Pukekohe High School Childcare Centre

Education institution number:
25240
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
45
Telephone:
Address:

18 John Street, Pukekohe

View on map

Pukekohe High School Childcare Centre

ERO’s Akanuku | Assurance Review reports provide information about whether a service meets and maintains regulatory standards. Further information about Akanuku | Assurance Reviews is included at the end of this report.

ERO’s Judgement

Regulatory standards

ERO’s judgement

Curriculum

Meeting

Premises and facilities

Meeting

Health and safety

Meeting

Governance, management and administration

Meeting

At the time of the review, ERO found the service was taking reasonable steps to meet regulatory standards.

Background

Pukekohe High School Childcare Centre is located adjacent to Pukekohe High School. It is a community-based service with a committee of parent volunteers who provide governance support. Approximately a fifth of children who attend are Māori. A small number are of Pacific heritage.

Summary of Review Findings

The curriculum is inclusive and responsive to children as confident and competent learners. Children are involved in decisions about their learning experiences. They have opportunities to develop knowledge and an understanding of the cultural heritages of both parties to Te Tiriti o Waitangi.

Teachers demonstrate an understanding of children’s learning and development. They engage in meaningful, positive interactions to enhance children’s learning and nurture reciprocal relationships.

The philosophy guides service operations. An ongoing process of self-review and internal evaluation helps the service maintain and improve the quality of its education and care.

Key Next Step

A key next step is for teachers to:

  • strengthen the extent to which the curriculum and teaching practices acknowledge and respond to children’s cultures and languages.

Next ERO Review

The next ERO review is likely to be an Akarangi | Quality Evaluation.

Patricia Davey
Director of Early Childhood Education (ECE)

19 May 2023 

Information About the Service

Early Childhood Service Name

Pukekohe High School Childcare Centre

Profile Number

25240

Location

Pukekohe

Service type

Education and care service

Number licensed for

48 children, including up to 10 aged under 2

Percentage of qualified teachers

100%

Service roll

56

Review team on site

March 2023

Date of this report

19 May 2023

Most recent ERO report(s)

Akanuku | Assurance Review, May 2021; Education Review, June 201

General Information about Assurance Reviews

All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include the Licensing Criteria for Education and Care Services 2008.

Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a licence to operate.

ERO undertakes an Akanuku | Assurance Review process in any centre-based service:

  • having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation

  • previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development’

  • that has moved from a provisional to a full licence

  • that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership

  • where an Akanuku | Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum

  • premises and facilities

  • health and safety practices

  • governance, management and administration.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulatory standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; safety checking; teacher certification; ratios)

  • relevant evacuation procedures and practices.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:

  • discussions with those involved in the service

  • consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems

  • observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice.

Pukekohe High School Childcare Centre

ERO’s Akanuku | Assurance Review reports provide information about whether a service meets and maintains regulatory standards. Further information about Akanuku | Assurance Reviews is included at the end of this report.

ERO’s Judgement

Regulatory standards

ERO’s judgement

Curriculum

Meeting

Premises and facilities

Not meeting

Health and safety

Not meeting

Governance, management and administration

Meeting

At the time of the review, ERO identified non-compliance with regulatory standards that must be addressed.

Background

Pukekohe High School Childcare Centre is located adjacent to Pukekohe High School. It is a community-based service with a committee of parent volunteers who provide governance support. The centre manager and supervisor lead a team of eight qualified, two unqualified and two teachers in-training, in three age-based areas.

Summary of Review Findings

Infants, toddlers and young children experience meaningful, positive interactions that nurture reciprocal relationships. Aspects of the curriculum support children to be competent and confident learners. Teachers support children’s developing social competence. Parents and whānau are provided with opportunities to contribute to the development of the service’s policies and philosophies. The design and layout of the premises support the provision of different types of indoor and outdoor experiences appropriate to the ages and abilities of children attending. 

The service is not meeting regulatory standards in some areas.

Actions for Compliance

ERO found areas of non-compliance in the service relating to:

  • conforming to the Building Act by holding a current Code of Compliance Certificate issued under Section 95 of the Building Act 2004 for building work undertaken
  • ensuring daily checks to equipment, premises and facilities for hazards to children include, as a minimum, all items listed in the licensing criteria.

[Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Centres 2008, PF3, HS12]

Since the onsite visit the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed the following non-compliances:

  • consistently recording parental acknowledgement that medicine has been administered for category (ii) medication (HS28)
  • ensuring all food provided by the service is prepared in accordance with Ministry of Health: Reducing food-related choking for babies and young children at early learning services (HS19)
  • keeping records of all food served during the service’s hours of operation, for at least three months (HS19)
  • ensuring furniture intended for children to sleep on, that will be used by more than one child, are securely covered with a non-porous material that protects them from being soiled (PF30)
  • ensuring equipment that could fall or topple and cause serious injury are secured (HS6)
  • ensuring that when children leave the premises on regular excursions that records of the excursion are fully documented (HS17).

Recommendation to Ministry of Education

ERO recommends the Ministry follows up with the service provider to ensure that non-compliances identified in this report are addressed promptly.

