Hororata School

Hororata School

Te Ara Huarau | School Profile Report

Background

This Profile Report was written within 22 months of the Education Review Office and Hororata School working in Te Ara Huarau, an improvement evaluation approach used in most English Medium State and State Integrated Schools. For more information about Te Ara Huarau see ERO’s website www.ero.govt.nz

Context 

Hororata is a contributing primary school for learners from Years 0 to 6, located in the Selwyn District of Mid-Canterbury. The school is a member of Te Hū o Kākāpōtahi Kāhui Ako.

Hororata School’s strategic priorities for improving outcomes for learners are to:

  • enhance achievement

  • provide quality teaching and learning

  • provide effective conditions for learning.

You can find a copy of the school’s strategic and annual plan on Hororata School’s website.

ERO and the school are working together to evaluate leadership for sustainability of a coherent learning pathway of effective reading practices, from Years 0 to 6.

The rationale for selecting this evaluation is:

  • this focus aligns with strategic planning that prioritises a review of the quality of reading practices within the school’s integrated and localised curriculum, and to weave culturally responsive practices through all learning

  • the school has a strong focus on developing teaching and learning programmes to improve student success, and is considering ways to purposefully sustain these practices going forward

  • reading recovery has been replaced as a withdrawal intervention by professional development in structured literacy, designed to strengthen in-class teaching practices to foster success for all learners.

  • English-language learners and neuro-diverse learners will require teachers to build specific skills and strategies to support literacy success.

The school expects to see staff enacting quality teaching practices, so that students experience a smooth transition and learning pathway through the school. Teachers will demonstrate deliberate acts of teaching and adaptive teaching skills that respond to students’ individual strengths and prior learning. Teachers will scaffold enhanced learning, engagement, achievement and progress in reading. Culturally responsive practices will be evident in strong relationships between staff and students, promoting equity and excellence. Leaders will sustain quality practices and build capability by embedding collaborative opportunities for teachers’ evidence-based reflection and inquiry, including a professional growth cycle structure and approach.

Strengths

The school can draw from the following strengths to support the school in its goal to evaluate leadership for sustainability of a coherent learning pathway of effective reading practices, from Years 0 to 6:

  • a strong focus on the school’s values, promoting student wellbeing and inclusion

  • thorough analysis of data to inform evidence-based strategic planning

  • strong community connections, and collaborative partnerships with other schools.

Where to next?

Moving forward, the school will prioritise:

  • completing the investigation phase of the school’s ERO Evaluation for Improvement Plan to create a current picture of teaching and learning strengths and needs

  • using this information to collaboratively explore consistency of practice and opportunities for growth, using a GROW framework for sensemaking, to prioritise the focus areas for change and improvement.

ERO’s role will be to support the school in its evaluation for improvement cycle to improve outcomes for all learners. ERO will support the school in reporting their progress to the community. The next public report on ERO’s website will be a Te Ara Huarau | School Evaluation Report and is due within three years.

Shelley Booysen
Director of Schools

15 May 2023 

About the School

The Education Counts website provides further information about the school’s student population, student engagement and student achievement.  educationcounts.govt.nz/home

Hororata School

Board Assurance with Regulatory and Legislative Requirements Report 2022 to 2025

As of March 2022, the Hororata School Board of Trustees has attested to the following regulatory and legislative requirements:

Board Administration

Yes

Curriculum

Yes

Management of Health, Safety and Welfare

Yes

Personnel Management

Yes

Finance

Yes

Assets

Yes

Further Information

For further information please contact Hororata School Board of Trustees.

The next Board of Trustees assurance that it is meeting regulatory and legislative requirements will be reported, along with the Te Ara Huarau | School Evaluation Report, within three years.

Information on ERO’s role and process in this review can be found on the Education Review Office website.

