Rakaia Little Learners Preschool

Education institution number:
70168
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
74
Telephone:
Address:

52 Dunford Street, Rakaia

View on map

Rakaia Little Learners Preschool

ERO’s Akanuku | Assurance Review reports provide information about whether a service meets and maintains regulatory standards. Further information about Akanuku | Assurance Reviews is included at the end of this report.

ERO’s Judgement

Regulatory standards

ERO’s judgement

Curriculum

Meeting

Premises and facilities

Meeting

Health and safety

Meeting

Governance, management and administration

Meeting

At the time of the review, ERO found the service was taking reasonable steps to meet the regulatory standards.

Background

Rakaia Little Learners Preschool, formerly Rakaia Childcare & Preschool Ltd, is a small, rural centre. Most staff, including the owner, are qualified early childhood teachers. A significant number of Māori children and those from Pacific heritages attend. Since the June 2018 ERO report, there has been very good progress towards addressing the key next steps in relation to assessment, planning and evaluation, strategic planning and internal evaluation.

Summary of Review Findings

The service’s curriculum is based on Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum. It acknowledges and reflects the unique place of Māori as tangata whenua. Leaders and teachers engage in meaningful, positive interactions to assist children’s learning and to nurture reciprocal relationships. The curriculum is informed by assessment, planning, and evaluation that demonstrates an understanding of children’s learning, interests, and their whānau contexts.

The design and layout of the premises provides quiet places, areas for physically active play, and a range of individual and group learning experiences. A philosophy and annual plan guide the service’s operation. Ongoing processes of self-review and internal evaluation help to maintain and improve the quality of education and care.

Next Steps

Next steps include:

  • refining the assessment, planning and evaluation processes, to more clearly show how the aspirations held by parents and whānau are used, and to consider the length of time taken for an individual child’s documented learning cycle

  • finding ways for individual children to independently revisit their learning and progress over time while at the centre.

Next ERO Review

The next ERO review is likely to be an Akarangi | Quality Evaluation.

Patricia Davey
Director of Early Childhood Education (ECE)

15 June 2023

Information About the Service

Early Childhood Service Name

Rakaia Little Learners Preschool

Profile Number

70168

Location

Rakaia

Service type

Education and care service

Number licensed for

50 children, including up to 11 aged under 2

Percentage of qualified teachers

80-99%

Service roll

77

Review team on site

April 2023

Date of this report

15 June 2023

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education review, June 2018; Education review, November 2014.

General Information about Assurance Reviews

All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include the Licensing Criteria for Education and Care Services 2008.

Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a licence to operate.

ERO undertakes an Akanuku | Assurance Review process in any centre-based service:

  • having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation

  • previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development’

  • that has moved from a provisional to a full licence

  • that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership

  • where an Akanuku | Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum

  • premises and facilities

  • health and safety practices

  • governance, management and administration.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulatory standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; safety checking; teacher certification; ratios)

  • relevant evacuation procedures and practices.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:

  • discussions with those involved in the service

  • consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems

  • observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice.

Rakaia Childcare & Preschool Ltd - 20/06/2018

1 Evaluation of Rakaia Childcare & Preschool Ltd

How well placed is Rakaia Childcare & Preschool Ltd to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

Rakaia Childcare and Preschool is well placed to promote positive learning outcomes for children.

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Rakaia Childcare and Preschool is a small, rural service providing care and education for up to 25 children, five of whom can be under two years old. The infants and toddlers, and the preschool children each have separate indoor and outdoor areas.

The owner has two centres, this one in Rakaia and another in Dunsandel. A centre manager and curriculum leader are employed at this centre. The teaching staff are qualified early childhood teachers or training to become qualified. As at the time of the last ERO review in 2014, there have been ongoing changes in staffing.

The previous ERO review identified significant areas for development. Considerable progress has been made in improving assessment, planning and evaluation for individual children. Progress has been made in increasing the range of teaching practices that teachers use, developing strategic planning and improving the staff appraisal processes. While changes have been made to the indoor environment it still needs further work to provide effectively for the learning and developmental needs of all children.

