Barnardos Early Learning Homebased Canterbury One

Education institution number:
70511
Service type:
Homebased Network
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
27
Telephone:
Address:

322 Milford Clandeboye Road, RD26, Temuka

View on map

Barnardos Early Learning Homebased Canterbury One - 18/02/2019

1 Evaluation of Barnardos Early Learning Homebased Canterbury One

How well placed is Barnardos Early Learning Homebased Canterbury One to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

Barnardos Early Learning Homebased Canterbury One is well placed to provide positive learning outcomes for children.

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Barnardos Early Learning Homebased Canterbury One provides individual care and education for children from birth to school age in the educator's home. This service is part of the Barnardos Early Learning organisation.

The organisation and the network have undergone significant organisational and management changes since the previous ERO review in 2014. Barnardos Early Learning organisation has recently rebranded. It was previously known as Barnardos KidStart. A new leadership team has been in place since 2016. This includes a regional manager, practice advisor and an experienced visiting teacher. They work together to support educators and children across a wide geographical area. Leaders have successfully addressed all of the areas identified for improvement in the previous ERO report.

In 2017 the vision and philosophy of the whole organisation was reviewed to create a stronger focus on the service's valued outcomes for children. It aims 'to have an Aotearoa New Zealand where every child shines bright'; 'create strong foundations for the future' and go from being 'credible to incredible'.

In 2018 the organisation's policies and procedures were updated and aligned to quality assurance and accountability processes. The visiting teacher reviewed the network philosophy to align to the organisation's philosophy and valued outcomes for children.

This review was part of a cluster of five Early Learning Home Based Network reviews in the Barnardos Early Learning organisation cluster.

The Review Findings

The service's valued outcomes for children are clearly evident in learning records and aligned to Te Whāriki. These records capture children's increasing confidence as communicators and active learners and explorers who are well understood in the context of their family/whānau and community.

The interests, strengths and capabilities of all children (Māori, diverse learners, infants and toddlers) are well supported and sensitively responded to. Te ao Māori and the Māori values are integrated in ways that are respectful of the Māori culture and meaningful to children. Children benefit from a rich, localised, culturally-responsive curriculum that makes purposeful links to the local area, the natural world and the learning that matters for this community of learners.

Strong professional leadership, high expectations and targeted mentoring and coaching of educators promotes equity and excellence for all children. Leaders foster respectful, inclusive relationships with educators, children and families/whānau to promote learning-centred partnerships that have the child at the heart of all decision making. Purposeful links are made to expertise within and beyond the service to support and advocate for children with additional needs and families with additional needs.

The Barnardos Early Learning Home Based organisation has recently introduced and actioned a number of new initiatives. The purpose of these initiatives is to provide assurance of consistent, collaborative and professional approaches to support equity and excellence for all children. This includes:

  • clear alignment of key priorities to the vision, philosophy and valued outcomes for children
  • strong, collaborative leadership and inclusive learner-focused relationships within and across the service and with relevant community experts and agencies
  • giving prominence to te ao Māori and culturally responsive practices across the organisation
  • developing initiatives to respond to the diverse needs of learners and to promote equity and social justice for children and families
  • high expectations and purposeful use of evidence-based internal evaluation and quality assurance processes to inform future directions and improvements
  • effective systems to identify, monitor and report on health and safety and legislative requirements.

Key Next Steps

Service leaders have identified and ERO's evaluation has confirmed that the key next steps for the Canterbury One network are to:

  • embed new initiatives, including annual planning and evaluation, policies, procedures and appraisal processes
  • ensure evaluations include the impact of actions on practices and outcomes for children and their whānau
  • strengthen assessment, planning and evaluation, and the implementation of Te Whāriki (2017).

National and service leaders have identified and ERO's evaluation has confirmed, that the key next steps for the organisation are to:

  • embed new initiatives and evaluate the impact of actions on practice and valued learning outcomes for children and their whānau
  • progress the monitoring, tracking and evaluation of key priorities
  • consolidate and build on reflective and evaluative practices.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Barnardos Early Learning Homebased Canterbury One completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. 

