Gore Preschool

Education institution number:
47155
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
108
Telephone:
Address:

15 Pomona Street, Gore

View on map

Gore Preschool

ERO’s Akanuku | Assurance Review reports provide information about whether a service meets and maintains regulatory standards. Further information about Akanuku | Assurance Reviews is included at the end of this report.

ERO’s Judgement

Regulatory standards

ERO’s judgement

Curriculum

Meeting

Premises and facilities

Meeting

Health and safety

Meeting

Governance, management and administration

Meeting

Since the onsite visit, the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed non-compliances and is now taking reasonable steps to meet regulatory standards.

Background

Gore Preschool is one of three services under common private ownership. The centre manager is new to the role after being a long serving member of the teaching team. There have been significant staff changes in the last 18 months. There are many tamariki Māori attending the service. This is the service’s first ERO report under new ownership.

Summary of Review Findings

The curriculum is aligned to Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum. It is responsive to the needs and interests of children. The curriculum provides children with a range of experiences and opportunities both indoors, outdoors, individually and in groups. Teachers support infants and toddlers to develop their oral language skills, and their play preferences are respected.

The premises and facilities support the provision of different types of experiences, including quiet areas, and physically active play, appropriate to the abilities of the children attending.

Service operations are guided by an annual plan and philosophy statement. The service is now meeting the requirements of the regulatory standards.

Key Next Steps

Next steps include: 

  • strengthening the extent to which Information documented about children’s learning reflects their identity, languages and cultures

  • increasing the range of opportunities children and their families have to share aspects of their cultures with others in the service. 

Actions for Compliance

During the review, the service provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed the following non-compliances:

  • Ensuring heavy furniture that can topple or fall are secured.

  • Ensuring that hazard to the safety of children are minimised.

Since the onsite visit, the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed the following non-compliances:

  • Maintaining accurate records of training and/or information provided to adults who administer medicine to children (other than their own) while at the service.

Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Services 2008; HS6, HS12 HS29.

Next ERO Review

The next ERO review will likely be an Akarangi | Quality evaluation.

Patricia Davey
Director of Early Childhood Education (ECE)

11 July 2023 

Information About the Service

Early Childhood Service Name

Gore Preschool

Profile Number

47155

Location

Gore

Service type

Education and care service

Number licensed for

85 children, including up to 30 aged under 2

Percentage of qualified teachers

80-99%

Service roll

85

Review team on site

5 May 2023

Date of this report

11 July 2023

Most recent ERO report(s)

  Education Review, March 2019

General Information about Assurance Reviews

All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include the Licensing Criteria for Education and Care Services 2008.

Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a licence to operate.

ERO undertakes an Akanuku | Assurance Review process in any centre-based service:

  • having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation

  • previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development’

  • that has moved from a provisional to a full licence

  • that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership

  • where an Akanuku | Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum

  • premises and facilities

  • health and safety practices

  • governance, management and administration.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulatory standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; safety checking; teacher certification; ratios)

  • relevant evacuation procedures and practices.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:

  • discussions with those involved in the service

  • consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems

  • observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice.

Gore Preschool Early Learning Centre - 07/03/2019

1 Evaluation of Gore Preschool Early Learning Centre

How well placed is Gore Preschool Early Learning Centre to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

Gore Preschool Early Learning Centre is well placed to promote positive learning outcomes for children.

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Gore Preschool Early Learning Centre is a new, privately-owned service offering education and care for children aged 0 to 5 years. The preschool is licensed for 85 children, including up to 30 infants and toddlers. It runs all-day sessions. Children learn in one of four age-group classrooms in a purpose-built facility. Since opening in January 2017, the preschool has had rapid growth in its roll.

The centre philosophy states that teachers aim to support all children to develop courage, curiosity, responsibility, creativity, resilience, trusting relationships and a strong sense of cultural identity. They aim to support these outcomes through child-led and play-based learning, responsive relationships, provision of a rich environment and a bicultural curriculum.

The service is one of two early learning services owned by the directors. A director oversees day-to-day operations in the preschool. Teaching and learning is led by a professional practice leader and two team leaders.

This is the preschool's first ERO review.

The Review Findings

Strategic and annual planning is well considered and has effectively supported the development, growth and daily operations of the preschool. The directors have thoughtfully drawn on their learning and experience with their first preschool to plan and implement effective systems, policies, procedures and practices in Gore Preschool. This has contributed to a well-organised learning environment, which is characterised by clear expectations and shared understandings for staff, families and children.

The collaboratively developed philosophy identifies desired learning outcomes for children and key beliefs about effective teaching and learning. It is effectively guiding curriculum delivery and teaching practice. Teachers encourage children to lead their learning at their own pace and support this through the purposeful design of the learning environment. The director has identified that the next step is to review the philosophy in consultation with children's families and to ensure it clearly identifies learning priorities valued by families and staff.

The curriculum responds well to children's interests, needs and abilities. Daily routines are predictable, but flexible to meet children's and families' needs. Children experience responsive, reciprocal and caring interactions with teachers. Infants and toddlers benefit from stable, nurturing relationships with key teachers and from learning in a calm and homely environment. Positive guidance strategies are well used to support all children to develop and demonstrate the service's values of respect for self, others and the environment.

Teachers carefully observe children's emergent interests and abilities and use these as the basis for curriculum planning. They are developing their understandings and capability to integrate Māori perspectives meaningfully throughout their programmes.

Internal evaluation is used effectively to know about the quality of teaching and learning and to improve positive outcomes for children. It is well planned and aligned with the preschool's strategic goals and philosophy. It involves teachers building their professional knowledge of effective practice, analysing their own teaching practice and drawing on the perspectives of families.

Key Next Steps

ERO and preschool leadership discussed and agreed on the following next steps to continue to improve outcomes for children and support the development of teacher capability.

1. Further refine planning and assessment processes and practices in order to:

  • ensure these focus on the breadth of the preschool's curriculum and desired outcomes for children

  • reflect Te Whāriki (2017) the NZ Early Childhood Curriculum's focus on teacher intentionality and progression in children's learning

  • incorporate and respond to children's individual cultural identities.

2. Continue to develop the rigour of teacher appraisal processes.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Gore Preschool Early Learning Centre completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Alan Wynyard

Director Review and Improvement Services Southern

Southern Region

7 March 2019

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Gore

Ministry of Education profile number

47155

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

85 children, including up to 30 aged under 2

Service roll

111

Gender composition

Girls: 38%

Boys: 62%

Ethnic composition

Māori
Pākehā
Other ethnicities

5%
89%
6%

Percentage of qualified teachers

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

1:4

Better than minimum requirements

Over 2

1:8

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

November 2018

Date of this report

7 March 2019

Most recent ERO reports

No previous ERO reports

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement

The overall judgement that ERO makes will depend on how well the service promotes positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed

  • Well placed

  • Requires further development

  • Not well placed

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.