Marian Early Childhood Centre

Education institution number:
10149
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
24
Telephone:
Address:

19A Sunset View Road, Panmure, Auckland

View on map

Marian Early Childhood Centre

ERO’s Akanuku | Assurance Review reports provide information about whether a service meets and maintains regulatory standards. Further information about Akanuku | Assurance Reviews is included at the end of this report.

ERO’s Judgement

Regulatory standards

ERO’s judgement

Curriculum

Meeting

Premises and facilities

Meeting

Health and safety

Meeting

Governance, management and administration

Meeting

Since the onsite visit, the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed non-compliances and is now taking reasonable steps to meet regulatory standards.

Background

Marian Early Childhood Centre is a Catholic service that is part of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Auckland. The service is governed by a management committee. A centre manager leads a team of two qualified and four unqualified teachers. Children come from the ethnically diverse, local community.

Summary of Review Findings

Children’s preferences are respected, and they are involved in decisions about their learning experiences. The curriculum is inclusive, and responsive to children as confident and competent learners. It provides children with a range of experiences and opportunities to enhance and extend their learning and development both indoors and outdoors, individually and in groups.

Adults providing education and care engage in meaningful, positive interactions to enhance children’s learning and nurture reciprocal relationships. A philosophy statement guides operations and expresses the service’s beliefs, values and attitudes.

The service must take all reasonable steps to ensure that appropriate procedures are in place to deal with all health and safety practices.

Key Next Steps

Next steps include:

  • strengthening the extent to which information documented about children’s learning reflects their identity, languages and cultures

  • increasing the opportunities children have to hear and speak te reo Māori in meaningful learning contexts.

Actions for Compliance

During the review, the service provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed the following non-compliances:

  • Evidence of review of the emergency plan on at least an annual basis and implementation of improved practices as required (HS7).

  • Record of emergency drills carried out, and evidence of how evaluation of the drills has informed the annual review of the service’s emergency plan (HS8).

  • A record of excursions that includes evidence of parental permission and approval of adult:child ratios for special excursions (HS17).

  • Evidence of parental permission for any travel by motor vehicle (HS18).

Next ERO Review

The next ERO review is likely to be an Akarangi | Quality Evaluation.

Filivaifale Jason Swann
Director Review and Improvement Services (Northern)
Northern Region | Te Tai Raki

15 August 2022 

Information About the Service

Early Childhood Service Name

Marian Early Childhood Centre

Profile Number

10149

Location

Panmure, Auckland

Service type

Education and care service

Number licensed for

34 children over two years of age

Percentage of qualified teachers

80-99%

Service roll

26

Review team on site

July 2022

Date of this report

15 August 2022

Most recent ERO report(s)

Akanuku | Assurance Review, May 2021
Education Review, September 2016

General Information about Assurance Reviews

All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include the Licensing Criteria for Education and Care Services 2008.

Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a license to operate.

ERO undertakes an Akanuku | Assurance Review process in any centre-based service:

  • having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation

  • previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development’

  • that has moved from a provisional to a full licence

  • that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership

  • where an Akanuku | Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum

  • premises and facilities

  • health and safety practices

  • governance, management and administration.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulated standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher certification; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:

  • discussions with those involved in the service

  • consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems

  • observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice.

Marian Early Childhood Centre

ERO’s Akanuku | Assurance Review reports provide information about whether a service meets and maintains regulatory standards. Further information about Akanuku | Assurance Reviews is included at the end of this report.

ERO’s Judgement

Regulatory standards

ERO’s judgement

Curriculum

Meeting

Premises and facilities

Meeting

Health and safety

Meeting

Governance, management and administration

Not meeting

At the time of the review, ERO identified non-compliance with regulatory standards that must be addressed.

Background

Marian Early Childhood Centre is a Catholic preschool that is part of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Auckland. The service is governed by a management committee. A centre manager leads a team of two qualified and three unqualified teachers. A small number of children are Māori or have Pacific heritages.

