Hira Rural Kindergarten

Education institution number:
65140
Service type:
Free Kindergarten
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
31
Telephone:
Address:

460 State Highway 6, Wakapuaka

View on map

Hira Rural Kindergarten - 20/09/2018

Here is the latest report for the Governing Organisation that this service is part of.

 

1 Evaluation of Hira Rural Kindergarten

How well placed is Hira Rural Kindergarten to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Hira Rural Kindergarten is part of the Nelson Tasman Kindergarten Association (NTKA). It is located in Wakapuaka, a semi-rural area close to Nelson city. The kindergarten provides for the education and care of up to 36 children, aged from two-to-five years. The association offers up to 30 free hours to support children's participation in early childhood education. It also provides a range of external expertise to help all children succeed in their learning. This includes te ao Māori expertise, teacher aides, a speech-language therapist, whānau support and parent- education opportunities.

All teachers are fully qualified. Teacher aides provide support for the children and teachers to help meet identified areas of need. An active parent committee leads fundraising initiatives to support ongoing resourcing, special outings and improvements to the kindergarten. The kindergarten is part the Enviroschools' initiative and has achieved a silver award.

The NTKA, including a Chief Executive Officer and board, is responsible for the governance of the kindergarten. A team of senior education advisors (SEA) oversees and supports the professional practice of the teaching team.

The kindergarten has made steady progress with the recommendations identified in ERO’s 2013 report. This includes improved appraisal and internal evaluation practices, developing understandings of te ao Māori and implementing a bicultural curriculum. Assessment, planning and evaluation processes and practices remain areas to improve.

This review was part of a cluster of seven kindergarten reviews in the NTKA.

The Review Findings

The kindergarten's vision, emphasising the importance of nurturing partnerships, children and the natural world is strongly evident in practice. Environmentally sustainable practices are integrated into the programme.

This vision is supported by a philosophy of shared beliefs and caring ways of working with children. The following valued learning outcomes are evident in the ways teachers:

  • foster respectful relationships and kindness
  • encourage friendships and social skills
  • involve children in creativity, literacy, science, numeracy and technology learning experiences.

Teachers develop strong partnerships with parents, whānau and the community to support children's sense of wellbeing and belonging. Transitions into the kindergarten and onto school are personalised to meet the needs of each family. The contributions and involvement of parents, whānau and community enrich the curriculum provided for children.

The home language, culture and identity of children and families are acknowledged, respected and celebrated. Children have many opportunities to learn about bicultural practices and te ao Māori in ways that are meaningful to them and respectful of Māori culture.

Children with additional needs are well supported through sensitive interactions within an inclusive learning environment. Teachers work collaboratively with parents, and external agencies when required, to develop an individualised approach to children's learning and wellbeing.

Children benefit from a child-centred curriculum that is responsive to their interests, strengths and capabilities. Records of learning show children's involvement in a wide range of rich experiences that foster imagination and learning through play.

The head teacher is building teaching and leadership capacity. Teachers make good use of appraisal processes, reflective practice, internal evaluation and professional development to continually grow their practice, and provide positive outcomes for children.

Managers and leaders have proactively addressed ERO’s recommendations for the association, identified in previous ERO reports. There is strong alignment between the NTKA strategic priorities and each kindergarten’s priorities and plans.

The board is well informed about outcomes from association-wide strategic reviews and the progress being made to achieve strategic goals. The board and association managers are taking deliberate action to support Māori and Pacific children and children with diverse learning needs. NTKA leaders have developed strong, networked relationships with community organisations to support children and their whānau.

There are effective systems and processes to ensure that regulatory requirements are met. Relevant professional learning opportunities, improved teacher appraisal processes and effective ongoing coaching and mentoring by the education advisors are building leadership and teacher capability within the kindergartens.

Key Next Steps

A next step for association leaders and managers is to improve planning to support the achievement of the board’s strategic objectives. This includes ensuring that reporting is evaluative and focuses on outcomes for children.

The key next steps for the board are to:

  • explore ways to know more about how well children are achieving in relation to the association’s valued outcomes (vision and philosophy)
  • evaluate the extent of improved outcomes for all children and use these findings to inform decision making and the future direction of the association.

The key next steps for Hira Rural Kindergarten are to:

  • fully implement Te Whāriki (2017) the early childhood curriculum, to further develop assessment, planning and evaluation processes that are focused on valued learning outcomes for children and intentional teaching practices
  • improve the focus on outcomes for children within annual planning and evaluation
  • strengthen internal evaluation processes to include the evaluation of outcomes for children.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Hira Rural Kindergarten completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Hira Rural Kindergarten will be in three years.

Alan Wynyard

Director Review & Improvement Services Southern

Te Waipounamu - Southern Region

20 September 2018

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

LocationNelson
Ministry of Education profile number65140
Licence typeFree Kindergarten
Licensed underEducation (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008
Number licensed for36 children, aged over two years
Service roll32
Gender composition

Boys: 18

Girls: 14

Ethnic compositionMāori 
Pākehā 
Other ethnicities

28
3

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%+

Based on funding rates

80% +
Reported ratios of staff to childrenOver 21:10Meets minimum requirements
Review team on siteJune 2018
Date of this report20 September 2018

Most recent ERO report(s)

 

Education ReviewSeptember 2013
Education ReviewMarch 2010

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.

