Canterbury Educare Prestons Preschool

Education institution number:
47201
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
85
Telephone:
Address:

8 Te Rito Street, Marshland, Christchurch

View on map

Canterbury Educare Prestons Preschool

ERO’s Akanuku | Assurance Review reports provide information about whether a service meets and maintains regulatory standards. Further information about Akanuku | Assurance Reviews is included at the end of this report.

ERO’s Judgement

Regulatory standards

ERO’s judgement

Curriculum

Meeting

Premises and facilities

Meeting

Health and safety

Meeting

Governance, management and administration

Meeting

During the onsite visit, the service provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed non-compliances and is now taking reasonable steps to meet regulatory standards.

Background

Canterbury Educare Prestons Preschool is one of two privately-owned services. The owners provide governance and management support. A professional leader has overall responsibility for both centres and works closely with the head teacher at each service. A small number of children identify as Māori. This is similar for children of Pacific heritages.

Summary of Review Findings

Children experience a curriculum that is informed by Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum, and assessment, planning and evaluation documentation. This helps to show an understanding of children’s learning, their interests and life contexts. There is a range of resources, equipment, and experiences, indoors and out, to extend children’s learning and development.

Food provided by the service is prepared, served, and stored hygienically. The service’s philosophy statement and associated strategic and annual plans, guide the service's operation and practices. Ongoing self-review and internal evaluation helps the service to maintain and improve the quality of education and care provided.

Key Next Steps

Next steps include:

  • increasing the use of te reo me ngā tikanga Māori in daily teaching practices, routines, and interactions with children

  • further clarifying the purpose and use of the goals and learning outcomes from Te Whāriki in children's learning documentation.

During the review, the service provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed the following non-compliance:

  • documentation completed to show the four-point safety checking of an existing certificated teacher every three years.

[Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Centres 2008, GMA7a].

Next ERO Review

The next ERO review is likely to be an Akarangi | Quality Evaluation.

Dr Lesley Patterson
Director Review and Improvement Services (Southern)
Southern Region | Te Tai Tini

12 October 2022 

Information About the Service

Early Childhood Service Name

Canterbury Educare Prestons Preschool

Profile Number

47201

Location

Christchurch

Service type

Education and care service

Number licensed for

61 children, including up to 16 aged under 2

Percentage of qualified teachers

100%

Service roll

91

Review team on site

August 2022

Date of this report

12 October 2022

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review, June 2018.

General Information about Assurance Reviews

All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include the Licensing Criteria for Education and Care Services 2008.

Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a licence to operate.

ERO undertakes an Akanuku | Assurance Review process in any centre-based service:

  • having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation

  • previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development’

  • that has moved from a provisional to a full licence

  • that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership

  • where an Akanuku | Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum

  • premises and facilities

  • health and safety practices

  • governance, management and administration.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulatory standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; safety checking; teacher certification; ratios)

  • relevant evacuation procedures and practices.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:

  • discussions with those involved in the service

  • consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems

  • observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice.

Canterbury Educare Prestons Preschool - 12/06/2018

1 Evaluation of Canterbury Educare Prestons Preschool

How well placed is Canterbury Educare Prestons Preschool to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

Canterbury Educare Prestons Preschool is well placed to promote positive learning outcomes for children.

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Canterbury Educare Prestons Preschool is one of two privately-owned centres. It is part of the Canterbury Educare organisation. A Director of Learning has overall responsibility for both centres. Each centre is managed by a Head Teacher.

The centre was purpose built and provides full-day education and care for up to 60 children from birth-to-school age. There are separate, spacious indoor and outdoor areas for infants, toddlers and preschool children.

Most staff are registered and qualified early childhood education teachers. An on-site cook provides meals and snacks to meet children's dietary needs.

The service opened in 2016. This is the first ERO review for this centre.

The Review Findings

The centre's philosophy provides a clear vision for the centre and is evident in practice. Teachers foster positive and respectful relationships with children, their parents and whānau. They provide a welcoming learning environment where family knowledge of the child is integral and importance is placed on valuing the child in a holistic way.

The child-led programme enables children to make decisions about their learning. Children are well supported to make choices and follow their interests. Teachers provide opportunities for children to extend their thinking and understandings of the world around them. Children play well independently and with others for sustained periods. They are supportive of each other and older children show care for younger children.

Teachers effectively identify and respond to individual children's learning and needs. They engage children in meaningful conversations and contexts. Teachers give deliberate consideration to teaching and learning spaces and resources. There is a strong focus on sustainability and the natural world. Children have easy access to a wide range of learning materials and opportunities. Literacy learning is naturally embedded into all aspects of the programme.

Teachers know children well and use this knowledge to build children's identity as successful learners. They proactively seek and respond to the aspirations parents have for their children's learning. Children's interests and needs are clearly identified and responded to. Teachers are increasingly effective in identifying the specific teaching strategies they will use to support children's learning and development.

The wellbeing of children who are under two is actively promoted through sensitive and respectful interactions. Teachers provide routines for young children that are calm, unhurried and responsive to the needs and preferences of each child. There are high levels of communication between staff about children's learning and care.

Children's transitions into, within and beyond the centre are very well supported and flexible to meet the individual child and family needs. The centre has close links with the local school to support children's transition to school.

Teachers are well supported through strong leadership. There are clear expectations for leaders and teachers and this is helping to ensure shared understanding and consistency. It is also providing opportunities for support across the two centres owned by the Educare Canterbury organisation. A considered approach to team building and staff appointments is helping to ensure a cohesive teaching team. The collaborative approach across the centres encourages and supports teachers to work closely with others from both centres. They regularly share best practice to support children's learning and wellbeing. Good use is made of individual teachers' strengths.

Teachers and leaders make good use of internal evaluation to enhance outcomes for children. They reflect regularly on their practice and are strongly focused on continuous improvement. Teachers are provided with useful feedback about their teaching.

The centre's responsive governance model is focused on continuous improvement. Managers are supportive of staff and make good provision for building capacity across the teaching team. External expertise and professional development are effectively used to further strengthen teaching and learning within the centre. Leadership is responsive to parents, whānau and staff to ensure positive outcomes for children.

Key Next Steps

The centre has identified, and ERO agrees, that the key next steps to further improve outcomes for children are to:

  • continue to develop the ways teachers plan for and evaluate the effectiveness of teaching and learning for groups of children
  • consider ways to ensure children can revisit their learning
  • continue to grow and give prominence to bicultural perspectives within practices and documentation.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Canterbury Educare Prestons Preschool completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Canterbury Educare Prestons Preschool will be in three years.

Dr Lesley Patterson

Deputy Chief Review Officer

Te Waipounamu - Southern Region

12 June 2018

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Christchurch

Ministry of Education profile number

47201

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

60 children, including up to 15 aged under 2

Service roll

58

Gender composition

Boys 32

Girls 26

Ethnic composition

Māori
Pākehā
Asian
Other ethnicities

6
41
6
5

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%+

Based on funding rates

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

1:4

Meets minimum requirements

Over 2

1:10

Meets minimum requirements

Review team on site

May 2018

Date of this report

12 June 2018

Most recent ERO report(s)

No previous ERO reports

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.