Aspirations Early Learning Centre

Education institution number:
20529
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
39
Telephone:
Address:

129-131 Moire Road, West Harbour, Auckland

View on map

Aspirations Early Learning Centre

ERO’s Akanuku | Assurance Review reports provide information about whether a service meets and maintains regulatory standards. Further information about Akanuku | Assurance Reviews is included at the end of this report.

ERO’s Judgement

Regulatory standards

ERO’s judgement

Curriculum

Meeting

Premises and facilities

Meeting

Health and safety

Meeting

Governance, management and administration

Meeting

Since the onsite visit, the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed non-compliances and is now taking reasonable steps to meet regulatory standards.

Background

Aspirations Early Learning Centre is one of two services under the same ownership. The owner is responsible for governance, management, and daily operations. Approximately 35 percent of children enrolled are either Māori or have Pacific heritages. This is the first ERO review of the service since a change of ownership in 2021.

Summary of Review Findings

The design and layout of the premises support the provision of different types of indoor and outdoor experiences. The environment includes quiet spaces, areas for physically active play, and spaces for a range of individual and group learning experiences that enhance children’s learning.

The curriculum respects and supports the right of each child to be confident in their own culture, and encourages children to understand and respect each other.

Teachers providing education and care engage in meaningful, positive interactions to enhance children’s learning and nurture reciprocal relationships. Children are supported to develop social competence skills and an understanding of appropriate behaviour.

Leaders need to more closely monitor systems and practices to ensure regulatory standards are maintained.

Key Next Steps

Next steps include:

  • strengthening planning, assessment, and evaluation practices to show individual children’s learning, interests, whānau and life contexts

  • increasing opportunities for children to develop their knowledge and understanding of te ao Māori.

Actions for Compliance

Since the onsite visit, the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed the following non-compliances:

  • Having a first aid kit that complies with the requirements of Appendix 1 (PF28).

  • Securing all heavy furniture, fixtures, and equipment to ensure they cannot fall or topple and cause serious injury of damage (HS6).

Next ERO Review

The next ERO review is likely to be an Akarangi | Quality Evaluation.

Patricia Davey
Director of Early Childhood Education (ECE)

2 November 2023 

Information About the Service

Early Childhood Service Name Aspirations Early Learning Centre
Profile Number 20529

Location

West Harbour, Auckland

Service type

Education and care service

Number licensed for

70 children, including up to 20 aged under 2

Percentage of qualified teachers

80-99%

Service roll

69

Review team on site

October 2023

Date of this report

2 November 2023

Most recent ERO report(s)

Previously reviewed as West Harbour Whizz Kidz:

Education Review, February 2018; Supplementary Review, June 2014

General Information about Assurance Reviews

All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include the Licensing Criteria for Education and Care Services 2008.

Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a licence to operate.

ERO undertakes an Akanuku | Assurance Review process in any centre-based service:

  • having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation

  • previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development’

  • that has moved from a provisional to a full licence

  • that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership

  • where an Akanuku | Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum

  • premises and facilities

  • health and safety practices

  • governance, management and administration.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulatory standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; safety checking; teacher certification; ratios)

  • relevant evacuation procedures and practices.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:

  • discussions with those involved in the service

  • consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems

  • observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice.

West Harbour Whizz Kidz - 22/02/2018

1 Evaluation of West Harbour Whizz Kidz

How well placed is West Harbour Whizz Kidz to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

West Harbour Whizz Kidz is licensed to provide all day care and education for up to 66 children including 20 aged under two years. Children aged under three have their own separate indoor and outdoor play spaces. Children come from an increasingly diverse range of cultural backgrounds.

The centre owner manages the centre. She leads a team of four other qualified teachers, one teacher in training and one unqualified teacher.

The philosophy of the service is strongly based on children learning through play, and recognises each child as unique. Teachers acknowledge their responsibility towards honouring Te Tiriti o Waitangi, and ensuring that the culture, language and identity of Māori are protected and enhanced. The development of positive, respectful relationships with children and their whānau is important to the teaching team.

