Papakura Playcentre

Education institution number:
25208
Service type:
Playcentre
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
2
Telephone:
Address:

15 Opaheke Road, Papakura

View on map

Papakura Playcentre - 26/06/2017

1 Evaluation of Papakura Playcentre

How well placed is Papakura Playcentre to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Papakura Playcentre is a well-established, parent-led early childhood education service. It is situated in a residential area. The playcentre offers four group-supervised, general sessions per week, catering for up to 30 children from birth to school age. Extended sessions for older children are provided one morning per week. These sessions are planned and overseen by employed supervisors.

Through the philosophy, centre members aim to provide a safe and caring environment for children for play and learning. Parents provide experiences where children learn through play, opportunities for peer learning and exploration in their own time alongside others, or in some cases by themselves. Papakura Playcentre philosophy states that parents are the first and best educators of children. Playcentre is a place for whānau to find friendship and support, growing together as part of the learning community.

The previous ERO report in 2013 identified areas for development around strategic planning, planning, assessment and evaluation. Considerable progress made in the following areas:

  • there is now an inclusive environment for infants and toddlers

  • a strategic plan is in place

  • parents noticing, recognising and responding to children's interests and learning in a more emergent environment.

Currently a professional development officer from the Counties Playcentre Association facilitates Ministry of Education funded professional learning for members to guide practice and self review that is designed to improve implementation of a learning focussed programme.

The playcentre is one of 17 centres in the Counties Playcentre Association (CPA). The New Zealand Playcentre Federation (NZPF) and the CPA provide governance oversight for the centre. This includes strategic direction, management support, documentation and adult education programmes. In addition, the centre receives regular visits from experienced personnel who offer advice guidance and support to centre members. The NZPF is currently undergoing restructuring, and this has implications for CPA governance actions in the future.

This review was part of a cluster of six playcentre reviews in the Counties Playcentre Association.

The Review Findings

Children benefit from a well-resourced and planned learning environment. Rich opportunities for playing and learning alongside peers is promoted by parents. The programme is a mix of child-directed and adult-led experiences, where children can make choices around the complexity that is added to their play. The programme follows some deliberate planning related to the children’s interests, particularly in the extended sessions.

Children of all ages have ongoing access to plentiful equipment in all areas of play. They are supported to explore and investigate through play in unhurried and calm learning spaces. In general sessions, parents promote experiences for their children to extend knowledge and skills that builds confidence and competence.

Children enjoy learning with and alongside their parents. This affirms their language, culture and identity. Parents confidently use their home languages, allowing children to develop their play and interactions with others. The environment responds to interests, strengths and abilities of all children. Strong links between centre and home provide continuity for children.

Experienced members plan for and implement learning opportunities, and in collaboration with a liaison officer from the CPA, model good practice and positively guide children’s behaviour. Improvements made to assessment since ERO's last report in 2013 is enabling members to develop an understanding of what children are learning, and is guiding practice on how to provide continuity of this learning.

Parents are supporting their children to gain an appreciation and understanding of the Māori language and culture, and the bicultural heritage of Aotearoa. They are developing a commitment to using te reo Māori in sessions, learning about and including significant events and celebrations. This enables children to develop skills in listening and language.

Self review is developing and informs improvement and change. Planned reviews ensure that aspects of the playcentre are evaluated in a systematic way. In response to ERO's 2013 report centre members undertook specific self review in care and learning for babies and toddlers. This review has resulted in strengthened curriculum provision and inclusion of these very young learners.

The centre benefits from a core group of knowledgeable parent members who support and engage in parent education to promote learning opportunities for children, and to provide leadership. Experienced centre members are actively supporting new members to engage in playcentre adult education courses. This is resulting in an increasing number of members in training, those holding playcentre qualifications, and a shared commitment to improving education and care for children. 

Key Next Steps

Through self review, consideration should now be given to:

  • reviewing the centre philosophy to develop a shared understanding of the intent of CPA expectations and aligning these to a common vision and goals for Papakura Playcentre

  • ensuring that planning for extension sessions consistently promotes independence and opportunities for children to lead their own learning and investigations through play.

Recommendation

ERO recommends that CPA:

  • continues to access support for Papakura Playcentre for professional learning and development that focuses on strengthening self review

  • develops strategies to ensure that its centre members are kept up-to-date with obligations and expectations in relation to current regulatory requirements and policies.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Papakura Playcentre completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. 

Actions for compliance

ERO identified areas of non-compliance relating to governance and management and health and safety. To meet requirements the service needs to improve its performance in the following areas:

  • implement a system of regular appraisal for employees.

  • develop, document and implement an annual plan

  • secure heavy objects that might fall

  • police vet for anyone appointed to work during normal opening hours

  • record accidents and incidents to eliminate hazards

  • record risk assessment for excursions.

[Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Centres 2008, GMA 7, 8, HS6,12,17]

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Papakura Playcentre will be in three years.

Lynda Pura-Watson

Deputy Chief Review Officer

26 June 2017 

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service 

Location

Papakura, Auckland

Ministry of Education profile number

25208

Licence type

Playcentre

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

30 children, including up to 15 aged under 2

Service roll

34

Gender composition

Girls 20 Boys 14

Ethnic composition

Māori
Pākehā
South African
Bangladeshi
Indian
Samoan
Sri Lankan

8
20
2
1
1
1
1

Review team on site

February 2017

Date of this report

26 June 2017

Most recent ERO report(s)

 

Education Review

December 2013

Education Review

September 2010

Education Review

March 2007

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.

Papakura Playcentre - 09/12/2013

1 Evaluation of Papakura Playcentre

How well placed is Papakura Playcentre to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Papakura Playcentre is one of seventeen parent run cooperatives in the Counties Playcentre Association, which provides a management and policy framework for centre operations. Liaison workers and other elected association officers provide support for centres. Association members deliver the Playcentre adult education programme to help whānau build their understanding about children’s learning.

Papakura Playcentre is a well established centre that continues to maintain high membership levels. The centre is managed by an elected president and members who hold officer roles and responsibilities. Members promote the importance of ‘Whanau Tupu Ngatahi’- families growing together. They maintain good levels of qualifications and offer general sessions and one weekly extended session for older children aged three to five years old, which is staffed by a paid supervisor.

This review was part of a cluster of eight playcentre reviews in the Counties Playcentre Association.

The Review Findings

Children settle quickly into the programme and play well together. They benefit from positive and inclusive interactions with adults who know them well. Adults also provide good support for children to develop as socially competent learners. Children easily access good quality resources and engage in interesting learning activities. Children with special needs are supported by all adults and children.

Most adults have ongoing conversations with children and some ask open questions to extend children’s learning. These experienced parents could model these questions more explicitly in order to share these good practices with newer members.

Attractive assessment records of children’s progress document children’s learning. Literacy and numeracy is integrated into the programme and is emphasised in the extension group offered to support children’s transition to school.

Members are developing self-review practices to provide information that will assist with centre improvement. Positive feature of centre self review are that it involves centre members, and it contributes to decision making. Members could now use a more rigorous approach to self review by consistently considering how well positive outcomes for children have been promoted as a result of each review.

There are high levels of training at the centre and good quality support for members. Inclusive leadership practices promote members’ sense of ownership of and belonging to the centre. The playcentre is well positioned to develop mentoring opportunities to strengthen leadership capacity.

There is evidence of some bicultural practices in the centre. A more culturally responsive approach to the programme should increase the ways in which children’s language, culture and identity are promoted through the curriculum.

Association management practices are well established. A strategic review is currently underway, with a view to streamlining Association systems and practices and making them more manageable for Playcentre members. This review could also consider how the Association can provide earlier, more focused support for centres that are facing challenges. Liaison workers should consider ways to help centres establish effective strategic and annual planning, and strengthen self review practices. Monitoring and supporting the quality of programmes in centres should be a more central aspect of the liaison worker role.

Key Next Steps

Centre members and ERO agree that the key next steps for the centre include:

  • further developing the strategic plan to include indicators to show progress towards strategic goals
  • more in-depth assessment of children’s learning and improved identification and documentation of children’s learning progress
  • ensuring that programme planning and evaluation processes focus on extending children’s learning
  • reviewing practices and provision for infants and toddlers and strengthening adult supervision for these children.

Recommendation

As a result of this cluster of reviews, ERO recommends that the Counties Playcentre Association access support from the Ministry of Education and the NZ Playcentre Federation to refine the Association’s structure, systems and practices.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Papakura Playcentre completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

To improve the health and safety of children at the centre, adults need to ensure:

  • better hygiene practices are implemented when children handle food
  • that the potential hazard posed by items stored at height are addressed. Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations, 2008 46, 47(c).

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Papakura Playcentre will be in three years.

Dale Bailey

National Manager Review Services

Northern Region

9 December 2013

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Papakura, Auckland

Ministry of Education profile number

25208

Licence type

Playcentre

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

30 children, including up to 15 aged under 2

Service roll

64

Gender composition

Girls 34

Boys 30

Ethnic composition

Māori

NZ European/Pākehā

Asian

Indian

African

Tongan

other European

22

24

4

4

2

1

7

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

1:3

Better than minimum requirements

 

Over 2

1:3

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

August 2013

Date of this report

9 December 2013

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

September 2010

 

Education Review

March 2007

 

Education Review

January 2004

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.