Barbaras Place Learning Centre

Education institution number:
20584
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
23
Telephone:
Address:

23 Mauranui Avenue, Epsom, Auckland

View on map

BestStart Newmarket - 08/05/2020

1 Evaluation of BestStart Newmarket

How well placed is BestStart Newmarket to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

BestStart Newmarket is well placed to promote positive learning outcomes for children.

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

BestStart Newmarket is licensed to provide full-day education and care for up to 49 children, including 15 aged under two years. Infants and toddlers have their own separate indoor and outdoor play space. The roll includes children from a range of diverse cultures.

The centre is part of the BestStart charitable trust. The organisation has re-branded all its early learning services. BestStart provides an overarching governance and management framework to support operations and curriculum delivery in individual centres. Business Managers (BM) and Professional Services Managers (PSM) facilitate staff professional development and provide strategic guidance.

The curriculum is underpinned by the principles of Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum, bicultural practices and partnerships with parents/whānau. These values and principles are integrated with the philosophy of Reggio Emilia. Emphasis is placed on providing a welcoming environment that caters for individual children's needs and encourages them to engage with challenges.

ERO’s 2016 report noted children's culture and language and identity were valued alongside the bicultural heritage of Aotearoa. Respectful and caring relationships between teachers and children supported independence and self-management. Areas for development included aligning key documentation, strengthening learning stories and deepening reflection in internal evaluation. The centre has made good progress in these areas. Since the report a new centre manager appointed.

This review was part of a cluster of 10 reviews in the BestStart Upper North Island region.

The Review Findings

Children’s sense of wellbeing and belonging is affirmed in a learning environment where their language, culture and identity is valued and promoted. Children are warmly welcomed by staff on arrival. Positive, respectful relationships and strong connections with teachers and peers help children to settle quickly.

Children are friendly and confident learners. They are supported by teachers to develop independence. Children play cooperatively with their peers for sustained periods of time. They have opportunities to explore and be physically active in a well-resourced environment that encourages imagination and creativity.

Teachers’ sensitive, nurturing and respectful interactions with infants, toddlers and whānau result in a calm, settled environment and promote a strong sense of belonging. Routines are unhurried, allowing children opportunities to learn and explore their environment. Children's individual needs and communication styles are well catered for. Infants early language attempts are well supported by teachers.

Teachers and leaders have an ongoing commitment to developing bicultural practices. They model te reo and tikanga Māori. Children are encouraged to support each other in tuakana/teina relationships. The programme supports children to learn about their own and other cultures and languages. Cultural events are celebrated. Parents/whānau are involved in the life of the centre.

Teachers work collaboratively to ensure positive outcomes for children. They encourage parents to be involved in the learning programme and keep them well informed of their child’s progress. Teachers are aware of children’s interests and respond positively and respectfully to their questions and ideas. They use intentional, deliberate teaching approaches to develop children’s specific skills and knowledge.

Good systems for internal evaluation guide teaching practice, which results in improved practices that promote positive outcomes for children. Professional learning and development is focused on building teacher capabilities and has impacted positively on teaching practices. The service provides opportunities for emergent leadership within the team.

National, regional and centre operations are guided by strategic and annual plans, and a shared vision which monitor quality and promote ongoing improvement. These are linked to BestStart strategic goals, which promote a sense of belonging to a wider learning community and support more widespread collaboration amongst teaching teams. Professional learning and development have a focus for building capabilities and has impacted positively on teaching practices. The service provides opportunities for leadership within the team.

Key Next Steps

Centre leaders agree that key next steps for the centre's development include continuing to strengthen:

  • teachers' professional capability to support children to co-construct and take ownership for their learning

  • internal evaluation by deepening data analysis of data and reviewing the effectiveness of post evaluation changes

  • partnerships with whānau in planning, assessment and evaluation of programmes.

Agreed next steps for the organisation are to continue to strengthen:

  • bicultural understanding and practice

  • risk analysis management systems, processes and procedures for excursions

  • appraisal processes to support teachers’ continuum of professional knowledge and practice.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of BestStart Newmarket completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Steve Tanner

Director Review and Improvement Services (Northern)

Northern Region - Te Tai Raki

8 May 2020

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Epsom, Auckland

Ministry of Education profile number

20584

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

49 children, including up to 15 aged under 2 years

Service roll

46

Gender composition

Girls 28 Boys 18

Ethnic composition

Māori
NZ European/Pākehā
Indian
Chinese
African
Filipino
Korean
other ethnic groups

1
8
9
7
5
4
4
8

Percentage of qualified teachers

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

1:5

Meets minimum requirements

Over 2

1:10

Meets minimum requirements

Review team on site

January 2020

Date of this report

8 May 2020

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

June 2016

Education Review

April 2013

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement

The overall judgement that ERO makes will depend on how well the service promotes positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed

  • Well placed

  • Requires further development

  • Not well placed

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.

