Kindercare Learning Centres - Silverdale

Education institution number:
10211
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
86
Telephone:
Address:

71 Hibiscus Coast Highway, Orewa

View on map

Kindercare Learning Centres (16) Hilltop

Here is the latest report for the Governing Organisation that this service is part of.

 

1 Evaluation of Kindercare Learning Centres (16) Hilltop

How well placed is Kindercare Learning Centres (16) Hilltop to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placedRequires further developmentWell placedVery well placed

Kindercare Learning Centres (16) Hilltop is well placed to promote positive learning outcomes for children.

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Kindercare Learning Centres (16) Hilltop, in Orewa, north of Auckland, is owned and administered by Kindercare Learning Centres Limited. All centres operate under the Kindercare vision, values, philosophy and strategic goals. Together these form the foundation on which each centre and the organisation base their practices.

The centre is purpose-built and well established. It is licensed for 105 children, including 25 children up to 2 years of age. Children attending the centre are from increasingly diverse cultural backgrounds.

Children play and learn in different age groups, in four different areas. There are separate indoor and outdoor spaces for infants and toddlers. Older children access two rooms, plus a 'transition' room. These groups share an outdoor playground.

The centre director leads a team of 14 qualified teachers, one of whom leads curriculum planning. An experienced cook provides children with nutritious meals and snacks.

The 2014 ERO report noted caring practices, effective teamwork and positive partnerships with whānau. These practices are still evident. Improving bicultural practices and increasing children's opportunities for independence, self-management and learning were identified as key next steps in 2014. Good progress has been made in addressing these areas and they continue to be a focus for teachers.

This review was part of a cluster of 8 Kindercare Learning Centre reviews in the Auckland area.

The Review Findings

Children are settled and enjoy long periods of uninterrupted play. They interact confidently with adults and maintain friendships with their peers. Teachers foster children's independence and self-management skills through daily rituals and routines. A respectful and inclusive culture is evident throughout the centre.

Infant and toddler environments offer many opportunities for them to explore and make choices about play. Teachers' warm interactions nurture oral language development and build infants' and toddlers' confidence. Daily journals highlight children's learning for families.

Effective teaching strategies include:

  • calm, peaceful environments that promote respectful relationships
  • caring interactions that foster children's language development and thinking
  • nurturing practices that encourage children to be resilient, curious learners
  • carefully considered play spaces that are attractive, easily accessible and promote children's creativity
  • incorporating meaningful opportunities for children to experience a bicultural perspective in the programme.

Teachers are committed to strengthening partnerships with families and use a variety of ways to communicate with them. Online portfolios provide a forum for parents, whānau and teachers to share information about children. Teachers value and respond to the information parents share about their children.

Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum, underpins the centre's curriculum. Planning for learning is based on teachers' observations of children's emerging interests. Teachers are beginning to use information from parents to plan for children. A stronger focus on programme evaluation should help to refine current practices.

The friendly, collaborative teaching team fosters a positive centre culture. Leaders and teachers are working on establishing a values-based statement that sits alongside the Kindercare philosophy to reflect their own team culture.

The centre is well led and managed. Internal evaluation results in ongoing improvement. Using evaluative questions to guide the process should help to strengthen internal evaluation.

The Kindercare organisation provides a broad range of support for centres and families. Comprehensive management and accountability systems across the company include:

  • support for centre directors through regular visits by area managers
  • effective processes for ensuring that children have safe and healthy learning environments
  • appraisal, mentoring and well targeted professional development that supports teachers to build their capability.

Key Next Steps

Centre leaders agree that the next key steps include:

  • continuing to deepen teachers' knowledge and use of te reo and tikanga Māori
  • further empowering children to lead their own learning
  • teachers engaging at a deeper level with Te Whāriki (2017) to strengthen planning and build learning partnerships with parents, based on outcomes for children
  • strengthening teachers' evaluation of the effectiveness of programmes and their teaching practices, to make evidence-based judgements about outcomes for children.

Next Steps for the Organisation

Key next steps for the Kindercare organisation include continuing to:

  • make progress with ensuring the company's vision, values, philosophy, systems and practices reflect and enact the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi
  • evaluate how consistently leaders, including area managers and centre directors, build teachers’ capability and improve practice
  • embed practices that support leaders' ongoing commitment to strengthening, and reporting about the outcomes of, strategic planning and internal evaluation across the organisation.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Kindercare Learning Centres (16) Hilltop completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Kindercare Learning Centres (16) Hilltop will be in three years. 

