Riversdale Playcentre

Education institution number:
90017
Service type:
Playcentre
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
9
Telephone:
Address:

Newcastle Street, Riversdale

View on map

Riversdale Playcentre - 06/05/2019

1 Evaluation of Riversdale Playcentre

How well placed is Riversdale Playcentre to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

Riversdale Playcentre is well placed to promote positive learning outcomes for children.

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Riversdale Playcentre is one of 47 playcentres in the recently-formed South Island Southern Region (SISR) hub. The SISR is part of the New Zealand Playcentre Federation (NZPF). The playcentre organisation is nearing the end of an extensive restructure and review. From 2019, playcentres will be part of a national group known as Playcentre Aotearoa.

Riversdale Playcentre is a rural playcentre open for two morning sessions for children from birth-to-school age. Most parents attend with their children. The sessions are led by a paid educator with the support of designated parent help. At the time of this review, the playcentre was transitioning to a new educator in term two following the retirement of a long-serving educator. A centre support worker from the SISR visits regularly. A number of the parents are participating in the playcentre adult education training programme.

ERO's 2017 review found significant areas requiring further development and some aspects of non-compliance. Areas to improve included:

  • assessment for learning

  • adult engagement with children and their learning

  • internal evaluation

  • educational success for Māori

  • systems for the effective operation of the playcentre.

The playcentre, with the support of the SISR and external providers, has made very good progress in addressing all of these areas. There have also been improvements to the indoor and outdoor areas. All of the non-compliance actions have been addressed.

The Review Findings

There is a strong sense of whakawhanaungatanga in the playcentre. This is evident in the positive culture and welcoming environment for children and their families. Parents' aspirations are for their children to be successful learners at Riversdale Playcentre. Together they have developed clear guiding statements which reflect this aspiration and their commitment to the bicultural heritage of Aotearoa New Zealand.

Children are settled and show a sense of belonging. They play and learn in well-resourced indoor and outdoor environments. The wide range of experiences and resources provide them with choice and challenge. Many of the resources and activities reflect the lives and interests of rural children, and enable them to make meaningful connections to the community. The child-led programme allows them to follow their interests.

The playcentre is building bicultural practice and te reo Māori. This is helping Māori children to know their heritage is valued.

Infants and toddlers benefit from being with their parents during the sessions and from the tuakana-teina relationships in the mixed-age setting. They are able to successfully participate in all the activities and also make use of the dedicated area with resources especially designed for younger children.

Parents have become more involved in supporting their own and other children's learning in the sessions. They are encouraged to share their strengths and ideas and are becoming more confident in setting goals and developing plans for their children's learning. New systems for planning, assessment and evaluation are helping parents develop an understanding of Te Whāriki, the NZ Early Childhood Curriculum, and to set goals for their children's learning.

Parents have improved their use of internal evaluation to review aspects of the playcentre operation and programme. This has been aligned to the strategic plan and has led to some positive improvements. The parents work well together to ensure the smooth running of the service.

Key Next Steps

The parents and leaders at the playcentre agree that their next steps are to embed new systems and ensure that the positive changes are maintained. This includes continuing to:

  • refine aspects of planning, assessment and evaluation by focusing more on the intended learning

  • build parent involvement in the playcentre organisation, education and in the assessment, planning and evaluation of children's learning

  • review and evaluate the playcentre's annual and strategic goals and keep these to the fore, particularly with changes in centre personnel.

Governance

NZPF have developed and are implementing a clear national and regional management structure. Some of the new roles have had a very positive impact at centre level, with parent council members valuing the increased support they receive.

Of particular significance are:

  • the centre administrator role which provides sound monitoring of health, safety and compliance

  • the centre support worker who visits regularly to share best practice and monitor the quality of learning and teaching

  • the role of a facilitator, available at every session, to role model good practice and empower parents to implement effective early childhood education for their children.

The next steps for the SISR are to:

  • refine and embed the new NZPF structure, systems and processes, including monitoring and lines of reporting

  • continue to develop and strengthen the NZPF and individual playcentre internal evaluation processes and practices.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Riversdale Playcentre completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Alan Wynyard

Director Review and Improvement Services Southern

Southern Region

6 May 2019

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Riversdale, Southland

Ministry of Education profile number

90017

Licence type

Playcentre

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

30 children, including up to 10 aged under 2

Service roll

29

Gender composition

Boys 17, Girls 12

Ethnic composition

Māori
NZ European/Pākehā
Other ethnicities

3
25
1

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49%

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

1:1

Better than minimum requirements

Over 2

1:5

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

February 2019

Date of this report

6 May 2019

Most recent ERO reports

Education Review

April 2017

Education Review

September 2013

Education Review

November 2010

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement

The overall judgement that ERO makes will depend on how well the service promotes positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed

  • Well placed

  • Requires further development

  • Not well placed

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.

Riversdale Playcentre - 05/04/2017

1 Evaluation of Riversdale Playcentre

How well placed is Riversdale Playcentre to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

Further support and development to strengthen service provision is required. Members should continue to build their understanding and implementation of effective and responsive curriculum delivery, self review and evaluation for ongoing improvement.

