Cambridge Road Community Kindergarten

Education institution number:
34003
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
20
Telephone:
Address:

Hillcrest Normal School, Hillcrest, Hamilton

View on map

Cambridge Road Community Kindergarten

1 ERO’s Judgements

Akarangi | Quality Evaluation evaluates the extent to which this early childhood service has the learning and organisational conditions to support equitable and excellent outcomes for all learners. Te Ara Poutama Indicators of quality for early childhood education: what matters most are the basis for making judgements about the effectiveness of the service in achieving equity and excellence for all learners. Judgements are made in relation to the Outcomes Indicators, Learning and Organisational Conditions. The Evaluation Judgement Rubric derived from the indicators, is used to inform ERO’s judgements about this service’s performance in promoting equity and excellence.

ERO’s judgements for Cambridge Road Community Kindergarten are as follows:

Outcome Indicators

(What the service knows about outcomes for learners)


Whāngai Establishing

Ngā Akatoro Domains

 

Learning Conditions
Organisational Conditions

Whāngai Establishing
Whāngai Establishing

2 Context of the Service

Cambridge Road Community Kindergarten is located on the grounds of Hillcrest Normal School. The community-based centre is governed as an incorporated society. The elected parent committee also includes two lead teachers. Enrolled children represent a diverse range of ethnicities, including small numbers of Māori learners and those of Pacific heritage.

3 Summary of findings

Children experience a predictable curriculum that integrates a range of experiences to build their sense of security. The well-resourced indoor learning environment promotes child choice. The outdoor environment promotes active play. Transitions into service and to school are well supported. Younger learners experience a calm and unhurried environment. Children’s wellbeing is supported.

The service is at an early stage of working with parents and whānau to build their responsiveness to all children’s cultures, languages, and identities. Tuakana teina relationships support children’s learning. Teachers include te reo and tikanga Māori in daily experiences. Cultural celebrations and events are acknowledged for some children. Pacific culture is yet to be reflected in the curriculum.

Child assessments are mana enhancing. Te ao Māori concepts are increasingly integrated throughout documented assessments. The service is increasing the use of the learning outcomes in Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum, in its assessment practices. Leaders agree there is a need to grow cultural competence of teachers to include all children’s culture, language and identity in planning and assessment processes.

The service is beginning to use evaluation for improvement to inform decision making. Professional growth cycles and access to professional learning grow teachers’ knowledge to better respond to learning needs of children. The board provides curriculum resourcing and ongoing teacher development and supports the sustainability of the service. Internal evaluation systems are yet to identify the impacts of change on children’s learning.

4 Improvement actions

Cambridge Road Community Kindergarten will include the following actions in its Quality Improvement Planning:

  • Strengthen the integration of learning outcomes from Te Whāriki in documented planning and evaluation.

  • Develop evaluative capability to identify outcomes for children over time.

  • Work alongside families and whānau to respond to all children’s cultures, languages, and identities.

5 Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Cambridge Road Community Kindergarten completed an ERO Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum

  • premises and facilities

  • health and safety practices

  • governance, management, and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; safety checking; teacher registration; ratios)

  • relevant evacuation procedures and practices.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

6 Actions for Compliance

Since the onsite visit, the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed the following non-compliances:

  • documentation and risk assessment for regular excursions.

[Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Centres 2008, HS17]

Phil Cowi
Director Review and Improvement Services (Central)
Central Region | Te Tai Pūtahi Nui

5 April 2023 

7 About the Early Childhood Service

Early Childhood Service Name

Cambridge Road Community Kindergarten

Profile Number

34003

Location

Hillcrest, Hamilton

Service type

Education and care service

Number licensed for

20 children, aged over 2

Percentage of qualified teachers

100%

Service roll

21

Review team on site

December 2022

Date of this report

5 April 2023

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review, April 2019; Education Review, January 2016

Cambridge Road Community Kindergarten - 08/04/2019

1 Evaluation of Cambridge Road Community Kindergarten

How well placed is Cambridge Road Community Kindergarten to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

Cambridge Road Community Kindergarten is well placed to promote positive learning outcomes for children.

