122 Mt Albert Road, Mount Albert, Auckland
View on mapMARC Early Learning Centre
MARC Early Learning Centre
ERO’s Akanuku | Assurance Review reports provide information about whether a service meets and maintains regulatory standards. Further information about Akanuku | Assurance Reviews is included at the end of this report.
ERO’s Judgement
Regulatory standards |
ERO’s judgement |
Curriculum |
Meeting |
Premises and facilities |
Meeting |
Health and safety |
Meeting |
Governance, management and administration |
Meeting |
At the time of the review, ERO found the service was taking reasonable steps to meet regulatory standards.
Background
MARC Early Learning Centre is located on the grounds of Mount Albert Research Centre. The service caters for infants and older children in a mixed-age setting. A committee of parents and staff provide governance for the service’s operations. Children, their families, and staff have diverse cultural backgrounds.
Summary of Review Findings
Adults engage in meaningful, positive interactions to enhance children’s learning and nurture reciprocal relationships. The service curriculum is inclusive, and responsive to children as confident and competent learners.
Children’s preferences are respected, and they are involved in decisions about their learning experiences. The service curriculum supports children’s developing social competence and understanding of appropriate behaviour.
Parents have regular opportunities to communicate with staff about their child and to share specific evidence of their child’s learning. They are involved in decision-making concerning their child’s learning.
Key Next Step
A key next step is for teachers and leaders to collaboratively assess, plan and evaluate the curriculum for children’s learning.
Next ERO Review
The next ERO review is likely to be an Akarangi | Quality Evaluation.
Filivaifale Jason Swann
Director Review and Improvement Services (Northern)
Northern Region | Te Tai Raki
23 February 2022
Information About the Service
Early Childhood Service Name | MARC Early Learning Centre |
Profile Number |
20265 |
Location | Mt Albert, Auckland |
Service type |
Education and care service |
Number licensed for |
60 children, including up to 30 aged under 2 |
Percentage of qualified teachers |
80-99% |
Service roll |
52 |
Ethnic composition |
Māori 3, NZ European/Pākehā 18, Chinese 5, Indian 5, Sri Lankan 4, other European 6, other Asian 4, other ethnic groups 7 |
Review team on site |
January 2022 |
Date of this report |
23 February 2022 |
Most recent ERO report(s) |
Education Review, August 2019; Education Review, March 2016 |
General Information about Assurance Reviews
All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include the Licensing Criteria for Education and Care Services 2008.
Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a licence to operate.
ERO undertakes an Akanuku | Assurance Review process in any centre-based service:
- having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation
- previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development’
- that has moved from a provisional to a full licence
- that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership
- where an Akanuku | Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.
Management Assurance on Legal Requirements
All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:
- curriculum
- premises and facilities
- health and safety practices
- governance, management and administration.
As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulated standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:
- emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
- physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
- suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher certification; ratios)
- evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.
As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:
- discussions with those involved in the service
- consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems
- observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice.
MARC Early Learning Centre - 22/08/2019
1 Evaluation of MARC Early Learning Centre
How well placed is MARC Early Learning Centre to promote positive learning outcomes for children?
Not well placed |
Requires further development |
Well placed |
Very well placed |
MARC Early Learning Centre requires further development to promote positive learning outcomes for children.
Teachers need to improve how they document health and safety requirements and implement curriculum assessment and planning processes. The board needs to develop long-term goals to support ongoing improvement.
ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.
Background
MARC Early Learning Centre is a well-established community service. It operates in a large, converted house in the grounds of Plant & Food Research, Rangahau Ahumāra Kai.
The centre provides mixed-age, child-led programmes for up to 60 children including a maximum of 30 under two years of age. The roll is generally maintained at 50 children. Many children attending the centre have family members working at the Mt Albert Research Centre (MARC). Children, their families and teachers have diverse cultural backgrounds.
An executive board oversees the centre's operations. The board includes the head teacher, who is responsible for daily management of the centre and the teaching team. The majority of teachers are fully qualified.
The service has generally had a positive ERO reporting history. Previous ERO reports have identified areas for improvement that included assessment, planning and evaluation, and embedding Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum, in practice. Strategic and annual planning, appraisal and internal evaluation also needed to be aligned and strengthened. Several of the recommendations noted in earlier ERO reports are again identified in this report.
