Small Oaks Early Learning Centre

Education institution number:
25248
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
25
Telephone:
Address:

1/25 Maich Road, Manurewa, Auckland

View on map

Small Oaks Early Learning Centre

1 ERO’s Judgements

Akarangi | Quality Evaluation evaluates the extent to which this early childhood service has the learning and organisational conditions to support equitable and excellent outcomes for all learners. Te Ara Poutama- indicators of quality for early childhood education: what matters most (PDF 3.01MB) are the basis for making judgements about the effectiveness of the service in achieving equity and excellence for all learners. The Akarangi Quality Evaluation Judgement Rubric (PDF 91.30KB) derived from the indicators, is used to inform the ERO’s judgements about this service’s performance in promoting equity and excellence.

ERO’s judgements for Small Oaks Early Learning Centre are as follows:

Outcome Indicators

ERO’s judgement

What the service knows about outcomes for learners

Whakaū Embedding

Ngā Akatoro Domains

ERO’s judgement

He Whāriki Motuhake

The learner and their learning

Whakaū Embedding

Whakangungu Ngaio

Collaborative professional learning builds knowledge and capability

Whakaū Embedding

Ngā Aronga Whai Hua

Evaluation for improvement

Whakaū Embedding

Kaihautū

Leaders foster collaboration and improvement

Whakaū Embedding

Te Whakaruruhau

Stewardship through effective governance and management

Whakaū Embedding

2 Context of the Service

Small Oaks Early Learning Centre is a well-established service providing education and care for up to 25 children in a mixed-age setting. An experienced owner, who is a qualified teacher, leads a team of three qualified teachers and a teacher in training. Half of the children enrolled are Māori.

3 Summary of findings

Children engage in sustained periods of self-directed play. They interact in caring and respectful ways with teachers and other children. Centre routines and the well-designed learning environments allow time and space for children to explore and investigate. Teachers’ conversations with children support their participation as capable learners in the curriculum.

Teachers plan and enact a rich, culturally responsive curriculum, that is informed by children’s interests and strengths, and by parent aspirations for their child’s learning. Parents and whānau have developed positive relationships with teachers.

A high level of relational trust results in effective collaboration amongst the teaching team. Teachers’ individual strengths contribute to building the collective knowledge and capability of the whole team. Teachers are continuing to embed effective bicultural practices to enrich the curriculum experiences provided for children.

Regular and ongoing self-review reflects what is meaningful and relevant to children, families, teachers, and the local community. This is leading to improved professional practice and supports positive outcomes for children, parents and whānau.

Effective governance and management systems are well established and support the service’s strategic direction and vision. Regular review of these systems ensure they remain meaningful and reflective of the service’s philosophy and values.

4 Improvement actions

Small Oaks Early Learning Centre will include the following actions in its Quality Improvement Planning:

  • For leaders and teachers to evaluate how effectively the curriculum, teaching practices and systems impact on improved learning outcomes for children.

5 Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Small Oaks Early Learning Centre completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Phil Cowie
Acting Director Review and Improvement Services (Northern)
Northern Region | Te Tai Raki

24 September 2021 

6 About the Early Childhood Service

Early Childhood Service Name

Small Oaks Early Learning Centre

Profile Number

25248

Location

Manurewa, Auckland

Service type

Education and care service

Number licensed for

25 children, including up to 5 aged under 2

Percentage of qualified teachers

80%+

Service roll

32

Ethnic composition

Māori 15, NZ European/Pākehā 12, other ethnic groups 5

Review team on site

May 2021

Date of this report

24 September 2021

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review, November 2017; Education Review, March 2014

Small Oaks Early Learning Centre - 02/11/2017

1 Evaluation of Small Oaks Early Learning Centre

How well placed is Small Oaks Early Learning Centre to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Small Oaks Early Learning Centre provides education and care for children up to school age, in a renovated villa in Manurewa. It is licenced for 25 children, including four under two years of age. The indoor layout of the centre allows for mixed-age grouping. There is a separate play room for infants and toddlers if they require it for uninterrupted play.

