Edmonton Community Kindergarten

Education institution number:
20045
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
37
Telephone:
Address:

247 Edmonton Road, Te Atatu South, Auckland

View on map

Edmonton Community Kindergarten

ERO’s Akanuku | Assurance Review reports provide information about whether a service meets and maintains regulatory standards. Further information about Akanuku | Assurance Reviews is included at the end of this report.

ERO’s Judgement

Regulatory standards

ERO’s judgement

CurriculumMeeting
Premises and facilitiesMeeting
Health and safetyMeeting
Governance, management and administrationMeeting

Since the onsite visit, the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed non-compliances and is now taking reasonable steps to meet regulatory standards.

Background

Edmonton Community Kindergarten is a not-for-profit incorporated and charitable society. Governance is provided by a management committee that works collaboratively with the qualified teaching team. 

A fifth of children who attend are of Māori and or Pacific heritages. Other children attending come from a diverse range of cultural backgrounds.

Summary of Review Findings

Children’s learning is enhanced by adults engaging in meaningful, positive interactions to nurture reciprocal relationships with them. The curriculum acknowledges and reflects the unique place of Māori as tangata whenua. Children have an opportunity to develop an understanding of the cultural heritages of both parties to Te Tiriti o Waitangi

The design and layout of the premises supports the provision of different types of experiences. Children access a language-rich environment and range of experiences and opportunities that enhance and extend their learning and development. 

Service leaders must ensure consistent implementation of health and safety practices to maintain regulatory standards. 

Key Next Steps

Next steps include:

  • improve the extent to which assessment, planning and evaluation information shows children’s progress and learning overtime
  • strengthen the extent to which information documented about children’s learning reflects their identity, language and culture.

Actions for Compliance

During and since the onsite review, the service provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed the following non-compliances:

  • A procedure for the changing of nappies that aims to ensure that children are treated with dignity and respect (HS3).
  • Maintaining a current Fire Evacuation Scheme approved by Fire and Emergency New Zealand (HS4).
  • Heavy fixtures that could fall or topple and cause serious injury or damage secured (HS6).
  • Having a written emergency plan that includes evacuation procedures for the service’s premises which apply in a variety of emergency situations, and evidence of review of the plan on an, at least, annual basis (HS7).
  • Having evidence of evaluation of relevant emergency drills and how this has informed the annual review of the service’s emergency plan (HS8).
  • Maintaining a record of the time each child attending the service sleeps (HS9). 
  • Daily consideration of hazards to children including windows and other areas of glass (HS12).
  • Having a record of excursions that includes detailed assessment and management of risk, evidence of parental permission and approval of adult:child ratios for regular excursions, and the signature of the Person Responsible giving approval for the excursion to take place (HS17).
  • Including details of actions taken and by whom as part of the record of serious injuries that occur at the service (HS27).
  • Maintaining a record of the written authority from parents for the administration of medicine (in accordance with the requirement for each category of medicine) and the date and time medicine was administered and by whom (HS28).
  • A detailed record of each component of the safety check being kept, and the date of the risk assessment required to be completed after all relevant information is obtained (GMA7A). 

[Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Centres (2008)].

Next ERO Review

The next ERO review is likely to be an Akarangi | Quality Evaluation. 

Patricia Davey
Director of Early Childhood Education (ECE)

22 February 2024

Information About the Service

Early Childhood Service NameEdmonton Community Kindergarten
Profile Number20045
LocationTe Atatu South, Auckland 
Service typeEducation and care service
Number licensed for30 children aged over 2
Percentage of qualified teachers 100%
Service roll39
Review team on siteNovember 2023
Date of this report22 February 2024
Most recent ERO report(s)Education Review, March 2020; Education Review, December 2015

General Information about Assurance Reviews 

All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include the Licensing Criteria for Education and Care Services 2008.

Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a licence to operate. 

ERO undertakes an Akanuku | Assurance Review process in any centre-based service:

  • having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation
  • previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development’
  • that has moved from a provisional to a full licence
  • that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership
  • where an Akanuku | Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulatory standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; safety checking; teacher certification; ratios)
  • relevant evacuation procedures and practices.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:

  • discussions with those involved in the service
  • consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems
  • observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice. 