Next ERO Review

The next ERO review will be in consultation with the Ministry of Education.

Phil Cowie
Director Review and Improvement Services
Central Region | Te Tai Pūtahi Nui

6 May 2021 

Information About the Service

Early Childhood Service Name Pukekohe High School Childcare Centre
Profile Number 25240
Location Pukekohe

Service type

Education and care service

Number licensed for

48 children, including up to 10 aged under 2.

Percentage of qualified teachers

80%+

Service roll

50

Ethnic composition

Māori 9, NZ European/Pākehā 31, other European 5, Other ethnic groups 5.

Review team on site

March 2021

Date of this report

6 May 2021

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review, June 2016; Education Review, November 2012.

General Information about Assurance Reviews

All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include the Licensing Criteria for Education and Care Services 2008.

Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a licence to operate.

ERO undertakes an Akanuku | Assurance Review process in any centre-based service:

  • having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation
  • previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development’
  • that has moved from a provisional to a full licence
  • that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership
  • where an Akanuku | Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulated standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher certification; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:

  • discussions with those involved in the service
  • consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems
  • observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice.

Pukekohe High School Childcare Centre - 01/06/2016

1 Evaluation of Pukekohe High School Childcare Centre

How well placed is Pukekohe High School Childcare Centre to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Pukekohe High School Childcare Centre is a well-established service. It serves the wider community to provide education and care for up to 33 children, including eight up to the age of two. While there is a separate area for infants and toddlers, they frequently mix with older children. Over 60 percent of the children are Pākehā, 15 percent are Māori and 15 percent are from other cultures, including African, Asian and other European cultures.

The centre is governed by the committee of an incorporated society. The manager and centre leaders share responsibility for the day-to-day routines and programmes. The teaching team is made up of long serving and new teachers, all of whom are qualified and registered.

The centre philosophy places importance on nurturing children's individual learning and promoting a strong sense of self. It also promotes a strong focus on partnerships with parents and whānau. The centre is well maintained. Leaders identify challenges in extending the outdoor play area and incorporating more information and communication technologies into daily programmes.

The centre has a history of positive ERO reports. A well implemented action plan aligned to the strategic plan helped the committee and centre leaders respond positively to the areas for development in the 2012 report.

The Review Findings

Children show a strong sense of responsibility as they play. They work collaboratively with their peers at different activities that challenge their thinking. They take learning risks, solve problems and hold sustained conversations as they explore new and old ideas. They have lots of fun and enjoy each other's company.

Infants and toddlers are cared for very well. Teachers help children to reach their developmental milestones and explore their environment. Children respond to the warm affectionate approaches of the teachers. The calm and gentle environment provides security for the children who discover new interests each day.

Teachers unobtrusively monitor children as they enjoy many different activities and learning tasks. They support children as they make decisions and pose questions to extend learning in the play roles that the children adopt. Teachers promote positive behaviour with children and encourage them with calmness and care.

The relationships between children and teachers are rich with experiences. Early literacy and numeracy are strategically interwoven in the context of play and into the conversations that teachers have with children. This meaningful learning supports children to develop strong social skills and prepare for their future learning in schools.

Relationships between teachers and parents are a strength of the centre. Parents have a strong voice in the centre and they hold the teachers in high regard. They share aspirations for their children with teachers who write very good learning stories about children at play. Parents know teachers have strong trusting relationships with their children, who are becoming more confident to manage complex situations independently.

Bicultural Aotearoa New Zealand and the diversity of the community are strongly reflected in the learning programmes. Children get along well with each other and share their cultures. Teachers use te reo Māori as part of daily routines and children take home games and songs with cultural themes to share with their families. The role of tuakana/teina is valued in the centre with children moving freely between rooms to connect with older and younger siblings and friends.

The centre manager is very experienced and promotes shared leadership within her team. She oversees the cycle to review systems and strategies, and the rigorous appraisal policy and process that supports teacher accountability. The parent committee supports professional learning opportunities for staff development and is proactive in promoting the centre in the local community.

Key Next Steps

In order to build on their very good practices, centre leaders agree they could consider:

  • documenting their self review to provide ongoing points of reference for continual improvement
  • further developing their SMARTgoals to reflect progress over time.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Pukekohe High School Childcare Centre completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum

  • premises and facilities

  • health and safety practices

  • governance, management and administration. 

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Pukekohe High School Childcare Centre will be in four years.

Graham Randell

Deputy Chief Review Officer Northern

1 June 2016 

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning. 

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service 

Location

Pukekohe

Ministry of Education profile number

25240

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

33 children, including up to 8 aged under 2

Service roll

47

Gender composition

Boys 23 Girls 24

Ethnic composition

Māori
Pākehā
Indian
other European
other

8
30
3
4
2

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%+

Based on funding rates

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

1:4

Meets minimum requirements

Over 2

1:5

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

February 2016

Date of this report

1 June 2016

Most recent ERO report(s)

 

Education Review

November 2012

Education Review

August 2009

Education Review

September 2006

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.