Shelley Booysen
Director of Schools

15 May 2023 

About the School

The Education Counts website provides further information about the school’s student population, student engagement and student achievement. educationcounts.govt.nz/home

Hororata School - 30/08/2017

Summary

Hororata School is a contributing primary school for children from Years 1-6. At the time of the review the school had 75 children. This includes a small number of children who identify as Māori and as Pacific. The school’s roll fluctuates throughout the year as a result of parents’ employment in the dairy industry. The school is part of the Malvern Kāhui Ako | Community of Learning (CoL).

The school has addressed most recommendations identified in the 2013 ERO report, including extending curriculum reviews, and increasing opportunities for Māori children to experience success as Māori.

The 2010 and 2013 ERO reports identified the need to consult with parents of Māori children to gain their views about their children’s learning as Māori. This is an area of compliance that needs to be urgently addressed.

How well is the school achieving equitable outcomes for all children?

The school responds well to most children whose learning and achievement need acceleration. Further development is needed to lift achievement levels in writing, particularly for boys.

The school has many processes that are effective in enabling the achievement of equity and excellence. These include leaders using internal evaluation effectively for identifying areas needing to improve.

The school is well supported by its wider community. It is a very inclusive school, particularly of students new to the school who are quickly included in appropriate learning programmes.

At the time of this review most children were achieving well. The school demonstrates strong progress toward achieving equity in educational outcomes, supported by effective, sustainable processes and practices.

ERO is likely to carry out the next review in three years.

Equity and excellence

How effectively does this school respond to Māori and other children whose learning and achievement need acceleration?

The school is responding well to all children whose learning and achievement need acceleration. Māori children are achieving well in reading, writing and mathematics in relation to National Standards.

Overall, most children are achieving well in reading, writing and mathematics in relation to the National Standards. However, there is disparity for boys in writing and reading.

There are suitable procedures and processes for making reliable judgments about achievement. This should be strengthened by better documentation of moderation discussions. Teachers need to develop a shared understanding of what accelerated progress means.

School conditions supporting equity and excellence

What school processes are effective in enabling achievement of equity and excellence?

The school has many effective processes to enable equity and excellence for learners.

The board and principal have high expectations that all children have the opportunity to learn, progress and achieve. They are strongly focussed on children’s progress towards achieving the school’s vision of ‘being active and being able to think outside the box.’ Teachers, the principal and trustees are highly responsive to learner needs. Learner needs are identified early, especially for children new to the school. The board thoroughly scrutinises achievement information to make well-informed resourcing decisions to raise student achievement.

Leaders and teachers ensure a supportive learning environment that supports children’s learning and wellbeing. There is a strong focus on health and wellbeing at all levels of learning. The principal uses effective internal-evaluation processes and shares the outcomes and recommendations for improvements with the board and staff.

The school has a localised curriculum that is responsive to children’s interests and home lives, and is well aligned to the school’s vision and valued outcomes. The curriculum is being redesigned using research to reflect modern teaching practices and create richer learning opportunities for children. The current curriculum guidelines effectively guide teaching and learning. Children are actively involved in the ‘learning to learn process’ and many know about their learning.

Sustainable development for equity and excellence

Some processes need further development to achieve equity and excellence for all students.

What further developments are needed in school processes to achieve equity and excellence?

Charter targets should be strengthened to include all students who need to make accelerated progress in their learning. Associated planning should more clearly identify the actions needed to achieve desired learning outcomes for these children.

Teachers need to formally evaluate the effectiveness of classroom programmes and practices to:

  • find out what is going well and contributing to success for individual children’s learning
  • identify what needs improving and what teaching practices are having the greatest impact on children’s learning.

Board assurance on legal requirements

Before the review, the board and principal of the school completed the ERO board assurance statement and self-audit checklists. In these documents they attested that they had taken all reasonable steps to meet their legislative obligations related to the following: 

  • board administration

  • curriculum

  • management of health, safety and welfare

  • personnel management

  • asset management.