First Steps Newmarket - 27/06/2016

1 Evaluation of First Steps Newmarket

How well placed is First Steps Newmarket to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

First Steps Newmarket is licensed for up to 49 children, including 15 up to two years of age. The centre is part of the BestStart Education and Care Centres organisation, which provides an overarching governance and management framework as well as personnel to support individual centres.

The centre provides for children in two rooms; Atawhai for toddlers, and Arahi for children up to school age. A centre manager and a head teacher provide leadership in the centre and are supported by the BestStart professional services and business managers. Registered teachers in each room are supported by unqualified staff, and the centre also employs a cook and administrator.

Centre staff responded positively to the 2013 ERO report. Teachers have improved their planning and assessment processes, their self review and their teaching practices.

The Review Findings

The centre is welcoming to all children and their parents/ whānau. It offers a fresh and inviting environment where children have easy access to good quality resources and equipment. Children can select their play activities and have good opportunities for physical challenge.

Teachers' good support for toddlers' care and education is particularly noticeable. Teachers are responsive, warm and caring in their interactions with children. Toddlers have ample opportunity to mix with the older children where tuakana teina relationships are developed. Children’s transitions across the two age groups are well managed.

Children are valued as capable and competent communicators and learners, and are well supported to develop social competencies. Teachers support them to develop independence and self-management skills. Children collaborate in self-directed learning and group times and during imaginative play. They enjoy each other's company, show a strong sense of wellbeing and belonging, and exhibit persistence and concentration.

Teachers listen carefully to children and engage them in meaningful conversations to foster their language and learning. Children's cultural and language backgrounds are recognised and valued. Teachers make use of outings to connect with children's interests and the local environment.

Parents are included as partners in their children's education and care. Good information is shared in a variety of ways. Digital applications are being used and have the potential to further build depth in partnerships and links with families.

Individual assessment portfolios reflect the child's learning. Narratives and photographs illustrate how teachers have responded to individual children's interests. They identify teachers' strategies and capture children's growth and learning. Teachers should continue to build the narrative nature of learning stories so that they can better show parents how they have responded to children's interests.

Teachers' commitment to bicultural practice is strongly visible in the environment. There is very good recognition of local features and Māori history. Teachers are continuing to build their confidence in using te reo and tikanga Māori. They are ensuring that individual children's culture, language and identity are evident in the assessment and planning records.

The centre manager has led the development of a strong team culture and a sense of whānau. Her leadership is based on respectful and trusting relationships. Individual strengths and shared leadership are valued. Internal evaluation is directed towards improvement for children and is informed by current early childhood research and theory. Managers recognise the need to deepen the evaluative nature of centre self review and appraisal processes through ongoing reflection and dialogue.

The centre's philosophy is reflected in practice. BestStart have useful systems and policies that underpin centre organisation and these are developed and maintained to reflect current best practice and legislation. A next step could be to review centre plans so that strategic, annual and quality education and internal audit process goals align in a more manageable way.

Key Next Steps

Managers and teachers should now consolidate and build on recent improvements and good practice. Next steps could include:

  • strengthening the narrative nature of children's learning stories

  • aligning key centre documents that support the centre's strategic direction

  • deepening reflection and review in internal evaluation.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of First Steps Newmarket completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of First Steps Newmarket will be in three years.

Graham Randell

Deputy Chief Review Officer Northern

27 June 2016

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Epsom, Auckland

Ministry of Education profile number

20584

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

49 children, including up to 15 aged under 2

Service roll

47

Gender composition

Girls 28 Boys 19

Ethnic composition

Māori

Pākehā

Chinese

Japanese

Indian

Fijian

Korean

other

4

15

5

5

4

3

2

9

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%+

Based on funding rates

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

1:5

Meets minimum requirements

Over 2

1:8

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

April 2016

Date of this report

27 June 2016

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

April 2013

Previously reviewed as:

ABC St Marks

Supplementary Review

November 2009

Supplementary Review

October 2008

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.