Selwyn House Preschool

Education institution number:
65087
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
56
Telephone:
Address:

122 Merivale Lane, Merivale, Christchurch

View on map

Selwyn House Preschool

1 ERO’s Judgements

Akarangi | Quality Evaluation evaluates the extent to which this early childhood service has the learning and organisational conditions to support equitable and excellent outcomes for all learners. Te Ara Poutama Indicators of quality for early childhood education: what matters most are the basis for making judgements about the effectiveness of the service in achieving equity and excellence for all learners. Judgements are made in relation to the Outcomes Indicators, Learning and Organisational Conditions. The Evaluation Judgement Rubric derived from the indicators, is used to inform ERO’s judgements about this service’s performance in promoting equity and excellence.

ERO’s judgements for Selwyn House Preschool are as follows:

Outcome Indicators

(What the service knows about outcomes for learners)


Whakaū Embedding

Ngā Akatoro Domains

 

Learning Conditions
Organisational Conditions

Whāngai Establishing
Whakaū Embedding

2 Context of the Service

Selwyn House Preschool is a full-day education and care service for children from two and a half years to school age. The service is governed by the board of Selwyn House School and shares the same site. Since the 2019 ERO review, a new head teacher has been appointed. The roll includes seven Māori children.

3 Summary of findings

Children experience a broad, rich curriculum based on Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum, International Baccalaureate, and the Reggio Emilia philosophy. Leaders and teachers weave aspects of these approaches into an intentional curriculum that reflects the importance of learning and teaching in Aotearoa New Zealand.

Teachers are establishing learning partnerships with whānau. They use this information and children’s ideas to help plan the learning programme. Children have many opportunities to experience a range of languages, including English, Spanish, and te reo Māori. More work is required to purposefully integrate te reo Māori more fully into the daily learning programme. Children’s languages and cultures are celebrated through cultural events that are reflected in group learning stories. They have yet to make individual children’s languages and cultures explicit in learning records.

The recently established leadership team is developing shared understandings about evaluation for improvement. While there is a suitable framework to support engagement in internal evaluation, there is more work to do to foster teachers’ understanding and use of the process to promote ongoing improvement to outcomes for children.

The preschool is well supported by those involved with governance and school management. The board receives regular reports about the preschool’s operations. However, it is timely to include information about children’s progress and achievement against the learning outcomes from Te Whāriki, and the service’s learning priorities.

4 Improvement actions

Selwyn House Preschool will include the following actions in its Quality Improvement Planning:

  • intentionally integrate te reo Māori into daily learning conversations with children and their assessment documentation

  • explicitly make each child’s language and culture visible in learning records

  • build the teaching team’s capability to use internal evaluation as a tool to inform decision making about change and improvement to outcomes for children.

5 Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Selwyn House Preschool completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum

  • premises and facilities

  • health and safety practices

  • governance, management, and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Dr Lesley Patterson
Director Review and Improvement Services (Southern)
Southern Region | Te Tai Tini

25 August 2022 

6 About the Early Childhood Service

Early Childhood Service Name

 Selwyn House Preschool

Profile Number

65087

Location

Ōtautahi | Christchurch

Service type

Education and care service

Number licensed for

50 children

Percentage of qualified teachers

80-99%

Service roll

67

Review team on site

24 May, 2022

Date of this report

25 August 2022

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review, May 2019; Education Review, August 2015

Selwyn House Preschool - 22/05/2019

1 Evaluation of Selwyn House Preschool

How well placed is Selwyn House Preschool to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

Selwyn House Preschool is well placed to promote positive learning outcomes for children.

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Selwyn House Preschool is a full-day, co-educational and care service for children from two and a half years to school age. The service operates under the umbrella of Selwyn House School and shares the same site. Children come from a diverse range of cultural backgrounds.

Selwyn House Preschool follows a Reggio Emilia approach and the International Baccalaureate (Primary Years) Programme. All the teachers are fully qualified early childhood educators and additional staffing includes support teachers and specialist teachers for swimming, digital technology and Spanish. Since the last ERO review a new head of the preschool has been appointed.

The Review Findings

Respectful and collaborative relationships at all levels contribute to children's wellbeing and learning. The teachers know the children very well. They are responsive to the children's physical and emotional wellbeing and to those with identified learning needs. Children are engaged, purposeful learners, involved in spontaneous and planned experiences.

Teachers show a strong commitment to the centre's philosophy and vision. They offer a broad, very well resourced curriculum, with strengths in early literacy and maths, environmental learning, creative play and social competence. Teachers value parents as the child's first teacher.

Teachers ensure the children are prepared for an ever changing world and report regularly to parents using a range of digital platforms. Individual learning stories describe significant learning over time, and explain how teachers have identified this. Assessment and group planning results in thoughtful resourcing and experiences to support children's learning.

Daily routines and programmes reflect aspects of the bicultural and multicultural nature of Aotearoa/New Zealand. Continuing to build cultural awareness and responsiveness and ongoing integration of tikanga Māori in teaching and learning is a key next step for teachers.

Teachers are very well supported professionally. This has helped build a reflective and improvement focused teaching team. Leaders and teachers are strengthening their self-review/internal evaluation processes. This process is impacting positively on outcomes for children.

Sound governance and management practices have resulted in a clear alignment of systems and practices. This coherence enables smooth centre operations and allows the teachers to focus on supporting children's learning.

Key Next Steps

Next steps for this centre build on existing good practices. These are to:

  • continue to strengthen culturally responsive practice, with a particular focus on recognising success for Māori children as Māori

  • continue to develop effective documentation of parent aspirations in relation to children's learning and home cultures

  • deepen teacher understanding and practice in internal evaluation and teaching as inquiry.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Selwyn House Preschool completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Alan Wynyard

Director Review and Improvement Services

Southern Region

22 May 2019

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Christchurch

Ministry of Education profile number

65087

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

50 children, aged 2 years and over

Service roll

69

Gender composition

Boys 30 ; Girls 39

Ethnic composition

NZ European/Pākehā
Other ethnicities

42
27

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%+

Based on funding rates

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

over 2

1:8

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

January 2019

Date of this report

22 May 2019

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

August 2015

Education Review

May 2012

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement

The overall judgement that ERO makes will depend on how well the service promotes positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed

  • Well placed

  • Requires further development

  • Not well placed

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.