Petone Central School

Petone Central School

Te Ara Huarau | School Profile Report

Background

This Profile Report was written within twelve months of the Education Review Office and Petone Central School working in Te Ara Huarau, an improvement evaluation approach used in most English Medium State and State Integrated Schools. For more information about Te Ara Huarau see ERO’s website www.ero.govt.nz

Context 

Petone Central School is a full primary school providing education for students in years 1 to 8. The school draws from a diverse linguistic and cultural community and affirms student’s cultural identities alongside Te reo Māori and tikanga Māori. Inā kei te mōhio koe ko wai koe, I anga mai koe e hea, kei te mōhio koe, kei te anga atu ko ki heaIf you know who you are and where you are from, then you will know where you are going! 

Petone Central School’s strategic priorities for improving outcomes for learners are:

  • Whanaungatanga- sustain and nurture relationships with Petone Central School Community.
  • Maintain Teacher knowledge through Professional Learning and Development.
  • Grow and understand what each child is capable of and how to get there, ‘E kore au e ngaro, he kākano i ruia mai i Rangiātea- I will not be lost, I am a seed descended from Rangiātea’.

You can find a copy of the school’s strategic and annual plan on Petone Central School’s website.

ERO and the school are working together to evaluate how a continued focus on fostering confidence and a shared cultural identity can be integrated into a curriculum responsive to the needs of students who need to make progress in specific areas of language, literacy and mathematics.

The rationale for selecting this evaluation is: 

  • all students are embraced for their strengths and supported with their needs. School data shows many students have specific areas for development in relation to language acquisition, fluency and mathematics, all are growing their identity as citizens of Aotearoa New Zealand.

The school expects to see:

  • learners who each have a pathway within the school’s Māori Language Strategy and Language Progressions to further develop their competence in language and tikanga
  • positive shifts for students identified as needing to make progress in specific areas of language and mathematics.

 Strengths

The school can draw from the following strengths to support its goal to evaluate the success of initiatives to raise achievement by working together as a school community to reach the potential of each learner:

  • a culturally diverse and supportive community of whānau, parents, teachers, families and learners who are engaged in learning partnerships founded on a shared understanding of learner needs and celebration of strengths
  • experienced and expert leadership practices in Māori Achievement leading to strongly established educational connections with local kura, iwi, whānau
  • successful integration of Māori Language Progressions, Iwi Literacy Strategy and a classroom culture in which each learner’s own identity is valued and nurtured through Te Ao Māori, Te Reo Māori ona tikanga
  • clear strategic planning and regular achievement analysis, integrating shared goals with identification and support for students with additional needs and ESOL requirements.

Where to next?

Moving forward, the school will prioritise:

  • consulting whānau to unpack what whānau consider as potential 
  • using a variety of sources to evaluate learner progress including student and whānau voice, Poutama Reo, Māori Language Progressions and the Hikairo Schema 
  • developing teacher capability in structured literacy practice to be used as a tool alongside other teaching and learning strategies in supporting the progress of all learners in reading and writing.

ERO’s role will be to support the school in its evaluation for improvement cycle to improve outcomes for all learners. ERO will support the school in reporting their progress to the community. The next public report on ERO’s website will be a Te Ara Huarau | School Evaluation Report and is due within three years. 

Shelley Booysen
Director of Schools

30 November 2023 

About the School

The Education Counts website provides further information about the school’s student population, student engagement and student achievement.  educationcounts.govt.nz/home

 

Petone Central School

Board Assurance with Regulatory and Legislative Requirements Report 2023 to 2026

As of September 2023, the Petone Central School Board has attested to the following regulatory and legislative requirements:

Board Administration

Yes

Curriculum

Yes

Management of Health, Safety and Welfare

Yes

Personnel Management

Yes

Finance

Yes

Assets

Yes

Further Information

For further information please contact Petone Central School, School Board.

The next School Board assurance that it is meeting regulatory and legislative requirements will be reported, along with the Te Ara Huarau | School Evaluation Report, within three years.

Information on ERO’s role and process in this review can be found on the Education Review Office website.

Shelley Booysen
Director of Schools

30 November 2023 

About the School 

The Education Counts website provides further information about the school’s student population, student engagement and student achievement. educationcounts.govt.nz/home

Petone Central School

Findings

On the basis of the findings of this review, ERO‘s overall evaluation judgement of Petone Central School’s performance in achieving valued outcomes for its students is: Developing.

1 Background and Context

What is the background and context for this school’s review?

Petone Central School provides education for students in Years 1 to 8. The current roll of 88 children includes 15% of Pacific heritage and 38% who are Māori. Eight percent receive English language learning funding.

The June 2018 ERO report identified areas for development relating to assessment systems and practices, student achievement and curriculum documentation.

When the board of trustees resigned at the start of 2017, a commissioner was appointed by the Ministry of Education (MoE). A different commissioner took over managing governance responsibilities in 2018, continuing in the role in 2019 and for most of 2020. A new board of trustees has been recently elected. Their first meeting was held in November 2020. The New Zealand School Trustees Association (NZSTA) is providing induction and training for the new board. A specialist adviser has been appointed by the MoE to provide advice and guidance in relation to governance and finance.

