Gloriavale Christian Toddlers

Education institution number:
65113
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
17
Telephone:
Address:

28 Heaphy Road, Lake Haupiri, Greymouth

View on map

Gloriavale Christian Toddlers - 15/06/2020

1 Evaluation of Gloriavale Christian Toddlers

How well placed is Gloriavale Christian Toddlers to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

Gloriavale Christian Toddlers is well placed to promote positive learning outcomes for children.

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Gloriavale Christian Toddlers, previously known as Gloriavale Christian Community Garden of Children 3, is one of three services that operate within the Gloriavale Christian community. Since the 2015 ERO review there have been substantial changes to the configuration of the early childhood service. It now caters for the specific needs of toddlers aged 15 to 24 months old. It is licensed for a maximum of 50 children including up to 25 children under two years old. A new infant area has been built as part of the preschool licence. A third centre caters for children aged two to three years. Only children from within Gloriavale attend these centres. Most staff are qualified early childhood teachers.

There have been significant changes to the leadership of the Gloriavale Christian early learning services. Each of the centres has a new manager. The preschool centre manager has a leadership role across all three centres. Whole centre and parent community professional learning has been delivered by external providers. These opportunities include a focus on the brain development of infants, toddlers and young children, and the Ministry of Education, Incredible Years Training programme.

The Gloriavale Christian centres share the same philosophy and core values. There is an emphasis on:

  • New Testament Christian principles and beliefs
  • involving parents in teaching of, and the provision of care for their children
  • respectful, responsive relationships
  • developing children's language, self-management skills, and establishing the foundations of literacy and mathematics learning
  • exploring the creative and expressive arts, and the natural world
  • enacting the core values of love, faith, unity and obedience.

This review was one of three within the Gloriavale Christian community.

The Review Findings

Familiar, unhurried routines and rituals help to support toddlers’ sense of belonging and wellbeing. They have opportunities to play alone at their own pace and with others in small groups. Teachers engage toddlers in play and activities of interest to support social learning and oral language development. They extend each child’s interests and learning through responsive, affirming interactions. Expressive and creative arts, and sensory activities are offered to encourage experimentation and promote exploration. Teachers provide children with a variety of resources and opportunities for physical play within the spacious outdoor area. Leaders and teachers acknowledge they need to develop deeper understanding of Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum to support the provision of a curriculum that emphasises child-led learning and relevant teaching practices.

The bicultural curriculum is in the early stages of development. Teachers’ use of te reo me ngā tikanga Māori is becoming integrated into learning programmes and supports children to build their understanding of te ao Māori (a Māori world view). Further developing teachers’, parents’ and children's knowledge and understanding of te ao Māori will help to enhance learning opportunities as part of being citizens of Aotearoa/New Zealand. This would also support teachers to more fully reflect the bicultural curriculum within the environment and resources.

Leaders have implemented good quality assessment, planning and evaluation processes that show children’s development and progress over time. However, they recognise that these practices need to be embedded across the centres. Teachers purposefully use the learning outcomes from Te Whāriki to set priorities for children's learning. They actively seek and respond to valued parent and community contributions as partners in children's learning. Teachers’ planning helps to build children’s knowledge and skills and supports their smooth transitions between the centres.

The philosophy and core values are evident in many aspects of this centre's practices. Leaders recognise that they need to incorporate a clearer emphasis on Māori concepts and values into the philosophy and other key centre operational documents to provide better guidance to staff and support the implementation of the bicultural curriculum. This approach may also enable leaders to evaluate how well they are meeting their philosophical values and beliefs.

The new leadership team has worked collaboratively to help build shared understandings and expectations for appropriate learning and teaching practices. Leaders have made good progress with implementing and aligning a number of new initiatives to improve service operations, systems and practices. As these changes are embedded, they are likely to contribute to ongoing and sustained improvement.

Internal evaluation is becoming established through recently implemented processes. Service self-review has resulted in some positive changes for children. A greater emphasis on evaluating how well teachers’ practices support children's learning is now needed. Appraisal has been refined and effectively supports teachers to reflect on and further develop their practice. Findings from regularly evaluating aspects of the service’s curriculum would contribute to priorities for improvement.

Key Next Steps

ERO and service leaders agree that the key steps are to:

  • develop deeper understandings of Te Whāriki and its implications for learning and teaching
  • further develop bicultural understandings and give prominence to Māori concepts and values in key documentation and practices
  • embed assessment, planning and evaluation processes for individual children and consider ways to include learning dispositions in group planning
  • strengthen shared understandings and use of internal evaluation for improvements to learning and teaching.