During the review, ERO checked the following items because they have a potentially high impact on student safety and wellbeing:

  • emotional safety of students (including prevention of bullying and sexual harassment)

  • physical safety of students

  • teacher registration and certification

  • processes for appointing staff

  • stand down, suspension, expulsion and exclusion of students

  • attendance

  • school policies in relation to meeting the requirements of the Vulnerable Children Act 2014.

Actions required

ERO identified non-compliance in relation toconsulting with the school’s Māori community. The school needs to develop and make known to the school’s Māori community, policies and/or procedures, plans and targets for improving the achievement of Māori students. National Administration Guideline 1.e.

In order to address this the board must consult with the school’s Māori community.

Going forward

How well placed is the school to accelerate the achievement of all children who need it?

Children are achieving well. The school demonstrates strong progress toward achieving equity in educational outcomes, supported by effective, sustainable processes and practices.

Agreed next steps are to:

  • strengthen charter targets and associated planning towards meeting these
  • extend all teachers’ knowledge and use of effective evaluation practices.

ERO is likely to carry out the next review in three years.

Dr Lesley Patterson

Deputy Chief Review Officer Southern (Te Waipounamu)

30 August 2017

About the school 

Location

Canterbury

Ministry of Education profile number

3381

School type

Contributing

School roll

75

Gender composition

Boys: 49

Girls: 26

Ethnic composition

Māori 4

Pākehā 59

Pacific 1

Asian 7

Other 4

Provision of Māori medium education

No

Review team on site

July 2017

Date of this report

30 August 2017

Most recent ERO reports

Education Review November 2013

Education Review December 2010

Education Review March 2008

 

Hororata School - 08/11/2013

1 Context

What are the important features of this school that have an impact on student learning?

Hororata School is located in a rural community west of Christchurch. Many of the students come from families working in the local dairy industry. The community has been significantly affected in the last three years by the Canterbury earthquakes and severe weather events.

The school is well supported by the local community. The active parent teacher association funds a number of initiatives. These include developments in the play grounds, providing additional resources for classrooms and the library, and increasing the range of information and communication technologies available.

Students learn in three mixed-year level classrooms. There have been a number of changes of staff in the senior school.

The board has addressed some of the recommendations from the December 2010 ERO review. Trustees have undertaken surveys of staff, students and parents. The community has also been consulted about the school’s health programmes.

2 Learning

How well does this school use achievement information to make positive changes to learners’ engagement, progress and achievement?

The board, principal and teachers are making better use of school-wide achievement information since the last ERO review. The principal is focused on building the capacity of school leaders to extend the use of this information to support students’ learning.

The school’s most recent achievement information shows that the majority of students are achieving at or better than the National Standards in reading and some aspects of mathematics. The principal and teachers have identified groups of students who are not making the expected rates of progress in areas of writing.

Teachers collect a wide range of achievement data in reading, writing and numeracy. They make good use of this information in their class planning to meet students’ needs. Teachers have improved the way they make their judgements about student achievement.

The board is being provided with more useful reports about student achievement and progress, although greater use could be made of school-entry information to monitor progress over time. School data is used to identify groups of students who are not achieving at the expected level. Students with identified learning needs in reading, writing or mathematics are provided with additional, targeted learning support by well-trained teacher aides.

Areas for review and development

Student achievement reports to parents provide information about numeracy. The principal and teachers are aware that they need to report on all aspects of mathematics.

The school has recently asked parents about the usefulness of reports. The next step for the principal and teachers is to respond to the feedback from this survey to ensure that reports give parents clear information about how well their children are achieving and progressing in relation to the National Standards.

The board, principal and teachers need to place a greater emphasis on priority learners when setting targets and planning and evaluating class planning and programmes.

Policies and procedures are needed to guide the principal and teachers in managing additional learning support and how they will evaluate and report on its effectiveness in improving student learning.

3 Curriculum

How effectively does this school’s curriculum promote and support student learning?