Key next steps from the 2014 ERO report included the development of strategic planning, strengthening parent contributions, and a review of teacher led aspects of the programme. There has been good progress in these areas. Centre leaders and teachers continue to work with an external professional development provider to establish a robust internal evaluation process.

The Review Findings

Children display a sense of belonging in the centre environment. Centre routines allow for long periods of uninterrupted play. This allows older children to engage in imaginative and dramatic play where they set the scene, negotiate roles and learn to play co-operatively together. Strong friendships among the children are evident.

Children under three are well supported by teachers to make decisions about their play, and to be independent and responsible. Children are well respected. The relaxed pace of the programme allows all children to take their time, and to initiate and make decisions about their play.

Te ao Māori perspectives are becoming more widely included in programme planning as teachers' bicultural knowledge and confidence grows. Some teachers are skilled in their knowledge of te reo Māori, and include words and phrases in children's portfolios. Teachers could consider how they might use te reo more in their daily interactions with children and each other.

Teachers have established positive, sensitive and responsive relationships with children. They genuinely listen to them, encouraging and respecting their verbal language and conversations. Teachers recognise and support children's interests in literacy and mathematics at an individual level. They make links across time and activities to revisit children's ideas and interests.

Parents who spoke with ERO acknowledged the positive relationships established with centre staff, and the regular information they received about their child's learning. Parent aspirations for their children's learning are visible in programme planning processes.

Children's portfolios are individual to each child. They show continuity of learning, and are easily accessible to children and whānau. Teachers analyse learning stories well to identify individual learning, and to plan possible learning pathways that support more complex thinking. Curriculum planning and evaluation processes continue to evolve as the team undertakes ongoing professional development in this area.

Teachers are committed to teaching and learning that creates positive outcomes for children. The teaching team is becoming collaborative, and teachers are encouraged to contribute to an organisational culture of continual improvement. The manager provides good opportunities for teachers to develop professionally.

The manager has established annual and strategic plans, in consultation with teachers that will guide centre direction. The vision and mission statements are evident in teachers' and manager's practice. Managers should continue developing systems for ongoing review, and policies and procedures that meet current legislative requirements.

Key Next Steps

Centre leaders have discussed with ERO key next steps that include:

  • developing alignment between annual and strategic plans, internal evaluation and teacher appraisal
  • ensuring children's portfolios include links to their languages, and cultures
  • continuing to develop programme planning processes that are context specific
  • reviewing centre resources to include more natural materials, and ensure all play areas inspire children's critical thought, wondering and creativity.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of West Harbour Whizz Kidz completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist.  In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

A systematic and prioritised review plan needs to be established to ensure centre policies and procedures continue to meet current legislation.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of West Harbour Whizz Kidz will be in three years.

Julie Foley
Deputy Chief Review Officer Northern (Acting)

Te Tai Raki - Northern Region

22 February 2018 

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning. 

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service 

Location

West Harbour, Auckland

Ministry of Education profile number

20529

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

66 children, including up to 20 aged under 2

Service roll

43

Gender composition

Boys      22
Girls       21

Ethnic composition

Māori
Pākehā
Chinese
Filipino
Indian
other

11
18
  3
  2
  2
  7

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49%       50-79%       80%+

Based on funding rates

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

1:4

Better than minimum requirements

Over 2

1:8

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

January 2018

Date of this report

22 February 2018

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

June 2014

Education Review

May 2013

Education Review

March 2010

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau. 

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.

West Harbour Whizz Kidz - 03/06/2014

1 Background

Introduction

A Supplementary Review is undertaken at the discretion of a National Manager, Review Services in the Education Review Office (ERO).

A supplementary review evaluates the extent and effectiveness of actions a centre has taken towards addressing issues specified in a previous education review and/or any additional areas identified since that review.

