Makauri Rural Kindergarten

Education institution number:
55224
Service type:
Free Kindergarten
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
47
Telephone:
Address:

120 Kings Road, Gisborne

View on map

Makauri Rural Kindergarten - 15/05/2018

1 Evaluation of Makauri Rural Kindergarten

How well placed is Makauri Rural Kindergarten to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Makauri Rural Kindergarten is adjacent to Makauri School on the outskirts of Gisborne. It opens from 8:30am to 2:30pm Monday to Thursday and 8:30am to 12.45pm on Friday. The service is licensed for up to 40 children aged from two years to school age. Of the 54 children enrolled, four are Māori.

The centre philosophy emphasises the importance of relationships, sustainability, and problem solving.

A head teacher oversees operation of the centre. The teaching team is fully qualified and supported by a teacher aide. Over the past three years staff have participated in professional development provided by the Gisborne Kindergarten Association (the association) that has included learning about te ao Māori, working with younger children and assessment, planning and evaluation.

Makauri Rural Kindergarten is one of 11 kindergartens governed and managed by the association. Two senior teachers provide professional support and guidance to individual kindergartens. A pouawhina has been appointed on a fixed-term contract to guide kindergartens' implementation of tikanga and kaupapa Māori practices.

The June 2014 ERO report identified a number of areas requiring review and development at kindergarten level, including: self review; transition; and bicultural practices. Progress is evident. At the association level, strategic self review and review of the implementation of the appraisal process were identified. Progress is ongoing.

This review was part of a cluster of 10 reviews in the Gisborne Kindergarten Association. 

The Review Findings

Children engage in a play-based programme that promotes authentic and meaningful learning experiences. Intentional teaching builds on their skills and knowledge. A strength of the programme is its emphasis on sustainability and the natural world. Spaces and resources are thoughtfully arranged to offer children opportunities for exploration, challenge, and discovery.

Planning for children's learning is focused on their individual needs and interests. Whānau and parent aspirations are gathered as part of this process. Teachers and parents work in partnership to develop specific learning goals that align to the three key learning areas underpinning the valued outcomes of the kindergarten's philosophy.

Staff have developed a sound framework to guide planning for learning that involves teachers gathering a wide range of information. Portfolios are useful records of children's learning and engagement in kindergarten activities.

Teachers have been building their knowledge of te reo me ngā tikanga Māori. They demonstrate a genuine commitment to Te Tiriti o Waitangi. The programme affirms all children’s identities as bicultural citizens of Aotearoa.

The team has a shared understanding of what educational success for Māori children looks like in the kindergarten learning environment. Further developing learning partnerships with whānau Māori should enhance responsiveness to children and their families.

The centre is inclusive of children with additional needs. Established relationships with, and access to support agencies is available, if required.

A well-considered transition process supports children's entry to school. The kindergarten has developed a strong partnership with the local school. Regular visits help children to become familiar with the school environment.

A range of collaboratively undertaken reviews, aligned to kindergarten and association priorities for ongoing improvement, emphasise children's learning. A focus of development is strengthening teachers' knowledge of evaluation to support them to know the impact of their actions on children's outcomes.

Teachers are well supported to develop their practice. There is a strong commitment to growing staff knowledge and skills through ongoing professional learning and the sharing of good practice. Senior teachers regularly identify actions and provoke thinking in relation to children's learning. The newly developed appraisal system, when fully implemented, should strengthen teacher inquiries into their own practice.

Association leaders have a well-considered approach to progressing strategic objectives. Connections to the community are strong and maintaining these continues to be a focus. Leaders are committed to partnerships and acknowledging Māori as tangata whenua. The association has identified that developing shared understanding of internal evaluation is a priority.  ERO's evaluation confirms this development.

Key Next Steps

ERO and kindergarten's leaders agree that the priorities are to:

  • evaluate the effectiveness of the curriculum on outcomes for all children.

The association should:

  • fully implement the revised appraisal system
  • continue to develop a shared understanding and use of internal evaluation across all levels of operation.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Makauri Rural Kindergarten completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist.  In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. 

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Makauri Rural Kindergarten will be in three years.

Patricia Davey
Deputy Chief Review Officer Central (Acting)

Te Tai Pokapū - Central Region

15 May 2018

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning. 

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Gisborne

Ministry of Education profile number

55224

Licence type

Free Kindergarten

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

40 children

Service roll

54

Gender composition

Boys 29, Girls 25

Ethnic composition

Māori
Pākehā
Other ethnic groups

  4
48
  2

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49%       50-79%       80%+

Based on funding rates

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Over 2

1:10

Meets minimum requirements

Review team on site

March 2018

Date of this report

15 May 2018

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

June 2014

Education Review

August 2011

Education Review

June 2008

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau. 