In 2018, the principal and teachers began work with a Student Achievement Facilitator (SAF) and this work continued until the end of 2019. Other areas of professional learning and development (PLD) for staff since 2018 have been literacy and digital technology, facilitated by external providers.

2 Review and Development

How effectively is the school addressing its priorities for review and development?

Priorities identified for review and development

The 2018 ERO report identified the following areas for development:

  • strengthening assessment systems and practices
  • increasing student achievement
  • developing curriculum documentation
  • extending teacher inquiry.
Progress

The principal and teachers have made significant progress in all areas identified for development.

Assessment systems have been improved and effectively implemented. Regular schoolwide moderation is an established practice that supports and informs teachers’ judgements about achievement. Moderation with another school strengthens this process. The principal and teachers use assessment information to identify learning needs, to inform their teaching and to track students’ progress and achievement.

Student achievement data is collated, analysed and regularly reported. Specific teaching strategies and initiatives to promote the progress of students are well documented. Schoolwide targets identify specific groups of students for focussed interventions. Target students’ progress and achievement is clearly tracked.

Staff have regular informed discussions about children’s wellbeing and achievement. They have a shared commitment to all students across the school. The principal and staff are proactive using a collaborative focus on working alongside families to support and promote children to ‘be their best selves’.

At the end of 2018, most children were achieving at or above curriculum expectations in reading, writing and mathematics. At the end of 2019, most children achieved at or above expectations in mathematics and the large majority in reading and writing.

In 2020, the percentage of Pacific students achieving at or above expectations is higher than other ethnic groups, especially in mathematics. Māori students are achieving less well than other groups in reading, writing and mathematics. In 2019, many Māori students made accelerated progress during the year.

Students are enthusiastic, confident learners. They work both independently and collaboratively to carry out learning tasks. They have some choice within their learning programmes. Student agency is in the early stages of development. Classrooms reflect the school’s emphasis on respect. Positive and productive learning environments are evident.

The curriculum is well documented. It is aligned with the intent and philosophy of The New Zealand Curriculum, reflects the needs and priorities of the local and school communities, and covers all of the required learning areas. The curriculum is responsive to students’ learning, identities and wellbeing, and focusses on valued student outcomes. It promotes caring, inclusive and respectful learning partnerships.

Expectations for high quality teaching are clearly documented. Quality planning expectations are supported by schoolwide guidelines that ensure teachers cover all aspects of the curriculum, cater for students’ needs and interests, and prioritise local content. Teachers have a shared vision and responsibility for delivering high quality learning experiences.

3 Sustainable performance and self review

How well placed is the school to sustain and continue to improve and review its performance?

The school has made good progress with developing processes and practices to sustain and continue to improve its performance.

The principal has built relational trust and effective collaboration at all levels of the school. She has facilitated the development of a shared school vision and strategic goals and targets for equity and school improvement.

Recent schoolwide teacher inquiries into their practice have contributed to improvement in the quality of teaching and learning. Inquiry frameworks, processes and actions are developed and undertaken collaboratively. Shared inquiry and next steps have led to improvements in curriculum development and coverage.

A next step is to develop a shared understanding of an internal evaluation framework to evaluate the effectiveness of school goals and initiatives on outcomes for students.

Key next steps

Key next steps are to:

  • continue to raise achievement, including accelerating the progress of Māori students
  • further develop student agency
  • develop internal evaluation
  • induct and support new trustees into their governance role.
Board assurance on legal requirements

Before the review, the board of trustees and principal of the school completed the ERO Board Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklists. In these documents they attested that they had taken all reasonable steps to meet their legislative obligations related to:

  • board administration
  • curriculum
  • management of health, safety and welfare
  • personnel management
  • financial management
  • asset management.

During the review, ERO checked the following items because they have a potentially high impact on student achievement:

  • emotional safety of students (including prevention of bullying and sexual harassment)
  • physical safety of students
  • teacher registration
  • processes for appointing staff
  • stand-downs, suspensions, expulsions and exclusions
  • attendance
  • school policies in relation to meeting the requirements of the Children’s Act 2014.
Conclusion

Petone Central School has made positive progress in relation to the aspects of school improvement identified in the June 2018 ERO report. The principal and the newly appointed board of trustees are developing processes and practices to sustain, evaluate and embed changes to improve equity and excellence for all groups of students.
 
On the basis of the findings of this review, ERO‘s overall evaluation judgement of Petone Central School’s performance in achieving valued outcomes for its students is: Developing.

ERO’s Framework: Overall Findings and Judgement Tool derived from School Evaluation
Indicators: Effective Practice for Improvement and Learner Success is available on ERO’s website.

Dr Lesley Patterson
Director Review and Improvement Services (Southern)
Southern Region - Te Tai Tini

23 February 2021

About the school

The Education Counts website provides further information about the school’s student population, student engagement and student achievement.

Petone Central School - 28/06/2018

Findings

The commissioner, leaders and teachers have made good progress in addressing matters identified in the 2015 ERO report. There are respectful, reciprocal relationships amongst students and staff. A sound system is used to monitor and track student progress. Strengthening assessment systems and practices is an area for ongoing development.