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Riversdale Playcentre is parent led and provides three sessions each week, for 30 children up to school age. Sessions are led by an experienced, paid educator with the help of members.

The Southland Playcentre Association (SPA) is experiencing a time of change as all playcentre associations throughout New Zealand merge with the New Zealand Playcentre Federation (NZPF) to reduce duplication and make cost savings. This restructure will mean significant changes at the local association level. An interim board has been established at SPA to support playcentres through this transitional period.

The parents and educator have made some progress in addressing the recommendations of the September 2013 ERO report. These included, improving provision for infants and toddlers, strategic planning and self review.

This review was part of a cluster of 13 in the Southland Playcentre Association.

The Review Findings

Riversdale Playcentre's philosophy highlights the rural farming community focus. This is actively promoted in the centre in a variety of ways and is the basis for a range of activities in which children to participate.

Planning discussions provide some direction for the day's programme and are generally based on children’s interests. Strengthening the recording of how children's interests are responded to should better support understanding and continuity of learning over time. 

Learning goals are established by parents for each child. Members identify the achievement of these goals in the child's learning portfolio. Further developing the understanding of assessment for learning should better guide an individualised approach that is responsive to the child’s emerging interests. Effective evaluation of the individual goals and approach taken, needs to be consistently carried out to inform session planning. This is an expectation of SPA.

Group planning for centre experiences provides a shared direction for the term and is often theme based. The planning process needs to be strengthened to give wider consideration to implementing programme effectively. This should also better support review and evaluation.

A wide range of learning experiences are provided for children. They engage in sustained play. The programme for groups and individuals is educator led. At times children have restricted access to the outdoor environment. They have some time available to self-initiate play. Building an understanding of how to effectively work alongside children during free play, should further promote:

  • children's independence and decision making skills

  • extended learning opportunities

  • a responsive curriculum, based on children's individual strengths, interests and needs.

Toddlers play alongside their peers in all aspects of the environment. Since the previous ERO review the centre has explored and refreshed the range of equipment available for infants and toddlers.

The playcentre has continued to build their understanding of bicultural practice. Members have identified this as an ongoing area for improvement. ERO's evaluation affirms this and revisiting the SPA expectations for practice is a starting point.

Consideration needs to be given to what the centre is doing to support and promote educational success for Māori children.

Parents meet regularly to discuss the operation of the playcentre. Strengthening systems to monitor that policies, procedures and SPA expectations are consistently followed, should enable more effective leadership.

There is an informal approach to self review. The New Zealand Playcentre Federation framework was introduced to this centre in February 2017. Developing a shared understanding of, and formally implementing, effective review and evaluation to better guide centre improvement, is a key next step.

The board has been proactive in developing processes to assist in the smooth transition for playcentres to work under the NZPF. Opportunities have been offered to playcentre members to engage with the SPA to consider how the board could best provide support to services through the impending restructure.

The board has identified a number of systems and processes have lapsed and need improvement. Immediate attention is required to review policies that guide the appointments procedure and health and safety practices. The appraisal process has also lapsed or not been robustly implemented. These improvements are a priority to meet licensing criteria and for monitoring the quality of centre practices.

More consistent, timely and evaluative reporting should be provided to the board to assure them that accountabilities are met and to better inform their decision making.

Key Next Steps

The playcentre educator and members agree areas for strengthening include:

  • understanding of assessment for learning

  • effectively working alongside children

  • supporting and promoting educational success for Māori children

  • strengthening systems to monitor that policies, procedures and SPA expectations are consistently followed

  • effective review and evaluation to better guide centre improvement.

Key next steps for the association are to:

  • review SPA policies, giving priority to those related to appointments and health and safety practices

  • re-establish the appraisal process

  • facilitate the evaluative reporting to the board.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Riversdale Playcentre completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to: 

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration. 

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements 

Actions for compliance

ERO identified areas of non-compliance relating to excursions. To meet requirements the service needs to improve its performance in the following areas:

  • specific assessment and management of risk for special excursions. [Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Centres 2008, HS17]

ERO also identified areas of non-compliance for the Southland Playcentre Association in relation to governance and management. To meet requirements the association needs to:

  • implement a system of regular appraisal. [Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Centres 2008, GMA7]

To improve practice the Southland Playcentre Association should:

  • ensure policies and procedures for travel by a motor vehicle clearly specify the person responsible for excursion approvals, has verified all drivers have a current full New Zealand driver licence and each vehicle is registered and has a current warrant of fitness.

Recommendation

ERO recommends that the service consult with the Ministry of Education and plan to address the key next steps and actions outlined in this report. 

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Riversdale Playcentre will be within two years.

Joyce Gebbie

Deputy Chief Review Officer Central

5 April 2017 

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service 

Location

Riversdale, Southland

Ministry of Education profile number

90017

Licence type

Playcentre

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

30 children, including up to 10 aged under 2

Service roll

22

Gender composition

Boys 14, Girls 8

Ethnic composition

Māori

Pākehā

3

19

Reported ratios of adults to children

Under 2

1:1

Better than minimum requirements

Over 2

1:5

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

February 2017

Date of this report

5 April 2017

Most recent ERO report(s)

 

Education Review

September 2013

Education Review

November 2010

Education Review

May 2006

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.