Naenae School

Education institution number:
2922
School type:
Contributing
School gender:
Co-Educational
Definition:
Bilingual Year 7 and Year 8 School
Total roll:
314
Telephone:
Address:

Wheatley Street, Naenae, Lower Hutt

View on map

Naenae School - 18/06/2020

School Context

Naenae School is located in Lower Hutt. It has a roll of 275 students, approximately two thirds of whom are in Years 1-6 and learn in English medium classrooms. Around one third are enrolled in Te Kohanga Te Ra, the rumaki Māori (immersion programme) which provides te reo Māori teaching and learning for students in Years 1-8.

The school is culturally diverse, with two thirds of students identifying as Māori, one fifth as having Pacific heritage, and the balance a mix of other ethnicities. Students with high dependency needs are catered for within a specialist teaching space or regular classrooms. Both The New Zealand Curriculum and Te Marautanga O Aotearoa guide the school’s local curriculum.

Valued outcomes for students are for ‘All students to be the best they can be’. Its C.A.R.E. values of Care/Manaakitanga, Assist/Awhinatanga, Respect/Whakaute, Responsibility/Haepapatanga and Excel/Hiranga underpin school priorities and strategic direction. Current goals and targets focus on improving student outcomes through increased engagement and quality teaching.

The School is a member of the Naenae Kāhui Ako/ Community of Learning (CoL).

Leaders and teachers regularly report to the board, schoolwide information about outcomes for students in the following areas:

  • student progress and achievement in reading, writing and mathematics
  • curriculum enrichment opportunities
  • student wellbeing and attendance
  • CoL outcomes and implications for learners.

Evaluation Findings

1 Equity and excellence – achievement of valued outcomes for students

1.1 How well is the school achieving equitable and excellent outcomes for all its students?

Student achievement in Te Kohanga Te Ra, in relation to Marautanga O Aotearoa, indicates that in 2019 the large majority of students achieved well in pānui/reading, tuhituhi/writing and pangarau/mathematics. Girls are achieving better than boys in all three learning areas.

In the English medium, in 2019, a large majority of students achieved at expected levels in relation to the New Zealand Curriculum in reading and mathematics. The majority achieve at expected curriculum levels in writing.

Boys’ achievement is lower than that of girls in these three areas of the curriculum. Pacific achievement is higher than other ethnic groups in reading and writing. The achievement of Māori and Pacific students is similar in mathematics.

1.2 How well is the school accelerating learning for those Māori and other students who need this?

The school has had some success in accelerating learning for Māori and other students who need this. Acceleration is evident for some students of all ethnicities within the three key learning areas of pānui, tuhituhi and pangarau.

Targets are set to improve the achievement of boys and other groups whose learning requires acceleration.

2 School conditions for equity and excellence – processes and practices

2.1 What school processes and practices are effective in enabling achievement of equity and excellence, and acceleration of learning?

Students experience a broad curriculum that is highly relevant to students and replicated in both mediums. Learning programmes are responsive to student needs and interests. Class relationships are friendly and supportive. Teachers use a range of data effectively to develop class programmes and opportunities for learning.

The needs of students with additional needs are well known and suitably supported. Staff and students are both inclusive and supportive of these students. External agency support is accessed through an appropriate range of government and other agencies. Conductive education provides further support to those students with the highest additional needs. These students are both specifically provided for, and included in, the wide range of school events.

Curriculum design reflects the uniqueness of the school, following a comprehensive review. The resulting curriculum has clearly documented expectations for the promotion of bicultural and multi-cultural perspectives through a strong focus on language and identity. This is particularly evident for Māori, but Samoan and other cultures are increasingly acknowledged and celebrated. The curriculum seeks to share and celebrate stories from history of both Māori and early settlers. It provides choices for teaching and learning in a setting influenced by kaupapa Māori and in the full-immersion setting.

Trustees, students and staff understand tikanga practices and value them highly. Cultural expertise, both Māori and Samoan, is internally available and effectively accessed. Raising teachers’ cultural competency is an ongoing journey and teachers are committed to growing their practice in this area. A number of strategies are in place to support this growth.

Connections between the school and its wider community are strong. Whānau opinions have been sought, considered and incorporated. Community expertise is valued and utilised to support the delivery of class, and a wide range of sporting, programmes. Multiple opportunities are provided to build relationships with other community organisations.

Leaders set clear expectations for improvements to students’ success and teachers’ professional learning. They provide regular opportunities for staff to engage in professional learning and readings related to identified areas for review and development. Leaders are improvement focused and reflect on the impact of changes made.

A strongly collaborative culture is evident, as are positive and respectful relationships across all groups. Trustees and school staff share commitment to the school, its values and mission, goals, community and kaupapa. They view students holistically and are focused on positive student outcomes related to wellbeing, academic outcomes and sporting achievement.

2.2 What further developments are needed in school processes and practices for achievement of equity and excellence, and acceleration of learning?

Leaders and teachers have established a useful framework for internal evaluation. They should continue to develop processes to better understand the impact of new initiatives and teaching practices on student outcomes. They are yet to develop schoolwide processes for gathering reliable and relevant data to measure the impact of changes on student outcomes.

