Ilminster Intermediate

Ilminster Intermediate - 23/05/2019

School Context

Ilminster Intermediate School located in Kaiti Gisborne, caters for students in Years 7 and 8. Most of the 418 students attending at the time of this ERO review identify as Māori. The roll includes a small number of Pacific students.

The school’s mission is to meet the needs of individuals through programmes emphasising academic, social and cultural awareness underpinned by a vision of: ‘Simply the best’.

Leaders and teachers regularly report to the board, schoolwide information about outcomes for students in the following areas:

  • achievement

  • wellbeing

  • attendance.

The introduction of Matauranga groups for literacy, numeracy, health and physical education and connection subjects are in addition to the learning centres that cater for self-identified strengths and interests. In 2019 the school has implemented three bilingual classes and is reviewing the curriculum to include its local curriculum.

The school has stable staffing and a full complement of trustees including longstanding and new members.

Evaluation Findings

1 Equity and excellence – achievement of valued outcomes for students

1.1 How well is the school achieving equitable and excellent outcomes for all its students?

Most learners achieved the school’s expectations in reading, writing and mathematics at the end of 2018. The school continues to prioritise wellbeing and readiness of learners to engage in learning.

Senior leaders generate annual numeracy and literacy reports that consider achievement data and identify the acceleration and progress of all students. Entry data shows a significant number of incoming students below curriculum expectation. School data shows considerable shifts in achievement that are generally sustained through to the end of Year 8.

Achievement information since 2016 shows most Māori students continue to do well in reading, writing and mathematics. There has been a steady increase in achievement for Pacific students in reading and writing over time. There is minimal disparity in writing for all groups. However, some disparity is evident for Māori and Pacific in reading compared to Pākehā. This is more significant in mathematics.

Learners with additional needs are well identified, their needs recognised and programmes of support are in place. External resourcing and expertise supports this provision.

1.2 How well is the school accelerating learning for those Māori and other students who need this?

A clear focus on lifting and accelerating the achievement of priority learners in reading, writing and mathematics is evident. The emphasis is to shift students from achieving below expectations to enable them to better access the curriculum.

Analysis of school data shows significant acceleration of progress for at risk learners in reading, writing and mathematics.

2 School conditions for equity and excellence – processes and practices

2.1 What school processes and practices are effective in enabling achievement of equity and excellence, and acceleration of learning?

Trustees, leaders and teachers are strongly focused on promoting positive outcomes for children and their whānau. The provision of equitable opportunities for all students to access and participate in learning is a high priority. All students have access to a broad range of learning activities, resources and experiences that effectively engage them. The learning environment is inclusive and fosters a sense of belonging and community. This an important part of the school’s culture and curriculum organisation.

Leaders and teachers strongly prioritise capacity building to strengthen schoolwide practice. Teachers are reflective and this is encouraged through shared planning, observations and feedback. The leadership team works deliberately and purposefully to promote a culture of relational trust and collaboration that encourages participation and engagement for improvement. Appropriate professional development for teaching and learning builds the collective accountability of teachers.

Programmes and meaningful learning experiences are responsive to children’s interests and needs. Leaders and teachers have strengthened the curriculum to deliver numeracy and literacy more effectively to better cater for the needs of at risk learners. The school promotes students’ awareness and identity of self as capable and successful learners. Learning to learn is a priority and incorporates connections to students’ lives, interests, prior understandings and out-of-school experiences.

Teachers and leaders hold high expectations for all learners, including themselves. School practices are grounded in positive relationships in a respectful and inclusive environment. Caring and mutual respect are highly evident. Values and positive engagement in school life are promoted through Positive Behaviour for Learning (PB4L). Staff connect to students’ worlds to promote success, engagement, resilience and learning attitudes.

A culture of reflection, review and evaluation is well established to promote continuous improvement. The impact of the curriculum is monitored, reviewed and refined. Multiple perspectives are sought including student voice. An emphasis on promoting consistency is evident, with a considered approach to improvement and change.

There is a strong foundation for whānau and student engagement and a range of strategies support this. Teachers and leaders regularly consult with whānau, students and community. Community connections continue to strengthen this.

2.2 What further developments are needed in school processes and practices for achievement of equity and excellence, and acceleration of learning?

Trustees and leaders should continue to develop alignment of systems, processes and practices that better identify how well they are addressing disparity of groups of students by reporting rates of progress for at risk learners in each learning area.

Leaders have identified, and ERO agrees, that appraisal continues to be strengthened. New resources and ways of working, appropriately focused on challenging teachers and clarity and coherence across the school, are being implemented. As this process becomes embedded, leaders should ensure that all teacher appraisals include a much stronger focus on the impact of teacher practices on student outcomes.

Trustees and leaders should continue to develop a consistent shared understanding and approach to evaluation to ensure all aspects are strongly linked to evidence and outcomes.

