Huntly School (Waikato)

Huntly School (Waikato)

Findings

Huntly School (Waikato) has made sufficient progress to transition into ERO’s School Evaluation for Improvement. | Te Ara Huarau approach.

1 Background and Context

What is the background and context for this school’s review?

Huntly School is located on the eastern side of Huntly. It caters for students in Years 1 to 8. Most of the current roll of 236 are Māori who whakapapa to Waikato/Tainui, the local iwi.

Since the 2018 ERO report, the school has appointed a new principal. There have been some changes in teaching staff and trustees. A significant number of staff are long serving. The school values of perseverance, ownership, wairua pai, excellence and respect are well promoted.

2 Review and Development

How effectively is the school addressing its priorities for review and development?

Priorities identified for review and development

The areas for review and development identified in the 2018 ERO report were to:

  • develop a productive and professional learning culture amongst teachers and staff
  • improve the culture for learning including the development of a schoolwide behaviour management system
  • review and strengthen the local curriculum, including clear statements about expectations for teaching staff in regard to the teaching of literacy and mathematics
  • use the literacy and mathematics progressions as the basis for collaborative understanding about assessment, progress and achievement
  • strengthen systems for internal evaluation.
Progress
Develop a productive and professional learning culture amongst teaching and staff.

Leaders and teachers are developing, through a concerted effort, a productive and professional learning culture. A range of strategies have been used to promote this and include:

  • review of job descriptions so that areas of responsibility and lines of reporting are clear
  • reduction in student/teacher ratios in classrooms to optimise the amount of learning time students have with the teacher
  • change to the school timetable to promote a safe environment
  • support for teacher aides to assist teachers with groups of students, using evidence-based interventions
  • highly focused teacher meetings that are minimal in number
  • establishment of curriculum teams to promote a more collaborative culture and better use the strengths of all teachers.

Professional development focuses on specific programmes to increase teacher capacity. This is improving the quality of classroom programmes in writing, mathematics, local curriculum and digital technology. Classroom programmes are now well aligned with students’ needs identified in schoolwide achievement data. The environment encourages staff individual creativity to benefit children.

Improve the culture for learning including the development of a schoolwide behaviour management system.

Teachers and leaders have developed a positive and supportive culture for learning amongst students. Relationships between teachers and students are warm and supportive.  Students who spoke to ERO describe their teachers as kind and caring. Classroom behaviour treaties, co-constructed by teachers and students, form the basis of the classroom culture. Many teachers use flexible routines well to promote a sense of security and belonging.

A well-considered and comprehensive schoolwide behaviour management system, based on the Ministry of Education Positive Behaviour for Learning (PB4L) approach, is now in place.  Consistent use of the programme is evident in most classrooms. Features of the system include:

  • a focus on rewarding positive behaviour aligned to school values
  • comprehensive systems for managing serious behaviour incidents
  • a restorative approach
  • effective use of data to make evidence-based decisions about trends and patterns for individuals and groups.

This approach has contributed to settled and engaged classrooms and a positive school tone. Students with special needs, including those with high behaviour needs, are well supported through a range of well-considered interventions both within the classroom and through withdrawal programmes run by teacher aides and external experts.

Review and strengthen the local curriculum including clear statements about expectations for teaching staff in regard to the teaching of literacy and mathematics.

Curriculum documents provide clear expectations that reflect current professional development. These expectations allow teachers to align their classroom practice to collaboratively developed understandings of what best practice looks like at Huntly School. Leaders have also developed systems to support teachers and build collective accountability across the school.

There is now a need to strengthen these systems so that teaching practice more consistently reflects the expectations for good practice already in place.

Teachers are increasing the extent to which the local curriculum reflects the culture and aspirations of parents, whānau and the wider community. Many teachers are now using a national resource to better support students and whānau to make connections to their Māori culture. There are opportunities for all students to participate in kapa haka. Haka and waiata are selected so that they also contribute to student understanding of local iwi stories and histories.

Next steps include developing a sequential, schoolwide approach to the teaching of local Waikato/Tainui history and to the teaching of te reo Māori.

Use the literacy and mathematics progressions as the basis for collaborative understanding about assessment, progress and achievement.

A new student management system has recently been introduced. This system uses student mastery of the learning progressions of The New Zealand Curriculum (NZC) as the basis for tracking and monitoring the progress and achievement of all students in learning. Leaders and teachers have begun using the system to:

  • identify students’ next steps in learning
  • identify groups of priority students who are at risk of not achieving
  • plan programmes of work that are targeted to individual and group learning needs
  • identify and track accelerated progress
  • identify and respond to trends and patterns
  • report to the board on progress against board targets for accelerated progress.

