Kidz Kindy @49

Education institution number:
65227
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
41
Telephone:
Address:

49 Budge Street, Blenheim

View on map

Kidz Kindy @49

1 ERO’s Judgements

Akarangi | Quality Evaluation evaluates the extent to which this early childhood service has the learning and organisational conditions to support equitable and excellent outcomes for all learners. Te Ara Poutama Indicators of quality for early childhood education: what matters most are the basis for making judgements about the effectiveness of the service in achieving equity and excellence for all learners. Judgements are made in relation to the Outcomes Indicators, Learning and Organisational Conditions. The Evaluation Judgement Rubric derived from the indicators, is used to inform ERO’s judgements about this service’s performance in promoting equity and excellence. 

ERO’s judgements for Kidz Kindy @49 are as follows:

Outcome Indicators

(What the service knows about outcomes for learners)

Whakatō Emerging

Ngā Akatoro Domains

 
Learning Conditions
Organisational Conditions

Whakatō Emerging

Whakatō Emerging

2 Context of the Service

Kidz Kindy @49 provides education and care for children from three years of age. A new internally appointed head teacher leads an established team, alongside a newly appointed centre manager and general manager. At the time of the review a small number of children enrolled were Māori.

3 Summary of findings

A newly developed group planning system strongly guides the programme. Daily learning experiences reflect the current group focus and children’s interests. The learning environment encourages creativity and choice, in line with the service’s values. 

Children, and their parents and whānau have some opportunities to contribute to the centre wide curriculum. Parent and whānau goals for their children’s learning are sought. Teachers are yet to use these, and the learning outcomes in Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum, to guide planning for individual children. Whānau and outside agencies engage with teachers to create plans for children with additional learning needs. These support their participation in daily routines and learning experiences.

Development of the bicultural curriculum is in the early stages. Aspects of te ao Māori are evident in the environment. There is some use of te reo Māori and tikanga Māori through daily routines. Leaders acknowledge the need to further develop relationships with whānau Māori and local iwi to strengthen bicultural practices. 

The new leadership team is in the process of developing organisational conditions for improvement. Relational trust is building across the service. Changes to the provision of professional support and learning are being implemented. Teachers actively take responsibility for their own professional learning and development. A range of quality improvement processes such as teacher inquiry, reflection, and self-review, enable teachers to gather and use information on their teaching and to change individual and collective practice. However, the full process of internal evaluation is not understood by the wider team to promote its use to identify what impact these changes are having on children’s outcomes.

4 Improvement actions

Kidz Kindy @49 will include the following actions in its Quality Improvement Planning:

  • Identify the service’s learning priorities for children, alongside parents and whānau, to strengthen the localised curriculum.
  • Build shared understanding within the teaching team of the learning outcomes of Te Whāriki and how these can be used within planning, assessment, and evaluation of children’s learning. 
  • Strengthen relationships with whānau Māori to understand what success looks like for their tamariki and identify strategies to promote this.
  • Strengthen the team’s collaborative understanding of, and engagement in, internal evaluation. 

5 Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Kidz Kindy @49 completed an ERO Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; safety checking; teacher registration; ratios)
  • relevant evacuation procedures and practices.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

6 Actions for Compliance 

During the review, the service provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed the following non-compliance:

  • Ensuring all children’s workers are safety checked every three years in accordance with the Children’s Act 2014, and the results recorded. (GMA7A)

Since the onsite visit, the service provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed the following non-compliance:

  • Ensuring daily checks to equipment, premises, and facilities for hazards to children contain all areas required by the licensing criterion, and accident/incident records are analysed to identify hazards and appropriate action is taken (HS12).  

Patricia Davey
Director of Early Childhood Education (ECE)

30 November 2023 

6 About the Early Childhood Service 

Early Childhood Service NameKidz Kindy @49
Profile Number65227
LocationBlenheim
Service type Education and care service
Number licensed for 30 children over the age of 2
Percentage of qualified teachers 100%
Service roll49
Review team on siteOctober 2023 
Date of this report30 November 2023
Most recent ERO report(s)Education Review, February 2019 

Kidz Kindy @49 - 07/02/2019

1 Evaluation of Kidz Kindy @49

How well placed is Kidz Kindy @49 to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

Kidz Kindy @49 is well placed to promote positive learning outcomes for children.

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Kidz Kindy @49 is one of two early learning centres owned by the same licensee. The centres operate in close proximity to each other. This centre is licensed for 30 children over the age of two years old. It caters for the care and education of children from a culturally rich community.

Since the March 2017 ERO review there has been a change in the ownership and management of the service. There have also been changes to the teaching team. A centre manager oversees the operation of both services. The owner is a trained teacher and is regularly in the programme working with children. Most of the staff are qualified and registered teachers.

The 2017 ERO report identified a need to improve management systems. The new owner and staff have made progress in addressing all areas identified in the report. They have developed a shared philosophy and ways of working across both of the centres.

This review was part of a cluster of two early learning centre reviews in the Kidz Kindy Service.

The Review Findings

Leaders show a strong commitment to the philosophy and goals of the service. They promote shared understandings among teachers to ensure that the philosophy is clearly reflected in practice.

Leaders and teachers carefully consider children at the centre of their decision making. They are aware of their responsibility to advocate and provide equitable and positive outcomes for all children. Children with additional needs are well supported to succeed in their learning.

Teachers strive to understand the child in the context of family and whānau. They make purposeful use of the environment and provision of resources to engage children in the learning programme. Children are actively involved in a wide range of interesting learning experiences and activities that promote literacy, mathematics and fine motor skills. They are well supported to develop independence and to play well with and alongside others.