The centre has changed ownership since the 2014 ERO review. The centre owner/manager oversees centre operations. She is also the curriculum leader and guides staff in providing learning programmes for children. A cook provides meals for children. The manager and two other staff are registered teachers.

The centre serves many Māori families and a culturally diverse community. Teachers reflect this diversity. The roll has been increasing. There is good support for children with special learning needs.

The centre’s philosophy places a strong emphasis on children being socially competent, and values the children's home languages and cultural identity. The philosophy reflects Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum, and recognises the dual cultural heritages of Aotearoa New Zealand.

The Review Findings

Children are provided with an environment that is welcoming, caring and accepting of their diversity. Effective and inclusive teaching practices affirm and build on the strengths that children bring to their play. Children are confident, socially competent and well supported to be independent. They are keen learners and engage well in the range of activities teachers provide. Children are given the space to initiate their own play and to have conversations with each other.

Teachers support children’s learning and development by providing a play-based curriculum that engages them. The atmosphere is unhurried and calm, allowing children the time to explore their environment. Attractive, well defined areas of play contribute to children’s engagement in the programme. Children’s work is valued and displayed on the walls. Children explore literacy, mathematics, technology and science through the learning experiences teachers provide.

Children with Māori and Pacific heritages learn about and can see their cultures reflected and valued in the programme. The programme celebrates the bicultural heritage of Aotearoa New Zealand and shows respect for Māori as tangata whenua.

The programme for infants and toddlers is well suited to their needs. There is a good flow between indoor and outdoor areas enabling children to explore and persist with challenges in their play. A flexible and relaxed tone is evident in the mixed age group programme. Teachers' responsive caregiving supports infants’ need for secure attachments.

Teachers' internal evaluation is focused on exploring ways to strengthen the curriculum, understanding infant and toddler care and development, and becoming more knowledgeable about children's diverse cultural backgrounds. Continued professional learning about the younger age group is something teachers know would strengthen their practices and programmes.

Teachers are committed to promoting smooth transitions to school for all children, in particular for children with diverse learning needs. The centre manager has established strong relationships with schools that these children will attend and will work with parents closely to ensure transitions are seamless.

Teachers’ respectful relationships with children and their whānau are a strength of the centre. They are developing ways that could build parent/whānau contributions to the centre’s programme. They use collaborative leadership processes well. Teachers encourage and support parents and whānau and children to take on leadership roles and responsibilities in the programme.

Parents who spoke to ERO, appreciate that teachers help them to understand how children learn through play and build positive relationships in the community. The manager and teachers are proactive in encouraging families to participate in their children's learning experiences. Partnerships between teachers, children and their whānau are positive and give each child and their family a strong sense of belonging.

Strong professional leadership enables the centre to maintain its focus on providing good governance and quality early childhood education and care. Positive working relationships, mentoring and collaboration between the manager and staff help to create a culture of trust and respect.

Key Next Steps

The centre is well placed to continue building on improvements made since the change of ownership. Key next steps for centre development include:

  • increasing the extent to which children's portfolios reflect their cultural identity, and parents' desired outcomes for their children

  • continuing to deepen the analysis of children's assessment information to enhance teachers' planning for extending children's learning.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Small Oaks Early Learning Centre completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Small Oaks Early Learning Centre will be in three years.

Graham Randell

Deputy Chief Review Officer Northern

Te Tai Raki - Northern Region

2 November 2017

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Manurewa, Auckland

Ministry of Education profile number

25248

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

25 children, including up to 4 aged under 2

Service roll

32

Gender composition

Boys 17 Girls 15

Ethnic composition

Māori
Pākehā
Samoan
other Ethnicities

16
7
4
5

Percentage of qualified teachers

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

1:4

Better than minimum requirements

Over 2

1:8

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

August 2017

Date of this report

2 November 2017

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

March 2014

Education Review

November 2012

Education Review

June 2009

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.