Hillcrest High School Community Childcare

Education institution number:
34066
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
34
Telephone:
Address:

Carrington Avenue, Hillcrest, Hamilton

View on map

Hillcrest High School Community Childcare

ERO’s Akanuku | Assurance Review reports provide information about whether a service meets and maintains regulatory standards. Further information about Akanuku | Assurance Reviews is included at the end of this report.

ERO’s Judgement

Regulatory standards

ERO’s judgement

Curriculum

Meeting

Premises and facilities

Meeting

Health and safety

Meeting

Governance, management and administration

Meeting

Since the onsite visit the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed non-compliances and is now taking reasonable steps to meet regulatory standards.

Background

Hillcrest High School Community Childcare is a not-for-profit service located on the grounds of Hillcrest High School. This mixed-aged centre provides care and education for children up to school age. A governance board provides operational oversight. ERO’s July 2020 evaluation found that the service required further development.

Summary of Review Findings

The curriculum is informed by assessment, planning and evaluation that demonstrates an understanding of children’s learning. Children are supported to be confident in their culture. Positive steps are taken to acknowledge whānau aspirations. Teachers seek information and guidance from agencies to work effectively with children and their whānau. Children’s learning is supported through a literacy rich environment that is inclusive of a range of languages. The layout of the premises supports individual and group learning and is appropriate to the abilities of the children attending.

Actions for Compliance

During and since the onsite visit the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed the following non-compliances:

  • having a current fire evacuation scheme approved by Fire and Emergency New Zealand (HS4)
  • heavy furniture, fixtures and equipment that could fall or topple and cause serious injury or damage is secured (HS6)
  • indoor and outdoor items are safe and suitable for their intended use (PF5).

Next ERO Review

The next ERO review is likely to be an Akarangi | Quality Evaluation.

Shelley Booysen
Acting Director Review and Improvement Services (Central)
Central Region | Te Tai Pūtahi Nui

23 September 2021 

Information About the Service

Early Childhood Service Name Hillcrest High School Community Childcare
Profile Number 34066
Location Hillcrest, Hamilton

Service type

Education and care service

Number licensed for

34 children, including up to 8 aged under 2.

Percentage of qualified teachers

80-99%

Service roll

35

Ethnic composition

Māori 7, NZ European/Pākehā 11, Chinese 4, Indian 4, Other ethnic groups 9.

Review team on site

July 2021

Date of this report

23 September 2021

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review, July 2020; Education Review, December 2016.

General Information about Assurance Reviews

All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include the Licensing Criteria for Education and Care Services 2008.

Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a licence to operate.

ERO undertakes an Akanuku | Assurance Review process in any centre-based service:

  • having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation
  • previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development’
  • that has moved from a provisional to a full licence
  • that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership
  • where an Akanuku | Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulated standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher certification; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:

  • discussions with those involved in the service
  • consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems
  • observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice.

Hillcrest High School Community Ch-Care - 03/07/2020

1 Evaluation of Hillcrest High School Community Ch-Care

How well placed is Hillcrest High School Community Ch-Care to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

Hillcrest High School Community Ch-Care requires further development to promote positive learning outcomes for children.

Hillcrest High School Community Ch-Care requires further development to ensure that centre governors are compliant with all health and safety licensing requirements, as outlined in the Licensing Criteria for Early Education and Care Services 2008.

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Hillcrest High School Community Ch-Care is located in Hamilton city. It provides education and care for children from three months to school age in a mixed-aged setting. This not-for-profit, community-based centre is governed by a board of trustees consisting of parent and staff representatives. The centre is licensed for 34 children, including eight under two years. The 37 children enrolled are representative of a culturally diverse community, including 13 who identify as Māori.

The centre’s vision is to 'foster a love of learning in a fun, safe and supportive learning community'. Their philosophy aims to provide children with individual and unique opportunities for holistic life-long learning in an inclusive and respectful environment.

Since the December 2016 ERO report a new centre manager has been appointed. She is responsible for the day-to-day operation of the centre and leads a new teaching team of three fully qualified teachers and one teacher in-training. The centre has responded to some of the area for development identified in the previous ERO report.

The Review Findings

Some key practices and procedures need attention to meet the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. Governance and management practices require further development to ensure service operations meet requirements.

