50 Silverstream Road, Crofton Downs, Wellington
View on map|
Not well placed |
Requires further development |
Well placed |
Very well placed |
ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.
Ngaio Playcentre is one of 19 parent-led early childhood centres governed and administered by the Wellington Playcentre Association (the association). The playcentre is licensed to provide mixed age sessional education and care for 30 children five mornings a week. This includes provision for 18 children, up to the age of two, at any one time.
A council, of elected volunteer representatives from each of the association's member centres, oversees the association at the governance level. This work is assisted by an operations manager and general manager. An executive committee administers the adult education programme. A centre support worker is employed to visit the centre and provide professional advice and feedback to strengthen practice and promote improvement. Responsibility for the day-to-day operation is undertaken by centre-elected office holders.
Curriculum planning and implementation is a shared responsibility. Each session is supported by a duty team of parent educators who hold playcentre training certificates. Almost all centre members are involved in the association's training programme with a large proportion holding the most advanced course qualifications.
The association philosophy, Whānau tupu ngātahi – families growing together, is to empower parents and children to learn, grow and play together. This underpins practice and was reaffirmed by the association and Ngaio Playcentre in 2017.
The service and the association responded positively to the areas identified for improvement in the 2014 ERO review. Internal evaluation and strategic planning were undertaken by association personnel to bring about changes to both the structural and organisational culture of the organisation. Clear boundaries between governance and management were expressed and changes made to improve support to individual centres.
The previous ERO report also identified centre leaders would benefit from association support to further develop assessment, programme planning and the provision of a bicultural curriculum through improved self-review practices. Deepening understanding of diverse cultures in the community was suggested.
The New Zealand Playcentre Federation, which the Wellington Association is part of, is planning a significant restructure for 2017 that includes amalgamating associations. Playcentres will become part of a regional hub, supported by a regional manager and support persons.
This review was part of a cluster of nine in the Wellington Playcentre Association.
All children's holistic development is enhanced through their engagement in child-initiated, play‑based learning. They enjoy one another's company and play amicably together, exploring and engaging in a range of appropriate learning activities.
Attentive parent educators know the children and their preferences well. They are nearby to support and encourage ongoing engagement where needed. Children’s social skills and developing relationships are well-supported. A positive tone and inclusive practice are highly evident.
Te Whāriki and the playcentre philosophy underpin centre practice well. Parent educators have shared understanding of what they want children and families to experience during their time at playcentre and well-considered plans are in place to achieve this.
Assessment, curriculum planning and evaluation practices effectively support adults to provide challenging and thought provoking learning experiences that respond to children’s interests. Individual learning portfolios, and an online programme for sharing information, celebrate children's progress and successfully capture their developing skills, knowledge and attributes. These are used intentionally for review and design of further experiences.
A comprehensive internal evaluation was undertaken, during 2014, to discover how well the association and centres included te reo and tikanga Māori as part of a culturally responsive curriculum. Ngaio Playcentre participated in this process. Strengthened and regularly reviewed initiatives continue to deepen children and adults understanding of te ao Māori. The experiences provided as a result of these initiatives highly engage children.
Literacy, mathematics and science activities are core components of children’s daily experience. The youngest children are embraced and nurtured within a culture of care.
Ngaio Playcentre members are a diverse group of enthusiastic parents and whānau who bring valuable skills and knowledge to their roles. Leadership tasks are clearly described. This strengthens adults' participation in areas of expertise. The high levels of involvement of the centre's community and a sense of collective responsibility to all children, provide a positive platform for learning. New members are carefully mentored and appropriately supported. Well-developed systems assist the smooth day-to-day running of the playcentre.
The association is an improvement-focused organisation. The previous ERO review found the support provided at centre level by association support workers was helpful. ERO also recognised that formalising this arrangement to provide a more effective approach to responding to the needs of individual centres was a next step for development.
The association, as part of reviewing their structural organisation, reviewed the position of centre support workers and made improvements to human resource management. Timely and relevant leadership and guidance is provided for Ngaio Playcentre.
Self review is well understood and used for accountability and improvement. Centre members use review to guide ongoing decision-making and to help develop shared understandings about children's learning. Planning priorities are aligned to the service and association vision and focus on improving teaching and learning.
The centre support person and duty teams provide highly effective leadership that contributes positively to children’s early learning experience. Helpful strategies are in place to support newer centre members to document and record children's learning and progress. Playcentre course work and opportunities for professional learning successfully increase adults' individual and collective capacity to further support all children.
Association and centre leaders should continue to improve outcomes for children and families by using effective internal evaluation to ensure the very good practice occurring is sustained and prioritised developments are achieved.
Before the review, the staff and management of Ngaio Playcentre completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:
During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:
All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.
The next ERO review of Ngaio Playcentre will be in four years.
Patricia Davey
Deputy Chief Review Officer Central (Acting)
12 May 2017
The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.
|
Location |
Wellington |
||
|
Ministry of Education profile number |
60043 |
||
|
Licence type |
Playcentre |
||
|
Licensed under |
Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008 |
||
|
Number licensed for |
30 children, including up to 18 aged under 2 |
||
|
Service roll |
45 |
||
|
Gender composition |
Boys 25, Girls 20 |
||
|
Ethnic composition |
Māori |
3 |
|
|
Reported ratios of adults to children |
Under 2 |
1:2 |
Better than minimum requirements |
|
Over 2 |
1:4 |
Better than minimum requirements |
|
|
Review team on site |
March 2017 |
||
|
Date of this report |
12 May 2017 |
||
|
Most recent ERO report(s)
|
Education Review |
May 2014 |
|
|
Education Review |
September 2010 |
||
|
Education Review |
January 2008 |
||
ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:
Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.
ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.
A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.
For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.
The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:
ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.
ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.
|
Not well placed |
Requires further development |
Well placed |
Very well placed |
ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.
Ngaio Playcentre is one of 20 parent-led early childhood centres administered by the Wellington Playcentre Association (the association). A council oversees operation at governance level and an executive committee provides the adult education programme, guidance and support for members. Two centre supporters are employed by the executive to visit playcentres and provide professional advice and feedback to strengthen practice and promote improvement. Responsibility for day-to-day operation is undertaken by centre-elected office holders. Parents share the duties associated with implementing the programme. The centre operates five parent-led, mixed age sessions of two and a half hours per week, four mornings and one afternoon.
Playcentre philosophy recognises parents as the best first teachers of their children and emphasises the importance of child-initiated play in mixed-age sessions. Acknowledging Te Tiriti o Waitangi is an integral part of this philosophy.
Ngaio Playcentre is a long established centre in the area. It serves a diverse community. They use cooperative decision making, management, and positive relationships to support operations and children’s learning.
Since the September 2010 ERO report, this service has been relicensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The licensing process was a focus for development for some time. During this period extensive alterations were made to the building, especially to the utility areas.
This review was part of a cluster review of 20 centres in the Wellington Playcentre Association. This centre has a positive reporting history with ERO.
Key philosophical values are reflected in practice. A real sense of family and community is evident. Respect for the culture and identity is evident. There is an ongoing focus on building and maintaining positive and relationships in the centre. Members are friendly and welcoming.
Children are settled, cooperative and happy learners. They have free access to a wide variety of challenging learning materials. The outdoor area is extensive and inviting for play. It encourages exploration and physical challenge. Literacy and numeracy are well integrated into the programme in meaningful, playbased ways. A busy and engaged atmosphere with much sustained play is evident. The centre agrees it is timely to consider ways to promote the leadership opportunities of older children.
There is good provision for infants and toddlers. They are well supported and encouraged to explore the play spaces and full range of learning materials. These youngest playcentre members show confidence in making choices and leading their learning. A suitably resourced area is currently being considered for those children who are not yet mobile. Recently upgraded change and sleep areas are well-used.
Members maintain good levels of purposeful engagement with children. They are responsive to children, allowing them to take the lead and supporting them to explore. Adults use questioning to extend children’s ideas. High ratios of adults to children promote opportunities for one-to-one interaction.
Members are committed to participation in ongoing training and development. Recent review and development of planning and assessment focus on trying to capture children’s learning and developing skills. Parents share their aspirations for developing the interests and strengths of children. Session planning meetings consider identified, ongoing interests of children. PLODs (possible lines of direction) are now visibly displayed to aid continuity of planning for individual and groups of children. This is an ongoing area for development.
Assessment portfolios are attractive, informative and regularly accessed by parents and children. These include observations of children and records of enrichment events. Portfolios provide parents with an attractive record of the child’s learning and the range of their child’s experiences. A next step is to better capture children’s significant learning and to show progress over time.
Bicultural practices are highly evident. Centre leaders are committed to strengthening members’ understanding of bicultural practices in the centre. Members identify further development of te reo me ngā tikanga Māori is an ongoing focus.
The varied cultural backgrounds of children are recognised and valued. Members seek ways to share and support these during sessions. Continuing to deepen understanding of the diverse cultures within the Ngaio community should support an enriched programme.
The friendly, inclusive culture, strong centre leadership and support for each other fosters parents’ confidence and willingness to become involved in management roles and training. Members are reflective and committed in their roles. They use self review to undertake reviews and to make changes to the environment. The centre has identified that further development of self review is a next step. Members' strong commitment and sense of community point to a positive future for this service.
The association provides good support and a range of training for members. The centre supporter provides regular face-to-face feedback and help as needed. Comprehensive and up-to-date written policies and procedures guide office holders in their management role and members in planning and implementing an appropriate programme. The systematic review of and plan to restructure governance and management are being carefully worked through to support a more sustainable future for the organisation and individual centres.
Members should continue to:
The association should:
Before the review, the staff and management of Ngaio Playcentre completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:
curriculum
premises and facilities
health and safety practices
governance, management and administration.
During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:
emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.
All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.
The next ERO review of Ngaio Playcentre will be in three years.
Joyce Gebbie
National Manager Review Services Central Region (Acting)
6 May 2014
The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.
|
Location |
Ngaio, Wellington |
||
|
Ministry of Education profile number |
60043 |
||
|
Licence type |
Playcentre |
||
|
Licensed under |
Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008 |
||
|
Number licensed for |
30 children, including 18 aged up to 2 |
||
|
Service roll |
37 |
||
|
Gender composition |
Boys 20, Girls 17 |
||
|
Ethnic composition |
Māori NZ European/Pākehā Other ethnic groups |
3 24 10 |
|
|
Reported ratios of adults to children |
Under 2 |
1:1 |
Better than minimum requirements |
|
Over 2 |
1:3 |
Better than minimum requirements |
|
|
Review team on site |
March 2014 |
||
|
Date of this report |
6 May 2014 |
||
|
Most recent ERO report(s)
|
Education Review |
September 2010 |
|
|
Education Review |
January 2008 |
||
|
Education Review |
February 2005 |
ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:
Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.
ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.
A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.
For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.
The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:
ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.
ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.