Children's Circle Early Years Centre

Education institution number:
46107
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
68
Telephone:
Address:

55 Resolution Road, Welcome Bay, Tauranga

View on map

Children's Circle Early Years Centre

ERO’s Akanuku | Assurance Review reports provide information about whether a service meets and maintains regulatory standards. Further information about Akanuku | Assurance Reviews is included at the end of this report.

ERO’s Judgement

Regulatory standards

ERO’s judgement

Curriculum

Meeting

Premises and facilities

Meeting

Health and safety

Meeting

Governance, management and administration

Meeting

Since the onsite visit, the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed non-compliances and is now taking reasonable steps to meet regulatory standards.

Background

Children’s Circle Early Years Centre is privately owned and operated. The Rudolf Steiner inspired centre caters for children from birth to school age in two age-based rooms. The centre manager leads a team of five registered teachers. A large group of Māori learners are enrolled.

Summary of Review Findings

Children are responded to as confident and competent learners in a language-rich environment. Their preferences are respected. The service curriculum acknowledges and reflects the unique place of Māori as tangata whenua.

The practices of adults providing education and care demonstrate knowledge of relevant theories and practice in early childhood education. Kaiako providing education and care nurture reciprocal relationships. These meaningful and positive interactions enhance children’s learning and supports their developing social competence.

Centre systems and processes guide operation. A process of self-review helps the service improve the quality of its education and care.

Actions for Compliance

Since the onsite visit, the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed the following non-compliances:

  • ensuring a written procedure for safety checking all children’s workers is in place, that meets the safety checking requirements of the Children’s Act 2014

  • documenting the results of safety checking for all children’s workers.

[Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Services, 2008: GMA7A]

Next ERO Review

The next ERO review is likely to be an Akarangi | Quality Evaluation.

Phil Cowie
Director Review and Improvement Services (Central)
Central Region | Te Tai Pūtahi Nui

14 December 2022

Information About the Service

Early Childhood Service Name

Children’s Circle Early Years Centre

Profile Number

46107

Location

Welcome Bay, Tauranga

Service type

Education and care service

Number licensed for

40 children, including up to 15 aged under 2

Percentage of qualified teachers

100%

Service roll

34

Review team on site

November 2022

Date of this report

14 December 2022

Most recent ERO report(s)

Akanuku | Assurance Review, June 2021; Education Review, June 2018

General Information about Assurance Reviews

All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include the Licensing Criteria for Education and Care Services 2008.

Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a licence to operate.

ERO undertakes an Akanuku | Assurance Review process in any centre-based service:

  • having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation

  • previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development’

  • that has moved from a provisional to a full licence

  • that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership

  • where an Akanuku | Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum

  • premises and facilities

  • health and safety practices

  • governance, management and administration.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulatory standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; safety checking; teacher certification; ratios)

  • relevant evacuation procedures and practices.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:

  • discussions with those involved in the service

  • consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems

  • observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice.

Children's Circle Early Years Centre

ERO’s Akanuku | Assurance Review reports provide information about whether a service meets and maintains regulatory standards. Further information about Akanuku | Assurance Reviews is included at the end of this report.

ERO’s Judgement

Regulatory standards

ERO’s judgement

Curriculum

Not meeting

Premises and facilities

Not meeting

Health and safety

Meeting

Governance, management and administration

Meeting

At the time of the review, ERO identified areas of non-compliance with regulatory standards that are an unacceptable risk to children.

Background

Children’s Circle Early Years Centre is privately owned and operated. The Rudolf Steiner inspired centre caters for children from birth to school age in two age-based rooms. The centre manager leads a team of five qualified and registered teachers.

Summary of Review Findings

The service curriculum supports children to become confident and competent learners. The philosophy statement guides centre operations. Children are given the opportunity to develop knowledge and an understanding of the cultural heritages of both parties to Te Tiriti o Waitangi.

The premises and facilities layout does not support effective adult supervision, and children’s access to the whole licensed space is limited. Effective governance and management systems and an
on-going self-review process that supports improvement requires strengthening. The service is not meeting regulatory standards in a number of areas.

Actions for Compliance

ERO found areas of non-compliance in the service relating to:

  • the service curriculum being consistent with Te Whāriki, the New Zealand early childhood curriculum
  • children’s preferences being respected, and having them involved in decisions about their learning experiences
  • children having access to all play areas both indoors and outdoors
  • the layout of the premises supporting effective adult supervision so that access to the licensed space is not limited.

 [Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Centres 2008, C1, C7, C9, PF2].        

Since the onsite visit the service has provided ERO with evidence that it has addressed the following non compliances:

  • maintaining a current Fire Evacuation Scheme approved by Fire and Emergency New Zealand (HS4)
  • ensuring heavy furniture that could fall or topple and cause serious injury is secured (HS6)
  • conducting earthquake drills with children on at least a three-monthly basis (HS8)
  • rooms that children use for sleeping are kept at a temperature no less than 16 degrees (HS24)
  • evidence of review of emergency plans on an annual basis (HS7)
  • an ongoing and regular process of reviewing and updating the service’s policies and procedures (GMA6)
  • recorded outcomes from the review process contributes to the evaluation of the service’s operations (GMA6).

