Matua Kindergarten

Education institution number:
40035
Service type:
Free Kindergarten
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
48
Telephone:
Address:

Audrey Place, Matua, Tauranga

View on map

Matua Kindergarten

ERO’s Akanuku | Assurance Review reports provide information about whether a service meets and maintains regulatory standards. Further information about Akanuku | Assurance Reviews is included at the end of this report.

ERO’s Judgement

Regulatory standards

ERO’s judgement

Curriculum

Meeting

Premises and facilities

Meeting

Health and safety

Meeting

Governance, management, and administration

Meeting

At the time of the review, ERO found the service was taking reasonable steps to meet regulatory standards.

Background

Matua Kindergarten is located at Matua School. It is governed and managed by Inspired Kindergartens (Tauranga Regional Kindergarten Association). The service caters for children over two within a daily six-hour session. This is its first ERO report under new ownership. Staffing has remained stable throughout this change.

Summary of Review Findings

A language-rich environment offers a range of experiences and opportunities to extend and enhance children’s learning. The curriculum supports children’s social competence, their preferences are respected, and they are involved in decisions about their learning.

Assessment, planning, and evaluation informs a curriculum underpinned by Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum. It acknowledges and reflects the unique place of Māori as tangata whenua. The rights of each child to be confident in their own culture are supported and they are encouraged to respect and understand other cultures. Regular opportunities are provided for parents and whānau to share aspirations for their child.

Key Next Steps

Next steps include:

  • continue to deepen relationships with local iwi so that children and their whānau grow their Mātauranga Māori knowledge

  • continue to extend the localised curriculum enabling children to learn about the world around them.

Actions for Compliance

During the review, the service provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed the following non-compliances:

  • areas of glass accessible to children being made of safety glass; or covered by an adhesive film designed to hold the glass in place in the event of it being broken; or effectively guarded by barriers.

[Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Centres 2008, PF7]

Next ERO Review

The next ERO review is likely to be an Akarangi | Quality Evaluation.

Phil Cowie
Director Review and Improvement Services (Central)
Central Region | Te Tai Pūtahi Nui

25 July 2022 

Information About the Service

Early Childhood Service Name

Matua Kindergarten

Profile Number

40035

Location

Matua, Tauranga

Service type

Free Kindergarten

Number licensed for

40 children aged over 2

Percentage of qualified teachers

100%

Service roll

53

Ethnic composition

Māori 2, NZ European/Pākehā 42, Other ethnic groups 9.

Review team on site

June 2022

Date of this report

25 July 2022

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review, July 2016; Education Review, July 2013.

General Information about Assurance Reviews

All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include the Licensing Criteria for Education and Care Services 2008.

Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a licence to operate.

ERO undertakes an Akanuku | Assurance Review process in any centre-based service:

  • having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation

  • previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development’

  • that has moved from a provisional to a full licence

  • that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership

  • where an Akanuku | Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum

  • premises and facilities

  • health and safety practices

  • governance, management and administration.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulated standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher certification; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:

  • discussions with those involved in the service

  • consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems

  • observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice.

Matua Plunket Kindergarten - 08/07/2016

1 Evaluation of Matua Plunket Kindergarten

How well placed is Matua Plunket Kindergarten to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Matua Plunket Kindergarten is located in the Tauranga suburb of Matua and next door to the local primary school. The centre is a community education and care centre owned and operated by the the Royal New Zealand Plunket Society. Matua Plunket Kindergarten provides sessional education and care for children from two years to five years of age. The centre is licensed for 40 children and has 57 children on the roll including 7 children who identify as Māori.

The centre's statement of philosophy has recently been reviewed and reflects the principles of Te Whāriki (the early childhood curriculum). It makes clear references to relationships forming the foundation of the kindergarten and a strong bridge between home and centre. Teachers are committed to developing children as initiators of their own learning through the use of a range of resources.

Since the previous ERO review, significant staff changes have resulted in a focus on team building and shared leadership. Teachers have addressed key next steps from the 2013 ERO report that relate to assessment, planning, evaluation, Treaty of Waitangi based practices and the appraisal process.

Policies and procedures are in place to assist with the provision for a safe, physical and emotional learning environment for children and staff.

The Review Findings

Warm and nurturing relationships between teachers, children and parents are a feature of this centre. The Matua Plunket Kindergarten philosophy is well integrated throughout centre programmes. It encourages children to work independently and follow their strengths and interests. The centre's vision and goals are firmly focused on providing learning and teaching programmes that are research based and promoting equitable outcomes for all children. There is a culture of trust and respect amongst teachers, children and parents.

Teachers know children and their families well. They use positive strategies to support social competencies and encourage self-directed learning and are skilled observers. These observations are used to extend children's thinking and creativity. The unobtrusive, responsive and caring interactions with children contribute to a calm, settled and focused learning culture. Children are becoming more socially competent by learning through play in spacious environments. These areas are designed to enable children to have active and quiet spaces to play.

