Active Explorers Greta Point

Education institution number:
60090
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
35
Telephone:
Address:

310 Evans Bay Parade, Greta Point, Wellington

View on map

Active Explorers Greta Point

ERO’s Akanuku | Assurance Review reports provide information about whether a service meets and maintains regulatory standards. Further information about Akanuku | Assurance Reviews is included at the end of this report.

ERO’s Judgement

Regulatory standards

ERO’s judgement

Curriculum

Meeting

Premises and facilities

Meeting

Health and safety

Meeting

Governance, management and administration

Meeting

At the time of the review, ERO found the service was taking reasonable steps to meet regulatory standards.

Background

Active Explorers Greta Point is owned by Evolve Education Group, which is responsible for governance. A centre manager, supported by an area manager, leads a team of teachers across three learning areas. The December 2018 ERO report found that the service was not well placed to promote positive learning outcomes for children.

Summary of Review Findings

The service curriculum is inclusive and informed by assessment, planning and evaluation aligned to Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum. Whānau aspirations are gathered to inform planning for children's learning. Children and infants are given time and space to learn at their own pace. The design and layout of the premises supports the provision of different types of indoor and outdoor experiences. A variety of resources are provided that are appropriate to the differing ages and abilities of those attending.

Leaders are committed to providing professional learning that aligns to the service’s priorities and enables teachers to stay current with relevant theory and practice. A policy framework and an annual plan guide centre operation.

Key Next Steps

Next steps are for teachers to:

  • increase the visibility of children’s language, culture and identity in assessment for learning documentation
  • provide children with more opportunities to hear and use te reo Māori.

Next ERO Review

The next ERO review is likely to be an Akarangi | Quality Evaluation.

Dr Lesley Patterson
Director Review and Improvement Services (Southern)
Southern Region | Te Tai Tini

2 March 2022 

Information About the Service

Early Childhood Service Name

Active Explorers Greta Point

Profile Number: 60090
Location Wellington

Service type

Education and care service

Number licensed for

65 children, including up to 25 aged under 2

Percentage of qualified teachers

80-99%

Service roll

49

Ethnic composition

Māori 4, NZ European/Pākehā 21, other ethnic groups 24

Review team on site

January 2022

Date of this report

2 March 2022

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review, December 2018; Education Review, October 2015.

General Information about Assurance Reviews

All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include the Licensing Criteria for Education and Care Services 2008.

Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a licence to operate.

ERO undertakes an Akanuku | Assurance Review process in any centre-based service:

  • having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation
  • previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development’
  • that has moved from a provisional to a full licence
  • that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership
  • where an Akanuku | Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulated standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher certification; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:

  • discussions with those involved in the service
  • consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems
  • observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice.

Active Explorers Greta Point - 18/12/2018

1 Evaluation of Active Explorers Greta Point

How well placed is Active Explorers Greta Point to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

Governance practices are not yet implemented with sufficient rigour to assure leaders that the company guidelines are followed. Leadership, quality of curriculum, appraisal and review and evaluation practices all require further development to support and sustain improvement.

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Active Explorers Greta Point, previously known as I Kids Greta Point, is a purpose-built education and care service in central Wellington. The centre is licensed for 65 children, including 25 up to the age of two years. At the time of this review, 10 children identified as Māori. Full-time education and care is offered across three playrooms.

Since the October 2015 ERO report, the service has changed ownership. It was purchased by the Evolve Group (the organisation) in July 2017. It provides governance guidelines, systems and processes for centre operation. An area manager offers professional support and guidance to teachers and leaders. The centre manager has overall responsibility for day-to-day operation. Two team leaders support teachers in their roles and have oversight of the curriculum.

The team leaders are new to their positions in 2018. They are in the initial stages of developing their leadership skills and understanding their roles.

The October 2015 ERO report, for I Kids Greta Point, identified areas requiring further development. These included: the strengthening of assessment, planning and evaluation practices; building an understanding of the self-review process and knowledge of evaluation; consulting with parents and whānau to define success for Māori and Pacific children; and the appraisal process. As a result of the change of ownership little progress has been made in these areas.

