St Mary's School (Carterton)

St Mary’s School (Carterton)

Te Ara Huarau | School Profile Report

Background

This Profile Report was written within 18 months of the Education Review Office and St Mary’s School (Carterton) working in Te Ara Huarau, an improvement evaluation approach used in most English Medium State and State Integrated Schools. For more information about Te Ara Huarau see ERO’s website. www.ero.govt.nz

Context 

St Mary’s School Carterton is a Catholic character school that caters for students in Years 0 to 8.

St Mary’s School (Carterton)’s strategic priorities for improving outcomes for learners are:

  • continuous improvement in literacy and mathematics

  • to strengthen awareness and understanding of the Catholic faith

  • to actively engage student and their families in their learning journeys.

You can find a copy of the school’s strategic and annual plan on St Mary’s School (Carterton)’s website.

ERO and the school are working together to evaluate how effectively teachers are actively engaging students and their whānau in their learning journeys

The rationale for selecting this evaluation is:

  • to ensure that all students and their whānau have the opportunity to contribute to their learning journeys

  • to ensure equitable and excellent outcomes for all students.

The school expects to see that student and whānau voices are heard with respect and aroha; and that community partnerships support improved learning outcomes

Strengths

The school can draw from the following strengths to support the school in its goal to have students and their whānau positively engaged in their learning journeys

  • leadership that keeps a strong focus on priority learners

  • a committed staff who know the community well

  • values that are well known and enacted

Where to next?

Moving forward, the school will prioritise:

  • focusing on the effective teaching of writing in order to engage students and improve their outcomes

  • enhancing student wellbeing and engagement through developing their understanding of how to care for themselves and others.

ERO’s role will be to support the school in its evaluation for improvement cycle to improve outcomes for all learners. ERO will support the school in reporting their progress to the community. The next public report on ERO’s website will be a Te Ara Huarau | School Evaluation Report and is due within three years.

Dr Lesley Patterson
Director Review and Improvement Services (Southern)
Southern Region | Te Tai Tini

7 November 2022 

About the School

The Education Counts website provides further information about the school’s student population, student engagement and student achievement.  educationcounts.govt.nz/home

St Mary’s School (Carterton)

Board Assurance with Regulatory and Legislative Requirements Report 2021 to 2024

As of October 2021, the St Mary’s School (Carterton) , School Board has attested to the following regulatory and legislative requirements:

Board Administration

Yes

Curriculum

Yes

Management of Health, Safety and Welfare

Yes

Personnel Management

Yes

Finance

Yes

Assets

Yes

Further Information

For further information please contact St Mary’s School (Carterton), School Board.

The next School Board assurance that it is meeting regulatory and legislative requirements will be reported, along with the Te Ara Huarau | School Evaluation Report, within three years.

Information on ERO’s role and process in this review can be found on the Education Review Office website.

Dr Lesley Patterson
Director Review and Improvement Services (Southern)
Southern Region | Te Tai Tini

7 November 2022 

About the School

The Education Counts website provides further information about the school’s student population, student engagement and student achievement. educationcounts.govt.nz/home

St Mary's School (Carterton) - 08/08/2017

Summary

St Mary’s School, Carterton, caters for 135 students in Years 1 to 8. Five students identify as Māori. Over the past three years there has been a 95% roll increase. In June this year the school celebrated its 100 year jubilee.

The present principal is moving to another position in term three. A new principal is due to take up the position at that time. The present board of trustees is made up of experienced and new members. There is continuity of proprietors’ representatives on the board.

The principal has led the school in responding to the areas for improvement identified in the June 2014 ERO report. Leaders and teachers continue to implement and refine improvements. An appropriate focus on accelerating learning in writing over the past two years continues to reduce the disparity in achievement between girls and boys.

How well is the school achieving equitable outcomes for all children?

School processes contribute to the promotion of equity and excellence. However, these processes are not consistently applied.

At the time of this review the school reports that most students are achieving at or above in relation to the National Standards in reading, writing and mathematics. Teachers are supported to build their capability to accelerate learning for identified students in writing, with some positive results. They agree that extending their new learning to promote achievement for all students in reading and mathematics, as well as writing, is a next step.

The school has capacity and capability to accelerate learning for all children. However, disparity in achievement for some children remains.

The school agrees to:

  • develop more targeted planning to accelerate learning for children
  • monitor targeted planning, improved teaching, and children’s progress
  • discuss the school’s progress with ERO.

ERO is likely to carry out the next review in three years. 

Equity and excellence

How effectively does this school respond to Māori and other children whose learning and achievement need acceleration?

The school continues to develop its response to students whose learning and achievement need acceleration.

