Kidz Matter 2 Us

Education institution number:
10176
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
25
Telephone:
Address:

7 View Road, Henderson, Waitakere

View on map

Kidz Matter 2 Us

ERO’s Akanuku | Assurance Review reports provide information about whether a service meets and maintains regulatory standards. Further information about Akanuku | Assurance Reviews is included at the end of this report.

ERO’s Judgement

Regulatory standards

ERO’s judgement

Curriculum

Meeting

Premises and facilities

Meeting

Health and safety

Meeting

Governance, management and administration

Meeting

During the onsite visit, the service provided ERO with evidence that showed it had addressed a non-compliance and is now taking reasonable steps to meet regulatory standards.

Background

Kidz Matter 2 Us is a Christian-based service owned by the Salvation Army. A director and national co-ordinator provide governance and curriculum support. A qualified centre manager leads a team of four qualified and two unqualified teachers. The majority of children enrolled are of Māori or Pacific heritages.

Summary of Review Findings

Adults providing education and care engage in meaningful, positive interactions to enhance children’s learning and nurture reciprocal relationships. Positive steps are taken to respect and acknowledge the aspirations held by parents and whānau for their children.

The service curriculum provides a language-rich environment that supports children’s learning. Children are provided with a range of experiences to enhance and extend their learning and development, both indoors and outdoors, individually and in groups.

Information and guidance are sought, when necessary, from agencies and services to enable adults providing education and care to work effectively with children and their parents.

Key Next Steps

Next steps include:

  • increasing the visibility of the languages, cultures and identity of individual children in the environment and in their portfolios of learning.

Action for Compliance

During the review, the service provided ERO with evidence that shows it had addressed the following non-compliance:

  • Ensuring water stored in any hot water cylinder is kept at a temperature of at least 60° Celsius (HS14).

Next ERO Review

The next ERO review is likely to be an Akarangi | Quality Evaluation.

Patricia Davey
Director of Early Childhood Education (ECE)

25 October 2023

Information About the Service

Early Childhood Service Name

Kidz Matter 2 Us

Profile Number

10176

Location

Henderson, Auckland

Service type

Education and care service

Number licensed for

29 children, including up to 8 aged under 2

Percentage of qualified teachers

80-99%

Service roll

21

Review team on site

September 2023

Date of this report

25 October 2023

Most recent ERO report(s)

Akanuku | Assurance Review, March 2021; Education Review, March 2017

General Information about Assurance Reviews

All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include the Licensing Criteria for Education and Care Services 2008.

Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a licence to operate.

ERO undertakes an Akanuku | Assurance Review process in any centre-based service:

  • having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation

  • previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development’

  • that has moved from a provisional to a full licence

  • that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership

  • where an Akanuku | Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum

  • premises and facilities

  • health and safety practices

  • governance, management and administration.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulatory standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; safety checking; teacher certification; ratios)

  • relevant evacuation procedures and practices.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:

  • discussions with those involved in the service

  • consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems

  • observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice.

Kidz Matter 2 Us

ERO’s Akanuku | Assurance Review reports provide information about whether a service meets and maintains regulatory standards.

ERO’s Judgement

Regulatory standards

ERO’s judgement

Curriculum

Meeting

Premises and facilities

Meeting

Health and safety

Meeting

Governance, management and administration

Meeting

Since the onsite visit the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed non-compliances and is now taking reasonable steps to meet regulatory standards.

Background

Kidz Matter 2 Us is a Christian-based centre. Almost all the children enrolled are Māori or have Pacific heritages. Governance support is provided by a director and a national consultant from The Salvation Army New Zealand Trust. The centre supervisor leads a team of three qualified teachers and four unqualified staff.

Summary of Review Findings

Adults providing education and care engage in meaningful, positive interactions that enhance children’s learning and nurture reciprocal relationships. The centre has a language-rich environment to support children’s early language development. There is sufficient quantity and variety of equipment appropriate for the learning and abilities of the children attending. Children have opportunities to enhance and extend their learning and development, both indoors and outdoors, individually and in groups.

The service provider, director and centre supervisor need to ensure they regularly implement and monitor processes to maintain regulatory requirements.

Compliance

Since the onsite visit the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed the following non-compliances:

  • ensuring suitability and placement of outdoor equipment is safe for intended use by children (PF5)
  • having evidence that a tempering valve or other accurate means of limiting hot water temperature is installed (PF24)
  • that furniture and items intended for children to sleep on being covered or made of a non-porous material (PF30)
  • documenting a procedure for the changing and disposal of nappies that states that children are treated with dignity and respect (HS3)
  • having a current fire evacuation scheme approved by the New Zealand Fire Service (HS4)
  • ensuring heavy furniture, fixtures, and equipment that could fall or topple and cause serious injury are appropriately secured (HS6)
  • checking equipment, premises and facilities daily for hazards to the children and implementing a documented risk management system (HS12)
  • ensuring water stored in any hot water cylinder kept at a temperature of at least 60 degrees centigrade (HS14)
  • documenting a record of excursions that includes the adult:child ratio for regular excursions, evidence of parental permission for ratio and method of travel for special excursions (HS17)
  • having evidence of parental permission for travel by motor vehicle for both special and regular excursions (HS18)
  • maintaining incident records that show parents have been notified of incidents that occur within the service, records of illnesses in the service and documenting a procedure outlining the service’s response to injury and incident (HS27)
  • ensuring medication records include evidence of parental acknowledgement (HS28)
  • providing parents with written information about how they can access the service’s operational documents (GMA2)
  • providing written information to parents regarding the amount and details of the expenditure of any Ministry of Education funding received by the service (GMA3)
  • ensuring all children’s workers who have access to children are safety checked in accordance with the Children’s Act 2014 and there is a written procedure for safety checking that meets the requirements of the Children’s Act 2014 (GMA7A).

