Playworx Kindy

Education institution number:
45702
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
12
Telephone:
Address:

89 Pine Avenue, Melville, Hamilton

View on map

Playworx Kindy

ERO’s Akanuku | Assurance Review reports provide information about whether a service meets and maintains regulatory standards. Further information about Akanuku | Assurance Reviews is included at the end of this report.

ERO’s Judgement

Regulatory standards

ERO’s judgement

Curriculum

Meeting

Premises and facilities

Meeting

Health and safety

Meeting

Governance, management and administration

Meeting

Since the onsite visit, the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed non‑compliances and is now taking reasonable steps to meet regulatory standards.

Background

Children enrolled at Playworx Kindy reflect the diversity of the community. This includes a large number of Māori and a small number Pacific learners. The service came under new ownership in November 2021. The philosophy values relationships with whānau and tamariki, committing to make a difference in families lives.

Summary of Review Findings

The unique place of Māori as tangata whenua is acknowledged in the curriculum. Children have the opportunity to develop knowledge of the cultural heritages of both parties to Te Tiriti o Waitangi. Adults engage in meaningful, positive interactions to enhance children’s learning and nurture reciprocal relationships.

The curriculum is informed by assessment, planning and evaluation that demonstrate an understanding of children’s learning, interests and life contexts. Positive steps are taken to respect the aspirations held by parents and whānau for their children. An ongoing process of self-review and internal evaluation helps the service maintain the quality of education and care.

Key Next Steps

Next steps include:

  • strengthening the extent to which information documented about children’s learning reflects their identity, language, and culture.

Actions for Compliance

Since the review, the service provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed the following non‑compliances:

  • Ensuring relevant emergency drills are carried out with children on an at least three-monthly basis.

[Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Centres 2008, HS8]

Next ERO Review

The next ERO review is likely to be an Akarangi | Quality Evaluation.

Phil Cowie
Director Review and Improvement Services (Central)
Central Region | Te Tai Pūtahi Nui

25 November 2022 

Information About the Service

Early Childhood Service Name

Playworx Kindy

Profile Number

45702

Location

Melville, Hamilton

Service type

Education and care service

Number licensed for

20 children aged over 2

Percentage of qualified teachers

100%

Service roll

13

Review team on site

October 2022

Date of this report

25 November 2022

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review, April 2019; Education Review, November 2016

General Information about Assurance Reviews

All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include the Licensing Criteria for Education and Care Services 2008.

Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a licence to operate.

ERO undertakes an Akanuku | Assurance Review process in any centre-based service:

  • having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation

  • previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development’

  • that has moved from a provisional to a full licence

  • that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership

  • where an Akanuku | Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum

  • premises and facilities

  • health and safety practices

  • governance, management, and administration.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulatory standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; safety checking; teacher certification; ratios)

  • relevant evacuation procedures and practices.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:

  • discussions with those involved in the service

  • consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems

  • observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice.

Playworx Kindy - 11/04/2019

1 Evaluation of Playworx Kindy

How well placed is Playworx Kindy to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

Playworx Kindy is well placed to promote positive learning outcomes for children.

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Playworx Kindy is one of two early childhood services in Hamilton under the same private ownership. It is located in the suburb of Melville and is licensed for 24 children aged over two years. The current roll of 12, includes two children of Māori and two of Samoan descent. The service operates from 8.00am to 3.30pm daily. Two of the three teachers have a recognised ECE qualification and one is in training.

The centre philosophy is ‘through play, learning is fun’. Since the previous ERO review in 2016, the teaching team are all new to their roles. An experienced teacher, employed in 2016, provides professional leadership and guidance for teaching staff. She visits the centre fortnightly to work alongside teachers to strengthen the quality of education provided, and to implement and align the centre philosophy, self review, strategic planning and staff appraisal processes. The professional leader also works in the other Playworx centre in Hamilton.

The previous ERO review in 2016 identified significant improvements were needed in curriculum development and review, assessment planning and evaluation and bicultural practices. In addition, important aspects of the service were not compliant with licence requirements. The Ministry of Education then placed the service on a provisional licence until these requirements were met and a full licence was reissued in September 2017. ERO's 2019 review shows that the service has responded well to the areas for improvement, and compliance issues have been addressed.

