Howick Intermediate

Howick Intermediate - 13/12/2019

School Context

Howick Intermediate in East Auckland provides for approximately 485 students in Years 7 and 8. The school’s roll is culturally diverse and is increasing.

Since the 2015 ERO review, many new staff have been appointed and classrooms have been upgraded so they are now more flexible learning spaces. A new leadership team has recently been appointed from within the staff.

The school’s vision states that it is a school of excellence where every person is enabled to succeed in a safe, happy and stimulating environment. The school values of perseverance, respect, attitude, integrity, service and excellence (PRAISE) guide the school. The board is focused on each student realising their full potential and on improving students’ learning progress and achievement.

Leaders and teachers regularly report to the board schoolwide information about outcomes for students in the following areas:

  • progress and achievement in reading, writing and mathematics
  • student engagement and wellbeing for success
  • provision for students with additional learning needs.

Leaders and teachers have participated in a wide range of professional learning and development (PLD), including building leadership capabilities and collaborative inquiry in mathematics.

The school hosts a satellite class from to Sommerville Special School. It is a member of the Howick Coast Community of Learning | Kāhui Ako.

Evaluation Findings

1 Equity and excellence – achievement of valued outcomes for students

1.1 How well is the school achieving equitable and excellent outcomes for all its students?

The school is making good progress toward achieving equity and excellence for all students. Most students achieve at or above expected curriculum levels in reading, writing and mathematics.

Achievement information for Māori students shows parity in mathematics and increasing parity in writing. Data also indicate improved parity for Pacific students in reading, writing and mathematics, over time. There is gender parity in reading and increasing parity in writing.

Valued outcomes for learners are documented in the school’s graduate profile. Students demonstrate a sense of pride and belonging in their school. They show positive attitudes to learning. Students are confident to take on increasing responsibility for their learning and collaborate with their peers. Senior leaders are strengthening their evaluative analysis of data gathered to show progress against the graduate profile.

1.2 How well is the school accelerating learning for those Māori and other students who need this?

Leaders and teachers are working positively to accelerate learning for Māori and other students who need this. Leaders and teachers identify priority and target students. They deliberately plan to accelerate learning by ensuring that programmes meet individual students’ needs.

In-class and withdrawal programmes for students who are learning English as an additional language are comprehensive. School progress and achievement information indicates that these students are making good progress with English language acquisition. Teachers also employ successful strategies to support the progress of students with additional learning needs.

2 School conditions for equity and excellence – processes and practices

2.1 What school processes and practices are effective in enabling achievement of equity and excellence, and acceleration of learning?

The board of trustees has been deliberate in its stewardship role. Trustees are committed to, and passionate about, the positive direction of the school. They make well-informed resourcing decisions to support the school’s strategic direction. Their resourcing of property and teachers’ PLD aligns well with current good school practices.

Leaders and teachers are collaboratively building their inquiry capacity and use evaluation purposefully for continued improvement for students. As these processes are strengthened, teachers and leaders will be better able to establish sustained improvement. This should enable trustees to know about and understand what makes the biggest difference for all learners.

Teachers use reliable assessment tools and closely analyse student progress over the year. The board uses this differentiated information to choose measurable schoolwide targets. Leaders and teachers identify useful strategies to meet these school targets.

Leaders manage the school well. They are deliberate and purposeful in engaging with families to build closer partnerships with the community.

Leadership of PLD that is focused on current good practice in teaching and learning, supports the strategic direction of the school. Middle managers have many opportunities for leadership.

The development of flexible learning spaces supports teachers’ delivery of a responsive curriculum. Specialist programmes enable students to experience a variety of learning opportunities. These experiences help build students’ learning pathways to secondary school and future career choices.

2.2 What further developments are needed in school processes and practices for achievement of equity and excellence, and acceleration of learning?

Trustees and school leaders agree that they should now review their strategic documentation to ensure that goals and targets are effective in supporting ongoing improvement in outcomes for students.

Trustees and leaders should progress plans for improving cultural responsiveness and ensuring that Māori learners are well supported to experience success as Māori, and Pacific learners as Pacific. As part of this development, leaders and teachers should increase their knowledge and capacity to integrate te reo and tikanga Māori throughout the curriculum. Regular evaluation of the impact and effectiveness of culturally responsive practices would assist with continual improvement.

3 Other Matters

Provision for international students

The school is a signatory to the Education (Pastoral Care of International Students) Code of Practice 2016 (the Code) established under section 238F of the Education Act 1989. The school has attested that it complies with all aspects of the Code.

The school mainly hosts short-term visiting students and groups. At the time of this review there were no international students attending the school.

4 Board Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the board and principal of the school completed the ERO board assurance statement and self-audit checklists. In these documents they attested that they had taken all reasonable steps to meet their legislative obligations related to the following:

  • board administration
  • curriculum
  • management of health, safety and welfare
  • personnel management
  • finance
  • asset management.

