Robins Nest

Education institution number:
40306
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
27
Telephone:
Address:

52 Beach Road, Katikati

View on map

Robins Nest

ERO’s Akanuku | Assurance Review reports provide information about whether a service meets and maintains regulatory standards. Further information about Akanuku | Assurance Reviews is included at the end of this report.

ERO’s Judgement

Regulatory standards

ERO’s judgement

Curriculum

Meeting

Premises and facilities

Meeting

Health and safety

Meeting

Governance, management and administration

Meeting

At the time of the review, ERO found the service was taking reasonable steps to meet regulatory standards.

Background

Robins Nest previously known as Biggles Katikati, changed ownership in October 2021. The centre owner manages day-to-day operations and leads the curriculum. Of the children enrolled, a small number are identified as Māori, or as Tongan. The service philosophy places value on a heart-led, home-away-from home approach to children’s learning.

Summary of Review Findings

The curriculum acknowledges the unique place of Māori as tangata whenua. Assessment, planning, and evaluation demonstrate children’s learning, their interests, whānau, and life contexts. Teachers demonstrate knowledge of relevant theories and practice in early childhood education.

Adults providing education and care build nurturing, reciprocal relationships with children. They support children’s developing social competence. The service curriculum is language rich. It provides children with a range of experiences to enhance and extend their learning and development, both indoors and outdoors, individually and in groups.

The service philosophy and an annual plan guide operations. Suitable health and safety practices are in place.

Key Next Steps

Next steps include:

  • increasing opportunities for children to hear and use te reo Māori in meaningful learning contexts

  • continuing to develop the local curriculum to reflect what is important to children and their families, kaiako and the wider community.

Next ERO Review

The next ERO review is likely to be an Akarangi | Quality Evaluation.

Patricia Davey
Director of Early Childhood Education (ECE)

3 July 2023

Information About the Service

Early Childhood Service Name

Robins Nest

Profile Number

40306

Location

Katikati

Service type

Education and care service

Number licensed for

25 children, including up to 5 aged under 2

Percentage of qualified teachers

80-99%

Service roll

30

Review team on site

May 2023

Date of this report

3 July 2023

Most recent ERO report(s)

Previous report for Biggles Katikati:

Akanuku | Assurance Review, July 2019

General Information about Assurance Reviews

All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include the Licensing Criteria for Education and Care Services 2008.

Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a licence to operate.

ERO undertakes an Akanuku | Assurance Review process in any centre-based service:

  • having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation

  • previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development’

  • that has moved from a provisional to a full licence

  • that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership

  • where an Akanuku | Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum

  • premises and facilities

  • health and safety practices

  • governance, management and administration.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulatory standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; safety checking; teacher certification; ratios)

  • relevant evacuation procedures and practices.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:

  • discussions with those involved in the service

  • consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems

  • observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice.

Pukeko Corner Kindergarten - 28/08/2015

1 Evaluation of Pukeko Corner Kindergarten

Pukeko Corner Kindergarten How well placed isto promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Pukeko Corner Kindergarten is a privately owned and family operated early childhood centre located in Katikati. It is licensed for 29 children over the age of two. Currently there are 41 children enrolled which is a significant increase since the previous ERO review in 2012. Four children are of Māori descent. The kindergarten provides education and care for children from diverse cultures and backgrounds.

Teachers are well qualified and experienced. The centre manager is committed to responding to the language, culture and identity of all the children and families attending. She has recently employed a teacher who is of Ngai Tamawhariua descent, which is the local hapū. This teacher brings knowledge and skills in te reo and tikanga Māori. This will enrich and deepen learning about local tribal history and te ao Māori for teachers, children and their families. In addition, part time teachers have been employed to respond to the language and culture of children of Tongan descent.

Since the 2012 ERO review, the centre has made progress and improved aspects of the teacher appraisal system and self review. This has led to systematic development and improvement in centre operations.

The centre's Christian values of respect and kindness are highly evident and underpin its philosophy of community involvement, service in the community, and children learning through meaningful contexts as they play.

The Review Findings

Children have many opportunities to express their ideas and opinions, follow their interests and sustain their play. They are developing high levels of social and creative skills as they work and play in a mixed age setting. Children are supported to make choices. They can freely access a wide variety of high-quality equipment and materials in a well designed home-like setting.

Children are benefitting from the extensive knowledge that individual teachers bring to enrich the programme, most notably in the creative arts, natural science, Māori and Tongan culture.

Children are also benefitting from the close, reciprocal and meaningful relationship that the centre manager and teachers have developed over time with the local hapū. Flexible routines and regular cultural celebrations and events contribute to a strong sense of belonging for children and families.

Regular trips and excursions into the local community are an important part of the centre programme. This includes close relationships with the nearby primary school and a local retirement home.

Children who have special needs experience an inclusive environment and benefit from a strong partnership between teachers, specialist agencies and families.

Well planned transitions into the centre and on to primary school are appreciated by families and contribute to children's confidence and well being.

High quality teaching practices observed by ERO include:

  • positive, nurturing and reciprocal relationships that have been established and maintained amongst teachers, children and families, whānau and fono.
  • complex learning conversations with children that promote their thinking and problem-solving skills
  • skilful integration of literacy and mathematics into children's play
  • teachers' planning well to add complexity to children's learning
  • a commitment to ensuring that children from Indian, Tongan and other backgrounds experience a strong sense of belonging in the centre.

There is a good balance between teacher led and child initiated learning. Teachers highly value children's contributions, listen carefully to their ideas and questions, and use these to underpin their planning.

The centre manager promotes a culture of shared leadership. This is evident because:

  • staff feel valued and listened to
  • leadership seeks parent input and responds to their ideas
  • responsibilities are distributed across all staff in a way that makes good use of individual strengths.

Good governance and management means that the centre is well placed to sustain its performance and promote positive outcomes for all children. A clear and regularly reviewed philosophy underpins centre operations. There is appropriate strategic and annual planning. This is increasingly useful in guiding centre development. Self review is well understood, ongoing and systematic and leads to improvement in centre practices and the environment.

Key Next Steps

Teachers are committed to increasing their bicultural knowledge and practice. Useful next steps should include:

  • increasing teachers' confidence and capability so that they can make more frequent daily use of Māori language
  • deepening teachers understanding of Māori preferred ways of teaching and learning.

Centre leaders and teachers acknowledge that assessment should be strengthened. A stronger focus on ensuring learning informs planning could help to extend that learning in a systematic way. This will include enhanced systems for monitoring and tracking.

The centre manager needs to continue to strengthen teacher appraisal by ensuring it is clearly linked to the Practicing Teacher Criteria and shared and agreed best practice in early childhood education.

Making more effective use of Ministry of Education resources, indicators and guidelines of best practice is likely to bring greater clarity and understanding to these reviews.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Pukeko Corner Kindergarten completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Pukeko Corner Kindergarten will be in three years.

Graham Randell
Deputy Chief Review Officer Northern (Acting)

28 August 2015

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Katikati

Ministry of Education profile number

40306

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

29 children aged over 2

Service roll

41

Gender composition

Boys 21
Girls 20

Ethnic composition

Māori
Pākehā
Tongan
Indian
Other Asian

  4
25
  7
  4
  1

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49%       50-79%       80%+

Based on funding rates

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Over 2

1:9

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

July 2015

Date of this report

28 August 2015

Most recent ERO report(s)

 

Education Review

October 2012

Education Review

October 2009

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau. 

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.