The Review Findings

Learners experience a range of activities that enable them to explore and begin to make sense of their world. Children respond well to teachers and their peers. A range of activities and routines are largely teacher led and are generally used for settling and transitioning children to eating times, rather than having a learning focus. Some aspects of literacy and numeracy are evident in the activities provided and the environment. Children aged up to two years are cared for in a calm and unhurried manner.

Teachers demonstrate limited knowledge of how to support children’s learning and development. Interactions are predominantly positive, however few effective teaching strategies were evident. Leaders acknowledge the need for focused professional development to enable effective teaching to take place.

Cultural responsiveness is emerging. Teachers are beginning to integrate aspects of te reo me ngā tikanga Māori into the curriculum to support Māori learners. Teachers' cultural backgrounds and awareness of additional needs are used to inform the programme. Artefacts, celebrations of cultural significance and waiata are evident throughout the centre and programme. Continued development in this area is required.

Children with additional needs are identified and appropriate advice is sought. Actions to support these children need to be better developed and implemented.

Assessment, planning and evaluation of children's learning requires strengthening. Teachers have begun to collect parent aspirations to inform children's individual programmes. They have trialled a range of formats to plan for children and investigated ways to assess and report children's learning to parents. However, assessment and planning for learning is currently minimal and inconsistent in format.

Useful appraisal processes are documented, however these are not yet implemented with sufficient rigour. There is little evidence of observations of teacher practice or robust feedback from the appraiser. Planned and sequential development of staff, including provisionally certificated teachers and teachers in training, has suffered as a consequence.

Some reflective practice is evident, however understanding of the process and purpose of review and evaluation is not yet sufficiently developed. The centre manager has accessed professional development focused on positive behaviour guidance and is planning to address identified needs. Some evidence is gathered, changes considered, but any impact is yet to be evaluated.

Key Next Steps

Stronger support by the organisation to assist service improvement, is a priority. The organisation has yet to provide effective support and mentoring for teachers in training and the centre manager. In addition, ERO identified concerns with the regular monitoring of practices to ensure compliance with regulatory matters are consistently met. Ongoing support is required to address a wide range of issues that have the potential to impact on achieving positive learning outcomes for children. This includes:

  • ongoing systematic support and guidance to ensure all guidelines and expectations are met and the quality of teaching and learning is improved to provide positive learning outcomes for children

  • providing suitable leadership development to ensure leaders have the capability to monitor and grow professional practice within the centre including, robust planning and assessment practices that consider children's interests and demonstrates how children's individual culture, language, identity and specific needs are catered for

  • developing centre wide understanding of review and evaluation. This should consider the impact of initiatives, interventions and day-to-day teaching practice on positive outcomes for children.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Active Explorers Greta Point completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Actions for compliance

ERO identified areas of non-compliance relating to the provision of the curriculum, staff appraisal and professional development.

To meet requirements the service needs to improve its performance in the following areas:

  • develop and implement a curriculum that responds to children's learning interests and strengths, provides a positive learning environment, reflects an understanding of learning that is consistent with current research

  • implementation of the appraisal process to meet Education Council requirements and Evolve guidelines. [Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Centres 2008, Reg 42 (a, I, iii, iv) (c i), GMA 7]

Recommendation to Ministry of Education

ERO recommends that the Ministry reassess the licence of Active Explorers Greta Point. ERO will not undertake a further education review of this service until the Ministry of Education is satisfied that the service meets licensing requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Active Explorers Greta Point will be in consultation with the Ministry of Education.

Alan Wynyard

Director Review and Improvement Services Southern Region

18 December 2018

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Wellington

Ministry of Education profile number

60090

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

65 children, including up to 25 aged under 2

Service roll

83

Gender composition

Boys 46, Girls 37

Ethnic composition

Māori
Pākehā
Greek
Samoan
Indian
Cook Island Māori
Other ethnic groups

10
44
8
4
4
3
10

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%+

Based on funding rates

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

1:4

Better than minimum requirements

Over 2

1:8

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

October 2018

Date of this report

18 December 2018

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

October 2015

Education Review

February 2013

Education Review

March 2010

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.