The Review Findings

Teacher, child relationships are respectful and responsive. Teachers work alongside children to support exploration and challenge. They ensure children’s wellbeing is prioritised and their care needs are well met. Children readily approach teachers and high levels of trust are evident during teacher child interactions. Teachers use a range of effective strategies to extend children’s learning and ideas. Children experience a strong sense of ownership and belonging in the kindy. Teachers need to undertake professional learning to more confidently use and model te reo Māori as a functional language with children.

Children are able to choose from a range of resources and experiences. There are many opportunities for children to explore and challenge themselves in areas that are attractive, well presented and used in a range of flexible and open-ended ways. The centre environment and programme organisation allow children to engage in learning and exploration for sustained periods.

The programme is planned in response to children’s strengths, emerging ideas and interests. Teachers meet regularly to discuss children's emerging interests and themes, then plan the programme and environment to support each child's learning and development. Children experience a programme that reflects their ideas and supports their developing competencies.

Learning story assessments indicate that teachers are effectively noticing the learning that is occurring throughout the day. Many of these stories also show that teachers know each child well. They also show the way children's interests, skills or learning dispositions are developing over time. Individual learning portfolios enable children to share learning and revisit important experiences with teachers and whānau. Teachers need to consider ways to ensure these documents are more accessible to children.

Effective systems support teachers to improve their practice. A designated professional leader works closely with each teacher and with the teaching team to build capability. A coherent appraisal process is now in place to support teachers’ professional learning journeys. Teachers are enthusiastic about continually improving outcomes for children. They need to continue with this programme of learning and support.

Processes for planned and spontaneous review are well documented. These processes provide sound guidelines for ongoing centre review and development. A three-year strategic plan is supported by an annual plan and ongoing review by teachers and leaders. Self review across the centre is resulting in improvements to the quality of education and care for children. Teachers and leaders need to seek ways to gather and more clearly document parent views as part of review and improvement processes.

It is important that the service develops policies and procedures to cater for children with diverse and special needs. No children with identified needs were enrolled at the time of this review.

Key Next Steps

  1. Centre leadership needs to ensure:
    • there is a robust review and inquiry processes that build professional capability and focus on improved outcomes for children
    • a greater level of parent and whānau views are included in curriculum, review and development processes
    • the curriculum, teaching interactions and assessments reflect and support the language, culture and identity of Māori and Pacific children and families
    • Te Whāriki 2017 is fully implemented
    • there are effective processes and partnerships with whānau that support children's transition to school.

2. Leaders need to systematically build leadership capability in the centre, including relevant job descriptions and programme of professional learning for those undertaking leadership roles.

3. Leaders need to develop policies and procedures for children with special and diverse educational or developmental needs.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Playworx Kindy completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Phil Cowie

Director Review and Improvement Services Central

Waikato / Bay of Plenty Region

11 April 2019

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Melville, Hamilton

Ministry of Education profile number

45702

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

24 children, over the age of 2

Service roll

12

Gender composition

Girls 8 Boys 4

Ethnic composition

Māori
Pacific
Pākehā
Southeast Asian

2
4
4
2

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%+

Based on funding rates

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Over 2

1:4

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

February 2019

Date of this report

11 April 2019

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

November 2016

Education Review

July 2013

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement

The overall judgement that ERO makes will depend on how well the service promotes positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed

  • Well placed

  • Requires further development

  • Not well placed

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.

Playworx Kindy - 29/11/2016

1 Evaluation of Playworx Kindy

How well placed is Playworx Kindy to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

The service needs support to further develop the quality of the programme and enhance positive outcomes for children. A number of legislative requirements have also been identified.

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Playworx Kindy is one of three privately owned early childhood services in Hamilton. It is located in the suburb of Melville and is licensed for 24 children aged over two years. Most families attending the service are from the local area and are Māori. The service opened in 2011 and operates from 8.00am to 3.00pm daily.

The centre philosophy is currently being reviewed. Since the previous ERO review in 2013, two new qualified teachers have been employed.