ERO intends to carry out another review over the course of one-to-two years.

1 Background and Context

What is the background and context for this school’s review?

Petone Central School caters for students from Years 1 to 8. The roll of 81 students includes 42 who identify as Māori and 18 of Pacific heritage. The school is organised into two syndicates; Ngā Rito provides Māori medium learning; and Ngā Mahuri delivers the curriculum through English medium. The number of students in Ngā Rito has reduced considerably since the February 2015 ERO report. The school culture is based on community values and acknowledges the importance of students’ identities.

The Ministry of Education (the Ministry) has continued to provide support over the past two years. This included:

  • a Ministry Student Achievement Function (SAF) practitioner to help improve the quality of teaching and learning
  • support and guidance from New Zealand School Trustees Association to assist trustees’ understandings about governance and management
  • professional development to build teacher capability to raise and accelerate student achievement in literacy and mathematics, including support from the Resource Teacher: Māori
  • participation in the Ministry's Positive Behaviour for Learning (PB4L) programme.

The board of trustees resigned at the start of 2017 and a commissioner was put in place by the Ministry to manage all governance responsibilities.

2 Review and Development

How effectively is the school addressing its priorities for review and development?

Priorities identified for review and development

The 2015 ERO report noted concerns related to:

  • assessment practice, analysis and reporting
  • curriculum
  • teaching practice including appraisal and support for provisionally certified teachers
  • school governance.
Progress

Good progress has been made in developing a consistent approach and shared understanding of assessment purposes and practice. An appropriate range of tools is used to gather information on student needs, progress and achievement. There is a sound system to track student progress. Improved use of data identifies students at risk of not achieving, informs next steps in teaching and supports resourcing decisions. Students with more complex needs are well identified and external supports are sought and used. Overall achievement is reported to the commissioner and community.

School data shows that a large majority of students are achieving at or above expectation in reading, writing or mathematics. Lower levels of achievement for Māori and boys especially, in reading and writing are ongoing. Reducing these disparities is a priority for leaders and teachers.

The documented curriculum provides general coverage and introductory overviews of learning areas. There is strong support for the culture, language and identity of Māori and Pacific students. Increased class time is appropriately scheduled for literacy development.

A range of appropriate classroom strategies engage students and promote positive outcomes. Some students take increased responsibility for their own learning. Relationships between teachers and students are respectful and supportive.

Key next steps

Leaders and teachers recognise that strengthening assessment systems and practices is an area for ongoing improvement. This includes:

  • building teacher understanding in the analysis and use of achievement information
  • enhancing moderation processes
  • aligning school and class targets and reporting regularly on the rate of progress of target students
  • placing increased emphasis on the use of data to inform next teaching steps

Leaders identify the need to continue growing shared understandings and common approaches to high quality classroom practice. Developing explicit expectations for teaching approaches and extending teacher inquiry are key aspects in increasing staff capability and improving outcomes for students. Documenting coverage of all learning areas, including career education in Years 7 and 8, is required as part of continuing curriculum review.

3 Sustainable performance and self review

How well placed is the school to sustain and continue to improve and review its performance?

The school is working to improve and sustain its performance.

The commissioner works closely with the principal to introduce and implement systems and processes to support school operation and support improved outcomes for students. Good progress has been made in addressing a number of policy and compliance matters identified in the previous ERO report. The SAF practitioner works with leaders and teachers to help improve the quality of teaching and learning.

Good progress has been made with improving engagement with whānau and the school community. There are regular opportunities for families to provide suggestions and feedback on planning and school operation.

Board assurance on legal requirements

Before the review, the board of trustees and principal of the school completed the ERO Board Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklists. In these documents they attested that they had taken all reasonable steps to meet their legislative obligations related to:

  • board administration
  • curriculum
  • management of health, safety and welfare
  • personnel management
  • financial management
  • asset management.

During the review, ERO checked the following items because they have a potentially high impact on student achievement:

  • emotional safety of students (including prevention of bullying and sexual harassment)
  • physical safety of students
  • teacher registration
  • processes for appointing staff
  • stand-downs, suspensions, expulsions and exclusions
  • attendance.

Conclusion

The commissioner, leaders and teachers have made good progress in addressing matters identified in the 2015 ERO report. There are respectful, reciprocal relationships amongst students and staff. A sound system is used to monitor and track student progress. Strengthening assessment systems and practices is an area for ongoing development.

ERO intends to carry out another review over the course of one-to-two years.

Patricia Davey 
Deputy Chief Review Officer Central (Acting) Te Tai Pokapū - Central Region

28 June 2018

About the School

LocationLower Hutt
Ministry of Education profile number2955
School typeFull Primary (Years 1 to 8)
School roll81
Gender compositionBoys 43, Girls 38
Ethnic compositionMāori 
Samoan 
Pākehā 
Indian 
Other ethnic groups
42
15
7
6
11
Special Features1 immersion class
Review team on siteMay 2018
Date of this report28 June 2018
Most recent ERO report(s)Education Review
Education Review 
Education Review
February 2016 
June 2013
April 2010