Summary of Review Findings

Adults providing education and care engage in meaningful, positive interactions to enhance children’s learning and nurture reciprocal relationships. Positive steps are taken to respect and acknowledge the aspirations held by parents and whānau for their tamariki. The service curriculum acknowledges and reflects the unique place of Maori as tangata whenua and supports the right of each child to be confident in their own culture.

Centre leaders must continue to monitor that all policies and procedures meet the requirements of the licensing criteria and are implemented in the service.

Actions for Compliance

ERO found an area of non-compliance in the service relating to:

  • implementing a system of regular appraisal for all staff

Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Services 2008 GMA7.

Since the onsite visit the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed the following non-compliances:

  • information provided to parents about the amount and details of the expenditure of any Ministry of Education funding received by the service (GMA3)
  • ensuring children’s workers who have access to children are safety checked in accordance with the Children’s Act 2014 (GMA7A)
  • having an annual plan to guide the service’s operation, that identifies who, what, when in relation to key tasks is undertaken each year (GMA8)
  • having a safe and effective means of maintaining a room temperature when the heat pump is turned off to ensure the room is no lower than 16C (PF1),
  • having a means of monitoring that perishable food is kept at a temperature at or below 4⁰C (PF16)
  • providing evidence that a tempering valve or other accurate means of limiting hot water temperature is installed (PF24)
  • ensuring there are suitable facilities provided for sick or soiled children (PF26)
  • identifying a designated area for children who are unwell at the service, to be isolated to reduce the spread of infectious illnesses (PF27)
  • ensuring heavy furniture, fixtures and equipment that could fall or topple over and cause serious injury or damage are secured (HS6)
  • having evidence of an, at least annual review of the emergency plan and emergency supplies and resources not being sufficient for the age and number of children and adults attending the service (HS7)
  • a process to ensure earthquake drills are undertaken and recorded every three months (HS8)
  • ensuring children are checked for warmth, breathing and general wellbeing at least every 5 to 10 minutes (HS9)
  • undertaking daily hazard checks that include all the requirements as listed in the licensing criteria (HS12)
  • analysing accident/incident records to identify hazards and ensuring appropriate action is taken to eliminate, isolate or minimise hazards (HS12)
  • having a means to ensure that water stored in any hot cylinder is kept at a temperature of at least 60⁰C (HS14)
  • documenting evidence that assessment and management of risk is undertaken and evidence of parental permission and approval of adult:child ratios for special excursions, including a person responsible giving approval for the excursion to take place (HS17)
  • monitoring that where food is provided by the service, foods that pose a high choking risk are not to be served unless prepared in accordance with Ministry of Health guidelines (HS22)
  • maintaining records of medication administration that include parental acknowledgement of medicine given to children
  • developing a written child protection policy that meets the requirements of the Children’s Act 2014 (HS31)
  • monitoring that all practicable steps are taken to protect children from exposure to inappropriate material (HS32).

Next ERO Review

The next ERO review will be in consultation with the Ministry of Education.

Steve Tanner
Director Review and Improvement Services (Northern)
Northern Region | Te Tai Raki

12 May 2021 

Information About the Service

Early Childhood Service Name Marian Early Childhood Centre
Profile Number 10149
Location Panmure, Auckland

Service type

Education and care service

Number licensed for

34 children aged over 2 years of age.

Percentage of qualified teachers

80%+

Service roll

30

Ethnic composition

Māori 2
NZ European/Pākehā 5
Filipino 6
Samoan 4
other Pacific 5
other ethnic groups 8

Review team on site

March 2021

Date of this report

12 May 2021

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review, September 2016
Education Review, June 2013

General Information about Assurance Reviews

All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include the Licensing Criteria for Education and Care Services 2008.

Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a licence to operate.

ERO undertakes an Akanuku | Assurance Review process in any centre-based service:

  • having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation
  • previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development’
  • that has moved from a provisional to a full licence
  • that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership
  • where an Akanuku | Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulated standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher certification; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:

  • discussions with those involved in the service
  • consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems
  • observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice.

