Carlyle Kindergarten

Education institution number:
5539
Service type:
Free Kindergarten
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
41
Telephone:
Address:

113 Thackeray Street, Napier South, Napier

View on map

Carlyle Kindergarten

ERO’s Akanuku | Assurance Review reports provide information about whether a service meets and maintains regulatory standards. Further information about Akanuku | Assurance Reviews is included at the end of this report.

ERO’s Judgement

Regulatory standards

ERO’s judgement

Curriculum

Meeting

Premises and facilities

Meeting

Health and safety

Meeting

Governance, management and administration

Meeting

Since the onsite visit, the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed non-compliances and is now taking reasonable steps to meet regulatory standards.

Background

This is one of 16 kindergartens governed and managed by the Napier Kindergarten Association. Their philosophy includes a connection with community, friendship and diversity. A third of the children are identified as Māori alongside a diverse roll. The kindergarten is part of the Enviroschools programme.

Summary of Review Findings

The kindergarten philosophy guides a curriculum that is inclusive and responsive to children as confident competent learners. Children’s preferences are respected, and they have opportunities to be involved in decisions about their learning. Parent aspirations are acknowledged. A wide range of experiences and opportunities both indoors and outdoors, enhances and extends learning and development.

The kindergarten acknowledges and reflects the unique place of Māori as tangata whenua. Children develop knowledge and an understanding of the cultural heritages of both parties to Te Tiriti o Waitangi.

An ongoing focus on regulatory standards is required to ensure ongoing maintenance of licensing criteria.

Actions for Compliance

During and since the onsite visit, the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed the following non-compliances:

  • Having a written emergency management plan to ensure the care and safety of children and adults at the service that contains all aspects required by the licensing criterion (HS7).

  • Ensuring relevant emergency drills are carried out with children on at least a three-monthly basis, and evidence kept of how these have informed the annual review of the emergency plan (HS8).

  • Ensuring medicines are disposed of and sent home with a parent after the specified time, and there is evidence of parental acknowledgement that medicine has been administered (HS28).

  • Having the Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Centres 2008 prominently displayed (GMA1).

  • Ensuring suitable human resources practices are implemented, including a documented system of regular appraisal (GMA7).

  • Having a written procedure for safety checking all children’s workers that meets the requirements of the Children’s Act 2014, and ensuring every children’s worker is safety checked every three years (GMA7A).

Next ERO Review

The next ERO review is likely to be an Akarangi | Quality Evaluation.

Patricia Davey
Director of Early Childhood Education (ECE)

27 October 2023

Information About the Service

Early Childhood Service Name

Carlyle Kindergarten

Profile Number

5539

Location

Napier South, Napier

Service type

Free Kindergarten

Number licensed for

43 children over the age of 2

Percentage of qualified teachers

100%

Service roll

40

Review team on site

August 2023

Date of this report

27 October 2023

Most recent ERO report(s)

 Education Review, November 2019; Education Review, April 2016

General Information about Assurance Reviews

All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include the Licensing Criteria for Education and Care Services 2008.

Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a licence to operate.

ERO undertakes an Akanuku | Assurance Review process in any centre-based service:

  • having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation

  • previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development’

  • that has moved from a provisional to a full licence

  • that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership

  • where an Akanuku | Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum

  • premises and facilities

  • health and safety practices

  • governance, management and administration.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulatory standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; safety checking; teacher certification; ratios)

  • relevant evacuation procedures and practices.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:

  • discussions with those involved in the service

  • consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems

  • observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice.

Carlyle Kindergarten - 12/11/2019

1 Evaluation of Carlyle Kindergarten

How well placed is Carlyle Kindergarten to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

Carlyle Kindergarten is well placed to promote positive learning outcomes for children.

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Carlyle Kindergarten, in Napier, provides all-day education and care for up to 43 children aged over two years. Of the 45 children enrolled at the time of this ERO review, 11 identify as Māori. The kindergarten is a member of the Enviroschools programme.

The kindergarten’s philosophy places emphasis on building positive relationships and children forming friendships. Teachers aim to encourage confidence, curiosity and an enthusiasm for learning in children through sustained and cooperative play.