Edmonton Community Kindergarten - 25/03/2020

1 Evaluation of Edmonton Community Kindergarten

How well placed is Edmonton Community Kindergarten to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

Edmonton Community Kindergarten is well placed to promote positive learning outcomes for children.

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Edmonton Community Kindergarten is located behind the Te Atatu South Community Centre. It is a not for profit incorporated and charitable society. The kindergarten was established over 50 years ago to serve children and families in the local community.

The kindergarten is licensed for up to 30 children between two and five years of age. In 2018 the licence was amended to increase the hours and provide flexible attendance options. Children can attend all day, morning or afternoon sessions, Monday to Friday. Children and families come from a diverse range of cultural backgrounds. A third of children who attend the kindergarten are Māori.

The kindergarten's philosophy emphasises the right of all children to attend high quality and affordable early childhood education. It promotes partnership with parents, whānau and the community and reflects Aotearoa New Zealand's bicultural partnership and commitment to the principles of Te Whāriki, the New Zealand early childhood curriculum.

The kindergarten is managed by a group of parents who are elected annually. The management committee works collaboratively with early childhood educators and delegates day-to-day management of the centre to the experienced head teacher.

Since ERO's 2015 review the kindergarten introduced an online platform to record and communicate children's learning to parents and whānau. The outside sandpit area has been redesigned and refurbished. The head teacher and other full-time teachers are qualified and registered with a new teaching team of two teachers.

The Review Findings

Children are supported to be confident and competent learners. They settle quickly on arrival and are warmly welcomed by teachers. They lead the direction of their play based on their interests. Children have easy access to high quality resources and move freely between indoor and outdoor areas. They enthusiastically explore and investigate the spacious outdoor environment.

Interactions between teachers and children are positive and respectful. Children are well supported by teachers to be independent and develop their social skills. Teachers value and encourage a play-based programme that reflects the learning outcomes in the curriculum. Children actively initiate and engage in meaningful, sustained and purposeful play.

The kindergarten has strong connections to and highly respects parents, whānau and the community. Teachers know parents and whānau well. Teachers actively support the identity, language, and culture of the children and families.

Teachers' commitment to embedding te reo Maori and te ao Māori in the programme is evident. They continue to build their knowledge, capability and confidence with bicultural practice to continue to support ongoing positive outcomes for Māori children.

The head teacher and new teaching team meet regularly to plan and work collaboratively. Teachers have good opportunities for ongoing quality professional development. It is timely to consider ways to strengthen leadership opportunities for teachers in curriculum planning and assessment.

Internal evaluation is well embedded and is focused on positive outcomes for children and the ongoing sustainability of the kindergarten. The strategic plan and annual plan guide the future direction of the centre. Policies and procedures are regularly updated. The management committee are committed to the philosophy of the kindergarten and actively support equitable access to learning opportunities for all children.

Key Next Steps

The key next steps include:

  • strengthening curriculum planning and assessment systems by focusing on children's individual learning dispositions, interests and strengths

  • continuing to grow the teaching team by promoting leadership opportunities and building teacher capability.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Edmonton Community Kindergarten completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Steve Tanner

Director Review and Improvement Services (Northern)

Northern Region - Te Tai Raki

25 March 2020

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Te Atatu South, Auckland

Ministry of Education profile number

20045

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

30 children over 2 years old

Service roll

47

Gender composition

Boys 31 Girls 16

Ethnic composition

Māori
NZ European Pākehā
Chinese
other European
other Asian
other ethnic groups

13
14
4
5
4
7

Percentage of qualified teachers

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Over 2

1:10

Meets minimum requirements

Review team on site

February 2020

Date of this report

25 March 2020

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

December 2015

Education Review

October 2012

Education Review

September 2009

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement

The overall judgement that ERO makes will depend on how well the service promotes positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed

  • Well placed

  • Requires further development

  • Not well placed

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.

Edmonton Community Kindergarten - 03/12/2015

1 Evaluation of Edmonton Community Kindergarten

How well placed is Edmonton Community Kindergarten to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Edmonton Community Kindergarten is a community-based kindergarten in Te Atatu South that is located behind the Te Atatu Community Centre. The centre is licensed for up to 30 children between two and five years of age. Children and their families have diverse cultural backgrounds. The kindergarten is a not-for-profit, incorporated society. It has been open for 40 years and has strong connections to the local community.