Trustees are responsive to resourcing identified priorities. To continue to improve practice the Board should:

  • review its effectiveness in relation to governance, stewardship and legislative responsibilities

  • strengthen board minutes to better show the quality of discussion in relation to outcomes and priorities.

3 Board assurance on legal requirements

Before the review, the board and principal of the school completed the ERO board assurance statement and self-audit checklists. In these documents they attested that they had taken all reasonable steps to meet their legislative obligations related to the following:

  • board administration

  • curriculum

  • management of health, safety and welfare

  • personnel management

  • finance

  • asset management.

During the review, ERO checked the following items because they have a potentially high impact on student safety and wellbeing:

  • emotional safety of students (including prevention of bullying and sexual harassment)

  • physical safety of students

  • teacher registration and certification

  • processes for appointing staff

  • stand down, suspension, expulsion and exclusion of students

  • attendance

  • school policies in relation to meeting the requirements of the Vulnerable Children Act 2014.

4 ERO’s Overall Judgement

On the basis of the findings of this review, ERO‘s overall evaluation judgement of Ilminster Intermediate’s performance in achieving valued outcomes for its students is: Well placed.

ERO’s Framework: Overall School Performance is available on ERO’s website.

5 Going forward

Key strengths of the school

For sustained improvement and future learner success, the school can draw on existing strengths in the:

  • systems and processes that support student wellbeing and promote an inclusive culture and sense of belonging for students

  • extensive curriculum that encourages student engagement, learning and achievement

  • strategic and coherent approach to building leadership and growing staff professional capability to improve outcomes for students.

Next steps

For sustained improvement and future learner success, priorities for further development are in strengthening:

  • appraisal and inquiry to further support teachers to improve their practice

  • the process for monitoring legislative requirements

  • internal evaluation to better measure impact on students outcomes.

Actions for compliance

ERO identified non-compliance in the school related to personnel management.The board of trustees must ensure:

  1. appraisal of the principal is sufficiently robust, documented and meets Teaching Council of Aotearoa New Zealand requirements.
    [s77c State Sector Act 1988]

Areas for improved compliance practice

To improve current practice, the board of trustees should:

  • strengthen systems for monitoring, reviewing and reporting health and safety policies and practices

  • ensure the appraisal process more clearly aligns with Teaching Council of Aotearoa requirements.

Phillip Cowie

Director Review and Improvement Services Central

Central Region

23 May 2019

About the school

Location

Gisborne

Ministry of Education profile number

2581

School type

Intermediate (Years 7 and 8)

School roll

418

Gender composition

Male 50%, Female 50%

Ethnic composition

Māori 72%
NZ European/Pākehā 24%
Pacific 2%
Other ethnic groups 2%

Students with Ongoing Resourcing Funding (ORS)

Yes

Provision of Māori medium education

Yes

Review team on site

February 2019

Date of this report

23 May 2019

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review September 2014
Education Review September 2011

Ilminster Intermediate - 25/09/2014

Findings

Ilminster Intermediate provides a positive and inclusive environment. The curriculum offers wide experiences and options to cater for students’ strengths, interests and engagement in learning. Students make good progress in relation to National Standards for reading, writing and mathematics. Senior leaders and trustees seek continuous improvement to promote positive outcomes for students.

ERO is likely to carry out the next review in four-to-five years.

1 Context

What are the important features of this school that have an impact on student learning?

Ilminster Intermediate School is located in Kaiti, Gisborne and caters for students in Years 7 and 8. Most of the 359 students attending at the time of this ERO review identify as Māori. The roll includes a small number of Pacific students.

The Ilminster vision, 'Simply the Best', is underpinned by high expectations and a strengths-based philosophy of student learning. Students work in learning centres, which are structured to cater for self-identified strengths and interests, and encourage engagement.

The school's 2011 ERO report affirmed good performance and recommended that leaders consider ways to accelerate student progress. Since then there have been no changes of senior personnel. They have worked with an external adviser to review school operation and use the findings to build leadership and teacher capacity across the school. Continuous professional learning and development (PLD) is leading to new beliefs about effectiveness.

Many trustees are long-serving. School members work collaboratively to foster student wellbeing and success through equity of access to the curriculum. The environment is welcoming.

2 Learning

How well does this school use achievement information to make positive changes to learners’ engagement, progress and achievement?

School leaders use student information well to promote student engagement and learning outcomes. Attendance and achievement data are used to develop school wide and learning centre targets that support strategic goals for improvement.

Board planning is responsive to information received. Provision is made for PLD, interventions for students at risk of not progressing and meeting the National Standards, and programme resources.

School achievement data for reading, writing and mathematics shows:

  • patterns of performance across the three areas for the year, gender and ethnic groups
  • progress for the year groups over their time at the school and for identified students as a result of interventions
  • positive student responses toward many aspects of school life
  • improved and high levels of attendance.

