Rutene Road Kindergarten

Education institution number:
5274
Service type:
Free Kindergarten
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
43
Telephone:
Address:

Rutene Road, Kaiti, Gisborne

View on map

Rutene Road Kindergarten - 24/05/2018

1 Evaluation of Rutene Road Kindergarten

How well placed is Rutene Road Kindergarten to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Rutene Road Kindergarten is located in Gisborne and has been operating for over 50 years. It opens from 8:30am to 2:30pm Monday to Thursday and 8:30am to 12:45pm on Friday. The service is licensed for up to 45 children aged from two to school age. Of the 49 children enrolled, 16 are Māori.

The centre philosophy is defined by the four identified children's learning outcomes of resilience, resourcefulness, reflectiveness and reciprocity.

A head teacher oversees operation of the centre. The teaching team is fully qualified and supported by a teacher aide. Over the past three years staff have participated in professional development provided by the Gisborne Kindergarten Association (the association) which has included learning about te ao Māori, working with younger children and assessment, planning and evaluation.

Rutene Road Kindergarten is one of 11 kindergartens governed and managed by the association. Two senior teachers provide ongoing professional support and guidance to individual kindergartens. A pouawhina has been appointed on a fixed term contract to guide kindergartens implementation of tikanga and kaupapa Māori practices.

The July 2014 ERO report identified a number of areas to strengthen. These included: enactment of their philosophy; assessment and evaluation practices; selfreview; and consistency of the use of intentional teaching strategies. Good progress is evident. At association level it was identified that they should undertake strategic self review. Progress is ongoing.

This review was part of a cluster of 10 reviews in the Gisborne Kindergarten Association.

The Review Findings

Children benefit from a programme that is highly responsive to their strengths, needs and interests. The child-led play-based programme encourages children's independence. Children are affirmed as competent and confident learners.

Te reo me ngā tikanga Māori is valued and visible throughout the curriculum. Te ao Māori is meaningfully integrated into the kindergarten’s planning, interactions, and environment. The philosophy states "under the korowai of whakawhanaungatanga", the values of manaakitanga, rangatiratanga, ako and kaitiakitanga guide teaching. These are clearly evident in practice.

A highly effective place-based curriculum celebrates what is unique to the location of the kindergarten. Kaupapa Māori concepts such as pakiwaitara, waiata and te reo Māori are valued practices.

Partnerships with whānau are well established. Whānau are actively involved in curriculum and strategic decisions. Their expertise is used and actively promoted.

A useful process is in place for assessment, planning and evaluation. Teachers work collaboratively to implement plans for children's learning. Planned programmes are highly responsive to parent aspirations, children’s home cultures and languages, and their strengths, needs and interests. Learning narratives are included in the assessment approach and illustrate how children's learning goals progress over time.

The kindergarten has recently implemented a new internal evaluation framework. Teachers are working collaboratively to build their evaluative knowledge and understanding. Once fully implemented this should show the impact of teacher practice on children's learning. ERO affirms this approach.

Learners with diverse needs are welcomed. Teachers liaise closely with whānau and outside agencies to support their ongoing progress.

There is a wide range of useful information available for whānau and families when children transition to school. New entrant teachers regularly visit to develop relationships with those transitioning. This helps support children's ongoing learning about the move to school.

The collaborative teaching team demonstrate a strong commitment to the philosophy, vision and goals of the kindergarten. The distributive leadership model provides opportunities for teachers to lead aspects of the programme.

Teachers are well supported to develop their practice. There is a strong commitment to growing staff knowledge and skills through ongoing professional learning and the sharing of good practice. Senior teachers regularly identify actions and provoke thinking in relation to children's learning. The newly developed appraisal system, when fully implemented, should strengthen teacher inquiries into their own practice.

Association leaders have a well-considered approach to progressing strategic objectives. Connections to the community are strong and maintaining these continues to be a focus. Leaders are committed to partnerships and acknowledging Māori as tangata whenua. The association has identified that developing shared understanding of internal evaluation is a priority. ERO's external evaluation confirms this.

Key Next Steps

ERO and kindergarten leaders agree that the priority is to further develop understanding and use of internal evaluation to determine the impact of practices and programmes on children's outcomes.

The association should:

  • fully implement the new appraisal system

  • continue to develop shared understanding and use of internal evaluation across all levels.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Rutene Road Kindergarten completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Rutene Road Kindergarten will be in three years.

Patricia Davey

Deputy Chief Review Officer Central (Acting)

Te Tai Pokapū - Central Region

24 May 2018

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Gisborne

Ministry of Education profile number

5274

Licence type

Free Kindergarten

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

45 children

Service roll

49

Gender composition

Girls 29, Boys 20

Ethnic composition

Māori
Pākehā
Other ethnic groups

16
29
4

Percentage of qualified teachers

80% +

Reported ratio of staff to children

Over 2

1:10

Meets minimum requirements

Review team on site

March 2018

Date of this report

24 May 2018

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

July 2014

Education Review

August 2011

Education Review

March 2008

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.