There is a need to continue to strengthen teacher understanding and use of the learning progressions as a fundamental tool for identifying student learning needs. Trustees should review board targets to focus on accelerating the progress of all students at risk of not achieving.

Strengthen systems of internal evaluation.

A number of effective internal evaluation processes are used by the school to promote ongoing improvement. The board has an ongoing and systematic calendar of policy review. The school charter has a small number of clearly articulated strategic goals. The principal reports regularly to the board on progress against these goals. The Special Needs Coordinator (SENCO) and Learning Support Teacher (LSC) use student assessment data to evaluate the effectiveness of intervention programmes that teacher aides run for students with special needs. The principal writes regular reports on progress in rolling out new initiatives. These report progress so far and clarify next steps.

A more systematic process for internal evaluation is now needed. This should contribute to sustained, evidence-based improvement.

3 Sustainable performance and self review

How well placed is the school to sustain and continue to improve and review its performance?

The school is now in a better position to sustain and continue to improve and review its performance. Leaders and teachers have established a foundation of values, leadership, tone, climate and relationships likely to sustain and improve student learning - engagement, progress and achievement. They have built capability to sustain and continue to improve student achievement.

Board assurance on legal requirements

Before the review, the board of trustees and principal of the school completed the ERO Board Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklists. In these documents they attested that they had taken all reasonable steps to meet their legislative obligations related to:

  • board administration
  • curriculum
  • management of health, safety and welfare
  • personnel management
  • financial management
  • asset management.

During the review, ERO checked the following items because they have a potentially high impact on student achievement:

  • emotional safety of students (including prevention of bullying and sexual harassment)
  • physical safety of students
  • teacher registration
  • processes for appointing staff
  • stand-downs, suspensions, expulsions and exclusions
  • attendance
  • school policies in relation to meeting the requirements of the Children’s Act 2014.

Conclusion

Huntly School (Waikato) has made sufficient progress to transition into ERO’s School Evaluation for Improvement. | Te Ara Huarau approach.

Shelley Booysen

Acting Director Review and Improvement Services (Central)

Central Region - Te Tai Pūtahi Nui

24 September 2021

About the school

The Education Counts website provides further information about the school’s student population, student engagement and student achievement.

Huntly School (Waikato) - 29/10/2018

School Context

Huntly School (Waikato) is situated in Huntly in north Waikato and caters for students in Years 1 to 8. Its roll of 200 students includes 74% Māori and 10% from Pacific heritages. Many families have intergenerational associations with the school.

Since the 2015 ERO review, the principal has remained in her position. In 2017, a new board chair was elected. The 2015 ERO report noted many areas of good performance. However, areas for development identified in that report have not been addressed. Since the on-site stage of this review, the principal resigned from her position at the school.

The school’s motto is “Knowledge is Power”. It’s mission is to develop in students the attitude, beliefs and virtues to succeed in whatever they want to do. The school-wide virtues programme underpins the school’s culture and curriculum. Strategic goals focus on students who are at risk of underachieving making more than one year’s progress in a year. Some year groups are targeted for acceleration in identified learning areas.

Leaders and teachers regularly report to the board, school-wide information about outcomes for students in the following areas:

  • reading and writing and mathematics.

Evaluation Findings

1 Equity and excellence – achievement of valued outcomes for students

1.1 How well is the school achieving equitable and excellent outcomes for all its students?

The school is not achieving equitable and excellent outcomes for all students. Achievement information gathered by the school indicates that the majority of students achieved at expected levels in reading, writing and mathematics in 2017. Pākehā students are outperforming Māori in these areas. Disparity is significant for Māori in mathematics. School achievement data also shows that girls consistently out perform boys in reading and writing but achieve at similar levels in mathematics. These patterns have remained similar over recent years.

1.2 How well is the school accelerating learning for those Māori and other students who need this?

The school is not accelerating the learning for those Māori and other students who need this. The deputy principal has recently introduced procedures to demonstrate acceleration for identified students in each class to report progress to the board. This achievement information has not been analysed for ethnicity or gender patterns.

2 School conditions for equity and excellence – processes and practices

2.1 What school processes and practices are effective in enabling achievement of equity and excellence, and acceleration of learning?

Aspects of teaching practice are beginning to contribute to the achievement of equity and excellence. Positive relationships and pastoral care for students and families support student wellbeing and engagement. Many teachers make good use of assessment information to guide their planning and teaching. Responsive and adaptive programmes support students with additional learning needs. A current school-wide focus on critical histories is providing meaningful contexts for teaching and learning. High expectations for behaviour and the integration of the school’s virtues programme contribute to settled classroom environments.