During the review, ERO checked the following items because they have a potentially high impact on student safety and wellbeing:

  • emotional safety of students (including prevention of bullying and sexual harassment)
  • physical safety of students
  • teacher registration and certification
  • processes for appointing staff
  • stand down, suspension, expulsion and exclusion of students
  • attendance
  • school policies in relation to meeting the requirements of the Children’s Act 2014.

5 ERO’s Overall Judgement

On the basis of the findings of this review, ERO’s overall evaluation judgement of Howick Intermediate’s performance in achieving valued outcomes for its students is: Well placed.

Overall Findings and Judgement Tool derived from School Evaluation Indicators: Effective Practice for Improvement and Learner Success

6 Going forward

Key strengths of the school

For sustained improvement and future learner success, the school can draw on existing strengths in:

  • the board’s and leaders’ commitment to ongoing school improvement
  • trustees and leaders providing opportunities to grow schoolwide leadership
  • leaders’ and teachers’ shared understanding and ownership of the responsive curriculum.

Next steps

For sustained improvement and future learner success, priorities for further development are in the board:

  • evaluating the effectiveness of culturally responsive practices and their impact on outcomes for students
  • strengthening evaluative reporting to increase trustees’ knowledge about and understanding of what works and makes the biggest difference for all learners.

Steve Tanner

Director Review and Improvement Services Northern

Northern Region

13 December 2019

About the school

Location

Howick, Auckland

Ministry of Education profile number

1318

School type

Intermediate

School roll

485

Gender composition

Boys 50% Girls 50%

Ethnic composition

Māori 9%
NZ European/Pākehā 41%
Pacific groups 11%
Chinese 9%
Indian 9%
other European 12%
other Asian 6%
other ethnic groups 3%

Students with Ongoing Resourcing Funding (ORS)

Yes

Provision of Māori medium education

No

Review team on site

September 2019

Date of this report

13 December 2019

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review November 2015
Education Review June 2014
Education Review May 2011

Howick Intermediate - 27/11/2015

Findings

The principal and board are working strategically and collaboratively with a strong focus on student learning. Effective strategies foster student wellbeing and engagement, and positive partnerships with families and community. Recent improvements have strengthened teaching, leadership and governance. The school is well placed to consolidate good practices and continue to implement future-focused developments. 

ERO is likely to carry out the next review in three years.

1 Background and Context

What is the background and context for this school’s review?

Howick Intermediate School is a multi-cultural school in East Auckland. It provides education for students in Years 7 and 8. Over recent years there have been changes in the local community and fluctuations in the school roll. The school roll is now increasing.

At the time of ERO’s 2014 review a long-serving principal had recently retired and an acting principal had been appointed. The school’s declining roll at that time presented challenges with regard to staffing. Many teachers and leaders were new to their roles. While ERO’s report acknowledged ongoing areas of strength in the school, a number of key areas for school improvement that had been noted in ERO’s 2011 review still required considerable work.

A new principal was appointed in October 2014. A new deputy principal started at the beginning of 2015. Since then a new associate principal has also been appointed and a number of other leadership roles established.

In September 2014 the Ministry of Education (MoE) appointed a Limited Statutory Manager (LSM) to support the board of trustees in curriculum, employment and financial matters. The board, LSM and principal have implemented many strategies to address the areas for development identified by ERO. They have worked with external expertise to progress these improvements. Since October 2014 ERO has undertaken an ongoing evaluation of the school’s progress.

2 Review and Development

How effectively is the school addressing its priorities for review and development?

Priorities identified for review and development

ERO’s 2014 report and subsequent discussion with the school identified the need to:

  • lift the quality of governance practices
  • review and develop the school curriculum to align more closely with The New Zealand Curriculum (NZC) and better reflect New Zealand’s bi-cultural heritage
  • improve processes for the collection and use of data
  • increase engagement with the community, including whānau Māori
  • build leadership and teacher capability.
Progress

School leaders and trustees are very effectively addressing the identified priorities for review and development. They demonstrate a strategic approach to change management, which includes consideration of strategies for sustaining initiatives and improvements.

The board has made very good use of the LSM and other external support to resolve areas of concern and to develop effective systems and frameworks that promote successful governance. Areas of non-compliance identified in the 2014 ERO report have been addressed.

The board, senior leaders and staff have worked together on the development of the school charter, strategic and annual plans. An improved framework for policies and procedures has been developed, along with processes for board assurance about implementation of policies and health and safety matters. Systems are in place for regular review against school goals. Improved reporting processes now ensure that trustees receive comprehensive and clear information to inform decision making.

Curriculum review and development is resulting in a balanced curriculum, with focused instruction in all learning areas and an appropriate emphasis on literacy and mathematics. School leaders have developed comprehensive curriculum statements that align very well with the NZC and promote effective teaching practices. They are using reflective frameworks and collaborative practices to increase clarity and consistency in expectations, and to scaffold and support teachers in making changes to improve their practice.

The development of effective teaching and learning practices includes resourcing to support the use of digital devices in students’ learning. The continued development of future-focused teaching practices should provide a good platform for the planned upgrade to create more modern learning environments.