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.

Makauri Rural Kindergarten - 26/06/2014

1 Evaluation of Makauri Rural Kindergarten

How well placed is Makauri Rural Kindergarten to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Makauri Rural Kindergarten is located on the outskirts of Gisborne city and provides education and care for children from two to five years of age. It is licensed for up to 30 children and operates for six hours, Monday to Thursday and four hours and fifteen minutes on a Friday.

The teaching team is fully qualified and is supported by a teacher aide. The kindergarten has a positive reporting history with ERO. Over the past three years, the Gisborne Kindergarten Association (the association) has provided professional support for teachers focusing on assessment, planning and evaluation.

The philosophy, which focuses on relationships, sustainability and problem solving, is strongly evident in teaching practice and the curriculum.

The kindergarten is governed by the association. Two senior teachers are employed by the association to provide professional support and guidance to teachers. This review was part of a cluster of six kindergartens in the Gisborne Kindergarten Association.

The Review Findings

Children are viewed as capable and confident learners. They engage in self-directed play and learning for sustained periods of time. The rural setting provides meaningful opportunities for children to explore, investigate and participate in real-life learning experiences. They assist with tending the garden and caring for the animals. An appropriate emphasis is also given to supporting children’s understanding of sustainability. There are opportunities for children to lead aspects of the programme and revisit and build on interest over time.

The head teacher competently leads her team using a collaborative approach. All teachers are committed to the kindergarten philosophy and provide a range of thoughtful experiences for children.

Teachers work alongside of children using a range of effective strategies to support and extend their learning. They engage children in problem solving and further develop their decision making and negotiation skills. Teachers respectfully listen to children’s ideas and assist them to learn from each other.

Teachers have warm and positive interactions with children and their parents, promoting children’s sense of belonging. They know children and their families well and are welcoming of parent support to the kindergarten. Children’s wellbeing is supported through an appropriate emphasis on physical play and healthy eating.

Planning is responsive to children’s interests and is used as a basis to broaden the programme. A next step is to undertake regular formal evaluation to inform future programmes. Ongoing observations of children in everyday activities builds a picture of children’s participation and emerging friendships. A clear assessment, planning and evaluation cycle has recently been developed. Consistent use of this should promote a shared understanding of children’s learning and development and help to identify their progress over time.

Teachers have identified that they will continue to develop the bicultural programme. This should provide teachers with the foundations to explore what success for Māori, as Māori, might look like in this context. Teachers should also reflect on how Pacific nations are reflected within their kindergarten curriculum.

Transition to school is supported by teachers through a range of appropriate initiatives and relationships. Practices should be revisited to ensure that they reflect current research in this field. Teachers recognise the need to strengthen processes to gather information that supports children’s transition into the kindergarten.

Teachers are reflective and are developing skills of self review. They should continue to strengthen their understanding of the self-review process and knowledge of evaluation. This should help them to judge the effectiveness of kindergarten operations, the programme and practice to inform decision making.

The association provides high levels of guidance and support to teachers for the continuous improvement of teaching and learning. This includes:

  • robust guiding documents and comprehensive policies
  • clear expectations for programme delivery and kindergarten operations including health and safety practices
  • strong leadership
  • professional learning and development for staff
  • sound supporting processes for provisionally registered teachers.

Senior teachers should undertake strategic review and evaluation across the association and use this information to inform decision making. They should also support teachers to build their evaluative capacity to systematically enquire into the effectiveness of their practice to further improve positive outcomes for children.

The association has identified that the implementation of the appraisal process requires review. ERO agrees with this direction.

Key Next Steps

ERO and kindergarten leaders agree that the key next steps are to strengthen:

  • assessment, planning and evaluation
  • transition practices
  • the bicultural programme,
  • their response to the culture, language and identity of Māori and Pacific children and families
  • self review.

The association’s next steps should include:

  • reviewing the implementation of the appraisal process
  • undertaking formal strategic self review at association level.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Makauri Rural Kindergarten completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Makauri Rural Kindergarten will be in three years.Image removed.

Joyce Gebbie

National Manager Review Services Central Region

26 June 2014

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Gisborne

Ministry of Education profile number

55224

Licence type

Free Kindergarten

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

30 children aged over 2 years

Service roll

49

Gender composition

Boys 29, Girls 20

Ethnic composition

Māori

Pākehā

Asian

Tongan

3

41

4

1

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%

Based on funding rates

80%

Reported ratios of staff to children

Over 2

1:10

Meets minimum requirements

Review team on site

May 2014

Date of this report

26 June 2014

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

August 2011

 

Education Review

June 2008

 

Education Review

May 2005

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.