The school’s curriculum is effective in promoting and supporting students’ learning.

Since the 2010 ERO report, the principal and teachers have continued to review the school’s curriculum. The curriculum now has a stronger emphasis on learning and opportunities for students to be physically active. The school’s values and skills for learning are closely linked to the New Zealand curriculum. Learning statements for English, science, health and physical education are well documented and include clear guidelines for effective teaching practice.

The principal has a suitable vision for the school’s curriculum development. This includes ensuring that the school’s curriculum provides students with a wide range of learning opportunities covering all aspects of the New Zealand curriculum.

The principal provides teachers with focused feedback on the quality of their teaching and what their next steps are.

Areas for review and development

The principal and teachers are aware they need to complete some of the curriculum learning statements. They should also include Māori perspectives in all aspects of the curriculum.

Curriculum reviews could be further extended by:

  • having clearer guidelines for what is expected as part of the review
  • a more in-depth analysis of student achievement data
  • placing greater emphasis on teachers identifying what changes they could make to their teaching practices to improve outcomes for all students
  • having clearer plans for how review recommendations are going to be used and monitored.

How effectively does the school promote educational success for Māori, as Māori?

The school has effective systems in place to identify and support individual Māori students’ learning through school assessment practices and class programmes.

While some Māori culture and language is included in the curriculum, such as school camp at a marae, ERO found limited evidence that Māori perspectives are well integrated in class programmes, teachers’ planning and the school curriculum documents.

The board has not consulted with the parents of Māori students to gain their views about their children’s learning as Māori. This was also identified as an area for action in the 2010 ERO report [Action 1].

4 Sustainable Performance

How well placed is the school to sustain and improve its performance?

The school is well placed to sustain and improve its performance.

The board is increasing its capability to plan for future school development. The board receives regular and comprehensive information about school operations.

Since the 2010 ERO review, staff work more closely together and leadership opportunities have been extended.

The principal and teachers make good links with other schools to broaden their own understanding and knowledge of teaching and learning.

Areas for review and development

The school’s long term planning does not clearly show what the main goals are for each year of the plan. The annual plans need indicators to show how these goals will be monitored and achieved.

Board assurance on legal requirements

Before the review, the board of trustees and principal of the school completed the ERO Board Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklists. In these documents they attested that they had taken all reasonable steps to meet their legislative obligations related to:

  • board administration
  • curriculum
  • management of health, safety and welfare
  • personnel management
  • financial management
  • asset management.

During the review, ERO checked the following items because they have a potentially high impact on student achievement:

  • emotional safety of students (including prevention of bullying and sexual harassment)
  • physical safety of students
  • teacher registration
  • processes for appointing staff
  • stand-downs, suspensions, expulsions and exclusions
  • attendance.

Action

The board has attested that it has not consulted with the school’s Māori community to develop and make known to the school’s community policies and or procedures, plans and targets for improving the achievement of Māori students [NAG 1 (e)].

During the onsite stage of the review ERO discussed with the board some areas of non-compliance. These related to non-teaching staff and police vetting and the board’s responsibility to promote healthy food options.

ERO has requested that the school provide an action plan to show how the board, principal and teachers will:

  • increase opportunities for Māori students to experience success as Māori
  • respond to the findings of its recent community survey.

When is ERO likely to review the school again?

ERO is likely to carry out the next review in three years.

Graham Randell

National Manager Review Services Southern Region

8 November 2013

About the School

Location

Darfield, Canterbury

Ministry of Education profile number

3381

School type

Full Primary (Years 1 to 8)

School roll

56

Gender composition

Boys 33 Girls 23

Ethnic composition

NZ European/Pākehā

Māori

Asian

Other ethnicities

44

6

4

2

Review team on site

September 2013

Date of this report

8 November 2013

Most recent ERO reports

Education Review

Education Review

Education Review

December 2010

March 2008

May 2005