Leeston Playcentre

Education institution number:
70078
Service type:
Playcentre
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
10
Telephone:
Address:

4 May Street, Leeston

View on map

Leeston Playcentre - 20/02/2019

1 Evaluation of Leeston Playcentre

How well placed is Leeston Playcentre to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

Leeston Playcentre is well placed to promote positive learning outcomes for children.

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Leeston Playcentre is a long-established parent co-operative providing four morning sessions per week for up to 25 children aged from birth to school age. The centre's stated philosophy is to provide whole child development within a supportive whānau and tamariki led environment.

The playcentre is part of the Upper South region of the Playcentre Federation. The new region employs a Centre Support Worker (CSW) and Centre Administrator (CA). Sessions are facilitated by two paid coordinators who hold playcentre qualifications. A new governance committee has been recently elected and is undertaking federation training for office holders. The playcentre is an active member of the Ngā Mātāpuna o te Waihora Kāhui Ako I Community of Learning.

Since ERO's 2014 review the playcentre has made good progress in addressing the areas identified for development.

The Review Findings

The wellbeing and learning of children are nurtured through the family atmosphere at Leeston Playcentre. Since ERO's 2014 review, there has been a significant change of playcentre families. The centre provides an important support network to new members of its community. New parents have a growing appreciation of the philosophy and learning approach of the centre, increasingly taking a lead in session planning, based on children's current interests. Children and their parents enjoy a strong sense of belonging at the centre and the community's cultural diversity is incorporated into daily practice. The playcentre is well resourced, including interesting outdoor facilities that encourage independence, challenge and creativity for all ages.

Infants and toddlers have a safe and secure area in which to learn and play, with appropriate provision of intellectual stimulation and social support. They are welcomed into the wider programme along with the older children. All children are empowered to take increased responsibility for the wellbeing of themselves and others, demonstrating care of one another across the centre.

Coordinators and parents demonstrate a commitment to growing a bicultural environment and to including te reo and tikanga Māori in daily practice. External support and expertise is sought where necessary, including for children with special needs. Parents benefit from training available through the kāhui ako, local playcentre cluster, the Playcentre Federation and Te Whāriki (2017) The Early Childhood Curriculum resources.

Effective internal evaluation practices help parents to know what is working well, what is improving and what could be done differently. The centre's current self review is focussing on helping parents to be more engaged with their children's learning. Parent and child 'voice' are valued in internal evaluation for decision making and improvement. The governance committee has identified that actions from internal evaluation should be regularly revisited to ensure good practice is sustained.

Key Next Steps

The next steps are for parents, with the support of the CSW, to:

  • review the centre's philosophy and strategic actions to align with Te Whāriki (2017) The Early Childhood Curriculum
  • clearly state and use the playcentre's priorities for children's learning.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Leeston Playcentre completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist.  In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. 

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Leeston Playcentre will be in three years.

Alan Wynyard
Director Review and Improvement Services Southern
Southern Region

20 February 2019 

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning. 

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service 

Location

Leeston

Ministry of Education profile number

70078

Licence type

Playcentre

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

25 children, including up to 10 aged under 2

Service roll

35

Gender composition

Boys: 21

Girls: 14

Ethnic composition

Māori
Pākehā
Asian
Other ethnicities

  3
27
  2
  5

Percentage of qualified adults (with play-centre qualifications)

50-79%

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

1:1

Better than minimum requirements

Over 2

1:5

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

November 2018

Date of this report

20 February 2019

Most recent ERO reports

Education Review

November 2014

Education Review

October 2011

Education Review

May 2008

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau. 

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.

Leeston Playcentre - 10/11/2014

1 Evaluation of Leeston Playcentre

How well placed is Leeston Playcentre to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

Leeston Playcentre is well placed to promote positive learning outcomes for children.

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

This playcentre operates under the guidance of the Canterbury Playcentre Association. The playcentre is a parent cooperative. The parents are encouraged to be involved in all aspects of the programme and centre operation.

