Wellington City Rudolf Steiner Kindergarten

Education institution number:
60357
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
15
Telephone:
Address:

10 Davis Street, Thorndon, Wellington

View on map

Wellington City Rudolf Steiner Kindergarten

ERO’s Akanuku | Assurance Review reports provide information about whether a service meets and maintains regulatory standards. Further information about Akanuku | Assurance Reviews is included at the end of this report.

ERO’s Judgement

Regulatory standards

ERO’s judgement

CurriculumMeeting
Premises and facilitiesMeeting
Health and safetyMeeting
Governance, management and administrationMeeting

Since the onsite visit, the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed non-compliances and is now taking reasonable steps to meet regulatory standards.

Background

Wellington City Rudolf Steiner Kindergarten is a not-for-profit service. A board of trustees, made up of parents, oversee the operations. The curriculum is based on the Steiner philosophy and focuses on self-directed play, rhythm, and imitation. A small number of children enrolled are Māori. This is the service’s second Akanuku | Assurance review. 

Summary of Review Findings

Teachers engage in meaningful, positive interactions to enhance children’s learning and nurture reciprocal relationships. They demonstrate an understanding of children’s learning and development, and knowledge of relevant theories and practice in early childhood education.

The service curriculum is inclusive, and responsive to children as confident and competent learners. Children’s preferences are respected, and they are involved in decisions about their learning experiences. A language-rich environment supports children’s learning.

Regular opportunities are provided for parents to communicate with teachers about their child and their child’s learning.

Additional monitoring of compliance with the licensing criteria is needed to ensure the requirements of the regulatory standards are maintained. 

Key Next Steps

Key next steps include strengthening the: 

  • extent to which information documented about children’s learning reflects their identity, languages and cultures.
  • inclusion of children’s perspectives and reflections in assessment, planning and evaluation.

Actions for Compliance

During the review, the service provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed the following non-compliance:

  • Ensuring safety recheck records include date on which each step was taken, including the date of the risk assessment required to be completed after all relevant information is obtained (GMA7A).

Since the onsite visit, the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed the following non-compliances:

  • Ensuring sleep records include the time each child attending the service sleeps, and checks made by adults during that time for warmth, breathing and general well-being (HS9). 
  • Identifying, eliminating, minimising or isolating hazards including all of the hazards required for this criterion (HS12).
  • Having evidence that all excursion records include the names of adults and children involved; time and date of the excursion; the location and method of travel; assessment and management of risk; adult: child ratios; evidence of parental permission and approval of adult: child ratios (HS17).

Next ERO Review 

The next ERO review is likely to be an Akarangi | Quality Evaluation. 

Patricia Davey
Director of Early Childhood Education (ECE)

10 January 2024 

Information About the Service

Early Childhood Service NameWellington City Rudolf Steiner Kindergarten
Profile Number60357
LocationWellington City
Service typeEducation and care service
Number licensed for20 children over 2 years of age
Percentage of qualified teachers 100%
Service roll17
Review team on siteNovember 2023
Date of this report10 January 2024
Most recent ERO report(s)Akanuku | Assurance Review, October 2020; Education Review, November 2018 

General Information about Assurance Reviews 

All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include the Licensing Criteria for Education and Care Services 2008.

Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a licence to operate. 

ERO undertakes an Akanuku | Assurance Review process in any centre-based service:

  • having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation
  • previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development’
  • that has moved from a provisional to a full licence
  • that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership
  • where an Akanuku | Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulatory standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; safety checking; teacher certification; ratios)
  • relevant evacuation procedures and practices.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:

  • discussions with those involved in the service
  • consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems
  • observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice. 

Wellington City Rudolf Steiner Kindergarten - 29/10/2020

ERO’s Akanuku | Assurance Review reports provide information about whether a service meets and maintains regulatory standards. Further information about Akanuku | Assurance Reviews is included at the end of this report.