A clear focus on developing children’s social competence promotes a culture for learning. Teachers use positive guidance strategies well to encourage and acknowledge children's efforts and successes. Children are empowered to make choices and lead their learning increasing their confidence and independence.

Māori children and whānau benefit from manaakitanga and whanaungatanga evident in practice. Rich experiences extend children's knowledge of te ao Māori. These practices are supporting Māori children and their whānau to feel valued and affirmed in their culture. Strengthening visibility of all children's language, culture and identity in assessment documentation, including children from Pacific heritage, is an identified next step. 

Children are provided with a broad range of learning experiences both in the centre and in the community. The outdoor learning environment and regular excursions into the local nature reserve, provide children with opportunities to learn to manage risk and engage in problem solving. Children are developing as resilient and self-confident learners.

Children with additional needs and their whānau are well supported through consistency of practice and collaboration with external agencies.

Teachers' know each child well. They use this knowledge to develop individual learning plans for children that reflect their needs and parent aspirations. Continuing to develop individual planning and assessment should strengthen the visibility of children's progression of learning over time.

Transitions in to and out of the centre are flexible and responsive to the needs of individual children and their families. Infants and toddlers benefit from nurturing and secure relationships in a caring and calm environment. 

Respectful relationships between teachers, children and whānau are nurtured. Leaders are building teacher capability through effective internal evaluation practices that are improving aspects of the curriculum. Ongoing professional learning and development promotes a reflective culture focused on improvement and positive outcomes for children. Review for accountability purposes requires strengthening. Fully implementing the annual appraisal that meets the Teaching Council New Zealand requirements for the issue and renewal of teachers' practising certificates is needed.

A well-embedded philosophy promotes positive learning outcomes for all children. Regular communication and consultation with parents is increasing their involvement in decision making and the life of the centre. Strategic direction has been self-identified as an area to improve. Governance demonstrates a commitment to equitable outcomes for children.

Key Next Steps

To better promote sustainability and improvement it is timely for the board, in consultation with leaders, to:

  • clarify roles and responsibilities for governance and for leadership
  • develop a long-term strategic plan that identifies specific goals linked to priorities for learning and timelines to monitor progress
  • strengthen governance and management systems, including oversight and monitoring to meet the licensing requirements and regulatory standards.

In addition, leaders acknowledge that assessment, planning and evaluation practices should be strengthened to better reflect:

  • increasing complexity of children's learning over time
  • the visibility of all children's languages, cultures and identities.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Hillcrest High School Community Ch-Care completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Actions for compliance

ERO found areas of non-compliance in the service related to health and safety practices and governance and management. To meet requirements the service needs to improve its performance in the following areas:

  • having a current Fire Evacuation Scheme approved by Fire and Emergency New Zealand
  • carrying out and evaluating relevant emergency drills on at least a three-monthly basis
  • gathering appropriate parental acknowledgement of the administering and daily collection of medications
  • notifying the specific agency and Ministry of Education of any serious injury, illness or incident
  • safety checking of work force that is robustly undertaken and recorded.

[Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Centres 2008, HS4, HS8, HS28, HS34, GMA7A, Children's Act 2014].

To improve practice the service needs to:

  • ensure a robust process of policy and procedure review is carried out.

[Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Centres 2008]

Development Plan Recommendation

ERO recommends that the service, in consultation with the Ministry of Education, develops a plan to address the key next steps and actions outlined in this report.

Phil Cowie
Director Review and Improvement Services (Central)
Central Region - Te Tai Pūtahi Nui

3 July 2020 

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning. 

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Hillcrest, Hamilton

Ministry of Education profile number

34066

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

34 children, including up to 8 aged under 2

Service roll

37

Gender composition

Female                 19
Male                      18

Ethnic composition

Māori
NZ European/Pākehā
Pacific
Other ethnic groups

13
11
  4
  9

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49%       50-79%       80%+
Based on funding rates

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

1:4

Better than minimum requirements

Over 2

1:10

Meets minimum requirements

Review team on site

March 2020

Date of this report

3 July 2020

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

December 2016

Education Review

November 2013

Education Review

February 2011

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau. 

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement

The overall judgement that ERO makes will depend on how well the service promotes positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed
  • Well placed
  • Requires further development
  • Not well placed

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.