Carlyle Kindergarten is one of 16 kindergartens operating under the governance and management of the Napier Kindergarten Association (the association). The governing board is responsible for setting the overall strategic direction for the organisation. The day-to-day operation of the association is the role of the general manager. Two education managers provide teaching and learning support for teachers. The board employs a Pou Whakarewa Mātauranga (Professional Practice Advisor Māori) to work alongside all association personnel to continue to strengthen cultural responsiveness.

Since the April 2016 ERO evaluation, there have been some changes to the teaching team including the employment of a long-term reliever in February 2018.

The key next steps identified in the previous ERO report, internal evaluation and assessment, planning and evaluation, continue to be areas for the kindergarten to strengthen.

This review was part of a cluster of 16 kindergartens in the Napier Kindergarten Association.

The Review Findings

Children experience warm and welcoming relationships with teachers. Effective teaching strategies support children’s developing social and emotional competency. Thoughtful conversations between children and teachers promote rich oral language development. Collaborative relationships between children and teacher encourage problem solving and challenge children’s thinking. Teachers positively encourage and acknowledge children's efforts and successes.

Children actively participate in a curriculum that reflects the beliefs and values of the kindergarten's philosophy. They are supported to build their knowledge about New Zealand’s unique cultural heritage through the integration of te reo me ngā tikanga Māori. Children have opportunities to learn about stories and landmarks of significance to local Māori. Māori children experience an environment where their language and culture are affirmed.

Children with additional learning and development needs are well supported through close cooperation with appropriate external agencies. A weekly playgroup supports children's successful transitions into the kindergarten. Relationships established with local schools is also contributing to children's successful transitions beyond the kindergarten.

Children's interests and parents' contributions inform group planning. Learning portfolios capture children’s engagement in the life of the kindergarten. A next step is to strengthen planning for individual children aligned with the learning outcomes in Te Whāriki. This should support teachers to:

  • more intentionally provide resources and experiences

  • ensure assessment over time strongly reflects each child's learning journey and their language, culture and identity

  • evaluate how well planned teaching strategies promote individual learning and value information shared by parents.

The head teacher has created an inclusive environment where whānau are encouraged to stay and participate. A collaborative team culture uses the strengths of the teaching team to support children’s learning. Strengthening the teaching team's understanding and use of evaluation and how well it contributes to high-quality practice and outcomes for children is a next step. Considerations should also be given to strengthening alignment between internal evaluation, appraisal goals and the association's strategic direction to better support positive outcomes for children. Education managers should continue to grow their own knowledge and practice of internal evaluation to better support this process.

The governing board is future focused and has developed a clear strategic direction to meet the diverse needs of its communities. Board members value diversity of viewpoints and gather community and staff voice to inform decision-making. Regular reporting by the education managers is useful in identifying how strategic teaching and learning goals are being addressed.

The board places importance on developing teachers' capabilities. Targeted and deliberate building of cultural responsiveness supports Māori children and their whānau to experience success. An association-wide appraisal process is in place to support teacher practice in promoting positive learning outcomes for children. Further strengthening of the appraisal process, including targeted observations, should assist teachers to determine how well they are progressing and actively encourage them to improve their effectiveness.

Key Next Steps

Teachers should:

  • strengthen understanding and use of effective internal evaluation for improvement to know the impact of teacher practices on children’s learning

  • strengthen alignment between internal evaluation, appraisal goals and the associations strategic direction

  • improve the quality and consistency of assessment, planning and evaluation processes.

Education managers should continue to promote sustained improvement and innovation through strengthening:

  • evaluation, inquiry and professional guidance

  • the appraisal process.

Recommendation

Education managers should strengthen their understanding and use of internal evaluation to systematically evaluate their practices and the impact of these on outcomes for children.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Carlyle Kindergarten completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

To improve current practice, the early childhood service management should strengthen:

  • documentation of emergency drills and evaluations

  • assessment and management of risk for excursions including robust mitigation

  • consistent parental approval of ratio and mode of transportation for excursions

  • robust analysis and evaluation of accidents.

Phil Cowie

Director Review and Improvement Services Central

Central Region

12 November 2019

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Napier

Ministry of Education profile number

5539

Licence type

Free Kindergarten

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

43 children aged over 2

Service roll

45

Gender composition

Male 31 Female 14

Ethnic composition

Māori
NZ European/Pākehā
Other ethnic groups

11
25
9

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%+

Based on funding rates

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Over 2

1:10

Meets minimum requirements

Review team on site

September 2019

Date of this report

12 November 2019

Most recent ERO report(s)

 

Education Review

April 2016

Education Review

September 2012

Education Review

June 2009

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement

The overall judgement that ERO makes will depend on how well the service promotes positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed

  • Well placed

  • Requires further development

  • Not well placed

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.

