Ōtewā School

Education institution number:
1874
School type:
Full Primary
School gender:
Co-Educational
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
60
Telephone:
Address:

916 Otewa Road, Otorohanga

View on map

Otewa School - 16/12/2019

School Context

Otewa Primary School, located in a rural setting approximately 10 km from Otorohanga, caters for students in Years 1 to 8. The school's current roll of 68 includes 21 students who identify as Māori. There has been a significant roll increase since the previous ERO review in 2016. The school experiences a high turnover of students each year.

The principal continues in her position and there have been several changes to the teaching team. A new board chairperson and several new trustees were elected in the 2019 elections. The wider school community remain fully involved at the school. Teachers have had professional learning about literacy, mathematics and science.

The school’s mission statement states ‘Otewa School will produce students who are effective communicators, team players, environmentally aware, self-confident and respectful.’ Priority is placed on empowering students to be confident, independent, communicators throughout life. These outcomes are underpinned by the values of contribution, care, communication, creativity and challenge.

The current strategic aims include a focus on:

  • a balanced education focusing on a culture of values-based learning, life skills and literacy and numeracy
  • enhancing and maintaining a rural school environment
  • providing a future focused environment
  • supporting teachers to learn, collaboratively think and lead student learning
  • an understanding in the community of the importance of their involvement with Otewa School.

Leaders and teachers regularly report to the board, schoolwide information about outcomes for students in the following areas:

  • reading, writing and mathematics.

The school is a member of the Nga Awa ki te Moana Kāhui Ako and the principal is the leader.

Evaluation Findings

1 Equity and excellence – achievement of valued outcomes for students

1.1 How well is the school achieving equitable and excellent outcomes for all its students?

The school is working towards achieving equitable and excellent outcomes for all of its learners. School data for 2018 shows that most students achieved at expected curriculum levels in reading and the majority of students achieved at expected curriculum levels in writing and mathematics.

This data also shows that Māori students achieved at similar levels to their peers at the school in reading and writing but significantly lower in mathematics and girls significantly outperformed boys in reading, writing and mathematics.

Data collected over the previous three years shows consistent patterns of achievement in reading and a slight improvement in writing and mathematics.

1.2 How well is the school accelerating learning for those Māori and other students who need this?

The school is accelerating the learning for some Māori and other students who need this.

Writing data for 2019 indicates that approximately half of at-risk students made accelerated progress. School data for 2018 shows that a small number of students whose learning is at risk in reading, writing and mathematics made accelerated progress.

2 School conditions for equity and excellence – processes and practices

2.1 What school processes and practices are effective in enabling achievement of equity and excellence, and acceleration of learning?

Strong professional leadership guides all aspects of school development. A planned approach to induction, mentoring and coaching is enabling teachers to build their capability in a supportive and collaborative environment. Clear expectations and shared understanding about assessment and teacher planning have been developed. Information about accelerated learning outcomes is systematically gathered, analysed and reported on. Leadership builds relational trust and educationally-focused partnerships with parents and whānau.

Teachers use a range of useful strategies to enhance student learning in multi-level settings. Relationships between teachers and students are respectful, affirming and focused on learning and wellbeing. Classroom culture strongly reflects the school’s core values. Teachers plan learning programmes based on a range of relevant assessment information. A deliberate approach to planning for new students enables smooth transitions and continuity for these learners. Teachers have introduced a framework that enables students to reflect on their learning and the extent to which they have been successful.

Teacher and leadership capability are being systematically enhanced through evidence informed internal evaluation. Teachers have established a process to inquire into their practice which is focused on improving outcomes for at-risk learners. Performance management processes are well aligned with professional learning priorities, cycles of professional inquiry and building teacher capability. Teachers continually reflect on and adapt their practice to improve outcomes of learners.

2.2 What further developments are needed in school processes and practices for achievement of equity and excellence, and acceleration of learning?

Teachers should give priority to implementing practices that support students to have a greater understanding of their own learning progress and next steps. This focus should include continuing to build teachers’ knowledge of learning progressions frameworks and establishing more visible reference points for students that enable them to monitor their own progress. This is likely to support student goal setting and self-directed learning.

Leaders and trustees need to set specific targets focusing on acceleration of at-risk learners in reading, writing and mathematics in the annual charter. This should provide a stronger framework for reporting to the board throughout the year about the effectiveness of the initiatives in place to accelerate the learning of at-risk students.

The school has identified the need to:

  • review and further develop the local, placed-based curriculum
  • implement a programme of trustee training to systematically build new trustees’ knowledge and understanding of governance.

ERO’s evaluation confirms these priorities.

3 Board Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the board and principal of the school completed the ERO board assurance statement and self-audit checklists. In these documents they attested that they had taken all reasonable steps to meet their legislative obligations related to the following:

  • board administration
  • curriculum
  • management of health, safety and welfare
  • personnel management
  • finance
  • asset management.