ERO’s Judgement

Regulatory standards
ERO’s judgement
CurriculumMeeting
Premises and facilitiesMeeting
Health and safetyMeeting
Governance, management and administrationMeeting

At the time of the review, ERO found the service was taking reasonable steps to meet regulatory standards.

Background

Wellington City Rudolf Steiner Kindergarten is based in a converted villa in Thorndon, Wellington. The service is licensed for 22 children aged over two years. Most children attend part time. A trust board of parents oversees operation of this not-for-profit service.

Summary of Review Findings

The service curriculum is guided by Steiner philosophy, as well as the early childhood curriculum Te Whāriki. Children are encouraged to be confident and competent learners. Teachers implement consistent daily rituals and emphasise the use of natural materials, music and storytelling as learning tools. The design and layout of the premises include quiet spaces, areas for physically active play, and space for a range of individual and group learning experiences.

The programme and documentation are increasingly supporting children’s understandings around culture, language and identity. Parents have opportunities to contribute to the service’s operation.

Actions for Compliance

Since the onsite visit the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed the following non-compliances:

  • a procedure was developed for monitoring children’s sleep, stating that children are checked for warmth, breathing, and general well-being at least every 5-10 minutes, or more frequently according to individual needs
  • a recording process was developed for the checks made by adults during children’s sleep.

Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education & Care Services 2008, HS9

Next ERO Review

The next ERO review is likely to be an Akarangi | Quality Evaluation.

Dr Lesley Patterson

Director Review and Improvement Services (Southern)

Southern Region | Te Tai Tini

29 October 2020

Information About the Service

Early Childhood Service NameWellington City Rudolf Steiner Kindergarten
Profile Number60357
LocationWellington
Service typeEducation and care service
Number licensed for22 children aged over 2
Percentage of qualified teachers80%+
Service roll20
Gender compositionMale 12, Female 8
Ethnic compositionNZ European/Pākehā 11
Other Ethnic groups 9
Review team on siteSeptember 2020
Date of this report29 October 2020
Most recent ERO report(s)Education Review, November 2018; Education Review, October 2015.

General Information about Assurance Reviews

All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include the Licensing Criteria for Education and Care Services 2008.

Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a licence to operate.

ERO undertakes an Akanuku | Assurance Review process in any centre-based service:

  • having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation
  • previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development’
  • that has moved from a provisional to a full licence
  • that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership
  • where an Akanuku | Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulated standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher certification; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:

  • discussions with those involved in the service
  • consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems
  • observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice.

Wellington City Rudolf Steiner Kindergarten - 15/11/2018

1 Evaluation of Wellington City Rudolf Steiner Kindergarten

How well placed is Wellington City Rudolf Steiner Kindergarten to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Wellington City Rudolf Steiner Kindergarten is a not-for-profit, community-based, early learning service, located in Thorndon, Wellington. It is licensed to provide education and care for 22 children aged over two years. The centre caters for a diverse ethnic community.

A trust board made up of parents of enrolled children and members of the community with particular expertise provides governance for the service. The head teacher manages day-to-day operation and reports to the board. All teachers are registered. Two are long term employees, qualified in Steiner Education.

The kindergarten programme integrates Rudolf Steiner educational philosophy and Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum. Values underpinning teaching and learning highlight the importance of bicultural partnership, play as a vehicle for learning, care of the natural environment and the development of reciprocal relationships with families. Daily and seasonal rhythms support implementation of the programme.

The October 2015 ERO report identified priorities for improvement that included: developing the bicultural programme; strengthening assessment, planning and evaluation; and improving self review. Trustees and teachers have worked collaboratively to address these aspects of practice.

The Review Findings

Organisation of the learning environment has been carefully considered to support the Steiner approach. A suitable range of natural and open-ended play materials support children’s play and creativity. The outdoor space provides opportunities for them to learn about the natural environment and be involved in physically challenging experiences. Regular excursions into the local community extend learning opportunities for children.

Teachers are caring and respectful in their interactions with children, working together to implement the daily programme. While sustained play was evident, teachers should consider further developing their strategies to support children's perseverance in purposeful play.