Teachers have been integrating ‘play-based learning’ opportunities into the daily curriculum and are actively exploring ways to promote and document learning in this context. They acknowledge that the impact of this approach on children’s learning is yet to be evaluated, to better understand what difference this approach makes to children’s learning. Evaluation needs to focus on the effectiveness of planning and identification of purposeful teaching strategies to actively promote progress in targeted areas.

There is also a need to strengthen the recording of key information about learning strategies that work for individual high-needs students, to enable all staff working with these students to access this information. Development of schoolwide systems to better track progress and share information in these areas is a next step.

3 Board Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the board and principal of the school completed the ERO board assurance statement and self-audit checklists. In these documents they attested that they had taken all reasonable steps to meet their legislative obligations related to the following:

  • board administration
  • curriculum
  • management of health, safety and welfare
  • personnel management
  • finance
  • asset management.

During the review, ERO checked the following items because they have a potentially high impact on student safety and wellbeing:

  • emotional safety of students (including prevention of bullying and sexual harassment)
  • physical safety of students
  • teacher registration and certification
  • processes for appointing staff
  • stand down, suspension, expulsion and exclusion of students
  • attendance
  • school policies in relation to meeting the requirements of the Children’s Act 2014.

4 ERO’s Overall Judgement

On the basis of the findings of this review, ERO’s overall evaluation judgement of Naenae School’s performance in achieving valued outcomes for its students is: Well placed.

ERO’s Framework: Overall Findings and Judgement Tool derived from School Evaluation Indicators: Effective Practice for Improvement and Learner Success is available on ERO’s website.

5 Going forward

Key strengths of the school

For sustained improvement and future learner success, the school can draw on existing strengths in:

  • a curriculum that focuses on positive outcomes for students
  • culturally responsive practices that recognise students’ culture, language and identity, and make provision for learning in a Māori immersion medium
  • collaborative trustees and leaders that are improvement focused and consultative about school decisions.

Next steps

For sustained improvement and future learner success, priorities for further development are to:

  • better identify effective planning and purposeful teaching strategies to actively promote progress in targeted areas
  • develop schoolwide systems to improve the tracking of student progress and sharing of information
  • continue to develop evidence-based evaluation processes to better understand the impact of new initiatives and teaching practices on improving student outcomes.

Areas for improved compliance practice

To improve current practice, the board of trustees should:

  • ensure policies reflect current practice and are readily available
  • strengthen the school’s emergency plan and implement regular emergency drills
  • ensure accidents are more fully recorded and regularly analysed, with analysis being included in board reports.

Dr Lesley Patterson

Director Review and Improvement

Southern Region - Te Tai Tini

18 June 2020

About the school

The Education Counts website provides further information about the school’s student population, student engagement and student achievement.

Naenae School - 23/06/2017

Summary

Naenae School caters for students in Years 1 to 6. At the time of this review, 205 students were enrolled, with 60% identifying as Māori and 26% of Pacific heritage. Approximately 11% of students have significant physical and learning needs. Two new classrooms accommodate the steady roll growth since the June 2014 ERO report.

The school’s Māori Medium unit, Te Kohanga Te Ra, has grown to fifty students in three full immersion classes using Te Marautanga o Aotearoa curriculum. A conductive education classroom provides for children with motor disorders and other high needs. The school has developed relationships with nearby early learning services and schools. They are part of the Naenae Community of Learning | Kāhui Ako (CoL).

CARE School values emphasise: caring, manaakitanga; assisting, awhinatanga; respecting whakaute; responsibility, kawangatanga; and excellence, hiranga. Students are supported in their learning through an afterschool programme and a boys’ mentoring programme.

National Standards data over the past three years shows fluctuations and disparity in rates of students’ achievement. Approximately three-quarters of students achieve at or above in relation to the National Standards in reading, with half the students at this level in mathematics and writing.

Teachers have been involved in a wide range of professional learning and development (PLD) including Positive Behaviour for Learning (PB4L), mathematics and pāngarau, accelerated learning in literacy (ALL), and learning with digital technology.

How well is the school achieving equitable outcomes for all children?

National Standards information shows that some groups of students makeprogress over time, but many do not achieve at expected levels. Disparity of achievement is evident between boys and girls and Māori and Pacific learners. Significant fluctuations in achievement occur across year levels, and in writing and mathematics.

In 2016, most students in Te Kohanga Ra achieved at or above Ngā Whanaketanga Rumaki Māori in pāngarau, pānui, korero and tuhituhi.

The school has recently increased emphasis on improving its systems and strategies to support students whose learning and achievement need acceleration. Further developments in school processes to achieve equity and excellence should involve: strengthening target setting and monitoring processes; inquiry and internal evaluation; and building teaching practice. 

The school has capacity and capability to accelerate learning for all children. However, disparity in achievement for Māori and/or other children remains.

ERO is likely to carry out the next review in three years.

Equity and excellence

How effectively does this school respond to Māori and other children whose learning and achievement need acceleration?