Violet Tu’uga Stevenson
Director Review and Improvement Services
Te Tai Raki - Northern Region

29 November 2018

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

LocationOrewa, Auckland
Ministry of Education profile number10211
Licence typeEducation & Care Service
Licensed underEducation (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008
Number licensed for105 children, including up to 25 aged under 2
Service roll115
Gender compositionBoys      52%
Girls       48%
Ethnic compositionMāori
Pākehā
Chinese
other European
other ethnic groups
  3%
62%
19%
11%
  5%
Percentage of qualified teachers80% +
Reported ratios of staff to childrenUnder 21:4Better than minimum requirements
Over 21:10Meets minimum requirements
Review team on siteSeptember 2018
Date of this report29 November 2018
Most recent ERO report(s)Education ReviewJuly 2014
Education ReviewJune 2011
Education ReviewJune 2008

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau. 

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.

Kindercare Learning Centres (16) Hilltop - 30/07/2014

1 Evaluation of Kindercare Learning Centres (16) Hilltop

How well placed is Kindercare Learning Centres (16) Hilltop to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Kindercare Learning Centres (16) Hilltop, located in Orewa, north of Auckland, offers sessional and full day education and care options for families. The community is increasingly culturally diverse. Children are grouped according to age into four different areas: infants, toddlers, preschool 1 and preschool 2. The well established centre operates from purpose-built premises and is licensed for 90 children aged from three months to five years.

The centre’s effective leadership team includes a centre manager and supervisor, supported by a Kindercare area manager. They lead a team of well qualified staff. Together they provide a high level of education and care, as identified in previous ERO reports. Continued good practices include a welcoming environment, teaching that is responsive to children and their learning needs, effective teamwork, and positive partnerships with parents and whānau.

The centre is part of the Kindercare Learning Centre group which provides a framework for governance and management. Kindercare also provides professional advice and support to centre leaders and teachers. Kindercare’s philosophy statement promotes an environment where children are “safe, loved and learning” and this underpins teachers’ work with children and their families.

The Review Findings

Children of all ages experience caring and affectionate relationships with teachers. They are very well supported to engage in the programme, to become confident in their interactions with adults, and to socialise well with their peers. Teachers regularly add interest to the environment by presenting experiences that prompt children’s participation and thinking abilities.

Teachers communicate well as a team and use positive language with children to promote independence and decision making. Some use highly effective questioning to encourage children’s complex thinking and they skilfully promote children’s learning.

Programme planning is responsive to children’s interests. Teachers in the preschool rooms present attractive portfolios that show children’s learning over time and identify future learning opportunities. The centre supervisor, who is responsible for curriculum development, delivers high quality feedback to individual teachers to build capacity in this area. Teachers in the infant and toddler areas continue to develop children’s journals to make children’s learning apparent and clear.

Experienced centre leaders have high expectations of themselves and others. They know their teaching teams well and identify strengths, leadership potential, and next steps to grow teacher capacity. Appraisal processes effectively build practice. Teachers have made very good use of relevant professional learning and development to strengthen their knowledge about best practice in early childhood education.

There is a collaborative and honest approach to recognising and targeting areas for future centre development to foster high quality professional practice. Teachers’ receive very positive parent feedback about their provision for children’s learning and care. Centre leaders identify the need for a continued focus on deepening self-review processes to consolidate best practice understandings.

Kindercare personnel and internal systems support the highly effective practices at the centre. The area manager displays confidence in centre leaders and in their capability to lift the quality of the programme further. External resources are being well used to enhance the quality of care for children up to two years of age.

Key Next Steps

ERO and centre leaders agree that self review could now be further used to enhance:

  • bicultural practices that reflect the dual heritage of Aotearoa, New Zealand
  • opportunities for children of all ages to take increasing responsibility for independent self management and learning.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Kindercare Learning Centres (16) Hilltop completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Kindercare Learning Centres (16) Hilltop will be in four years.

Dale Bailey

National Manager Review Services

Northern Region

30 July 2014

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Orewa

Ministry of Education profile number

10211

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

90 children, including up to 25 aged under 2

Service roll

106

Gender composition

Boys 55%

Girls 45%

Ethnic composition

Māori

NZ European/Pākehā

Chinese

Indian

Middle Eastern

South East Asian

other European

other

11%

64%

9%

3%

2%

2%

7%

2%

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%

Based on funding rates

80%

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

1:4

Better than minimum requirements

 

Over 2

1:9

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

June 2014

Date of this report

30 July 2014

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

June 2011

 

Education Review

June 2008

 

Education Review

August 2005

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.