Children’s transitions into, through and out of the kindergarten and to school are well supported. A playgroup at the centre provides an introduction for parents to the Steiner philosophy and encourages children’s familiarity with the environment. A well-developed relationship with the local Steiner school is in place. Staff document summaries of children’s learning and encourage parents to share these with new entrant teachers.

A comprehensive approach to planning the programme is in place that is strongly driven by the valued learning outcomes identified in the philosophy. Individual children’s success in meeting these outcomes is regularly discussed by teachers, and documented and shared with families. The development of strong partnerships with parents is prioritised to support decisions about children’s learning. Their aspirations are valued and form the basis of long term goals. Teachers are continuing to develop their approach, including the authentic integration of te ao Māori. The head teacher agrees, next development steps are to:

  • use the team’s recent learning about the revised Te Whāriki curriculum to redefine success indicators and valued outcomes
  • evaluate the curriculum and assessment process against these indicators and outcomes
  • increase the emphasis on each child's progress in relation to their goals, emerging interests and learning needs.

These steps should sharpen the focus of teachers' approach to assessment, planning and evaluation, and improve its manageability.

Appropriate provision is in place for children with additional learning needs. Teachers allocate time for one-to-one interactions with individuals requiring specific interventions. External agency support is sought as required.

Teachers are highly committed to their roles in the service and the Steiner philosophy. They are well supported by a useful appraisal process, generous provision for non-contact time and a range of professional learning opportunities. A more distributed approach to division of day-to-day roles and responsibilities in the centre should better support sustainability of practices and operation.

The head teacher provides strong leadership for the implementation of review to support improvement. This is a continuous process that incorporates regular reflection on outcomes for children. To strengthen the approach, further consideration should be given to:

  • the implementation of a more evaluative process, supported by defined indicators of success
  • developing shared understanding and leadership of the process.

Strong governance supports service operation. A group of highly committed parents and others work cohesively with the head teacher to ensure accountabilities are met and plans put in place to address future requirements. Trustees receive comprehensive information about teaching, learning and daily happenings to inform their decision making. A good range of guidelines is in place to support consistent understanding of centre and legislative requirements.

Key Next Steps

ERO and kindergarten teachers agree that their priority next steps are to:

  • continue to develop teachers' authentic integration of te ao Māori
  • sharpen the focus when planning for learning
  • continue to strengthen strategies to support children's growth in social capability and perseverance in purposeful play
  • develop a shared understanding and use of internal evaluation.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Wellington City Rudolf Steiner Kindergarten completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Actions for compliance

ERO identified areas of non-compliance relating to Health and Safety. To meet requirements the service needs to improve its performance in the following areas:

  • hazards to the safety of children are eliminated, isolated or minimised
  • the design and layout of the premises support effective adult supervision so that the children’s access to the licensed space is not unnecessarily limited.
    [Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Centres 2008, HS 12, PF2 ]

Since the onsite phase of the review the head teacher has provided a plan that outlines how the issues in relation to health and safety have been responded to.

Development Plan Recommendation

ERO recommends that the service, in consultation with the Ministry of Education, develops a plan to address the key next steps and actions outlined in this report.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Wellington City Rudolf Steiner Kindergarten will be within two years.

Alan Wynyard

Director Review and Improvement Services

Te Tai Pokapū - Central Region

15 November 2018

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

LocationWellington
Ministry of Education profile number60357
Licence typeEducation & Care Service
Licensed underEducation (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008
Number licensed for22 children aged over two years
Service roll19
Gender compositionGirls 12, Boys 7
Ethnic compositionMāori 
Pākehā 
Other ethnic groups

11
7
Percentage of qualified teachers80% +
Reported ratios of staff to childrenOver 21:4Better than minimum requirements
Review team on siteAugust 2018
Date of this report15 November 2018

Most recent ERO report(s)

 

Education ReviewOctober 2015
Education ReviewOctober 2012
Education ReviewFebruary 2009

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.