Recommendation to Ministry of Education

ERO recommends that the Ministry reassess the licence issued to this service provider. ERO will not undertake a further review of this service until the Ministry of Education is satisfied that the service meets regulatory standards.

Next ERO Review

The next ERO review will be in consultation with the Ministry of Education.

Phil Cowie
Director Review and Improvement Services (Central)
Central Region | Te Tai Pūtahi Nui

17 June 2021 

Information About the Service

Early Childhood Service Name Children’s Circle Early Years Centre
Profile Number 46107
Location Welcome Bay, Tauranga

Service type

Education and care service

Number licensed for

40 children, including up to 15 aged under 2.

Percentage of qualified teachers

80%+

Service roll

27

Ethnic composition

Māori 2, NZ European/Pākehā 22, Other ethnic groups 3.

Review team on site

April 2021

Date of this report

17 June 2021

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review, June 2018; Education Review, April 2015.

General Information about Assurance Reviews

All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include the Licensing Criteria for Education and Care Services 2008.

Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a licence to operate.

ERO undertakes an Akanuku | Assurance Review process in any centre-based service:

  • having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation
  • previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development’
  • that has moved from a provisional to a full licence
  • that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership
  • where an Akanuku | Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulated standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher certification; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:

  • discussions with those involved in the service
  • consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems
  • observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice.

Children's Circle Early Years Centre - 01/06/2018

1 Evaluation of Children's Circle Early Years Centre

How well placed is Children's Circle Early Years Centre to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Children’s Circle Early Years Centre is a privately owned education and care service located in the Tauranga suburb of Welcome Bay. It is a small centre licensed for 18 children including up to nine under two years of age. The current roll is 27, including six children who identify as Māori. The owner is also the centre manager and has a teaching role. The teaching team is made up of two full time and two part-time teachers.

The centre philosophy is largely influenced by Rudolf Steiner. Teachers work to preserve the precious nature of childhood and use practices that nurture the child’s senses as well as their physical, emotional, social and spiritual wellbeing.

The centre has developed a strategic and annual plan and is continuing to work on aspects of self-review.

The Review Findings

Children’s Circle Early Years Centre’s philosophy and vision effectively promotes positive learning outcomes for children. The service's philosophy expresses shared values and beliefs which promote the wellbeing, health, safety, learning and development of children. Internal evaluation is ongoing and responsive to identified priorities. Planned and spontaneous self reviews are leading to improved outcomes for children. Management, in consultation, now need to develop procedures and practices for an effective appraisal system for centre manager and leaders. This is necessary to ensure a rigorous performance management process is in place to build capability.

The service has successfully woven Te Whāriki, early childhood curriculum and Rudolf Steiner philosophies together to provide a well-prepared environment centred around children’s individual interests and strengths. Teachers have surveyed the parents of children who identify as Māori to find out how they can be more responsive to individual needs. Teachers are currently upskilling in te reo Māori and have integrated waiata and karakia into daily programmes. The next step is to further engage with the local iwi to further enrich the bicultural curriculum.

Teachers understand and value each child as a unique learner and effectively support children’s sense of belonging. Assessment is used well to identify individual children's strengths and interests and those children needing additional support. Literacy and mathematic concepts are integrated in the daily programme. Teachers empower children to take responsibility for their own learning and promote the concept of tuakana-teina. Children’s sense of belonging is nurtured during transitions into, within the service, and when moving to school.

Responsive and respectful interactions between teachers and children support the building of independent, self-confident children, with a love for learning. The outdoor areas includes a wide range of natural resources and supports children's exploration and imaginative play. Teachers are committed to an inclusive education for all. Children are engaged in prolonged activities in a calm and settled learning environment.

Teachers show high levels of nurture and care for babies and toddlers. They are responsive to the individual routines and needs of young children. Purposeful resourcing supports children’s learning and parents are kept well informed about their children’s interests and development. Babies and toddlers enjoy consistent caregiving that responds sensitively to each child’s changing needs and preferences.

The centre manager has established a culture in which children are first and foremost valued, celebrated and affirmed for who they are and what they bring to their learning. She has created a collaborative environment where teachers, children and parents learn alongside each other. Staff provide many opportunities for parents and whānau to be involved with their children's learning. The centre fosters a family, whānau environment that links to the centre's philosophy and promotes positive outcomes for all children.

Key Next Steps

ERO and management agree that the centre manager, in consultation with staff, needs to develop procedures and practices for an effective appraisal system.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Children's Circle Early Years Centre completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

ERO identified an area of non-compliance.

The service needs to ensure that appraisals of staff in teaching positions by the professional leader of the service is based on the Standards established by the Education Council for the issue and renewal of practicing certificates. [Part 31 Education Act 1989]

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Children's Circle Early Years Centre will be in three years.

Lynda Pura-Watson Deputy Chief Review Officer

Te Tai Miringa - Waikato / Bay of Plenty Region

1 June 2018

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Tauranga

Ministry of Education profile number

46107

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

18 children, including up to 9 aged under 2

Service roll

27

Gender composition

Girls 14 Boys 13

Ethnic composition

Māori
Pākehā
Other

6
16
5

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%+

Based on funding rates

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

1:4

Better than minimum requirements

Over 2

1:6

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

April 2018

Date of this report

1 June 2018

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

April 2015

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.