Busy Bees Alfriston Road

Education institution number:
45923
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
66
Telephone:
Address:

52 Alfriston Road, Manurewa East, Auckland

View on map

Choice Kids Alfriston Road - 23/05/2019

ERO’s judgement

Regulatory standards

Curriculum

Meeting

Premises and facilities

Meeting

Health and safety

Meeting

Governance, management and administration

Meeting

At the time of the review, ERO found the service was taking reasonable steps to meet regulatory standards.

Background

Choicekids Alfriston Road is one of eight ChoiceKids services in South Auckland. Its community, families and staff are culturally diverse, with the largest groups on the roll being Māori, Pacific and Indian. Programmes are provided for children in three areas, according to age. The centre manager leads a team of nine qualified teachers and six unqualified staff.

Since ERO’s 2016 review, the centre’s building has been extended and licence numbers increased. ERO’s last report identified a number of areas for improvement. Some progress has been made in each of these areas.

ERO’s 2018 special review of the ChoiceKids organisation identified a high number of areas for improvement. The service had been on a provisional licence and monitored by the Ministry of Education. It was returned to a full licence in April 2018. ChoiceKids personnel continue to support the service’s ongoing improvement.

This review was part of a cluster of eight reviews in the ChoiceKids organisation.

Summary of review findings

The service’s curriculum is inclusive and responsive to children’s needs and development. It is consistent with Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum, and is becoming better informed by assessment, planning and evaluation.

The service regularly collaborates with parents and whānau, who are advised on how to access information about their children’s learning and the operation of the service. An ongoing process of internal evaluation helps to maintain and improve centre practices. Premises and facilities are hygienic and maintained in good condition.

Next ERO Review

The next ERO review is likely to be an Education Review.

Steve Tanner

Director Review and Improvement Services Northern

Northern Region

23 May 2019

Information about the service

Early Childhood Service Name

Choicekids Alfriston Road

Profile Number

45923

Location

Auckland

Service type

Education and care service

Number licensed for

90 children, including up to 20 aged under 2

Percentage of qualified teachers

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

1:4 - Better than regulatory standards

Over 2

1:8 - Better than regulatory standards

Service roll

116

Gender composition

Boys 57% Girls 43%

Ethnic composition

Māori 39%

NZ European/Pākehā 8%

Indian 20%

Samoan 16%

other ethnic groups 17%

Review team on site

April 2019

Date of this report

23 May 2019

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

January 2016

Education Review

November 2015

General Information about Assurance Reviews

All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include:

Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a licence to operate.

ERO undertakes an Assurance Review process in any service:

  • having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation

  • previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development’

  • that has moved from a provisional to a full licence

  • that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership

  • where an Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum

  • premises and facilities

  • health and safety practices

  • governance, management and administration.

As part of an Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulated standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher certification; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

As part of an Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:

  • discussions with those involved in the service

  • consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems

  • observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice.

Choice Kids Alfriston Road - 18/01/2016

1 Evaluation of Choice Kids Alfriston Road

How well placed is Choice Kids Alfriston Road to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

Choice Kids Alfriston Road has made considerable progress since its 2013 ERO review. Centre leaders and staff have improved their use of self review and made improvements to develop a more responsive and relevant curriculum for children.

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Choice Kids Alfriston Road caters for children from birth to school age. The centre is licensed for thirty-seven children, including five up to the age of two years. It offers sessional and full day education and care. The centre caters for a diverse community where many children speak more than one language. Several staff are also bilingual and share the children’s cultures and languages.

The centre is part of a privately owned and operated network which includes five centres. In consultation with families, owners have begun a significant purpose-built extension to the existing centre. They intend to cater for up to eighty children, including twenty children up to the age of two years.

To help manage the organisation’s growth, a new management and leadership structure is developing. A general manager role has been created to enable the operation manager to focus on developing the quality of teaching and learning. Administration and additional support staff are in place to improve centre management.

The service has begun to design an emerging managers’ programme to support leaders to develop their leadership skills. This is likely to be a valuable strategy to build professional capability and maintain the momentum for improvement. New and additional leadership roles in the under and over two areas are planned to further support the centre manager.

