa, the over-two group, and a senior teacher has a curriculum leadership role.

Since the 2015 ERO report, the management committee and teachers have undertaken professional development provided by the MoE. Although the management committee and staff have worked to address the areas of concern identified by ERO, significant areas need further development. These include governance, management, leadership, teaching and learning programmes for children.

The Review Findings

Internal evaluation at all levels of centre operations is not sufficiently well established to ensure that children benefit from ongoing improvements. The management committee has developed:

  • a process for internal evaluation

  • systems for reporting and monitoring aspects of compliance, health and safety

  • strategic and annual planning

  • a budget and reporting of equity funding

  • a teacher appraisal process

  • a mentoring programme for provisionally certificated teachers.

Teachers use a Fijian curriculum, Vula Vakaviti to plan programme themes. They integrate Vula Vakaviti with Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum, to respond to children's individual and group interests. Teachers require external professional development to strengthen their capability:

  • to contribute to programme planning, assessment and evaluation

  • to respond to children through intentional teaching practices.

In order to sustain meaningful change, external support is needed to build the collective skills of governors, managers and staff. Establishing a professional environment of trust and respect that fosters open-to-learning conversations will be key to achieving centre-wide improvement.

External support is required to embed and sustain a collaborative centre-wide culture of ongoing improvement that leads to shared understanding at all levels of centre operations. Areas requiring urgent attention include:

  • formalising a governance, management and leadership structure that clearly defines and separates centre operations and financial management from the FCAA's other core business

  • developing a centre governance manual and code of conduct to guide board and committee systems and practices, to ensure the centre is meeting legal requirements, and to minimise potential conflicts of interest

  • implementing a collaborative annual appraisal process for all staff that meets Education Council requirements

  • continuing to improve the quality of planning, assessment and evaluation of children's learning

  • making permanent appointments, and formalising roles and responsibilities for all staff, governors and managers including those in long-term acting positions.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Bula Centre completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements

Actions for compliance

ERO found significant areas of non-compliance in the service related to:

  • financial management and reporting to parents to specifically account for MoE funding

  • human resource management practices that follow centre guidelines and policies, and meet the requirements of the Vulnerable Children Act 2014

  • reviewing and implementing the complaints policy and procedures

  • internal evaluation that helps the centre improve the quality of education and care

Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Centres 2008, GMA3, 6, 7, 7A.

Recommendation to Ministry of Education

ERO recommends that the Ministry reassess the licence of Bula Centre. ERO will not undertake a further education review of this service until the Ministry of Education is satisfied that the service meets licensing requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Bula Centre will be in consultation with the Ministry of Education.

Steffan Brough

Deputy Chief Review Officer Northern (Acting)

12 June 2017 

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning. 

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service 

Location

Mangere East, Auckland

Ministry of Education profile number

45936

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

30 children, including up to 5 aged under 2

Service roll

21

Gender composition

Boys 11 Girls 10

Ethnic composition

Māori

Tongan

Fijian/ Fijian Indian

Samoan

1

12

7

1

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%+

Based on funding rates

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

1:3

Better than minimum requirements

Over 2

1:5

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

April 2017

Date of this report

12 June 2017

Most recent ERO report(s)

 

Education Review

March 2015

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.