Programmes include the integration of literacy and mathematics learning in the context of play and the development of group skills such as taking turns, listening and sharing. Mixed-age groups support older children to lead learning with younger children, and they are provided with a variety of opportunities to make sense of the natural, social, physical and material worlds. Te reo and tikanga Māori is naturally integrated into the daily programme. Flexible and natural routines promote children’s independence and responsibility. Children’s sense of belonging is nurtured during and after transitions into and within the service, and when moving to school.

The centre manager operates a shared leadership model including collaborative decision making. She ensures that teachers have time to critically reflect on their practices and have opportunities to contribute to self review. A shared understanding among teachers of the service's philosophy, vision and goals have been successfully promoted. An effective staff appraisal process is linked to relevant professional development.

The Royal New Zealand Plunket Society provides administration support and opportunities for professional learning and development. A Community Services leader is available for advice and guidance. The umbrella organisation provides a framework for centre governance and direction.

Staff actively encourage a strong partnership with parents and families, and a parent committee supports the centre with resourcing for centre activities. Parents spoken to expressed confidence that their children’s diverse needs were being catered for. They are well informed through regular e-portfolios, newsletters and informal conversations with staff.

Key Next Steps

While there are some effective self-review practices, other reviews could be further improved by clearly developing documented procedures and practices for strategic self review.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Matua Plunket Kindergarten completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Matua Plunket Kindergarten will be in three years.

Lynda Pura-Watson

Deputy Chief Review Officer

8 July 2016

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Tauranga

Ministry of Education profile number

40035

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

40 children over 2 years of age

Service roll

57

Gender composition

Boys 29 Girls 28

Ethnic composition

Māori

Pākehā

Other

7

44

6

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%+

Based on funding rates

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Over 2

1:8

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

May 2016

Date of this report

8 July 2016

Most recent ERO report(s)

 

Education Review

July 2013

Education Review

August 2010

Education Review

July 2007

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.

Matua Plunket Kindergarten - 01/07/2013

1 Evaluation of Matua Plunket Kindergarten

How well placed is Matua Plunket Kindergarten to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Matua Plunket Kindergarten is a community-based service, located in the Matua suburb of Tauranga. It caters for children from two years to school age in a mixed-age setting. Both full day and sessional options are available during school terms. The service is owned by and operates under the governance of the Royal New Zealand Plunket Society.

In 2011 significant changes to administration, staff roles and responsibilities and financial constraints have occurred. These have impacted on centre management, organisation and hours of operation. resulting in strengthened viability of the service, greater flexibility for families and clarity of leadership roles and responsibilities.

Since ERO’s last review in 2010 the centre has maintained its commitment to employing 100% qualified staff. Many staff members have been at the centre for a significant number of years. The centre has a positive reporting history with ERO.

The Review Findings

The centre manager has been well supported by Plunket to restructure and reorganise the centre. A suitable range of policies effectively guide centre operations and prudent financial management has enhanced viability of the service. Families appreciate the centre’s responsiveness to their needs.

The centre philosophy has been reviewed to make priorities and teaching approaches clear and better understood by both teachers and parents. Professional development has been valuable in assisting the management and teaching team to recognise leadership styles of themselves and others. They maximise opportunities for all staff to make a contribution and lead curriculum developments. Parents are actively encouraged to be involved and to show leadership in aspects of the programme and centre operations. This shared leadership and contribution enriches learning opportunities for children.

Aspects of the curriculum and teaching practice that are highly evident include:

  • promotion of virtues related to character and life skills which support children as capable and confident learners
  • responding to children’s strengths and interests in a well-resourced, play-based setting
  • respectful and reciprocal relationships among teachers, children and families
  • the provision of literacy, mathematics and technology in context for children and meaningful learning conversations
  • teachers listening and responding to children using an effective range of strategies
  • children showing leadership in play scenarios, planning and learning in an atmosphere of enjoyment, purpose and fun.

Additional special features of the curriculum are the genuine inclusion of children with diverse learning needs and parent education opportunities.

Key Next Steps

ERO and centre management agree on these priority areas to enhance centre development:

  • assessment, planning and evaluation processes so that teachers reach a common understanding about the purpose and use of assessment information. They also need to develop consistent quality practices that clearly document progress and learning for individual children
  • treaty-based practices to more closely reflect the centre philosophy’s acknowledgement of Te Tiriti o Waitangi
  • develop and implement an effective and ongoing appraisal process that is linked to professional development and is supportive, rigorous and culturally appropriate.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Matua Plunket Kindergarten completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Matua Plunket Kindergarten will be in three years.

Dale Bailey

National Manager Review Services

Northern Region

1 July 2013

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Tauranga

Ministry of Education profile number

40035

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

40 children, aged 2 years and over

Service roll

63

Gender composition

Girls 35

Boys 28

Ethnic composition

Māori

NZ European/Pākehā

Other European

Chinese

Samoan

South East Asian

Tongan

7

45

7

1

1

1

1

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%

Based on funding rates

80%

Reported ratios of staff to children

Over 2

1:8

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

May 2013

Date of this report

1 July 2013

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

August 2010

 

Education Review

July 2007

 

Education Review

July 2004

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.