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Cambridge Road Community Kindergarten is located inside the grounds of Hillcrest Normal School in Hamilton. The centre provides education and care for children from two years to school age. Licensed for 20 children, it operates from 8:30am to 3:15pm during the school terms. The roll reflects a significant number of different cultures.

The community-based centre is governed as an incorporated society. The elected parent committee also includes the head teacher (also the licensee) and teachers. Since the 2016 ERO review, one of the teachers has been appointed to the head teacher role and two new teachers have been appointed. All teachers are qualified early childhood educators.

The centre's philosophy states that they offer a small, friendly engaging learning environment for children and their whānau. They are driven to provide high-quality early childhood education underpinned by: tamariki whakamana - nurturing the mana and learning of children, ako - teaching and learning, whanaungatanga - relationships, Māoritanga - bicultural commitment and Māori ways of being, and kaitiakitanga - guardianship.

The centre has responded positively to the areas identified for development in the 2016 ERO report.

The Review Findings

Children demonstrate a strong sense of belonging and wellbeing in the centre. Teachers are skilled at noticing children's interests and extending their learning in meaningful contexts. They know each child and their whānau well and relationships are based on trust and respect. Children are supported and encouraged to be self managing and to develop positive relationships.

There is an inclusive and relational approach to supporting children with additional learning needs and their families, including involvement with specialised agencies. The collaborative approach ensures these children can fully participate in the programme through individualised planning. Transitions to school, including school visits are personalised and sensitive to the needs of the children.

The service philosophy expresses its community aspiration for the children. The principles of Te Whāriki are strongly evident in the localised and authentic learning programme. Regular excursions into the local natural environment extends learning opportunities. Children are creative and actively explore the well-considered resources, activities and experiences. Languages, cultures and identities are strongly reflected and celebrated in learning portfolios and in practice. Individual assessment portfolios provide a rich record of progress of children over time and reflect a learning partnership with whānau. Literacy and mathematics are naturally integrated into children’s play.

Leadership has identified and values the strengths of the teaching team to contribute to positive outcomes. Children and their whānau are at the centre of all decision making. Leadership and a growing collaborative team culture is highly focused on improving outcomes for children. Useful frameworks for internal evaluation support ongoing centre improvement. Children experience teaching and learning opportunities that are well informed and incorporate recognised current practice in early childhood education.

Governance and management are effective in supporting high-quality education and care for children. There is a collaborative and inclusive approach to governing the centre. They are well informed by leaders. A strong focus on continual improvement underpins the shared decision-making processes.

Key Next Steps

Managers and leaders need to continue to make clear, the alignment of the strategic plan to outcomes for children. This is should enhance and deepen internal evaluation to sustain and continually improve teaching and learning for all children.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Cambridge Road Community Kindergarten completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Phil Cowie
Director Review and Improvement Services
Central Region

8 April 2019

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Hamilton

Ministry of Education profile number

34003

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

20 children, including up to 0 aged under 2

Service roll

20

Gender composition

Boys 10 Girls 10

Ethnic composition

Pākehā
Other

6
14

Percentage of qualified teachers

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Over 2

1:10

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

February 2019

Date of this report

8 April 2019

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

January 2016

Education Review

December 2012

Education Review

January 2010

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement

The overall judgement that ERO makes will depend on how well the service promotes positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed

  • Well placed

  • Requires further development

  • Not well placed

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.

Cambridge Road Community Kindergarten - 12/01/2016

1 Evaluation of Cambridge Road Community Kindergarten

How well placed is Cambridge Road Community Kindergarten to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Cambridge Road Community Kindergarten is a well-established, purpose-built kindergarten located in Hamilton, adjacent to Hillcrest Normal School. It is governed as an incorporated society by an elected parent committee that includes the head teacher/licensee. The service is licensed for 20 children over 2 years of age. At the time of this ERO review, there were 31 children on the roll, including 5 identified as Māori.

Since the 2012 ERO review, the kindergarten has responded to parent needs by offering more flexible hours of opening for older children. It has also increased the visibility of the kindergarten in the local and wider community. The outside play area has been extensively redeveloped and the presentation of the indoor environment has been enhanced. The appointment of a new teacher is providing additional skills and knowledge for the teaching team.