Hira Rural Kindergarten - 02/09/2013

1 Evaluation of Hira Rural Kindergarten

How well placed is Hira Rural Kindergarten to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Hira Rural Kindergarten is located in Wakapuaka, a semi rural area close to Nelson city. This service is operated by Nelson Kindergarten Association through an agreement with Hira Community Preschool Incorporated which owns and maintains the building.

Education and care for up to 30 children over the age of two years is provided at the kindergarten. Morning sessions are offered each day and three days a week there is the option of an extended six-hour day.

The teaching team is fully qualified and the programme is further assisted by support staff and volunteers from the community. The kindergarten vision, emphasising the importance of nurturing partnerships, children and the natural world, is strongly evident in practice.

Sustainable practices are promoted throughout the programme. The kindergarten is a member of the enviroschools initiative and has achieved a bronze award. An active parent committee leads fundraising initiatives to support ongoing resourcing and improvements to the kindergarten environment.

The kindergarten is governed by the Nelson Kindergarten Association (the association) and overseen by a team of Senior Education Advisors (SEAs). The kindergarten has a positive reporting history with ERO. This review was part of a cluster of eleven kindergartens and early childhood services reviews in the Nelson Kindergarten Association.

The Review Findings

Children and families have a strong sense of belonging in the kindergarten. Partnership with parents and whānau is strong, positive and respectful. Parents spoken to by ERO indicated that teachers take time to genuinely listen to families’ aspirations and work collaboratively to implement these. Through doing so, each child's uniqueness is acknowledged and celebrated. The wider community is well used to enhance learning opportunities for children and extend their understanding of the living world.

High quality teaching challenges and extends children's learning. Children are viewed as competent learners. They make choices and follow their interests in play, and work collaboratively with their peers. Tuakana teina relationships are actively promoted by teachers where they facilitate opportunities for children to share their expertise and tutor their peers. Mathematics, music and high quality language experiences are an integral part of the programme.

The learning environment offers challenge and a wide range of interesting experiences that invite children to investigate. Children have very good opportunities to be physically active in a spacious outdoor area. Teachers work alongside children encouraging them to think and solve problems. Self management and independent skills are promoted.

Teachers demonstrate a high level of commitment to implementing a bicultural programme. Te reo Māori is valued and used by both teachers and children and appropriate tikānga practices are implemented. A culturally responsive approach is being implemented to promote success for Māori children as Māori. Teachers have identified that exploring success for Pacific children in this context is a next step.

A range of effective processes assist children and their families to successfully transition into the kindergarten and onto school. A transition to school programme offered to older children should be strengthened through evaluation that informs future programmes and identifies the impact on learning.

Well-presented portfolios highlight children’s engagement, developing relationships and, at times, progress. Parents frequently contribute to their child’s portfolios.

Teachers engage in ongoing research. They are highly reflective practitioners and are committed to keeping up-to-date with professional learning and development. Spontaneous review has been used to reflect on aspects of the programme to inform ongoing improvements. There is strong alignment between the guiding documents of the association and kindergarten and the resulting review. Teachers and the association are highly consultative, regularly requesting and receiving feedback from their parent community. The association has effectively led robust review and evaluation using a collaborative approach.

The association provides high levels of guidance and support for teachers for the continuous improvement of teaching and learning. These include:

  • clear guiding documents
  • expectations for programme delivery and kindergarten operations, including health and safety practices
  • access to a wide range of professional learning and development opportunities.

The recently updated appraisal process is collaborative and provides clear guidance and support to staff. Leaders are engaging in ongoing professional learning in this area to support its successful implementation. ERO’s evaluation affirms this direction.

The SEA regularly visits the kindergarten and provides support and leadership to the teaching team. Through SEA guidance and identified next steps teachers are well supported to provide positive outcomes for children.

Key Next Steps

ERO and kindergarten leaders agree that the key next steps are to:

  • show through the assessment documentation how depth and complexity has been added to children’s learning to more consistently highlight their progress overtime
  • continue to build the evaluative capacity of teachers to systematically enquire into and judge the effectiveness of their kindergarten operations. This should assist future decision-making and identify priorities to further enhance children’s learning and wellbeing.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Hira Rural Kindergarten completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Hira Rural Kindergarten will be in four years.

Joyce Gebbie

National Manager Review Services Central Region (Acting)

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Wakapuaka, Nelson

Ministry of Education profile number

65140

Licence type

Free Kindergarten

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

30 children aged over 2

Service roll

46

Gender composition

Girls 23, Boys 23

Ethnic composition

Māori

NZ European/Pākehā

Japanese

Other ethnic groups

1

35

2

8

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%+

Based on funding rates

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

N/A

 
 

Over 2

1:10

Meets minimum requirements

Review team on site

June 2013

Date of this report

2 September 2013

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

March 2010

 

Education Review

October 2006

 

Education Review

February 2004

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.