Terms of Reference

This supplementary review is based on an evaluation of the performance of the West Harbour Whizz Kidz governing body and management in relation to areas identified in the May 2013 ERO report or issues identified since that review. The terms of reference for this review are to investigate:

  • the extent to which adults promote children’s emotional and physical safety
  • the quality of teaching and learning environments
  • the extent to which the curriculum provides a positive and inclusive environment
  • the effectiveness of programme planning, assessment and evaluation
  • the effectiveness of centre management structures and practices
  • the extent to which self review is resulting in improved centre operation to promote positive outcomes for children
  • any other issues relevant to the management and operation of the centre that arise during the course of this review.

2 Evaluation Findings

West Harbour Whizz Kidz is now well placed to promote positive outcomes for children.

Background

There has been a recent change to the centre’s governance and management structure. Two of the previous four owners now have full ownership. One of these owners is a qualified early childhood teacher and is the centre’s manager. The owners have kept staff and families informed during this period of change.

Centre development has focused on the areas of concern identified by ERO in 2013. Improvement is being progressed through professional learning and development (PLD) for management and staff, with support from the Ministry of Education. Recent changes are beginning to have a positive impact on outcomes for children. Centre owners have addressed the health and safety concerns identified by ERO in 2013.

Areas of progress

The manager is future focused and a sense of enthusiasm is evident across the centre. The teaching team work well together and value the support of the owners. Head teachers state that their work has become much more rewarding. The manager models collaborative leadership and planned PLD should help head teachers to develop their leadership skills.

A focus on improving teachers’ skills in promoting children’s social competence is resulting in positive outcomes for children’s wellbeing. Teachers have linked this work to their review of the centre philosophy and their systems for programme planning, evaluation, and assessment of learning.

Children make independent choices about their play and are busy and settled. They enjoy a programme that is increasingly focused on their learning interests. Children have some input into programme decisions and teachers continue to build on this feature.

Teachers are inclusive and caring. They respect children’s choices and are thoughtful about the ways they participate in children’s play. Teachers’ good knowledge of each child helps them respond well to individual preferences.

Children benefit from the recent changes to the physical environment. They have easier access to equipment and resources. Alternative use of some spaces has extended options for children’s play. Plans are in place to keep enhancing the environment and increasing resources, with input from staff and children.

Self-review practice continues to improve with PLD support. A structured, planned approach is now evident. Policies are being updated in a systematic way. A new performance appraisal process, with good potential to improve practice, is now underway.

The manager is promoting a reflective, best practice approach to curriculum change. PLD is helping teachers to implement programme planning based on children’s interests. They are starting to add depth to programme evaluation. Teachers document assessment through learning narratives. They could now increase the value of this assessment by showing their responses to ongoing opportunities to promote children’s learning. Displays provide good information for parents about the programme, and invite their input. Consistent availability of non-contact time and regular staff meetings should help teachers to better manage these aspects of their work.

Areas for further improvement

It is essential that the owners continue to access external professional learning and development to deepen self review reflection and analysis. This PLD could help the manager and teachers to:

  • progress plans to develop well documented and regularly reviewed strategic planning
  • use review processes to guide development and monitor the impact of changes and new initiatives
  • continue to build on parents’ contribution and participation
  • review the more teacher-led aspects of the programme, including some activities, routines, rosters and group times.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of West Harbour Whizz Kidz will be in three years.

Dale Bailey

National Manager Review Services

Northern Region

3 June 2014

Information about the Service

Location

West Harbour, Auckland

Ministry of Education profile number

20529

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

66 children, including up to 20 aged under 2

Service roll

52

Gender composition

Boys 33

Girls 19

Ethnic composition

Māori

NZ European/Pākehā

Chinese

Cook Island

Filipino

Indian

4

39

3

2

2

2

Percentage of qualified teachers

50-79%

Review team on site

April 2014

Date of this report

3 June 2014

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

Education Review

Education Review

May 2013

March 2010

March 2007