The board actively represents and serves the school community. Trustees have undertaken comprehensive training about their governance roles and responsibilities. They understand the importance of scrutinising achievement information to make decisions that promote positive outcomes for students. Robust policy and procedural guidelines are in place to guide school operations. Governance is increasingly responsive to the needs of students and staff.

2.2 What further developments are needed in school processes and practices for achievement of equity and excellence, and acceleration of learning?

Since the 2015 ERO review the principal has not sustained a productive and professional learning culture to support the achievement of equity and excellence for all students. Teachers have not had professional development focused on building their capability to meet the identified learning needs of students. The school does not have an agreed system for managing student behaviour. Relationships between the principal and staff are not positively focused on supporting student engagement and improving achievement. Senior leaders do not have personalised job descriptions to provide clarity about their roles and responsibilities.

The curriculum does not effectively promote student learning. Teachers have not been involved in collaborative decisions about curriculum design. The school’s expectations now needs to include shared understandings about teaching practices that effectively promote acceleration for at-risk learners. Assessment practices need to be reviewed to ensure the appropriate use of assessment tools and the continuing monitoring of at-risk learners so that their achievement can be improved. Students do not have strategies for understanding and monitoring their own progress towards curriculum expectations. Learning progressions that reflect The New Zealand Curriculum need to be established as the basis for collaborative understanding between teachers, students and parents about progress and achievement.

The school does not have effective systems for internal evaluation to support continuous school improvement. Annual charter targets to improve student outcomes need to be focused on accelerating the progress of all groups who are at risk of underachieving, including those who are identified by ethnicity or gender. There is a need for a strategic and annual approach to internal evaluation that includes a rigorous process for conducting ongoing curriculum review and development.

3 Board assurance on legal requirements

Before the review, the board and principal of the school completed the ERO board assurance statement and self-audit checklists. In these documents they attested that they had taken all reasonable steps to meet their legislative obligations related to the following:

  • board administration

  • curriculum

  • management of health, safety and welfare

  • personnel management

  • finance

  • asset management.

During the review, ERO checked the following items because they have a potentially high impact on student safety and wellbeing:

  • emotional safety of students (including prevention of bullying and sexual harassment)

  • physical safety of students

  • teacher registration and certification

  • processes for appointing staff

  • stand down, suspension, expulsion and exclusion of students

  • attendance

  • school policies in relation to meeting the requirements of the Vulnerable Children Act 2014.

Actions for compliance

ERO identified non-compliance in relation to consultation with its Māori community and police vetting procedures for non-registered staff.

In order to address these matters, the board of trustees must ensure that:

  1. there is regular consultation with the Māori community about policies, plans and targets for improving Māori student achievement
    [National Administration Guidlelines 1.(v)]
  2. police vetting of all non-registered staff is up to date.
    [Vulnerable Children Act 2014. S 18 &19]

Areas for improved compliance practice

To improve current practice, the board of trustees should ensure that:

  • there is an agreed behaviour management system
  • the school maintains records of all formal complaints along with the process followed and actions taken in response to each complaint

  • the board receives regular reports about student attendance trends and patterns

  • all teachers have current and personalised job descriptions

4 Going forward

Key strengths of the school

For sustained improvement and future learner success, the school can draw on existing strengths in:

  • teachers’ high expectations for behaviour that contribute to settled classroom environments

  • governance that is increasingly responsive to the needs of students and staff.

Next steps

For sustained improvement and future learner success, priorities for further development are in:

  • professional leadership of learning and school management practices to improve the school’s culture and its response to students whose learning requires acceleration

  • curriculum and assessment practices that support effective teaching and the acceleration of progress for at-risk learners

  • internal evaluation processes and practices

[ERO will provide an internal evaluation workshop for trustees and senior leaders.]

Recommendations to other agencies

ERO recommends that the Secretary for Education consider intervention under Part 7A of the Education Act 1989 in order to bring about improvement in:

  • personnel

  • curriculum

  • internal evaluation.

ERO’s next external evaluation process and timing

ERO intends to carry out a process of ongoing external evaluation to support development over the course of one-to-two years.

Adrienne Fowler

Director Review and Improvement Services

Te Tai Miringa - Waikato / Bay of Plenty Region

29 October 2018

About the school

Location

Huntly

Ministry of Education profile number

1751

School type

Full primary (Years 1 to 8)

School roll

214

Gender composition

Boys 57% Girls 43%

Ethnic composition

Māori 74%
Pākehā 15%
Cook Island Māori 4%
Other Pacific 4%
Other 3%

Students with Ongoing Resourcing Funding (ORS)

Yes

Provision of Māori medium education

No

Review team on site

August 2018

Date of this report

29 October 2018

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review May 2015
Education Review February 2012
Supplementary Review February 2009