During the review, ERO checked the following items because they have a potentially high impact on student safety and wellbeing:

  • emotional safety of students (including prevention of bullying and sexual harassment)
  • physical safety of students
  • teacher registration and certification
  • processes for appointing staff
  • stand down, suspension, expulsion and exclusion of students
  • attendance
  • school policies in relation to meeting the requirements of the Children’s Act 2014.

4 ERO’s Overall Judgement

On the basis of the findings of this review, ERO’s overall evaluation judgement of Otewa School’sperformance in achieving valued outcomes for its students is: Well placed.

ERO’s Framework: Overall Findings and Judgement Tool derived from School Evaluation Indicators: Effective Practice for Improvement and Learner Success is available on ERO’s website.

5 Going forward

Key strengths of the school

For sustained improvement and future learner success, the school can draw on existing strengths in:

  • leadership that is effectively guiding school improvement
  • useful teaching strategies that support student learning and wellbeing
  • reflective practice that supports teacher learning and accelerated outcomes for students.

Next steps

For sustained improvement and future learner success, priorities for further development are in:

  • growing teacher practice to build on and embed student agency
  • establishing annual targets to focus on acceleration across all aspects of literacy and mathematics
  • establishing a local curriculum to support teaching, learning and culturally responsive practice across all learning areas
  • engaging trustees in board training to support their understanding of governance roles and responsibilities.

Areas for improved compliance practice

To improve current practice, the board of trustees should:

  • maintain school records about staff appointments that meet the requirements of safety checking the work force
  • ensure staff performance management processes and records meet all the requirements of Teaching Council New Zealand.

Phillip Cowie

Director Review and Improvement Services

Central Region

16 December 2019

About the school

Location

Otorohanga

Ministry of Education profile number

1874

School type

Full Primary (Years 1-8)

School roll

68

Gender composition

Male 36 Female 32

Ethnic composition

Māori 21
NZ European/Pākehā 47

Students with Ongoing Resourcing Funding (ORS)

No

Provision of Māori medium education

No

Review team on site

October 2019

Date of this report

16 December 2019

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review August 2016
Education Review July 2013
Education Review June 2010

Otewa School - 15/08/2016

1 Context

Otewa Primary School is located in a rural setting approximately 10 km from Otorohanga. The school's roll of 52 includes 12 Māori children. Over the last two years the school roll has fluctuated. Since the last ERO review in 2013 a new principal has been appointed and some changes made to the teaching team. A new chairperson was also elected to the board of trustees. There have been significant developments to buildings and grounds that enhances facilities for children and teachers. The wider school community remain fully involved at the school.

2 Equity and excellence

The vision and valued outcomes defined by the school for all children are to be confident, independent, communicators throughout life. These outcomes are underpinned by the recently reviewed and well known values of contribution, care, communication, creativity and challenge.

Teachers make Overall Teacher Judgements (OTJ) using a range of appropriate assessment information. These judgements are moderated by teachers and the principal to ensure they are reliable and consistent across the school. 

The school’s achievement information shows that in 2014 and 2015 half of all Māori children achieved at the National Standard in writing, reading and mathematics. Achievement for other students in the school is slightly higher than that of Māori children. All students achieving below expected levels are either included in a target group in classrooms or are receiving specialist support to accelerate their achievement.

Since the last ERO evaluation the school has established a focus on identifying and addressing the learning needs of Māori and other children achieving below expected levels through:

  • refining assessment systems to make effective use of achievement information at all levels of the school
  • redesigning the school's curriculum placing greater priority on New Zealand's dual cultural heritage and Māori language, culture and identity
  • providing teachers with professional learning and development to accelerate achievement for all children with a particular focus on priority learners
  • reviewing and further developing performance management systems for the principal and teachers.

3 Accelerating achievement

How effectively does this school respond to children whose learning and achievement need acceleration?

The school effectively identifies Māori children who are at risk in their learning. The principal and teachers gather reliable information about their learning strengths and needs and use this information to set relevant targets to raise achievement levels. In addition, the school has developed a policy and procedures that outline expectations for identifying the needs of children when they enter and leave the school during the year. 

The school responds effectively to children whose learning and achievement needs acceleration particularly for those children who have been at the school for a longer period of time. In 2015, the significant proportion of students in the below National Standards category in mathematics and writing were targeted. The schools end of year data indicates that approximately half of the targeted children were no longer in the school. Of those remaining children most made good progress. Clarification and definition of accelerated progress needs further discussion within the teaching team.

The board receive collated data from the principal. This data shows school-wide achievement and progress for all students including Māori and by gender. The board uses this data to make resourcing decisions to support programmes and interventions for at risk learners. Trustees are yet to scrutinise achievement data to determine how well the school is accelerating the achievement of at risk learners throughout the year.

Teachers are making good use of data to plan targeted programmes. There is a need to continue to build their knowledge of learning progressions. Teachers should also develop strategies that enable children to better understand the own progress and achievement levels and next learning steps.