Next ERO Review

The next ERO review is likely to be an Akarangi | Quality Evaluation.

Steve Tanner
Director Review and Improvement Services (Northern)
Northern Region | Te Tai Raki

12 March 2021 

Information About the Service

Early Childhood Service Name Kidz Matter 2 Us
Profile Number 10176
Location Henderson, Auckland

Service type

Education and care service

Number licensed for

29 children, including up to 8 aged under 2.

Percentage of qualified teachers

80%+

Service roll

29

Ethnic composition

Māori  13
NZ European/Pākehā  4
Samoan 5
other Pacific 6
other ethnic group 1

Review team on site

January 2021

Date of this report

12 March 2021

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review, March 2017
Education Review, December 2013

General Information about Assurance Reviews

All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include the Licensing Criteria for Education and Care Services 2008.

Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a licence to operate.

ERO undertakes an Akanuku | Assurance Review process in any centre-based service:

  • having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation
  • previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development’
  • that has moved from a provisional to a full licence
  • that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership
  • where an Akanuku | Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulated standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher certification; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:

  • discussions with those involved in the service
  • consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems
  • observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice.

Kidz Matter 2 Us - 08/03/2017

1 Evaluation of Kidz Matter 2 Us

How well placed is Kidz Matter 2 Us to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Kidz Matter 2 Us, is the early learning service entity of the 'Faith Factory', the Salvation Army's hub in Henderson. The centre caters for children from birth to school age and offers full day and sessional education and care. It operates four and half days a week.

Faith Factory personnel work collaboratively to provide social, educational and spiritual support for the diverse community it serves. The centre is seen as an important component to support families, whānau, and their children.

The centre is led by a newly appointed supervisor who is supported by the Faith Factory's director. Governance structures ensure that operations, property management and future improvements are catered for. The centre is also supported by a national Salvation Army early childhood consultant.

Continuity in leadership and teaching staff has helped the family friendly centre maintain the positive findings of previous ERO reviews. These include useful assessment of learning and responsive relationships between teachers and children

External support has focused on developing shared leadership. This significant professional learning and development has had a positive impact on areas identified in the 2013 ERO report as requiring attention. Appraisal systems are now more effectively implemented and risk management systems are more robust.

The Review Findings

Children are warmly welcomed by staff and quickly settle to areas of play that support their interests. Respectful and genuine relationships between teachers and children reflect the centre's Christian character and the Faith Factory's active support of individuals and families. Children take turns and are cooperative in their play.

Teachers extend children's oral language by asking questions about their learning and by providing prompts. These very good quality interactions contribute to children's confidence to pursue their interests. Children with additional learning needs are well catered for in a caring environment that celebrates diversity.

Provision for children up to two years of age is well considered and nurturing. Teachers interact with infants and toddlers in calm and caring ways. They are sensitive to children’s preferences and requirements. A separate area is well resourced to cater for younger children's physical and emotional wellbeing, and learning. Infants and toddlers also have varied opportunities to observe, and learn alongside older children in the wider indoor and outdoor environments.

Since the 2013 ERO review the outdoor learning environment has been successfully re-developed. It now provides more complex and challenging learning opportunities. Plans are in place to revitalise the indoor environment by using the internal evaluation processes that have contributed to enhancing learning opportunities in other areas of the centre.

The centre's ongoing bicultural development has supported Māori children to use their cultural knowledge and language in their learning. This development has been helped by some teachers speaking te reo Māori. Pacific children are encouraged to use their home language in the centre and their parents and extended family members help teachers with key phrases to support communication and learning.

Centre leaders continue to support teachers to reflect on their role to extend children’s learning and foster their wellbeing. Planning and assessment for children who are over two years of age is regular and thoughtful. Teachers contribute their knowledge, skills and talents to the programme. They could strengthen planning and assessment by recording what they recognise about learning for infants and toddlers.

The centre continues to be well managed. Internal evaluation has been strengthened by including ideas from children, their parents/whānau and staff. Teachers recognise the importance of determining the quality of programmes and teaching practice in order to inform and support the centre’s continuous improvement.

Key Next Steps

ERO and centre leaders agree that teachers could be supported to:

  • use appraisal in more deliberate ways to support their professional growth

  • strengthen assessment records to show children's progress

  • continue to develop meaningful partnerships with parents and whānau that focus on children's learning

  • improve their capability to use te reo me ōna tikanga Māori in order to support the centre's bicultural development.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Kidz Matter 2 Us completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum

  • premises and facilities

  • health and safety practices

  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Kidz Matter 2 Us will be in three years.

Graham Randell

Deputy Chief Review Officer Northern

8 March 2017 

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning. 

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service 

Location

Henderson, Auckland

Ministry of Education profile number

10176

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

29 children, including up to 8 aged under 2

Service roll

42

Gender composition

Boys 21 Girls 21

Ethnic composition

Māori

Pākehā

Samoan

Tongan

Cook Islands Māori

Indian

Latin American

South East Asian

Tokelauan

other

8

10

5

5

3

2

2

2

2

3

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%+

Based on funding rates

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

1:4

Better than minimum requirements

Over 2

1:6

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

December 2016

Date of this report

8 March 2017

Most recent ERO report(s)

 

Education Review

December 2013

Education Review

November 2010

Education Review

December 2007

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.