The kindergarten’s philosophy places strong emphasis on providing high quality and affordable early childhood education experiences in partnership with parents, whānau and the community. Its curriculum also promotes NZ’s bicultural partnership and reflects a commitment to the principles of Te Whāriki, the New Zealand early childhood curriculum. Teachers emphasise respectful relationships and view children as capable, competent learners.

The kindergarten is governed by a management committee that works collaboratively with staff to monitor the strategic priorities of the centre. The committee delegates day-to-day management of the centre to the head teacher. The head teacher and two other teachers are qualified and registered. Teachers reflect some of the different cultures that make up the kindergarten’s community.

Positive aspects identified in ERO’s previous reports on the centre have been sustained over time. Respectful relationships, a responsive learning programme, a well resourced learning environment and effective leadership practices are continuing features of the centre. Since ERO’s 2012 report, robust self-review processes have been developed to further enhance learning outcomes for children.

The Review Findings

Children enjoy a strong sense of belonging and connection to the centre. They know the routines well and are supported to be independent in their play and learning. Children relate very well to each other. They are respectful of others’ choices and need for space. There are good opportunities for children to work collaboratively or to play on their own. Children use imaginative play and exploration to extend their learning. Children have many opportunities to problem solve. They actively initiate and lead their own play.

The environment is very well resourced. Children can readily access materials to support their interests. They are supported by teachers to extend their thinking, be creative, and to learn at their own pace. There is a genuine focus on environmental sustainability and learning activities that invite children to explore in natural surroundings. Children enjoy being involved in caring for plants in the centre’s gardens.

Teachers work well together as a cohesive team. Their calm interactions with children foster children’s wellbeing and learning. Teachers are very good at listening to children and asking openended questions to promote conversation and thinking skills. They talk about children’s preferences and interests.

Teachers know their parent community very well. There are many opportunities for teachers to provide leadership and to work collaboratively with a shared purpose. Teachers are strongly focused on positive outcomes for children.

Parents of children attending the centre appreciate the ways in which centre staff are culturally inclusive and show respect for children’s different backgrounds. Parents’ aspirations are sought and valued by teachers.

The curriculum reflects a commitment to promoting the principles of Te Tiriti o Waitangi. Its bicultural focus reflects the centre’s philosophy of inclusion. There is a collaborative planning process responding to children’s interests and strengths. Teachers discuss their observations of children’s learning and work together to extend these interests and strengths. Children’s individual portfolios are an attractive celebration of their achievements. Learning stories include a good balance of children’s individual and group learning. Format of these stories invites children and parent feedback to inform further long-term planning.

The head teacher leads the teaching team well. Her skilled, experienced and well considered leadership impacts positively on centre operations. She models and promotes lifelong learning and has sought relevant external professional support for teachers.

The management committee are well informed through regular reports about the centre’s progress. Comprehensive strategic and annual plans help committee members to make decisions about key centre priorities. They are committed to ensuring the centre meets its strategic goals. A strong policy framework enables the centre to respond efficiently to legislative changes.

Self-review is well understood and well documented. Changes to self-review processes have enabled staff to evaluate the effectiveness of their practice and make improvements to outcomes for children. Recent self review has identified ways in which teachers can further extend children’s learning.

Key Next Steps

To enhance existing high quality practices the head teacher and teachers have identified that they could:

  • deepen partnerships with parents to increase their involvement in the centre’s programme
  • strengthen the ways in which they promote ongoing educational success for Māori children.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Edmonton Community Kindergarten completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Edmonton Community Kindergarten will be in four years.

Graham Randell

Deputy Chief Review Officer Northern

3 December 2015

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Te Atatu South, Auckland

Ministry of Education profile number

20045

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

30 children, including up to 0 aged under 2

Service roll

60

Gender composition

Girls 36

Boys 24

Ethnic composition

Māori

Pākehā

Samoan

Chinese

Tongan

Cook Island

other Asian

other Pacific

other European

12

24

6

3

3

1

6

3

2

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%

Based on funding rates

80%

Reported ratios of staff to children

Over 2

1:10

Meets minimum requirements

Review team on site

October 2015

Date of this report

3 December 2015

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

October 2012

 

Education Review

September 2009

 

Education Review

September 2006

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.