Carlyle Kindergarten - 20/04/2016

1 Evaluation of Carlyle Kindergarten

How well placed is Carlyle Kindergarten to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Carlyle Kindergarten is licensed for up to 43 children aged over two years. The centre provides six-hour sessions each weekday. The roll of 53, includes 11 Māori children.

The kindergarten is part of the Napier Kindergarten Association, which oversees the operations of 16 kindergartens, including two based in Wairoa. A board of trustees oversees governance for the association with the support of the general manager. Two education managers have a responsibility for building teacher capability. An experienced head teacher is providing considered leadership to a stable teaching team. A recently appointed Pou Whakarewa Mātauranga supports teachers to develop their knowledge and understanding of te ao Māori. He demonstrates a clear vision for Māori children and their whānau.

Since the September 2012 ERO report, two teachers have been appointed to the long serving teaching team. They have focused on strengthening the team's understanding of bicultural teaching practices. Improvements have been made to the kindergarten property to enhance its appeal for children. The Enviroschool programme and understandings of cultural diversity are integrated in kindergarten practices. Positive guidance for children through a virtues programme has been extended to include mindfulness.

This review was part of a cluster of seven reviews in the Napier Kindergarten Association.

The Review Findings

The kindergarten's philosophy is clearly evident in practice. There is an emphasis on building positive relationships and children forming friendships. Children are enthusiastic and show curiosity and confidence in how they learn through sustained cooperative play. They enjoy learning about healthy food and caring for the environment through sustainable practices.

A strong focus on supporting literacy, mathematics and testing theories is evident. Children are actively encouraged to communicate and develop their oral language skills. They appreciate the natural world and being able to follow their emerging interests.

Kindergarten routines are increasingly responsive to the wider range of children's needs, including those aged two years and children who require additional support. Teachers work collaboratively with external agencies to increase the participation and engagement of children in learning. Information to support children's transition to a wide range of local schools is provided for parents.

The bicultural aspect of the curriculum to support success for Māori children and their whānau has strengthened. The programme enables children to participate in learning experiences that celebrate local Māori history, places and events. Whānau are sharing their expertise with teachers and children. Teachers continue to work on building their capacity to support Māori children's language, culture and identity.

Profile books attractively record children's enjoyments and participation in a wide range of kindergarten experiences. A recently introduced approach strongly acknowledges parent aspirations and children's interests. Teachers should continue to build their use of assessment, planning and evaluation to progress each child's learning over time.

Teachers plan to further refine appraisal goal setting, evidence gathering, feedback and observations in relation to the Practising Teacher Criteria.

A stable teaching team is focused on building collaborative ways of working. An experienced head teacher role models the importance of putting children at the heart of decision making. An emphasis on growing culturally responsive teaching practices is sustained.

Self-review practices are used by teachers to better consider options and to inform decision-making. Leaders should continue to develop the teaching team's understanding and use of evaluation to improve outcomes for children.

The association empowers teachers to use team strengths to respond to children and the parent community. Education managers should continue to lead the implementation of systems and processes that effectively build teacher capability.

Key Next Steps

The kindergarten teachers and education managers should continue to improve:

  • assessment practices, planning and evaluation linked to whānau aspirations

  • understandings and use of self review and internal evaluation to support ongoing improvement in children's learning.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Carlyle Kindergarten completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum

  • premises and facilities

  • health and safety practices

  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Carlyle Kindergarten will be in three years.

Joyce Gebbie

Deputy Chief Review Officer Central

20 April 2016

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Napier

Ministry of Education profile number

5539

Licence type

Free Kindergarten

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

43 children aged over 2

Service roll

53

Gender composition

Girls 27, Boys 26

Ethnic composition

Māori

Pākehā

Other ethnic groups

11

37

5

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%+

Based on funding rates

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Over 2

1:10

Meets minimum requirements

Review team on site

February 2016

Date of this report

20 April 2016

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

September 2012

Education Review

June 2009

Education Review

February 2006

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.