Clandeboye Kindergarten

Education institution number:
70345
Service type:
Free Kindergarten
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
26
Telephone:
Address:

14 Kotuku Place, Temuka

View on map

Clandeboye Kindergarten​

1 ERO’s Judgements 

Akarangi | Quality Evaluation evaluates the extent to which this early childhood service has the learning and organisational conditions to support equitable and excellent outcomes for all learners. Te Ara Poutama Indicators of quality for early childhood education: what matters most are the basis for making judgements about the effectiveness of the service in achieving equity and excellence for all learners. Judgements are made in relation to the Outcomes Indicators, Learning and Organisational Conditions. The Evaluation Judgement Rubric derived from the indicators, is used to inform ERO’s judgements about this service’s performance in promoting equity and excellence.  

ERO’s judgements for ​Clandeboye Kindergarten​ are as follows: 

Outcome Indicators 

(What the service knows about outcomes for learners) 

Whāngai Establishing​ 

Ngā Akatoro Domains 

 
Learning Conditions 
Organisational Conditions 

Whāngai Establishing​ 

Whakaū Embedding​ 

2 Context of the Service 

Clandeboye Kindergarten is one of 13 kindergartens governed by South Canterbury Kindergarten Association. A general manager is responsible for day-to-day operations, and a senior teaching team leads teaching and learning. There have been several changes in leadership in the last two years. Children from a range of ethnicities attend, and nearly a quarter are Māori. Good progress has been made since the 2022 ERO report.  

3 Summary of findings 

Children learn within a well-resourced curriculum aligned to the kindergarten’s learning priorities and Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum. Teachers empower them to lead their own learning and develop a sense of belonging. Children are effectively supported to develop their social competence, emotional wellbeing, thinking and oral language skills. Those with additional learning needs are well supported to achieve their learning goals. Teachers are responsive to children’s strengths, interests and abilities and view them as confident and capable learners.  

The bicultural curriculum is evident. Te reo Māori and tikanga Māori are noticeable in the daily curriculum. Children hear, see, and speak some te reo Māori. Aspects of children’s cultures, languages and identity are evident in the learning environment, however not yet consistently evident in assessment documentation. 

Assessment documentation shows children’s participation in a range of curriculum experiences and their learning. Individual planning is informed by whānau aspirations and goals for their children. There is yet to be consistent documentation of children’s progress over time in relation to Te Whāriki learning outcomes.  

Leaders and those in governance roles have established and implement sound systems, processes and practices to drive improvement within the association. This includes relevant opportunities for professional learning and engagement in professional growth and reflection. Senior teachers support improved practice by regularly visiting and mentoring kindergarten staff.  

Improved guidelines for internal evaluation are in place. However, at association level and within individual kindergartens, evaluation practices require further embedding to be fully effective. This includes developing collective capability to effectively monitor and evaluate the improvement actions to better determine whether these are having the desired impact.  

Leaders and teachers work alongside parents, the community, and mana whenua to implement the association’s strategic vision and goals. This is enabling them to develop practices committed to implementing practices related to Te Tiriti o Waitangi

4 Improvement actions 

​Clandeboye Kindergarten​ will include the following actions in its Quality Improvement Planning: 

  • Embed assessment, planning and evaluation processes and documentation, consistently showing children’s progress over time in relation to the learning outcomes of Te Whāriki, and increasing the visibility of children’s cultures, languages, and identity. 
  • Those in roles of governance and management to continue to build their own and teachers' capability in the use of evaluation to scrutinise all aspects of operation and more clearly show the impact of planned actions on outcomes for identified individuals and groups of learners.  

5 Management Assurance on Legal Requirements 

Before the review, the staff and management of ​Clandeboye Kindergarten​ completed an ERO Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they ​have​ taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to: 

  • curriculum 
  • premises and facilities 
  • health and safety practices 
  • governance, management and administration. 

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing: 

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection) 
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures) 
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; safety checking; teacher registration; ratios) 
  • relevant evacuation procedures and practices. 

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. 

6 Actions for Compliance  

ERO identified the following area of non-compliance: 

  • ensuring accurate recording of medication, including children’s names, and parent permission to administer medication is undertaken.  

Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Centres 2008, HS28. 

​During the review, the service provided​ ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed the following  
non-compliance:  

  • Maintaining a detailed record of safety checking, including risk assessment required to be complete after all relevant information is obtained (GMA7A). 

Patricia Davey 
Director of Early Childhood Education (ECE) 

​11 December 2023​   

7 About the Early Childhood Service  

Early Childhood Service NameClandeboye Kindergarten
Profile Number​70345
LocationTemuka, Timaru
Service type  ​Free Kindergarten​
Number licensed for  20 children aged over 2 years 
Percentage of qualified teachers  ​100%​
Service roll 22 
Review team on site July 2023 
Date of this report ​11 December 2023​
Most recent ERO report(s) ​​Akanuku | Assurance Review​, ​February 2022​; ​Education Review​, ​February 2017​

Clandeboye Kindergarten

ERO’s Akanuku | Assurance Review reports provide information about whether a service meets and maintains regulatory standards. Further information about Akanuku | Assurance Reviews is included at the end of this report.