The school’s effectiveness in responding to students whose learning needs acceleration is variable. Some groups of students make expected progress. However, the school recognises that significant numbers of Māori students do not make accelerated progress.

Teachers use a range of national assessment tools to identify students’ needs and progress. They are increasing their knowledge of these tools to better inform their planning and strategies to improve achievement. Teachers know their students well and are beginning to use Accelerating Learning Plans to better target and monitor small groups of students whose achievement needs acceleration.

Teachers in the Māori Medium unit use culturally responsive practices and programmes to support and promote students’ learning. Rates of achievement for some targeted students have accelerated in pāngarau, and increased in korero since 2015. Disparity between boys and girls continues.

Leaders and teachers appropriately identify the importance of robust moderation of their assessment judgements. Lead teachers are participating in moderation clusters and targeted PLD to build capability in this area.

School conditions supporting equity and excellence

What school processes are effective in enabling achievement of equity and excellence?

Leaders are working to improving practices and processes that better promote the achievement of equity and excellence.

School tone and relationships are respectful and positive. The CARE values are reinforced by the strong focus on programmes and learning contexts that promote students’ wellbeing and sense of belonging in the school. Students observed by ERO demonstrated high levels of engagement and cooperation in their learning.

An emphasis on strengthening teaching to be more responsive to learners’ needs, backgrounds and interests is evident. Teachers build their cultural competencies and identify areas they need to develop. PLD and improved teaching, particularly in literacy and mathematics, have enabled some targeted groups of students to accelerate their learning and achievement. Further use of accelerated learning plans for targeted students across the school should support improved rates of progress for more of these learners.

Ongoing emphasis is appropriately placed on broadening students’ learning, including cooperative and experiential learning and use of digital communication. High levels of engagement and success are enjoyed by students involved in kapa haka performances and cultural competitions. 

Leaders promote increased interaction between students, teachers, families and the community to strengthen learning partnerships. Increased use of digital programmes, home learning materials, homework centre programmes and adult mentoring in reading and counting, assist targeted learners to make progress.

Sustainable development for equity and excellence

What further developments are needed in school processes to achieve equity and excellence?

Some school processes need further development to achieve and sustain equity and excellence.

The school has identified a need for effective leadership and monitoring of learning programmes for students with high and additional learning needs. A special education needs coordinator (SENCO) has recently been appointed and has begun to implement improved systems.

Increasing use of review is beginning to inform plans and actions to drive improvement in some areas of the school. Trustees and leaders should use internal evaluation to identify what works and what needs to change to improve outcomes for learners. Ensuring school wide processes and support are in place for the analysis of accurate data to measure effectiveness and impact should assist trustees and leaders to develop clear goals, targets and actions that focus on acceleration of identified students.

Building teacher capability should be supported by teachers more explicitly linking their inquiry and appraisal processes to improved outcomes for students whose achievement needs acceleration. An annual evaluative appraisal summary statement about teachers' strengths and areas to develop should provide greater direction for their future development.

Board assurance on legal requirements

Before the review, the board and principal of the school completed the ERO board assurance statement and self-audit checklists. In these documents they attested that they had taken all reasonable steps to meet their legislative obligations related to the following:

  • board administration

  • curriculum

  • management of health, safety and welfare

  • personnel management

  • asset management.

During the review, ERO checked the following items because they have a potentially high impact on student safety and wellbeing:

  • emotional safety of students (including prevention of bullying and sexual harassment)

  • physical safety of students

  • teacher registration and certification

  • processes for appointing staff

  • stand down, suspension, expulsion and exclusion of students

  • attendance

  • school policies in relation to meeting the requirements of the Vulnerable Children Act 2014. 

Going forward

How well placed is the school to accelerate the achievement of all children who need it?

The school has capacity and capability to accelerate learning for all children. However, disparity in achievement for Māori and other children remains.

Leaders and teachers:

  • need to develop and implement approaches that effectively meet the needs of each child

  • need to improve the school conditions that support the acceleration of children’s learning and achievement

  • need to build teacher capability to accelerate children’s learning and achievement.

The school agrees to:

  • develop more targeted planning to accelerate learning for children

  • monitor targeted planning, improved teaching, and children’s progress

  • discuss the school’s progress with ERO.

ERO will provide an internal evaluation workshop in response to a request by the school.

ERO is likely to carry out the next review in three years.

Alan Wynyard

Deputy Chief Review Officer Central (Acting)

23 June 2017

About the school

Location

Lower Hutt

Ministry of Education profile number

2922

School type

Contributing (Years 1 to 6)

School roll

205

Gender composition

Girls 51%, Boys 49%

Ethnic composition

Māori 60%
Pacific 26%
Pākehā 8%
Other ethnic groups 6%

Provision of Māori medium education

Yes

Number of Māori medium classes

3

Total number of students in Māori medium (MME)

50

Number of students in Level 1 MME

50

Review team on site

May 2017

Date of this report

23 June 2017

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review June 2014
Education Review April 2011
Education Review February 2008