Leeston Playcentre has four morning sessions and two afternoon sessions. The Tuesday afternoon session is for mothers with babies. It is ably managed by one of the playcentre’s coordinators.

Since the October 2011 ERO review, the centre has made good progress towards addressing the recommendations in the report. Self review is more purposeful, assessment procedures are more consistent and bicultural practice is improving.

The centre’s involvement in a learning cluster with local early childhood centres, primary schools and the college is helping to strengthen professional relationships and understandings.

This review was part of a cluster of 11 reviews in the Canterbury Playcentre Association.

The Review Findings

The children experience positive, caring and nurturing support from adults at the centre. Children lead their learning with positive assistance and guidance from parents. Their ideas for learning are valued. Parents respond appropriately to children’s requests for resources and suggestions.

The programme is planned around children’s emerging interests and strengths. There is regular sharing of children’s successes and developing skills and attitudes. The learning profiles are contributed to by coordinators, parents and children. The positive change made to the way children’s learning is noticed, and is evident in the children’s profiles.

Parents have collaborative and positive relationships with each other and this contributes to a relaxed and enjoyable place for children to explore and learn. The high adult-to-child ratio helps to promote sustained play and appropriate extension of children’s thinking and understanding.

The learning environment is spacious, colourful and well resourced. The displays on the wall and children’s learning records show the broad range of learning opportunities at the centre. Children regularly visit the local primary school for celebrations of learning, sports and cultural events and take trips to areas of interest in the community.

Parents are fully involved in supporting their children and taking an active role in reviewing the centre’s operations and practices. They get useful guidance and ongoing support from the centre coordinators and association training.

The centre has good processes in place to evaluate the effectiveness of centre practices and operations. The reflective practices have led to improvements in planning and self review.

Key Next Steps

The centre has identified, and ERO agrees, the following improvements will lead to better outcomes for children’s learning. These are:

  • continuing to build on the quality of assessment
  • maintaining the quality of self review through building parent capability.

Canterbury Playcentre Association

This is the third cluster review of a number of playcentres that ERO has undertaken in collaboration with the association. Each of the previous cluster reviews have identified emerging strengths from all playcentres reviewed. This process has resulted in key next steps for the association to further support playcentres to improve learning outcomes for children.

The association has made some good progress in addressing the recommendations from the previous two cluster reviews. This includes:

  • supporting children’s transitions to school
  • re-establishing the centre managers’ appraisal system
  • improving feedback from the centre support team to parent groups about the quality of teaching and learning.

Further work is required to develop a stronger understanding of the government’s focus on priority learners so that the association can better support parent groups to respond to these children.

There continues to be significant change occurring in the structure of governance and management at association and federation levels. This has had a major impact on the association’s positive response to ERO’s recommendation from the previous cluster review, to document future planning.

Key Next Steps for the Canterbury Playcentre Association

During this cluster review the association has identified, and ERO agrees, that the next steps for the association include:

  • helping parent groups more effectively sustain the developments in bicultural practices and strengthening the focus on Māori achieving success as Māori
  • reviewing assessment and planning processes to help adults identify children’s learning and the ways that adults can help children with their learning
  • developing a clear understanding of the process of strategic planning at association level and sharing this with parent groups
  • continuing to support and grow emergent leaders in playcentres.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Leeston Playcentre completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Leeston Playcentre will be in three years.

Graham Randell

National Manager Review Services Southern Region

10 November 2014

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Leeston, Canterbury

Ministry of Education profile number

70078

Licence type

Playcentre

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

25 children, including up to 8 aged under two

Service roll

29

Gender composition

Girls 12; Boys 17

Ethnic composition

Māori

NZ European/Pākehā

Filipino

Other ethnicities

9

13

2

5

Reported ratios of adult to children

Under 2

1:1

Better than minimum requirements

 

Over 2

1:5

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

August 2014

Date of this report

10 November 2014

Most recent ERO reports

Education Review

October 2011

 

Education Review

May 2008

 

Education Review

June 2004

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.