The Review Findings

The centre's vision, mission and values provide clear direction and are very evident in the programme, especially in the areas of bicultural inclusion, positive and supportive relationships and sustainability practices.

Children and families have many opportunities to participate in, share their knowledge of, and learn te reo and tikanga Māori. Leaders and kaiako (teachers) are strongly committed to continuing to increase their knowledge of Māori language and culture, and embedding it into all aspects of centre operations. Some kaiako naturally use te reo Māori in their conversations with children. They also ensure waiata, karakia and Māori values are positively integrated into the daily programme. Children are well supported to know the local history and role of Māori in their area. The number of children who identify as Māori is increasing. Māori children show pride in their bicultural heritage.

Infants, toddlers and preschool children enjoy nurturing and respectful relationships with their kaiako. Manaakitanga (caring) and aroha are clearly evident in the ways older children play and learn together, and support younger children in their play and learning.

Leaders and kaiako actively seek to involve the local community in the centre's curriculum and children's learning. Community ideals for sustainable practices have been adopted by the centre. Children enjoy regular excursions into the community and visits to the centre by community members. Children have a good knowledge and understanding of their local community.

Children are well supported by their kaiako to be self-managing and independent learners. They are actively encouraged to lead their learning, make decisions and take increasing responsibility for their behaviour. Kaiako effectively use a range of strategies to extend children's learning, help them to problem solve and work co-operatively with other children.

Leaders and kaiako have established meaningful learning partnerships with parents and whānau. They actively seek parent aspirations for their children and involve them in goal setting and evaluating their children's progress in achieving these goals. Technologies are well used to keep parents and whānau informed about centre events and their children's involvement in the curriculum.

Assessment and planning for individual children is well developed and used to support children's learning, progress and achievement. Strong links between home and centre learning are evident. Kaiako make effective use of children's interests and their knowledge of each child to plan for and extend learning in ways that are meaningful for the child. Carefully constructed evaluations of learning and progress identify the effectiveness of teaching and use of the learning environment.

Key Next Steps

Centre leaders and ERO agree that internal evaluation is a significant area for improvement. Leaders and kaiako need to develop more indepth understanding of evaluation processes, and particularly:

  • the use of an evaluative question to begin the evaluation

  • developing measurable indicators

  • using information gathered to develop and implement action plans

  • using the indicators to evaluate outcomes for children's learning and wellbeing.

Centre leaders and ERO also agree that to continue to improve the quality and consistency of learning and teaching, and outcomes for children, leaders and kaiako need to:

  • review small group planning, implementation and evaluation to ensure it complements planning, assessment and evaluation practices for individual children and is consistent with the principles of Te Whāriki 2017

  • improve the implementation, monitoring and evaluation of strategic goals by developing annual plans that include clear criteria, specific actions and timelines to regularly review processes and the impact on outcomes

  • continue to improve the indoor environment, including developing long-term plans based on recent research and professional development, and evaluating the outcomes against the centre's vision, mission and values for learning and wellbeing.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Rakaia Childcare & Preschool Ltd completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

ERO recommends that the service provider seeks clarification from the Ministry of Education (MoE) on the interpretation of the requirement for monitoring sleeping children to ensure centre practices are compliant with the regulation that sleeping children are to be checked for warmth, breathing and general wellbeing at least every 5-10 minutes.

Since the onsite stage of the review, the centre has contacted the MoE for further clarification.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Rakaia Childcare & Preschool Ltd will be in three years.

Dr Lesley Patterson

Deputy Chief Review Officer

Te Waipounamu - Southern Region

20 June 2018

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Rakaia Mid Canterbury

Ministry of Education profile number

70168

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

25 children, including up to 5 aged under 2

Service roll

41

Gender composition

Boys 21 ; Girls 20

Ethnic composition

Māori

Pākehā

Pacific

Other ethnicities

13

19

2

7

Percentage of qualified teachers

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

1:5

Meets requirements

Over 2

1:10

Meets minimum requirements

Review team on site

May 2018

Date of this report

20 June 2018

Most recent ERO reports

Education review

Education review

November 2014

February 2012

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.