The current owners/directors have identified the need to improve important aspects of the centre governance, management and leadership. In May 2016, they employed an experienced teacher to assist with these improvements. She works with staff one day per week to provide professional leadership in order to strengthen the implementation and alignment of the centre philosophy, self review, strategic planning and staff appraisal processes.

The new professional leader has established a broad outline to guide the development of these important aspects. She also works in two other Playworx centres in Hamilton and spends one day per week working alongside staff at the Melville centre.

This is the second ERO review of the service. Areas for development identified in the last 2013 ERO report about self review, programme planning and assessment have not been addressed.

The Review Findings

The learning programme is planned in response to children’s interests and strengths and provides a wide variety of learning opportunities. Teachers prepare the environment to provide well-resourced and well-maintained areas for children’s play and exploration. These areas are set up to invite children’s curiosity and involvement through open-ended and sustained play. Children’s early literacy experiences are integrated into the programme of play and learning.

Children's individual learning portfolios contain a record of their involvement in the centre programme. These documents are accessible to children and families so they can share and revisit learning. The new professional leader is working with teachers to improve assessment practices, with an increasing focus on the different ways children learn (children's learning dispositions). Centre leadership is focused on improving the way teachers write learning stories that identify the learning taking place, progress that is being made and how teachers are adding complexity to children’s exploration and play.

An important next step for teachers is to ensure decisions about curriculum planning and development are informed by ongoing assessment of children's learning and evaluation of the programme of learning.

Interactions between teachers and children are sensitive and affirming. Children are happily involved in exploring their environment and communicating with their peers and teachers. Teachers welcome parents and families warmly in the centre, and communicate regularly with parents about children’s learning and wellbeing. Children’s sense of belonging is strengthened through positive and caring relationships with teachers.

There are collaborative and respectful working relationships among teachers and other adults at the centre. Teachers are beginning to work collaboratively with colleagues under the guidance of the new professional leader. These relationships are providing a good foundation for ongoing professional learning and development.

As most of the children are Māori, it is important that leaders and teachers:

  • raise the visibility and presence of te ao Māori practices

  • strengthen the way Māori children's culture, identity and language are evidenced in teaching interactions, the environment, the learning programme and children's individual assessments.

Key Next Steps

The following next steps need to be prioritised in the review and development of the centre philosophy, strategic and annual plans.

The development of a curriculum:

  • that is more explicitly documented to identify curriculum priorities and emphases that are aligned to Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum.

  • that includes well-defined processes for programme assessment, planning and evaluation that are used more effectively to inform ongoing centre development

  • that defines the place of tikanga Māori in the curriculum

  • shows how the centre programme reflects the language, culture and identity of each child.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Playworx Kindy completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements

Actions for compliance

ERO identified areas of non-compliance relating to self review, strategic planning and curriculum design. To meet requirements the service needs to improve its performance in the following areas:

  • An agreed process of regular and ongoing self review for all centre operations, focused on identifying strategic priorities for improving outcomes for children, is implemented.
    [Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Centres 2008, GMA6]. 

  • A process for effective, regular and ongoing staff appraisal is implemented. This needs to be aligned to the Practising Teacher Criteria of the Education Council New Zealand and focused on improving staff capabilities and outcomes for children.
    [Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Centres 2008, GMA7]. 

  • The service's curriculum acknowledges and reflects the unique place of Māori as tangata whenua.
    [Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Centres 2008, Regulation 43, C5]. 
  • The service's curriculum is informed by assessment, planning and evaluation.
    [Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Centres 2008, Regulation 43, C2.

Development Plan Recommendation

ERO recommends that the service consult with the Ministry of Education and plan to address the key next steps and actions outlined in this report.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Playworx Kindy will be within two years.

Lynda Pura-Watson

Deputy Chief Review Officer Waikato/Bay of Plenty

29 November 2016

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Hamilton

Ministry of Education profile number

45702

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

24 children, including up to 0 aged under 2

Service roll

21

Gender composition

Boys 13 Girls 8

Ethnic composition

Māori

Pākehā

Other

14

5

2

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%+Based on funding rates

50-79%

Reported ratios of staff to children

Over 2

1:8

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

October 2016

Date of this report

29 November 2016

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

July 2013

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.