Recommendation

Leaders have recently been involved in external professional learning and development which has successfully resulted in improvements to policies, processes and practices. Continuing with this support would be beneficial for building shared understanding across the centres and embedding new initiatives.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Gloriavale Christian Toddlers completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

During the on-site stage of the review ERO identified two areas of non-compliance in relation to health and safety which were immediately addressed by service leaders. These were:

  • heavy furniture, fixtures and equipment (three fridges and one washing machine) that could topple and cause serious injury or damage in the event of an earthquake. Service leaders mitigated the risk to children by ensuring that the potential hazards areas were made inaccessible while these items were secured

  • the Child Protection policy needed to state clear provision for direct reporting of any suspected child abuse.

Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Centres 2008, HS6 and HS31

Dr Lesley Patterson

Director Review and Improvement Services (Southern)

Southern Region - Te Tai Tini

15 June 2020

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Greymouth

Ministry of Education profile number

65113

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

50 children, including up to 25 aged under 2

Service roll

16

Gender composition

Male 9, Female 7

Ethnic composition

NZ European/Pākehā

16

Percentage of qualified teachers

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

1:4

Better than minimum requirements

Over 2

1:4

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

March 2020

Date of this report

15 June 2020

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

June 2015

Education Review

June 2011

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement

The overall judgement that ERO makes will depend on how well the service promotes positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed

  • Well placed

  • Requires further development

  • Not well placed

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.

Gloriavale Christian Community Garden of Children 3 - 09/06/2015

1 Evaluation of Gloriavale Christian Community Garden of Children 3

How well placed is Gloriavale Christian Community Garden of Children 3 to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

Gloriavale Christian Community Garden of Children 3 is very well placed to promote positive learning outcomes for children.

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Gloriavale Christian Community Garden of Children 3 is one of three centres that operate within the Gloriavale Christian Community.

The centre provides for the specific needs of children aged from 14 months to three years old, in two inside areas, one for younger and one for older children. The outside area provides opportunities for all of the children and teachers in this centre to play together.

The supervisor and teachers have been very responsive to the ERO recommendations from the 2011 ERO review and made significant improvements to management and curriculum systems and practices. This includes strengthening planning, evaluation, self review and appraisal processes. All teachers are qualified, or in training to become early childhood teachers.

This review was part of a cluster of three early childhood centre reviews in the Gloriavale Christian Community.

The Review Findings

The Christian philosophy of the community and centre is highly evident in all aspects of centre operation and practice.

The experienced and knowledgeable supervisors from all of the centres work well together. They provide strong leadership and direction for the teaching teams. Supervisors have high expectations of teaching practices and learning outcomes for children.

Supervisors and teachers have made very good use of targeted, internal and external professional development to strengthen the effectiveness of management, and curriculum systems and practices. Appraisal systems, including the registered teacher criteria, are well used to continually strengthen teachers’ practice. This includes robust processes in place to support those teachers still in training.

The programme is reflective of the community’s values and beliefs and local context. Children’s transitions into the centre and between centres are well supported. The supervisor and teachers foster close partnerships with families to support children’s learning and wellbeing. They value parent and community involvement in the centre.

The supervisor and teachers provide an inclusive learning culture that is highly responsive to the needs of children and families. The teaching team works collaboratively with specialist services and provide additional one-on-one support when needed.

Teachers follow children’s interests and promote children’s positive relationships with others. Children have good opportunities to be involved in a range of pre-literacy learning experiences. The supervisors and teachers have developed a shared understanding of what this will look like as children progress through the centres and onto school.

External professional support is helping teachers to place an increasing focus on providing a bicultural curriculum. The Māori culture is woven naturally through the programme in ways that are meaningful for children.

Families are provided with detailed information about their children’s progress and participation in the programme through well-presented and informative profile books. Parents are actively encouraged to regularly contribute to their children’s learning.

The manager and supervisors work well together. They communicate effectively and respect the contribution that they each make to the effective operation of the centre. There is strong alignment between long and short-term centre planning and the community’s priorities. Supervisors promote a culture of reflective practice amongst teachers. They make good use of self review to strengthen teaching practices and support children’s learning. A strong and ongoing emphasis is placed on improvement to promote positive outcomes for children.

Key Next Steps

The manager and supervisors have identified that their next step is to find ways to ensure that newly introduced management and curriculum practices are manageable. ERO agrees that these new systems need to be refined and embedded to build sustainability and capability amongst the whole teaching team.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Gloriavale Christian Community Garden of Children 3 completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Gloriavale Christian Community Garden of Children 3 will be in four years.

Graham Randell Deputy Chief Review Officer Southern

9 June 2015

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Lake Haupiri, West Coast

Ministry of Education profile number

65113

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

50 children, including up to 25 aged under two

Service roll

40

Gender composition

Girls 28; Boys 12

Ethnic composition

Māori

NZ European/Pākehā

0

40

Percentage of qualified teachers 0-49% 50-79% 80% Based on funding rates

80%

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

1:4

Better than minimum requirements

 

Over 2

1:5

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

March 2015

Date of this report

9 June 2015

Most recent ERO reports

Education Review

June 2011

 

Education Review

January 2008

 

Education Review

November 2004

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.