Ongoing curriculum development and property improvement should also provide opportunities for staff and leaders to better ensure that the school’s rich cultural diversity is reflected in learning programmes and in the environment.

Staff are using MoE resources to support Māori and Pacific students’ engagement in learning. They are continuing to consider ways they can use culturally responsive practices to accelerate progress for Māori and Pacific students whose learning and achievement needs accelerating.

The principal, senior leaders and board have a strong focus on supporting student engagement, progress and achievement. They have developed good school-wide systems for the collation, analysis and use of data, including processes for internal and external moderation. Teachers have increased their understanding of the National Standards and now use a range of assessment information to make more reliable overall judgements about student achievement.

Good processes are in place to identify the needs of students at risk of not achieving. Some groups of students are already showing good progress as a result of targeted interventions. School leaders recognise the need to raise the achievement of boys, and Māori and Pacific students. They are appropriately targeting writing as a priority area for improvement.

Parents now receive clear reports about their children’s progress and achievement in relation to the National Standards. Students are responding positively to having greater ownership of their learning and are increasingly able to talk about their learning and achievement.

School leaders and trustees are re-establishing connections with the wider community and raising the profile of the school. Useful contacts have been made with representatives from local iwi. Effective partnerships with families and whānau are now well established and formal consultation processes are in place. Staff, parents and students who spoke with ERO affirm the new direction for the school.

Key next steps

Trustees and school leaders agree that the school is now moving into a phase of embedding, refining and extending recent initiatives to help ensure good practices are consistently evident across the school.

As well as overall consolidation, school leaders have identified specific areas for ongoing development. These include:

  • extending the analysis and use of student achievement information, particularly to identify comparisons over time
  • continuing to build teacher capability in te reo me ngā tikanga Māori
  • continuing to use external support and opportunities to grow leadership capability.

3 Sustainable performance and self review

How well placed is the school to sustain and continue to improve and review its performance?

The school is now well placed to sustain and continue to improve and review its performance.

Findings

Increased capability in governance, leadership and teaching, together with by strong systems and documentation, has created a very good foundation for continued development.

Strategic appointments have strengthened leadership in the school. Good opportunities for professional learning and development (PLD) are being provided for staff new to leadership roles. Well considered PLD during the latter part of 2014 and in 2015 has had a positive impact on teaching practices. School-wide processes for inquiry into practice have been established. A new appraisal system that aligns with PLD and school goals has been introduced.

Trustees are demonstrating the capability to govern independently and to sustain ongoing review and improvement. Clear systems and useful documentation now support board processes and the induction of new trustees. Trustees value external guidance and continue to participate in a range of governance training opportunities. New trustees have been co-opted for particular roles to meet specific needs and strategic goals. The board now receives good information about school operations, teaching and learning, and student attendance, engagement in learning and achievement.

School leaders and trustees are establishing self review as part of governance and management practice, including strategies for the board to review its own governance role and effectiveness. They are developing a strong foundation of productive partnerships that are focused on student learning. Multiple perspectives are valued and inform decision-making. School leaders have identified appropriate next steps and shifts in priorities as they consolidate and embed good practices.

Key next steps

The board recognises that, while they now have a foundation of good practices in place, they can further improve practice by:

  • extending the good self-review systems being established
  • refining and improving the documentation for some governance processes
  • continuing to use external support and training to enhance governance capability.

Board assurance on legal requirements

Before the review, the board of trustees and principal of the school completed the ERO Board Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklists. In these documents they attested that they had taken all reasonable steps to meet their legislative obligations related to:

  • board administration
  • curriculum
  • management of health, safety and welfare
  • personnel management
  • financial management
  • asset management.

During the review, ERO checked the following items because they have a potentially high impact on student achievement:

  • emotional safety of students (including prevention of bullying and sexual harassment)
  • physical safety of students
  • teacher registration
  • processes for appointing staff
  • stand-downs, suspensions, expulsions and exclusions
  • attendance.

Conclusion

The principal and board are working strategically and collaboratively with a strong focus on student learning. Effective strategies foster student wellbeing and engagement, and positive partnerships with families and community. Recent improvements have strengthened teaching, leadership and governance. The school is well placed to consolidate good practices and continue to implement future-focused developments. 

ERO is likely to carry out the next review in three years. 

Graham Randell
Deputy Chief Review Officer Northern

27 November 2015

About the School 

Location

Howick, Auckland

Ministry of Education profile number

1318

School type

Intermediate (Years 7 to 8)

School roll

407

Number of international students

2

Gender composition

Boys      54%
Girls       46%

Ethnic composition

Māori
Pākehā
Indian
Samoan
Cook Island Māori
Chinese
African
Fijian
Filipino
Tongan
Middle Eastern
Niue
other Asian
other

11%
24%
13%
12%
  8%
  6%
  4%
  3%
  3%
  3%
  2%
  2%
  4%
  5%

Special Features

1 Somerville Special School satellite class

Review team on site

October 2015

Date of this report

27 November 2015

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review
Education Review
Education Review

June 2014
May 2011
February 2008