BestStart Te Awamutu

Education institution number:
34056
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
69
Telephone:
Address:

86 George Street, Te Awamutu

View on map

BestStart Te Awamutu - 17/12/2020

ERO’s Akanuku | Assurance Review reports provide information about whether a service meets and maintains regulatory standards. Further information about Akanuku | Assurance Reviews is included at the end of this report.

ERO’s Judgement

Regulatory standards

ERO’s judgement

Curriculum

Meeting

Premises and facilities

Meeting

Health and safety

Meeting

Governance, management and administration

Meeting

At the time of the review, ERO found the service was taking reasonable steps to meet regulatory standards.

Background

The September 2018 ERO evaluation identified non-compliances with regulatory standards that required addressing. The service (formerly TopKids George Street) has responded positively, and progress is evident.

A professional service manager and business manager provide support for the centre. The centre operates under the Central North Island Waikato regional management team within BestStart.

Summary of Review Findings

Children experience a programme that is consistent with Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum. The service curriculum provides opportunities for children to extend their learning and development. Adults engage in meaningful, positive interactions to enhance children’s learning and nurture reciprocal relationships.

The service curriculum acknowledges and reflects the unique place of Māori as tangata whenua. Positive steps are taken to respect and acknowledge the aspirations held by parents and whānau for their children.

The service has implemented ongoing self-review processes that help improve the quality of education and care.

Key Next Step

The key next step is to include provide further opportunities for children to be involved in decisions about their learning experiences.

Next ERO Review

The next ERO review is likely to be an Akarangi | Quality Evaluation.

Phil Cowie

Director Review and Improvement Services (Central)

Central Region | Te Tai Pūtahi Nui

17 December 2020

Information About the Service

Early Childhood Service Name

BestStart Te Awamutu

Profile Number

34056

Location

Te Awamutu

Service type

Education and care service

Number licensed for

75 children, including up to 20 aged under 2.

Percentage of qualified teachers

80%+

Service roll

68

Ethnic composition

Māori 21, NZ European/Pākehā 29, 18 Other ethnic groups.

Review team on site

17 November 2020

Date of this report

17 December 2020

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review September 2018; Education Review November 2014; Education Review August 2011.

General Information about Assurance Reviews

All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include the Licensing Criteria for Education and Care Services 2008.

Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a licence to operate.

ERO undertakes an Akanuku | Assurance Review process in any centre-based service:

  • having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation
  • previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development’
  • that has moved from a provisional to a full licence
  • that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership
  • where an Akanuku | Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulated standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher certification; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:

  • discussions with those involved in the service
  • consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems
  • observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice.

TopKids George Street - 07/09/2018

1 Evaluation of TopKids George Street

How well placed is TopKids George Street to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

TopKids George Street requires further development in developing their curriculum, internal evaluation, assessment and planning. A strategic approach to upgrading centre buildings and grounds is required.

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Topkids George St is located in the town centre of Te Awamutu. It provides all-day education and care and is licensed for 75 children, including up to 20 under the age of two years. Children learn in three age-based rooms, with the toddlers and older children also sharing an outdoor space. At the time of this review the roll of 92 included 25 Māori children.

Since the last ERO review in 2014 the governing organisation has changed its name from Kidicorp to BestStart Education and Care and has become a not-for-profit organisation. A professional service manager and business manager provide support for the centre. The centre operates under the Central North Island Waikato regional management team within BestStart.

A new centre manager has been appointed internally since the last ERO review and she is supported in her role by a head teacher and a team leader. Though staff hold teaching qualifications, only a few permanent staff members hold full teacher registration. There has been a significant turnover of teaching staff since the last ERO review, most recently in the nursery room.

Through their philosophy the centre aims to recognise children as individual learners who bring their knowledge and ways of learning with them. There is a centre expectation that teachers value independence and encourage life-long learning. The centre fosters partnerships with parents and whānau. Teachers aim to reflect New Zealand’s bicultural heritage in their practice and are inclusive of all cultures.