The committee and teachers have responded positively to the areas for review and development identified in the 2012 ERO review. They have continued to build teacher capability in assessment and planning, and strengthened relationships with parents.

The dedicated and capable governance committee supports the head teacher in her leadership role and contributes to decision making and financial stability. A useful strategic and annual plan provides guidance for kindergarten direction, and enables progress to be tracked and monitored in relation to the goals. The kindergarten philosophy reflects the early childhood curriculum, Te Whāriki, and aims to support children to become confident communicators with a strong sense of belonging and wellbeing in a positive learning culture.

The Review Findings

Children are actively involved in sustained independent and cooperative play. They benefit from highly effective interactions with their teachers who support and extend their play and exploration. Children lead and initiate learning and play. They demonstrate a strong sense of belonging and ownership of the environment. Teachers listen to, and are highly responsive to children’s suggestions, interests and preferences. They use questions and provocations to encourage children to inquire into and investigate the world around them. Teachers effectively model and develop children’s oral language and extend their communications skills.

Children and their parents/whānau contribute to the centre programme through their participation in a wide range of learning experiences such as regular visits to a local native bush area, storytelling, preparing ethnic foods, and joining in celebrations and events.

Particular strengths of the curriculum include:

  • opportunities for challenging physical play and ‘hands on’ authentic learning
  • a deeper focus on science, nature, and topics of interest such as the human body
  • a wide range of creative and sensory experiences using different media
  • rich opportunities to experience literacy and mathematics learning through books, puzzles, writing and drawing materials, and appropriate resources.

Teachers use an appropriate range of strategies to develop children’s social skills and encourage them to take increasing responsibility for the wellbeing of themselves, others and their environment. Children with special learning requirements are supported to participate actively in the programme.

Children and their parents/whānau have access to well-presented portfolios that record their learning and progress at the kindergarten. Children revisit their learning in these, and in the readily available books that record sustained group learning experiences. Teachers use information and aspirations from parents, together with the children’s learning stories, to respond intentionally to children’s learning journeys.

The committee and teachers use a variety of self-review initiatives to continually improve kindergarten systems and processes in order to promote successful outcomes for children. A recent example has been a review that has resulted in a successful and supportive transition-to-school programme.

Teachers have been involved in individual professional learning and development and are now undertaking in-depth curriculum review about science and the natural world. They work collaboratively and collegially. An appraisal process has been recently developed in line with Education Council requirements. This process now needs to be clearly documented and evaluated.

An experienced head teacher guides the development and improvement of the kindergarten. She encourages others to contribute their ideas and skills and has responded to parent wishes and needs. With the support of the office administrator, the head teacher skilfully manages the kindergarten operations and regularly meets with and reports to the parent committee. The committee is well led by a knowledgeable chairperson. Together with the vice chairperson and treasurer, they provide effective support for the head teacher and staff. This includes help with the employment of new staff, overseeing the finances and property development and maintenance, and reviewing polices. There is effective communication amongst committee members and staff, and with parents and the wider community.

Key Next Steps

The kindergarten leader and ERO agree that areas for future growth include:

  • continuing to explore ways to reflect children’s language, culture and identity in documentation and the kindergarten environment
  • continuing to review and develop systems, processes and documentation to reflect kindergarten priorities, show decision-making, actions and evaluations, and ensure alignment between all aspects of practice
  • seeking external advice and guidance to grow professional leadership and capability within the team to build sustainability.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Cambridge Road Community Kindergarten completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Cambridge Road Community Kindergarten will be in three years.

Graham Randell

Deputy Chief Review Officer Northern

12 January 2016

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Cambridge

Ministry of Education profile number

34003

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

20 children, including up to 032 aged under 2

Service roll

32

Gender composition

Girls 17 Boys 15

Ethnic composition

Māori

Pākehā

Asian

Pacific

Indian

Other

5

18

3

3

2

1

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%

Based on funding rates

80%

Reported ratios of staff to children

Over 2

1:10

Meets minimum requirements

Review team on site

October 2015

Date of this report

12 January 2016

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

October 2012

 

Education Review

January 2010

 

Education Review

December 2004

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.