Leaders know the extent of progress made by groups and how school performance compares with nationally referenced data. The 2012 and 2013 National Standards information reported indicates that the school wide level of student achievement has been sustained in reading and improved in writing and mathematics. School analysis of data shows an upward shift, especially for Year 7. Overall gains made by Year 7 students in 2012 were sustained and improved by the end of Year 8.

Specific programmes for assisting progress are having success. The mid-2014 monitoring information indicates expected progress for many students and an accelerated rate for some.

Improvement is a collective responsibility. School leaders are supporting teachers to use information for targeting individual student learning needs more precisely and identifying which strategies have made the difference. Teachers’ learning is further promoted through regular opportunities to discuss data, student progress and effective practice.

Continued promotion of consistency in understanding and practice across teachers is likely to sharpen their responsiveness to individual learning needs. Extending the scope of learning centre targets, through including all at risk learners in expectations for accelerated progress, should give additional support to the drive for success for all.

Written reports inform parents of their child's academic, social and creative success. Identified next learning steps are purposeful and useful for supporting learning at home. Teachers and parents work collaboratively to promote student outcomes.

3 Curriculum

How effectively does this school’s curriculum promote and support student learning?

School structures and curriculum design are effective strategies for fostering engagement and learning.

The school vision and values are well understood and clearly evident in the environment. Students’ interests, strengths, and needs are catered for within their chosen learning centre. Students know their opinions and those of their whānau are invited and respected.

Students are offered an extensive range of opportunities and new experiences for learning across academic, physical, social and cultural areas. They learn through inquiry-led teaching for connecting understandings, knowledge and thinking across the curriculum. The elements of personal choice and direction help to increase their level of engagement.

Teaching is of good quality. Leaders monitor how well new processes are promoting effectiveness and appreciate that development needs to be sustained. Formal guidelines to support teaching continue to be reviewed in line with professional learning.

The impact of PLD is evident in the quality of interactions and tone throughout the school. Students and teachers have worked to define strategies for promoting positive engagement and the success of these is evident across classrooms.

For a high proportion of Pacific students English is a second language. The progress and achievement of all Pacific students is a school priority. These students are assisted to access the curriculum through specific language development programmes. Learning is closely monitored by the support and centre teams.

Student transition from primary school, then to Year 8 and on to secondary school, is well considered and supported. Processes involve students, parents, whānau and other schools, to be informed about preferences and needs. Some aspects are under review to enhance how students are supported to continue their learning pathways.

How effectively does the school promote educational success for Māori, as Māori?

Most students identify as Māori. Students’ culture, language and identity are reflected in the environment and contexts for learning. Aspirations for cultural inclusion and success are well expressed in the curriculum.

The Ministry of Education strategy Ka Hikitia – Accelerating Success 2013 - 2017, has been used to reflect on culturally inclusive practices in the school. To give more guidance to evaluation of effectiveness for informing review, leaders and teachers should consider using Tātaiako: Cultural Competencies for Teachers within the performance management process.

4 Sustainable Performance

How well placed is the school to sustain and improve its performance?

The school is well placed to sustain good performance and further improve outcomes for students because:

  • the focus on student wellbeing, learning and success is persistent
  • actions for improvement are planned in response to review information
  • the approach is deliberate and coherent
  • strategies are effectively communicated, led and supported
  • progress is closely monitored
  • the extent of success is known, shared and celebrated
  • areas of further development are recognised and addressed
  • professional leadership is strong.

Board composition reflects its school community and provides a conduit for parent and whānau voice. Trustees are conscious of the need to be proactive in managing continuity of effective governance. They foster community relationships.

Board assurance on legal requirements

Before the review, the board of trustees and principal of the school completed the ERO Board Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklists. In these documents they attested that they had taken all reasonable steps to meet their legislative obligations related to:

  • board administration
  • curriculum
  • management of health, safety and welfare
  • personnel management
  • financial management
  • asset management.

During the review, ERO checked the following items because they have a potentially high impact on student achievement:

  • emotional safety of students (including prevention of bullying and sexual harassment)
  • physical safety of students
  • teacher registration
  • processes for appointing staff
  • stand-downs, suspensions, expulsions and exclusions
  • attendance.

Conclusion

Ilminster Intermediate provides a positive and inclusive environment. The curriculum offers wide experiences and options to cater for students’ strengths, interests and engagement in learning. Students make good progress in relation to National Standards for reading, writing and mathematics. Senior leaders and trustees seek continuous improvement to promote positive outcomes for students.

ERO is likely to carry out the next review in four-to-five years.

Joyce Gebbie

National Manager Review Services Central Region

25 September 2014

About the School

Location

Gisborne

Ministry of Education profile number

2581

School type

Intermediate (Years 7 and 8)

School roll

359

Gender composition

Male 54%,

Female 46%

Ethnic composition

Māori

NZ European/Pākehā

Pacific

85%

10%

5%

Review team on site

August 2014

Date of this report

25 September 2014

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

Education Review

Education Review

September 2011

May 2008

May 2003