Data from 2016, shows that most students achieve at and above National Standards expectations in reading, writing and mathematics. Schoolwide, a greater percentage of boys achieve below the standard in literacy and a greater percentage of girls achieve below the standard in mathematics. Data gathered over time indicates a growing percentage of students achieving at and above National Standards in reading, writing and mathematics.

At the end of 2014, school leaders and teachers appropriately identified that disparity in achievement between boys and girls in writing was an area that needed to be addressed. A literacy intervention was introduced to promote acceleration of learning in writing. Results show that disparity is reducing and that fewer students are below the National Standard in writing. This continuing programme is now being implemented schoolwide.

Teachers work collaboratively to moderate their judgements about student progress and achievement in writing, particularly for target students. A range of assessment tools is used to support their judgements about reading, writing and mathematics. Staff have identified that dependability of decisions would be enhanced through more considered use of data. The current implementation of Progress and Achievement Consistent Tool (PACT) should support this.

School conditions supporting equity and excellence

What school processes are effective in enabling achievement of equity and excellence?

The school continues to develop processes that promote equity and excellence.

The school’s special character and values, ‘aroha, integrity, respect and excellence’, underpin expectations for students about how they learn and act at this school. The valued outcomes are for students to be familiar with what it means to be Catholic, engaged and focused in what they are doing, leading them to be successful learners.

Trustees are proactive in their governance role in supporting the school’s vision and priorities. The board gives priority to resourcing that supports the focus on accelerating progress and learning for students identified in the writing target group.

Positive, reciprocal relationships are highly evident across all levels of the school community. School leaders assist teachers to build their capability and practice. Teachers and leaders continue to develop learning focused relationships with parents.

Across the school there are examples of teachers using effective strategies to engage and extend students in purposeful learning. School appraisal systems and processes are compliant and improvement focused. There is clear alignment to the school’s priority of accelerating writing progress for identified students. 

Staff are collegial and support each other. They have a collective responsibility for all children across the school. There is appropriate priority given in the curriculum to literacy and mathematics and the school’s Catholic special character.

The use of purposeful reflection, inquiry and internal evaluation is becoming part of school practice, as evident in the literacy intervention report.

Sustainable development for equity and excellence

What further developments are needed in school processes to achieve equity and excellence?

The school has processes in place to guide development of practice for equity and excellence. However, these processes are not consistently applied across school operation.

To improve the effectiveness of current processes for equity and excellence for learners, school leaders, teachers and trustees should evaluate and strengthen their implementation of:

  • expectations and models of teaching practice, to build consistency and quality across the school
  • systems for recording, accessing and retrieval of information
  • processes for gathering, tracking and reporting student progress and achievement
  • strategies learnt through the writing focus and how they can be extended to reading and mathematics.

Collaborative curriculum review should include defining how the local curriculum reflects the school’s context and community.

Board assurance on legal requirements

Before the review, the board and principal of the school completed the ERO board assurance statement and self-audit checklists. In these documents they attested that they had taken all reasonable steps to meet their legislative obligations related to the following:

  • board administration

  • curriculum

  • management of health, safety and welfare

  • personnel management

  • asset management. 

During the review, ERO checked the following items because they have a potentially high impact on student safety and wellbeing:

  • emotional safety of students (including prevention of bullying and sexual harassment)

  • physical safety of students

  • teacher registration and certification

  • processes for appointing staff

  • stand down, suspension, expulsion and exclusion of students

  • attendance

  • school policies in relation to meeting the requirements of the Vulnerable Children Act 2014.

Going forward

How well placed is the school to accelerate the achievement of all children who need it?

The school has capacity and capability to accelerate learning for all children. However, disparity in achievement between boys and girls remains.

Leaders and teachers:

  • know the children whose learning and achievement need to be accelerated
  • need to improve the school conditions that support the acceleration of children’s learning and achievement
  • need to build teacher capability to accelerate children’s learning and achievement.

The school agrees to:

  • develop more targeted planning to accelerate learning for children
  • monitor targeted planning, improved teaching, and children’s progress
  • discuss the school’s progress with ERO.

The school has requested that ERO provide them with an internal evaluation workshop.

ERO is likely to carry out the next review in three years.

Alan Wynyard

Deputy Chief Review Officer Central (Acting)

8 August 2017

About the school 

Location

Carterton

Ministry of Education profile number

3013

School type

Full Primary (Years 1 - 8)

School roll

135

Gender composition

Male 55%, Female 45%

Ethnic composition

Māori 4%
Pākehā 88%
Pacific 2%
Other ethnic groups 6%

Provision of Māori medium education

No

Review team on site

May 2017

Date of this report

8 August 2017

Most recent ERO report(s)

Longitudinal Review, June 2014
Education Review, February 2012
Education Review, February 2010