ERO’s Judgement

Regulatory standards

ERO’s judgement

CurriculumMeeting
Premises and facilitiesMeeting
Health and safetyMeeting
Governance, management, and administrationMeeting

At the time of the review, ERO found the service was taking reasonable steps to meet regulatory standards.

Background

Clandeboye kindergarten is a small early childhood service that offers education and care for children from two years to school age. The service was known as Clandeboye Preschool but is now part of the South Canterbury Kindergartens. All staff are qualified early childhood teachers.

Summary of Review Findings

The service curriculum is designed to be inclusive and responsive to children as competent and confident learners. It provides children with experiences and opportunities to extend their learning indoors and outdoors. The curriculum is informed by assessment, planning and evaluation that shows an understanding of children’s learning and interests. Children have access to a range of equipment and resources suitable for the age and abilities attending.

There are systems and processes in place that support the health, safety and wellbeing of children. Ongoing reviews help the service maintain and improve the quality of its education and care. Parents have opportunities to be involved in the review of service policies.

Key Next Step

The key next step is to:

  • embed the new assessment, planning and evaluation processes, with a focus on making children's learning and progress more visible.

Next ERO Review

The next ERO review is likely to be an Akarangi | Quality Evaluation.

Dr Lesley Patterson
Director Review and Improvement Services (Southern)
Southern Region | Te Tai Tini

17 February 2022 

Information About the Service

Early Childhood Service NameClandeboye Kindergarten
Profile Number70345
LocationTemuka
Service typeFree Kindergarten
Number licensed for20 children, including up to 0 aged under 2.
Percentage of qualified teachers100%
Service roll25
Ethnic compositionNZ European/Pākehā 15; other ethnicities 10.
Review team on siteNovember 2021
Date of this report17 February 2022
Most recent ERO report(s) Education Review, February 2017; Education Review, September 2013.

General Information about Assurance Reviews

All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include the Licensing Criteria for Education and Care Services 2008.

Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a license to operate.

ERO undertakes an Akanuku | Assurance Review process in any centre-based service:

  • having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation
  • previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development’
  • that has moved from a provisional to a full licence
  • that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership
  • where an Akanuku | Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management, and administration.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulated standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher certification; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:

  • discussions with those involved in the service
  • consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems
  • observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice.

Clandeboye Preschool - 09/02/2017

1 Evaluation of Clandeboye Preschool

How well placed is Clandeboye Preschool to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

Clandeboye Preschool is well placed to promote positive learning outcomes for children.

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Clandeboye Preschool is a small, rural early childhood service governed by elected parents and appointed staff members. A parent group also provides ongoing support for the centre.

The preschool offers education and care for children from two years to school age. Most staff are qualified early childhood teachers and one is in training to become a teacher. Parents regularly help in the learning programme.

Since the 2013 ERO review, leaders, teachers and parents have reviewed the centre philosophy. They have yet to include bicultural perspectives in this key centre document. The governance group has clarified management and governance roles and responsibilities. They have also created and regularly monitor strategic and operational plans. Further work is needed to improve assessment and planning.

The Review Findings

Children are settled and confident in the centre. They are purposefully focused on their interests and chosen activities. Two-year-old children are well supported to actively participate in the programme and join the play of older children.

Children experience positive, nurturing relationships with their teachers. Teachers listen carefully, and make appropriate use of questioning to help children extend their interests and ideas.

Children benefit from the well-resourced and carefully presented indoor and outside environments. Teachers actively promote sustainable practices, caring for animals and the environment. The expansive outdoor area is regularly reviewed and new features added to promote learning outcomes for children.

Parents have many opportunities to be involved in the programme and operation of the centre. They are kept well informed about their child's time at the centre. Parents are frequently consulted about policy reviews and centre internal evaluation.

Leaders and teachers have established strong links to the local community. The centre manager is part of a Community of Learning (CoL) and is building positive relationships with the participating schools and early childhood services.

Leaders make good use of strategic planning to set clear priorities and goals for the centre. Their annual operational plan is well aligned to the strategic plan and both are regularly monitored. Teachers often engage in systematic internal evaluation that identifies where improvements can be made.

Key Next Steps

Centre leaders and ERO agree, that the key next steps to improve outcomes for all children include:

  • integrating te ao Māori more fully into centre practices and documentation

  • improving assessment, planning and evaluation processes to show more clearly outcomes for children’s learning

  • reviewing the four-year-old programme to ensure it effectively supports children transitioning to school

  • continuing to develop ways to include children’s home culture in the programme

  • extending appraisal practices to meet Education Council requirements.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Clandeboye Preschool completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. 

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Clandeboye Preschool will be in three years.

Dr Lesley Patterson

Deputy Chief Review Officer-Southern/Te Waipounamu

9 February 2017 

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning. 

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service 

Location

Temuka

Ministry of Education profile number

70345

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

20 children over the age of two years

Service roll

32

Gender composition

Girls 15; Boys 17

Ethnic composition

Pākehā

Korean

Filipino

Indian

Latin American

28

1

1

1

1

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%+

Based on funding rates

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

Not applicable

Choose an item.

Over 2

1:7

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

December 2016

Date of this report

9 February 2017

Most recent ERO reports

 

Education Review

September 2013

Education Review

August 2010

Education Review

May 2007

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.