Teachers foster positive, sensitive and responsive relationships with children. They take time to genuinely listen to children and further develop oral language, ideas and learning. Children have many opportunities to engage in art experiences, physical activities, and to explore the natural outdoor environment.

Leaders value and make good use of teachers' strengths, interests and passions within the curriculum. They promote collaborative ways of working to build emergent leadership capacity and teacher capability. Together they have strengthened planning and assessment processes to support children's wellbeing and learning.

Leaders are building a reflective culture that is focused on continuous improvement and positive outcomes for all children.

Key Next Steps

The new centre owner and leaders have made significant progress in developing a number of new initiatives to support effective management and curriculum practices.

Centre leaders have identified, and ERO's evaluation has confirmed, that the key next steps are to strengthen:

  • the provision of a bicultural curriculum and response to children's language, culture and identity across the curriculum
  • consistency of effective internal evaluation processes and practices
  • appraisal and attestation processes to align more closely to the Education Council requirements.

ERO has identified that assessment, planning and evaluation documentation needs to be strengthened to better reflect the rich curriculum that is offered to children.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Kidz Kindy @49 completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Kidz Kindy @49 will be in three years.

Alan Wynyard

Director Review and Improvement Services

Te Waipounamu - Southern Region

7 February 2019

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

LocationBlenheim
Ministry of Education profile number65227
Licence typeEducation & Care Service
Licensed underEducation (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008
Number licensed for30 children aged over two years old
Service roll40
Gender compositionGirls 12 ; Boys 18
Ethnic compositionMāori
Pākehā
Pacific 
Other ethnicities
11 
12 

4

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%+

Based on funding rates

80% +
Reported ratios of staff to childrenover 21:8Better than minimum requirements
Review team on siteNovember 2018
Date of this report7 February 2019

Most recent ERO report(s)

 

Education ReviewMarch 2017
Supplementary ReviewMay 2013

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.

Beavertown Early Learning Centre - 28/03/2017

1 Evaluation of Beavertown Early Learning Centre

How well placed is Beavertown Early Learning Centre to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

The licensee has yet to put in place effective management practices that promote high quality learning and teaching for all children. The leaders need to improve management systems and practices and aspects of the curriculum to provide better learning and teaching outcomes.

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Beavertown Early Learning Centre is one of two centres managed by the licensee. The centres operate in close proximity to each other. The Centre is licensed for 25 children and since the last ERO report the owner has dedicated this centre to children mostly over three. There are no children under two.

The staff are all qualified early childhood teachers. There have been a number of staff changes since the 2013 ERO report, including the recent resignation of the centre manager, who managed both centres. The head teacher was appointed in 2016.

The Review Findings

Teachers provide children and their families with a welcoming, positive environment. The centre is flexible in meeting the diverse backgrounds and needs of families. Parents are supported and encouraged to be involved in their child's learning. Teachers have a good understanding of their parent community and use a range of ways to communicate with families.

Children are actively engaged, individually and in groups, in a broad range of activities. They are encouraged to follow their interests and to develop self-management, independence, creativity and problem-solving skills. Children are confident to make full use of the environment which encourages active exploration and the development of coordination and physical skills.

The centre's focus on sustainability and nutrition is well embedded in the curriculum through maintaining the garden, harvesting and cooking the produce. Professional development for teachers has led to the improved integration of mathematics and literacy in the programme and has extended staff understanding of the culture of Pacific children.

Children relate positively to each other and to adults. Children's learning is extended through teachers listening carefully, questioning and engaging them in sustained conversations.

Under the direction of the head teacher the teaching team works collaboratively and with a clear understanding of the centre's priorities for children's development and learning.

Since the previous ERO report teachers have successfully incorporated te reo Māori and te ao Māori into the programme and centre practices.

Teachers have well-established procedures for flexible child-centred transitions between both centres. The centre has developed close and useful links with the local primary school.

Key Next Steps

The leaders/managers need to improve management systems and practices to provide a better quality of service. They need to establish an effective management structure that includes:

  • strategic planning that is closely linked to the centre's philosophy and vision

  • well understood, planned and implemented programmes of internal evaluation

  • robust staff appraisal processes that meet the Education Council criteria for registered teachers

  • a useful and well understood assessment and programme planning process

  • continued development and embedding of bicultural perspectives to improve Māori success for Māori.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Beavertown Early Learning Centre completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Actions for compliance

ERO found areas of non-compliance in the service related to:

  • the effective governance and management of the service in accordance with good management practices

  • appraisal

  • aspects of health and safety.

[Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Centres 2008, 47 1(a), 1(e), (GMA6)]

Development Plan Recommendation

ERO recommends that the service, in consultation with the Ministry of Education, develops a plan to address the key next steps and actions outlined in this report.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Beavertown Early Learning Centre will be within two years.

Dr Lesley Patterson

Deputy Chief Review Officer, Southern - Te Waipounamu

28 March 2017 

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service 

Location

Blenheim

Ministry of Education profile number

65227

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

25 children, including up to 15 aged under 2

Service roll

24

Gender composition

Girls 13; Boys 11

Ethnic composition

Māori

Pākehā

Other Ethnicities

10

9

5

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%+ Based on funding rates

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Over 2

1:10

Meets minimum requirements

Review team on site

December 2016

Date of this report

28 March 2017

Most recent ERO reports

 

Supplementary Review

May 2013

Education Review

July 2012

Education Review

June 2009

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.