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Barnardos Early Learning Homebased Canterbury One will be in three years.

Alan Wynyard
Director Review & Improvement Services
Te Waipounamu - Southern Region

18 February 2019 

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning. 

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service 

Location

Christchurch

Ministry of Education profile number

70511

Institution  type

Homebased Network

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

50 children, including up to 50 aged under 2

Service roll

53

Standard or Quality Funded

Standard or Quality Funded

Gender composition

Boys 27 : Girls 26

Ethnic composition

Māori
Pākehā
Samoan
Filipino
Other ethnicities

  9
31
  2
  6
  5

Number of qualified coordinators in the network

1

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

1:2

Better than minimum requirements

Over 2

1:4

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

September 2018

Date of this report

18 February 2019

Most recent ERO reports

Education Review

May 2012

Education Review

September 2008

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau. 

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.

KidStart Christchurch One - 28/05/2012

1 The Education Review Office (ERO) Evaluation

KidStart Christchurch One is one of four Barnardos home-based networks that operate in Canterbury. The service contracts educators who use their own homes to provide care and education for up to four children at any one time.

Barnados provides initial and ongoing support and training for educators, along with detailed guidelines outlining procedures and expectations.

Visiting teachers, who are qualified early childhood teachers, visit educators and children in the educator's home regularly. The visiting teachers are responsible for making sure that the homes meet health and safety standards. Educators are well supported, and children receive the care and education they need.

The manager, visiting teachers and educators have successfully retained and built on many of the positive features detailed in the service’s September 2008 ERO report.

The service has been restructured and a practice leader appointed to help promote high-quality care and education.

The Canterbury earthquakes have had a significant impact on many children, their families, educators and Barnardos staff. The service has been very responsive to the circumstances and needs of children, families, educators and staff.

The additional learning experiences the service creates for children have been extended and now include a literacy group as well as play and music groups.

Positive features of the care and education the service provides for children include:

  • the suitably varied range of learning experiences children take part in, both within and beyond, the educator’s home
  • the focus adults place on building on children’s interests
  • the way adults often skilfully support children’s learning through play
  • the extent to which children’s sense of well-being and belonging are fostered.

Barnardos staff provide educators with helpful guidance and support them in ways that promote a strong sense of partnership.

Leadership and management practices foster good-quality care and education and help to support ongoing improvements to the service.

Areas for development and review relate largely to building on existing practices in ways that:

  • improve the quality of assessment, planning and programme evaluation
  • extend the self-review programme and practices to increase their usefulness for promoting ongoing improvements to teaching and learning.

Future Action

ERO is confident that the service is being managed in the interest of the children. Therefore ERO will review the service again within three years.

2 The Focus of the Review

Before the review, the management of Christchurch One was invited to consider its priorities for review using guidelines and resources provided by ERO. ERO also used documentation provided by the centre to contribute to the scope of the review.

The detailed priorities for review were then determined following a discussion between the ERO review team and the management and staff. This discussion focused on existing information held by the centre (including self-review information) and the extent to which potential issues for review contributed to positive outcomes for children at Christchurch One.

All ERO education reviews in early childhood focus on the quality of education. For ERO this includes the quality of:

  • the programme provided for children
  • the learning environment
  • and the interactions between children and adults.

ERO's findings in these areas are set out below.

The Quality of Education

Background

Since the service's ERO review in September 2008, there have been changes in management, staff and ongoing professional development. Management, visiting teachers and educators have continued to seek ways of building on the best of past practices to promote ongoing improvements to the quality of education and care practices for children.

Areas of strength

Programme

Educators provide children with a suitable and varied range of learning experiences. Their programmes:

  • provide children with appropriate opportunities to follow their interests and to have their immediate needs met
  • include a good mixture of activities both within and beyond the home
  • give children suitable options for playing either on their own or with others.

Reviewers observed children happily engaged in a variety of exploratory play activities, often for sustained periods.

