First Years Preschool

Education institution number:
55035
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
69
Telephone:
Address:

7 Allardice Street, Dannevirke

View on map

First Years Preschool

ERO’s Akanuku | Assurance Review reports provide information about whether a service meets and maintains regulatory standards. Further information about Akanuku | Assurance Reviews is included at the end of this report.

ERO’s Judgement

Regulatory standards

ERO’s judgement

CurriculumMeeting
Premises and facilitiesMeeting
Health and safetyNot meeting
Governance, management and administrationNot meeting

At the time of the review, ERO identified areas of non-compliance with regulatory standards that are an unacceptable risk to children. 

Background

First Years Preschool is a community based non-profit service. A recently appointed centre manager and two newly selected head teachers lead a team of 12 qualified teachers and two educators. Two fifths of enrolled children are MāoriThe service philosophy places value on building meaningful relationships with children, parents and whānau.

Summary of Review Findings

The service’s curriculum is responsive to children as confident and competent learners. Adults providing education and care engage in meaningful positive interactions to enhance children’s learning and nurture reciprocal relationships. 

The service acknowledges and reflects the unique place of Māori as tangata whenua. Children develop knowledge and an understanding of the cultural heritage of both parties to Te Tiriti o Waitangi.

A process of internal evaluation is being implemented to help maintain and improve the quality of education and care. The curriculum provided is consistent with Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum.

The service needs to improve and monitor operational systems and practices to maintain regulatory standards. 

Actions for Compliance 

ERO found areas of non-compliance in the service relating to:

  • having evidence of review of the written emergency management plan on at least an annual basis
  • having evidence of how evaluation of relevant emergency drills has informed the annual review of the service’s emergency plan
  • ensuring all children’s workers who have access to children are safety checked every three years in accordance with the Children’s Act 2014
  • implementing an annual plan that identifies how key tasks will have regard to the Statement of National Education and Learning Priorities (NELP).
    Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Centres 2008, HS7, HS8, GMA7A, GMA8.

Since the service provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed the following non-compliances:   

  • Ensuring heavy furniture or equipment that could fall or topple and cause serious injury or damage is secured (HS6).
  • Ensuring daily checks of equipment, premises and facilities for hazards to children include all areas required by the licensing criterion (HS12).
  • Evidence of parents/caregivers' written approval of the proposed ratio for special excursions prior to the excursion taking place (HS17).

Recommendation to Ministry of Education 

ERO recommends that the Ministry reassess the licence issued to this service provider. ERO will not undertake a further review of this service until the Ministry of Education is satisfied that the service meets regulatory standards.

Next ERO Review 

The next ERO review will be in consultation with the Ministry of Education. 

Patricia Davey
Director of Early Childhood Education (ECE)

 29 November 2023

Information about the Service

Early Childhood ServiceFirst Years Preschool
Profile Number55035
LocationDannevirke
Service typeEducation and care service
Number licensed for58 children, including up to 18 aged under 2
Percentage of qualified teachers80-99%
Service roll79
Review team on siteOctober 2023 
Date of this report29 November 2023
Most recent ERO report(s)Akanuku | Assurance Review​, ​February 2021​;​ Education Review​, ​February 2016​ 

General Information about Assurance Reviews 

All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include the Licensing Criteria for Education and Care Services 2008.

Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a licence to operate. 

ERO undertakes an Akanuku | Assurance Review process in any centre-based service:

  • having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation
  • previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development’
  • that has moved from a provisional to a full licence
  • that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership
  • where an Akanuku | Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

 As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulatory standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; safety checking; teacher certification; ratios)
  • relevant evacuation procedures and practices.

 As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:

  • discussions with those involved in the service
  • consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems
  • observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice. 

First Years Preschool

ERO’s Akanuku | Assurance Review reports provide information about whether a service meets and maintains regulatory standards. Further information about Akanuku | Assurance Reviews is included at the end of this report.

ERO’s Judgement

Regulatory standards

ERO’s judgement

CurriculumMeeting
Premises and facilitiesMeeting
Health and safetyMeeting
Governance, management and administrationMeeting

Since the onsite visit the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed non-compliances and is now taking reasonable steps to meet regulatory standards.

Background

First Years Preschool is a community based centre in Dannevirke. The service is governed by a volunteer committee. A centre manager leads a large teaching team and many have been with the service for a long period of time. Significant building developments are planned to begin in 2021.

Summary of Review Findings

The service’s curriculum is informed by Te Whāriki and assessment and planning systems. It reflects children’s interests and parents’ aspirations. Kaiako engage in meaningful and positive interactions to enhance learning and nurture reciprocal relationships.

The curriculum is responsive to children as capable and competent learners whose preferences are respected. Children have a range of opportunities to extend their learning.

Children are given opportunity to develop knowledge and understanding of the cultural heritages of both parties of Te Tiriti o Waitangi.

Actions for Compliance

Since the onsite visit the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed the following non-compliances:

  • assessment and management of risk being undertaken when children leave the premises on an excursion [HS17]
  • a record of all food provided by the service is maintained in the under two year old area [HS19]
  • heavy furniture, fixtures and equipment that could fall or topple and cause serious injury or damage are secured [HS6].

Next ERO Review

The next ERO review is likely to be an Akarangi | Quality Evaluation.