The Review Findings
Children settle quickly at the start of the day and make decisions about where they will play. They know each other well and sometimes work collaboratively, with high levels of conversation as they explore the many activities available. Children demonstrate great enthusiasm for the gathering times for stories and food.
Parents are comfortable in the centre, often staying to read to their children before leaving. Some books in the library reflect children's home languages, including te reo Māori. Children are familiar with some kupu and waiata Māori. Teachers have identified the need to strengthen their use of te reo Māori with children. Celebrations of children's home customs and festivals enable children to gain understanding of families' diverse cultures.
There are many opportunities for children to know about and experience their local community and environment. Short excursions into the community and local bush are helping them to learn about sustainability, different environments, transition to school and community events.
The head teacher brings experience to her role. A number of the teachers have worked in the centre for some years and know the families well. Teachers discuss children's assessment records to gather team knowledge about children. They share these records through an online portal for parents. At present, there is little identification in assessment records of children's developing learning or the teachers' role in supporting learning.
The outdoor area provides opportunities for children to explore and to challenge themselves. Teachers encourage children to play outdoors and provide appropriate wet weather clothing for younger children. They could now more purposefully prompt children to set goals and manage their own developing confidence and skills in physical play.
The board follows sound meeting procedures and is well informed by the head teacher. Policies and procedures are regularly reviewed and updated. It would be useful for the board to develop a strategic plan that includes clear goals for development and progress. This should then guide the annual plan for the centre and align with the staff appraisal process. It would also be worthwhile for board members to evaluate the effectiveness of their work for the centre.
Teachers need to be more strongly focused on the evaluation of their professional practice in relation to outcomes for children. Engaging in deeper reflection and research could further build teachers' leadership, capability and responsibility. This includes teachers providing more active support for children's developing social competence and confidence. There is generous provision for teachers' professional learning and development.
Key Next Steps
To improve current practices, the board, head teacher and teachers should:
-
seek assistance to embed the expectations of Te Whāriki into daily practice, and to improve assessment, planning and evaluation processes
-
develop strategic planning, in relation to all aspects of centre operations, to identify future goals and inform annual planning
-
improve documentation relating to aspects of health and safety
-
establish an organisational culture that supports ongoing improvement in teaching and learning through internal evaluation and reflection.
Since the on-site phase of this ERO review, the head teacher has been proactive in seeking external support to assist the centre in addressing these next steps.
Management Assurance on Legal Requirements
Before the review, the staff and management of MARC Early Learning Centre completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:
- curriculum
- premises and facilities
- health and safety practices
- governance, management and administration.
During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:
-
emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
-
physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
-
suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
-
evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.
All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.
Actions for compliance
ERO identified areas of non-compliance relating to governance and health and safety. To meet requirements the service needs to:
-
develop an ongoing process of self review to help the service maintain and improve the quality of education and care
-
improve documentation relating to aspects of health and safety.
Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Centres 2008, GMA4, 6.
Development Plan Recommendation
ERO recommends that the service, in consultation with the Ministry of Education, develops a plan to address the key next steps and actions outlined in this report.
Steve Tanner
Director Review and Improvement Services Northern
Northern Region
22 August 2019
The Purpose of ERO Reports
The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.
2 Information about the Early Childhood Service
Location |
Mount Albert, Auckland |
||
Ministry of Education profile number |
20265 |
||
Licence type |
Education & Care Service |
||
Licensed under |
Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008 |
||
Number licensed for |
60 children, including up to 30 aged under 2 |
||
Service roll |
48 |
||
Gender composition |
Boys 26 Girls 22 |
||
Ethnic composition |
Māori |
1 |
|
Percentage of qualified teachers |
80% + |
||
Reported ratios of staff to children |
Under 2 |
1:3 |
Better than minimum requirements |
Over 2 |
1:7 |
Better than minimum requirements |
|
Review team on site |
July 2019 |
||
Date of this report |
22 August 2019 |
||
Most recent ERO report(s) |
Education Review |
March 2016 |
|
Education Review |
March 2013 |
||
Education Review |
February 2010 |
3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews
ERO’s Evaluation Framework
ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:
Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.
Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.
ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.
A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.
For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.
ERO’s Overall Judgement
The overall judgement that ERO makes will depend on how well the service promotes positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:
-
Very well placed
-
Well placed
-
Requires further development
-
Not well placed
ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.
Review Coverage
ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.