195 Clayton Road, Western Heights, Rotorua
View on mapBusy Bees Western Heights
Mountain View Preschool Limited
ERO’s Akanuku | Assurance Review reports provide information about whether a service meets and maintains regulatory standards. Further information about Akanuku | Assurance Reviews is included at the end of this report.
ERO’s Judgement
Regulatory standards |
ERO’s judgement |
Curriculum |
Meeting |
Premises and facilities |
Meeting |
Health and safety |
Meeting |
Governance, management, and administration |
Meeting |
At the time of the review, ERO found the service was taking reasonable steps to meet regulatory standards.
Background
Mountain View Preschool Limited is governed by Provincial Education Group Ltd. A full license was re- issued in January 2021 after the service working with the Ministry of Education. Children play in two aged-based settings. The diverse teaching team of 13 includes both qualified, unqualified and in-training kaiako. The centre philosophy incorporates core Māori values.
Summary of Review Findings
Infants, toddlers, and young children experience an inclusive, language-rich environment where their interests and choices are valued. Their development is enhanced through a range of age-appropriate equipment and experiences that extend learning and promote social competence. The service’s curriculum is underpinned by Te Tiriti o Waitangi, reflecting Māori as tangata whenua.
Aspirations held by parents for their children are respected and acknowledged. The service curriculum is informed by assessment, planning, and evaluation.
Next ERO Review
The next ERO review is likely to be an Akarangi | Quality Evaluation.
Shelley Booysen
Acting Director Review and Improvement Services
Central Region | Te Tai Pūtahi Nui
21 January 2022
Information About the Service
Early Childhood Service Name |
Mountain View Preschool Limited |
Profile Number |
40274 |
Location |
Rotorua |
Service type |
Education and care service |
Number licensed for |
42 children, including up to 15 aged under 2. |
Percentage of qualified teachers |
80-99% |
Service roll |
46 |
Ethnic composition |
Māori 23, NZ European/Pākehā 12, Afrikaans 4, Other ethnic groups 7 |
Review team on site |
Dec 2021 |
Date of this report |
21 January 2022 |
Most recent ERO report(s) |
Education Review, June 2020; Education Review, March 2017. |
General Information about Assurance Reviews
All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include the Licensing Criteria for Education and Care Services 2008.
Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a licence to operate.
ERO undertakes an Akanuku | Assurance Review process in any centre-based service:
- having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation
- previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development’
- that has moved from a provisional to a full licence
- that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership
- where an Akanuku | Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.
Management Assurance on Legal Requirements
All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:
- curriculum
- premises and facilities
- health and safety practices
- governance, management and administration.
As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulated standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:
- emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
- physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
- suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher certification; ratios)
- evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.
As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:
- discussions with those involved in the service
- consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems
- observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice.
Mountain View Preschool Limited - 17/06/2020
1 Evaluation of Mountain View Preschool Limited
How well placed is Mountain View Preschool Limited to promote positive learning outcomes for children?
Not well placed |
Requires further development |
Well placed |
Very well placed |
Mountain View Preschool Limited is well placed to promote positive learning outcomes for children.
ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.
Background
Mountain View Preschool is located in Western Heights, Rotorua. The centre is licensed to provide all-day education and care for 42 children, including 15 up to the age of two years. At the time of this review there were 47 children enrolled, including 27 Māori children.
The centre is governed by Provincial Education Group. Senior leaders provide ongoing support and guidance for the centre manager who is responsible for the day-to-day running of the preschool. The core team includes a mix of fully qualified teachers and staff who are currently undertaking study towards teaching qualifications.
The centre's philosophy emphasises partnerships with parents and a curriculum that reflects culturally appropriate and equitable opportunities.
Since the previous ERO report in 2017, a new centre manager has been appointed.
The Review Findings
Children learn in a settled and supportive environment. Respectful teaching practice encourages children to manage themselves and to develop social competency. The intentional integration of te reo and tikanga Māori is highly evident in daily routines and teachers' interactions with children. Parents and whānau feel welcome and are encouraged to participate in centre activities. Teachers are highly responsive to children's care needs. Children under the age of two are catered for in a separate room and have individualised care plans. Transitions into and through the centre are responsive to the needs of individual children. Teachers liaise with local schools to support children's transitions out of the centre. Children’s sense of belonging and wellbeing is fostered.
Coherent systems support a well-considered and consistent approach to assessment, planning and evaluation of children’s learning. Parent and whānau aspirations are regularly captured and enacted in programme planning and assessment. Continuity of learning is supported through individualised planning and is evident in children's learning portfolios. Assessment of children's progress is well documented and shared with parents. Children's dispositions and interests are supported by responsive teaching practices. These practices could be further strengthened by teachers modelling a wider variety of language and developing the centre's bi-cultural practice.
Centre leadership is highly effective. A culture of strong relational trust and collaboration is evident among leaders and teachers. A systematic internal evaluation process supports ongoing review and improvement aligned to strategic goals. Regular consultation with parents and whānau is used to inform decision-making and centre direction. The centre manager builds leadership capacity and provides individual coaching and mentoring for all teachers. Children benefit from knowledgeable leadership and teaching practice.
Key Next Steps
To further strengthen current practices, leaders and ERO agree that next steps include:
-
considering ways that children's documented assessment might reflect the integration of te ao Māori that is evident in observations of teaching practice
-
continuing to develop place-based learning to extend curriculum opportunities
-
further enriching children's vocabulary and use of increasingly complex language through play.
Management Assurance on Legal Requirements
Before the review, the staff and management of Mountain View Preschool Limited completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:
- curriculum
- premises and facilities
- health and safety practices
- governance, management and administration.
During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:
-
emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
-
physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
-
suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
-
evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.
All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.
Darcy Te Hau
Acting Director Review and Improvement Services (Central)
Central Region - Te Tai Pūtahi Nui
17 June 2020
The Purpose of ERO Reports
The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.
2 Information about the Early Childhood Service
Location |
Rotorua |
||
Ministry of Education profile number |
40274 |
||
Licence type |
Education & Care Service |
||
Licensed under |
Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008 |
||
Number licensed for |
42 children, including up to 15 aged under 2 |
||
Service roll |
47 |
||
Gender composition |
Female 27 Male 20 |
||
Ethnic composition |
Māori |
27 |
|
Percentage of qualified teachers 0-49% 50-79% 80%+ Based on funding rates |
80% + |
||
Reported ratios of staff to children |
Under 2 |
1:4 |
Better than minimum requirements |
Over 2 |
1:8 |
Better than minimum requirements |
|
Review team on site |
January 2020 |
||
Date of this report |
17 June 2020 |
||
Most recent ERO report(s) |
Education Review |
March 2017 |
|
Education Review |
April 2014 |
||
Supplementary Review |
March 2013 |
3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews
ERO’s Evaluation Framework
ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:
Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.
Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.
ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.
A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.
For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.
ERO’s Overall Judgement
The overall judgement that ERO makes will depend on how well the service promotes positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:
-
Very well placed
-
Well placed
-
Requires further development
-
Not well placed
ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.
Review Coverage
ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.