Phil Cowie
Director Review and Improvement Services (Central)
Central Region | Te Tai Pūtahi Nui

15 February 2021 

Information About the Service

Early Childhood Service NameFirst Years Preschool
Profile Number55035
LocationDannevirke
Service typeEducation and care service
Number licensed for56 children, including up to 18 aged under 2.
Percentage of qualified teachers80%+
Service roll83
Ethnic compositionMāori 24, NZ European/Pākehā 53, Other ethnic groups 6.
Review team on siteDecember 2020
Date of this report15 February 2021
Most recent ERO report(s)   Education Review, February 2016; Education Review, March 2013.

General Information about Assurance Reviews

All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include the Licensing Criteria for Education and Care Services 2008.

Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a licence to operate.

ERO undertakes an Akanuku | Assurance Review process in any centre-based service:

  • having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation
  • previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development’
  • that has moved from a provisional to a full licence
  • that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership
  • where an Akanuku | Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulated standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher certification; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:

  • discussions with those involved in the service
  • consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems
  • observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice.

First Years Preschool - 23/02/2016

1 Evaluation of First Years Preschool

How well placed is First Years Preschool to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

First Years Preschool is a community-based centre in Dannevirke. It provides education and care for 56 children up to five years of age, including a maximum of 18 up to two years.

The centre is celebrating its 50th anniversary this year. A commitment to providing high quality, community-based education and care for children, their families and whānau remains central to the centre's philosophy.

Since the May 2013 ERO report, a new head teacher has been appointed in the area for children over two years. There has also been ongoing upgrading of facilities and resources and an increase in licensed child spaces. Members of the community often contribute to the outdoor environment.

The centre continues to value the employment of qualified staff. More teachers have qualified since the previous ERO review and some have upgraded their teaching qualifications.

A parent committee is responsible for the governance of the preschool. They provide regular support for staff professional learning and development.

This report shows that the centre has sustained its positive reporting history with ERO.

The Review Findings

Children learn in an environment that is highly effective in supporting them to become 'confident and competent learners'. Teachers have positive and responsive relationships with children. They empower children to make choices, problem solve and learn independently. Children lead their learning and sustain interests for significant periods of time. Teachers are very skilful at extending children's interests and supporting them to build on their previous learning. Children and teachers learn together.

Children, their families and whānau and teachers contribute to each child's learning pathway. Planning and assessment are done collaboratively by teaching teams. They draw on children's interests, previous learning, skills and family and whānau experiences. Parents are key contributors to the planning wall and learning stories.

The programme is underpinned by a living curriculum that regularly changes and connects children's learning over time, as their interests and experiences evolve. Bicultural practices are strongly evident and draw on the knowledge and experiences of whānau, children and teachers. Teachers have researched approaches to promote te ao Māori to ensure the needs and aspirations of Māori children and their whānau are met.

Teachers seek ways to maintain children's connections with their cultures, languages and identities. ERO and leaders agree that teachers need to continue to strengthen this approach for all Pacific children.

The curriculum for up to two year olds, is underpinned by a strong philosophy of responsive caregiving that is highly effective in supporting infants' and toddlers' need for secure attachments. Teachers value the importance of home and centre routines and recognise that consistency is important in establishing a secure foundation for young children's care and education.

Transitions are very child centred to ensure children retain a strong sense of identity and belonging before, during and after the process. Successful transitions are supported by effective partnerships between families, whānau, teachers and schools. When children with additional needs attend the centre, they receive targeted and responsive support, based on their individual needs, from teachers and agencies.

Teachers have a team approach to the provision of high quality education and care for all children. They use research to keep themselves abreast of current early childhood initiatives and teaching practices. Teachers regularly investigate the effectiveness of their teaching on children's outcomes and learning relationships with parents. This practice is linked to the centre's strategic priorities, appraisal and philosophy.

Appraisal has an appropriate focus on developing teachers' practices. Professional learning is discussed and observed in teams to ensure teachers focus on improving outcomes for children. Recording some of these observations in a more formal way should provide additional evidence in teachers' appraisal files.

Self review is a well-established and understood practice. Leaders and teachers know its value in improving outcomes for children. The centre's philosophy guides all practices across the centre and promotes desired outcomes for children.

Leaders are highly effective in building capability within the centre to promote and enable positive outcomes for children and their families. They support teachers to develop and improve their practice in an inclusive and collaborative way. Teachers have opportunities to lead initiatives.

The centre manager works closely with the parent committee to ensure there is consistency of practices and expectations across the centre. She supports the two head teachers in their leadership role and is clearly focused on continuous improvement.

Key Next Steps

The centre has the capacity and capability to sustain high quality education and care for children and to determine its own next steps.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of First Years Preschool completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of First Years Preschool will be in four years.

Joyce Gebbie

Deputy Chief Review Officer Central

23 February 2016

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

LocationDannevirke
Ministry of Education profile number55035
Licence typeEducation & Care Service
Licensed underEducation (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008
Number licensed for56 children, including up to 18 aged up to 2 years
Service roll80
Gender compositionBoys 44, Girls 36
Ethnic composition

Māori

Pākehā

Cook Island Māori

Asian

Other ethnic groups

16

57

2

4

1

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%+

Based on funding rates

80% +
Reported ratios of staff to childrenUnder 21:5Meets minimum requirements
 Over 21:6Better than minimum requirements
Review team on siteFebruary 2016
Date of this report23 February 2016
Most recent ERO report(s)Education ReviewMay 2013
 Education ReviewApril 2010
 Education ReviewMarch 2007

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.