A recent focus on improving assessment practices is helping educators to better notice and recognise children’s learning. More emphasis is now being placed on considering how to further promote each child’s learning.

Interactions

Reviewers observed adults interacting with children in ways that were responsive, respectful, supportive and caring. Relationships between educators and children are clearly helping to foster children’s sense of belonging and well-being.

Children were keen to have their educators and visiting teachers involved in play. Adults used a variety of good practices to help promote children’s learning including:

  • giving children many opportunities to make choices
  • playing alongside children in ways that prolonged their interest and encouraged creativity
  • providing additional resources to extend children’s learning.

Environment

Home environments visited by ERO helped to support children’s learning and development. For instance they provided children with:

  • a wide range of easily accessible activities and resources, both indoors and outdoors
  • a variety of well set out and “inviting” spaces that helped to engage them in play
  • interesting displays, in most homes, that included information about children’s experiences and aspects of their learning.

Educator selection, support and training

Educators are well supported, particularly by visiting teachers, in their efforts to provide good quality care and education for children. For example:

  • recruitment systems give suitable emphasis to making sure educators can meet the expectations associated with their role
  • induction processes and ongoing training for educators that provide them with regular opportunities for learning and development
  • the ongoing affirmation and support they receive from visiting teachers helps them to feel valued and increases their confidence

Barnardos-initiated activities such as workshops, group activities and social events, give educators good opportunities to meet with, share ideas and make links with other educators.

Areas for development and review

Enhancing assessment, programme planning and evaluation

To further support children’s learning and development:

  • educators should build on assessment initiatives and focus more on identifying the next possible steps for children’s learning and development
  • visiting teachers' contact records should more consistently note the learning that is occurring for children, the suggestions made for improving learning and teaching and the actions taken to address issues raised in previous visits
  • teachers and educators should explore further ways of evaluating the effectiveness of programmes in fostering children’s learning and development.

Leadership and Management

Areas of strength

Aspects of leadership and management

Leadership and management practices that are helping to foster good-quality care and education for children include the:

  • useful guidelines, (including handbooks, policies and procedures) that set out expectations
  • way team building and teamwork is being promoted
  • efforts made to promote reflective practices, professional learning and ongoing improvements.

Partnership building

Visiting teachers promote a sense of partnership between themselves and educators. They work in ways that reflect the service’s emphasis on empowering others.

The manager and visiting teachers communicate regularly, and in a variety of ways, with educators and parents. Increased opportunities for parents, educators and managers to meet socially and for further education, are also helping to create a sense of partnership.

Areas for development and review

Self review

The value and usefulness of self review for evaluating and improving the quality of care and education could be enhanced by:

  • extending guidelines and opportunities for professional development in relation to self review
  • making greater provision for evaluating the quality of programmes, teaching and learning
  • increasing the involvement of educators and parents in review processes.

3 Management Assurance on Compliance Areas

Overview

Before the review, the management and staff of Barnardos KidStart Christchurch One completed an ERO Home-Based Care Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they had taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • administration
  • health, safety and welfare
  • personnel management
  • financial and property management.

During the review, ERO checked the following items because they have a potentially high impact on outcomes for children:

  • emotional safety (including behaviour management, prevention of bullying and abuse)
  • physical safety (including behaviour management, sleeping and supervision practices; accidents and medication; hygiene and routines; travel and excursion policies and procedures)
  • staff qualifications and organisation
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

4 Future Action

ERO is confident that the service is being managed in the interest of the children. Therefore ERO will review the service again in three years.

Graham Randell

National Manager Review Services Southern Region

28 May 2012

About the Service

Location

Christchurch

Ministry of Education profile number

70511

Licence type

Home-Based Care

Chartered under

Education (Home-based Care) Order 1992

Service roll

51

Gender composition

Boys 29

Girls 22

Ethnic composition

NZ European/Pākehā

Māori

Cook Island

Other

26

9

1

15

Review team on site

April 2012

Date of this report

28 May 2012

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

Education Review

Discretionary Review

September 2008

June 2005

June 2002