4 School conditions

How effectively do the school’s curriculum and other organisational processes and practices develop and enact the school’s vision, values, goals and targets for equity and excellence?

The professional leaders are working on Otewa School's broad curriculum to improve its effectiveness in promoting excellent and equitable outcomes for Māori and other children. Appropriate priority is placed on literacy and mathematics. Children's enjoyment at school is fostered by a strong family-like atmosphere that includes many opportunities for them to develop their leadership skills and strong tuakana/teina relationships.

The school's curriculum particularly in relation to literacy and mathematics is well documented and clearly reflects the principles of The New Zealand Curriculum (NZC). There is a need to review and define learning expectations in relation to other curriculum areas and establish expected learning progressions for children as they move through the school. 

As part of the curriculum review process priority should be given to documenting how the curriculum is adding complexity to student learning as they move through the school in non-core subject areas.

The school is developing processes to build partnerships with parents that support them to assist with their children's learning. Parents are well informed through written reports, individual portfolios and interviews. They contribute and participate in school events and are regularly involved in consultation about school developments and priorities. An open-door policy is well enacted and parents feel welcome to participate.

Teachers work well together and have established close and respectful relationships within the team, with children and parents. They are continuing to build their knowledge and understanding of 'teaching as inquiry'. This is enabling teachers to better focus on accelerating the progress of children who are at risk of not achieving National Standards. ERO observed examples of teachers using effective strategies that support children's engagement in meaningful learning.

Robust systems have been implemented to support teachers to make reliable judgements in relation to the National Standards in Mathematics. These processes need to be further refined and extended to reading and writing.

The school effectively responds to children with high and complex learning and health needs in relation to meeting their social and ongoing learning development. These children are fully included in the life of the school and enjoy positive relationships with their peers, teachers and support staff.

Trustees work well together and value the work of the principal and teachers. It is important that all trustees participate in training to further develop their understanding of governance and effective self-review, including making appropriate decisions for students needing to accelerate their learning. 

The principal provides focused professional leadership for learning about accelerating achievement for Māori and other children at risk of not achieving. She effectively guides teachers to specifically target the learning needs of these children and supports them to plan programmes to accelerate achievement. Strengthening the links between teacher appraisal processes and students who are at risk of not achieving should add rigour to performance management processes and help to further build teacher capability.

5 Going forward

How well placed is the school to accelerate the achievement of all children who need it?

Leaders and teachers:

  • know the children whose learning and achievement need to be accelerated
  • respond effectively to the strengths, needs and interests of each child
  • regularly evaluate how well teaching is working for these children
  • act on what they know works well for each child
  • build teacher capability effectively to achieve equitable outcomes for all children
  • are well placed to achieve and sustain equitable and excellent outcomes for all children.

The school is working hard to achieve equitable outcomes for all children and is well positioned to address the next steps identified by ERO. The principal has developed a comprehensive plan to accelerate the achievement of Māori and other children at risk of not achieving at expected levels.  Full implementation of this plan should support the school's commitment to providing excellence and equitable outcomes for Māori and other children. This plan specifically includes strategies to:

  • define and accelerate the achievement of those students who move into and out of the school
  • strengthen processes that support teachers to make reliable overall judgements in reading and writing
  • further develop "teaching as inquiry" in relation to defining and implementing strategies to accelerate children's achievement
  • implement processes that support children to develop a greater understanding of their next learning steps
  • assist trustees to scrutinise and make better use of data to evaluate the effectiveness of initiatives to accelerate achievement
  • continue to grow the use of Māori language and presence of culture and identity as part of the school curriculum.

ERO is likely to carry out the next review in three years. 

6 Board assurance on legal requirements

Before the review the board of trustees and principal of the school completed the ERO board assurance statement and Self Audit Checklists. In these documents they attested that they had taken all reasonable steps to meet their legislative obligations related to the following:

  • board administration

  • curriculum

  • management of health, safety and welfare

  • personnel management

  • asset management.

During the review, ERO checked the following items because they have a potentially high impact on student safety and wellbeing:

  • emotional safety of students (including prevention of bullying and sexual harassment)
  • physical safety of students
  • teacher registration
  • processes for appointing staff
  • stand down, suspensions, expulsions and exclusions
  • attendance
  • compliance with the provisions of the Vulnerable Children Act 2014

7 Recommendation

ERO recommends that the trustees and principal review and strengthen the achievement plan to ensure it includes processes, practices and expectations outlined in the Going Forward section of this report. 

Lynda Pura-Watson
Deputy Chief Review Officer

15 August 2016

About the school 

Location

near Otorohanga

Ministry of Education profile number

1874

School type

Full Primary (Years 1 to 8)

School roll

52

Gender composition

Girls    33
Boys    19

Ethnic composition

Pākehā
Māori
Pacific
Other

32
14
  2
  4

Review team on site

May 2016

Date of this report

15 August 2016

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review
Education Review
Education Review

July 2013
June 2010
October 2007