The centre has made some progress in responding to the areas identified in the previous 2014 ERO report. Staff turnover, the need to strengthen internal evaluation processes to support high-quality learning and care at all times, and teacher's confidence in using te reo Māori as part of their regular practice are areas of ongoing concern.

This review was part of a cluster of six reviews in the BestStart organisation.

The Review Findings

Children and their families benefit from the following strengths of the centre:

  • well-supported transitions into, within the centre and on to school

  • regular trips into the community and whānau events

  • celebrations of multi-cultural festivals and diversity is promoted

  • respectful relationships between children, their teachers and families.

A strategic approach to deepen teachers' understanding of Te Whāriki, early childhood curriculum is required. The curriculum needs further development to align more closely with the intent of Te Whāriki. Some elements of a bicultural curriculum are evident. Māori learners are supported by some teachers modelling the use of basic te reo Māori, celebrations such as Matariki and the new introduction of children's pēpeha. However, further consistency is necessary across the teaching team to strengthen this area. In the toddler and young children areas, priority should be given to reviewing the way in which literacy and mathematics concepts are taught to align with best practice for early childhood education.

Assessment, planning and evaluation processes need strengthening. Further support is required for teachers to build their knowledge of the purpose of assessment, planning and evaluation to strengthen learning pathways for individual children. This should include culturally responsive assessment.

Teaching and learning practices require further development to effectively promote learning outcomes for all children. Teachers need support to further reflect on their practices and inquire into current research and best practice in early childhood education.

Teachers respond well to the individual care needs of children up to two years. However, the recent change in staffing in that room has resulted in the primary caregiving approach being disrupted until new staff build relationships with the children and families. One key teacher provides familiarity during this time of change.

Children with additional learning needs are well supported with inclusive teaching practices. Priority learners have their care needs met.

Leadership in the centre needs further development. Managers now need to provide targeted support for centre leaders and teachers. This should include close monitoring and timelines for improvement to curriculum delivery and teacher practice and knowledge, in order to improve learning outcomes for all children.

BestStart's vison is to make a positive difference in the lives of children. Governance and management have developed clear strategic goals with guidelines and expectations for centre practice and curriculum. Regional leadership and management need to provide more support for centre leaders and teachers to enact the vision and goals of the service.

Key Next Steps

The key next steps for Topkids George St are to strengthen leadership and management for the service with priority being given to:

  • management providing a timeline for monitoring the implementation of the plans intended for the upgrade to centre buildings and grounds

developing a strategic approach to deepening teacher understanding and implementation of Te Whāriki, early childhood curriculum

  • reviewing how literacy and mathematics are delivered within the curriculum

  • strengthening the analysis of internal evaluation findings with a focus on improvements to teaching practice and outcomes for learners

  • supporting teachers to review and understand the purpose of assessment, planning and evaluation

  • assisting the new teaching team in the nursery to develop a shared philosophy for infant care.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of TopKids George Street completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

In order to improve practice the early childhood service management should ensure professional development is provided to leaders and teachers on the Code of Professional Responsibility and Standards for the Teaching Profession. Regular observations of practice by management for the centre manager are required to strengthen the appraisal system.

Actions for compliance

ERO identified areas of non-compliance relating to Topkids George St. To meet requirements the service needs to improve its performance in the following areas:

  • support the practice of adults providing education and care to demonstrate an understanding of children's learning and development, and knowledge of relevant theories and practice in early childhood education.
    [Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Centres 2008, C4, C1, PF13]

Development Plan Recommendation

ERO recommends that the service, in consultation with the Ministry of Education, develops a plan to address the key next steps and actions outlined in this report.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of TopKids George Street will be within two years.

Adrienne Fowler

Director Review and Improvement Services

Te Tai Miringa - Waikato / Bay of Plenty Region

7 September 2018

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Te Awamutu

Ministry of Education profile number

34056

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

75 children, including up to 20 aged under 2

Service roll

92

Gender composition

Boys 50 Girls 42

Ethnic composition

Māori
Pākehā
Other

25
62
5

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%+ Based on funding rates

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

1:4

Better than minimum requirements

Over 2

1:8

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

June 2018

Date of this report

7 September 2018

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

November 2014

Education Review

August 2011

Education Review

October 2008

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.