The 2013 ERO report identified a number of significant challenges for the centre to improve the quality of the programme and the outcomes for children. Leaders, teachers and staff have worked diligently to make many positive changes. Centre leaders and staff have made very good use of external professional learning and development support through the Ministry of Education.

The Review Findings

Centre managers and staff have maintained a strong commitment to providing for and working with families. Social justice and partnership are a key part of the centre’s approach. Staff enact the centre’s philosophy through whakawhanaungatanga and manaakitanga. Children benefit from this genuine family-friendly approach and an environment that welcomes children and their whānau.

Children are well supported to develop positive social skills. They demonstrate a strong sense of belonging and connection to the centre. Positive interactions with their teachers and each other helps contribute to a warm and settled atmosphere. Children enjoy learning alongside their friends and teachers.

Teachers are approachable and friendly. They provide good support for children’s wellbeing. Teachers have improved opportunities for children to offer their contributions and inform the programme. Continuing to review the purpose of routines could offer further opportunities for teachers and children to extend decision making and sustain learning.

The programme has become more child led and responsive. Several improvements to the planning, assessment and evaluation systems have promoted more relevant and meaningful learning experiences. Children have better access to a wider range of resources. Individual learning portfolios are attractive and useful records of children’s learning and engagement in the programme.

Children up to the age of two benefit from caring teachers who promote a calm and peaceful environment. Care routines for younger children are appropriately individualised. Positive and responsive interactions are very evident. Teachers could now increase opportunities for younger children to choose to access the outdoors.

Māori perspectives are well integrated into learning experiences along with highly valued contributions from whānau. Māori children’s mana is enhanced through ongoing professional development that helps teachers engage in respectful ways with children and whānau. Te reo Māori is used well and teachers are increasing their confidence and expertise in this area through well chosen professional development.

Children of Pacific Island heritage benefit from several teachers who are able to speak their home language. These skilled bilingual teachers also help new children settle quickly and they make positive connections with families. Teachers are also writing useful bilingual learning stories to help promote learning partnerships with families. The individual culture, language and identity of children from Pacific heritage is recognised through regular, meaningful events and celebrations.

Leadership and management of the centre is now more effective and clearly focused on improvement. Leaders work collaboratively and respectfully with staff. They are focused on increasing positive outcomes for children. Clear policies and procedures support centre operations well. Regular internal audits by organisational leaders offer valuable input to centre leaders about centre operations.

An appropriate focus for the wider organisation is continuing to enhance the professional knowledge and expertise of staff through useful and relevant external professional development. Strengthening the depth of evaluation using the centre’s philosophy could also support leaders to consolidate the centre’s progress and manage the future expansion.

Key Next Steps

ERO and centre leaders agree leaders and staff are well placed to:

  • develop a shared teaching approach that extends children’s thinking and independence
  • use current educational research and theory to inform and document the centre’s philosophy and practices for the care and education of younger children
  • continue to improve the quality of individual children’s assessment to show their progress and success over time
  • strengthen performance management aligned to the Education Council requirements and increase teachers’ evaluation of the success of their teaching
  • develop goals that focus on positive learning outcomes for children with measurable indicators to inform selfreview within centre strategic planning.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Choice Kids Alfriston Road completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

In order to improve practice, centre leaders should ensure adequate shade is provided over the playground and that teachers ensure all children wear hats during outdoor play.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Choice Kids Alfriston Road will be in three years.

Graham Randell

Deputy Chief Review Officer Northern

18 January 2016

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Manurewa East, Auckland

Ministry of Education profile number

45923

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

37 children, including up to 5 aged under 2

Service roll

59

Gender composition

Boys 38 Girls 21

Ethnic composition

Māori

Pākehā

Samoan

Tongan

Indian

Asian

Cook Island Māori

Niue

other

22

5

8

7

6

2

2

2

5

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%

Based on funding rates

80%

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

1:5

Meets minimum requirements

 

Over 2

1:10

Meets minimum requirements

Review team on site

November 2015

Date of this report

18 January 2016

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

October 2013

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.