Marian Early Childhood Centre - 09/09/2016

1 Evaluation of Marian Early Childhood Centre

How well placed is Marian Early Childhood Centre to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Marian Early Childhood Centre provides education and care for 30 children over two years of age in either sessional or full day programmes. It currently has 32 children on the roll.

The centre operates under a Roman Catholic Ecclesiastical Trust and is managed by a committee, which includes the Bishop’s representative, parents and the centre supervisor. The centre’s Catholic character, with virtues and values based on the gospel and the integration of Māori spirituality, are strongly evident in the environment.

Teaching staff reflect the diverse cultures of the community. A longstanding teacher in the centre has been appointed as the new supervisor within the last 12 months. Three fully registered teachers are supported by an unqualified staff member and several student trainees.

ERO’s 2013 report noted the sense of family and community. It suggested improvements were needed in the development of a strategic plan, and reflection on teaching practice. Some good progress has been made. Teachers have further developed individual children’s portfolios. They have further work to do to strengthen the effectiveness of teaching practice, and to develop their roles as teachers in planning, enacting, assessing and evaluative professional practices.

The Review Findings

Children are settled in the inclusive centre environment. They are familiar with routines, develop friendships with peers and have good relationships with their teachers. Children play together happily. Teachers promote interactions among children. They listen to children with warmth and respect. Teachers build respectful relationships and positive partnerships with parents. They focus on developing quality practices to support children's ongoing learning, wellbeing and development.

Children make full use of the learning environment and are confident explorers. The outside play area is spacious and attractively set out. It offers a good range of appropriate and interesting challenges for children to help the growth of their physical skills and confidence. The indoor area has some inviting spaces and displays reflect the Catholic character of the centre. The values of the Catholic faith are inherent in the programme. Aspects of the environment, programme planning and implementation, and interactions amongst staff and children are positively influenced by the beliefs of staff and parents.

Teachers confidently integrate te reo Māori in the programme, especially during mat times. They support each other well to build their confidence and to increase bicultural practices. Teachers incorporate activities, resources and events that reflect Māori contexts.

Children's portfolios contain good records of their participation in the programme. Learning stories are linked to Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum and the CatholicEarly Childhood Curriculum Statement. The supervisor recognises the need to increase parents' contributions in the stories, and to strengthen partnerships with parents focused on supporting their child's learning.

Teachers plan activities from observing children's emerging interests. While this approach helps teachers to provide activities that reflect these interests, it does not yet identify specific teaching strategies or learning goals to extend children's learning. Teachers would benefit from support to strengthen their understanding of their role in extending children's learning and supporting older children to develop critical thinking skills. The centre supervisor recognises that it is now timely to review the effectiveness of curriculum planning.

Teachers are encouraged to reflect on the effectiveness of their practice and to share responsibilities through the centre. Work has begun to introduce a new performance management system. The centre now needs to develop improvement focused processes that build teachers’ evaluative capability and meet Education Council requirements.

The management committee and supervisor have developed processes for formal self review and have used this process to update governance and policies. Long-term strategic and annual plans have been developed.

Key Next Steps

The new supervisor's next task is to review the curriculum and continue to develop teacher capability. He agrees that key next steps alongside such a review include:

  • developing programme planning that identifies specific learning outcomes for children, and teachers' roles in children's learning

  • continuing to build teachers' understanding of assessment and evaluation

  • improving performance management practices to promote leadership and to strengthen the quality of teaching

further developing self-review practices that are evaluative and improvement focused.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Marian Early Childhood Centre completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Marian Early Childhood Centre will be in three years.

Graham Randell

Deputy Chief Review Officer Northern

9 September 2016

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Panmure, Auckland

Ministry of Education profile number

10149

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

30 children over 2 years of age

Service roll

32

Gender composition

Girls 18 Boys 14

Ethnic composition

Māori

Pākehā

Filipino

Tongan

Cook Island

Samoan

others

6

4

9

4

2

2

5

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%+

Based on funding rates

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Over 2

1:8

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

July 2016

Date of this report

9 September 2016

Most recent ERO report(s)

 

Education Review

June 2013

Education Review

June 2010

Education Review

June 2007

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.