Rutene Road Kindergarten - 25/07/2014

1 Evaluation of Rutene Road Kindergarten

How well placed is Rutene Road Kindergarten to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Rutene Road Kindergarten is located in Gisborne and provides education and care for children from two to five years of age. It is licensed for up to 45 children and offers five morning sessions a week, and three afternoon sessions for the younger children. From October 2014 the kindergarten will be open Monday to Thursday for six hours and on Friday for four hours and fifteen minutes.

The teaching team is fully qualified and is supported by a teacher aide. Currently the head teacher and one other teacher are employed as relievers.

This kindergarten is a well established early childhood service in Gisborne. It has recently celebrated fifty years of operation. A third of the roll identify as Māori.

Over the past three years, Gisborne Kindergarten Association (the association) has provided in-service professional support for teachers focusing on assessment, planning and evaluation.

The kindergarten is governed by the association. Two senior teachers are employed by the association to provide professional support and guidance to teachers. This review is part of a cluster of six kindergartens in the Gisborne Kindergarten Association.

The Review Findings

Children have ample opportunity to engage in sustained play. They play in groups of their own choosing and independently by choice. Teachers work alongside children following their selfinitiated interests. At times they use a range of appropriate strategies to further engage children in the programme. A key next step is for teachers to more consistently use strategies that promote the stated intent of the programme.

Teachers are welcoming, responsive and respectful in the interactions they have with children and parents. They know children well within the context of their families. Collaborative ways of working are fostered with those involved in the kindergarten. Teachers appropriately support children’s developing social and emotional competence and integrate aspects of literacy into the programme.

The philosophy is based around Māori concepts including whakawhānaungatanga, manaakitanga, kaitiakitanga, ako and rangatiratanga. A set of indicators has been developed to define these overarching concepts. At times, the view being promoted does not reflect these indicators. With the support of the association teachers should access additional cultural guidance to further explore how these concepts might be enacted in the curriculum.

A high level of commitment to providing a bicultural programme is evident. Te reo and aspects of tikanga Māori are incorporated across the curriculum in meaningful ways. Children’s culture, language and identity are well supported and teachers are committed to further learning in this area.

Ongoing communication between parents and teachers assists in children’s successful transitions into the kindergarten and onto school. A range of useful information about school transition is available in the kindergarten for parents.

Children with special educational needs are well supported and where appropriate teachers liaise with external agencies. Teachers also access professional learning opportunities to assist them to continue to support these children and their families.

Assessment practices support parents to contribute to their child’s learning. Information provided shows what the child is doing and their developing friendships. A key next step is for teachers to develop the assessment, planning and evaluation process to better reflect the child’s learning and ongoing progress.

Teachers are reflective and have an increasing knowledge of self review. They should continue to strengthen their understanding of the self-review process and knowledge of evaluation. This should help them to judge the effectiveness of kindergarten operations and practice and inform decisionmaking.

The association provides high levels of guidance and support to teachers for the continuous improvement of teaching and learning.

This includes:

  • robust guiding documents and comprehensive policies
  • clear expectations for programme delivery and kindergarten operations including health and safety practices
  • strong leadership
  • professional learning and development for staff
  • sound supporting processes for provisionally registered teachers.

Senior teachers should undertake strategic review and evaluation across the association and use this information to inform decision-making. They should also support teachers to build their evaluative capacity to regularly enquire into the effectiveness of their practice to further improve positive outcomes for children.

The association has identified that the implementation of the appraisal process requires review. ERO's evaluation affirms this direction.

Key Next Steps

ERO and kindergarten leaders agree that the key next steps are to strengthen:

  • the philosophy and how it is evident in practice
  • assessment, planning and evaluation
  • consistency in the use of intentional teaching strategies
  • self review.

The association's key next steps should include:

  • reviewing the implementation of the appraisal process
  • undertaking formal strategic self review at association level.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Rutene Road Kindergarten completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum

  • premises and facilities

  • health and safety practices

  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Rutene Road Kindergarten will be in three years.

Joyce Gebbie

National Manager Review Services Central Region

25 July 2014

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Gisborne

Ministry of Education profile number

5274

Licence type

Free Kindergarten

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

45 children over two years

Service roll

75

Gender composition

Boys 38, Girls 37

Ethnic composition

Māori

NZ European/Pākehā

Other ethnic groups

28

36

11

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%

Based on funding rates

80%

Reported ratios of staff to children

Over 2

1:15

Meets minimum requirements

Review team on site

June 2014

Date of this report

25 July 2014

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

August 2011

 

Education Review

March 2008

 

Education Review

November 2004

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.