Clevedon Kindergarten

Education institution number:
10023
Service type:
Free Kindergarten
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
41
Telephone:
Address:

14 Monument Road, Clevedon

View on map

Clevedon Kindergarten - 13/07/2016

Here is the latest report for the Governing Organisation that this service is part of.

 

1 Evaluation of Clevedon Kindergarten

How well placed is Clevedon Kindergarten to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Clevedon Kindergarten is a semi-rural service that is licensed for 30 children over two years old. The kindergarten provides six hour sessions that align well with school hours. It is part of the Counties Manukau Kindergarten Association and operates within the policies and management framework of this organisation. A professional practice manager (PPM) visits and provides leadership and curriculum support for teachers.

All but one of the teaching team is new since 2013. There are now three permanent teachers with a part-time teacher employed to cover lunch hours. The teachers, who are all fully registered, work collaboratively and are supported by an active parent fundraising group. Teachers have a commitment to bicultural practices and a teaching philosophy underpinned by respect and high expectations.

In 2013 ERO endorsed the positive reporting history of the kindergarten. High quality teaching and learning continued to be features of the service and the curriculum engaged children effectively. ERO recommended that teachers further involve children in planning their learning and continue to build relationships with families and local schools. There has been good progress in these areas.

This review was part of a cluster of four kindergarten reviews in the Counties Manukau Kindergarten Association.

The Review Findings

Children are motivated learners who confidently lead their own learning. They competently work independently or in collaborative groups, often sustaining their interest for prolonged periods. Children have well developed communication skills and use them to investigate, solve problems and plan with their friends. They understand the kindergarten ‘I can’ culture and know that hard tasks take practice and persistence. Children model the value of respect and willingly help others as they learn new skills. They benefit from bicultural practices that enable them to become familiar with some te reo Māori, waiata and aspects of tikanga Māori.

Teachers believe in children's competence. They have high expectations that children will make positive choices about what they do, engage in challenging learning and explore new ideas. Teachers skilfully prompt children with open-ended questions but also trust them to independently guide the direction of their play and negotiate with peers. Teachers promote the notion of ‘ako’, recognising all are learners and enabling children to use their expertise to teach others, including adults.

Teachers know children very well and use their interests to develop a diverse curriculum. Children's learning is enriched by opportunities to sew, make pottery and learn about photography. Teachers actively make links with school learning by integrating early literacy, mathematics, science and technology in the context of play. They have also established an environment that is extensively resourced, easily accessed and that invites children's exploration. Teachers document children's learning well and analyse their experiences to demonstrate the dispositions that support children to become lifelong learners.

Parents are partners in their children's learning. They actively support centre events and are kept well informed about children's learning. Families make good use of an interactive digital portal that enables them to read and comment on the child’s learning stories. Parents who were interviewed by ERO value the rich learning experiences their children enjoy. They also value the extent to which teachers know their child and respond to their interests.

The kindergarten is led and managed effectively. The head teacher has established a collaborative environment that enables teachers to take leadership responsibilities and confidently contribute to decision making. They work together as a highly reflective team who value their different skills and knowledge. Teachers engage in a range of internal evaluation processes that enable them to address incidental issues as well as to develop new approaches to their teaching and continually improve practice. A new format for linking strategic goals, the kindergarten’s annual plan, teachers’ professional development and their appraisal goals is contributing to efficient management of the service.

The Counties Manukau Kindergarten Association continues to support the kindergartens well. Leaders establish overarching long-term goals that enable teachers to align their centre development with the strategic direction of the Association. They are responsive to changing community needs and have prepared teachers well to face the challenges of increased competition, the intake of two-year olds and providing variable session hours. Leaders continue to adapt personnel systems to meet legislative changes, including a revised appraisal process to help teachers meet certification expectations.

Key Next Steps

The teachers and the PPM agree that the key next steps for the kindergarten’s development should include:

  • ongoing review of children's assessment portfolios to increase the focus on individual learning and maintaining teachers’ collaborative stories about children's first experiences as they settle into kindergarten
  • continuing to strengthen bicultural practices by developing a measurable plan for improvement.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Clevedon Kindergarten completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Clevedon Kindergarten will be in four years.

Graham Randell

Deputy Chief Review Officer Northern

13 July 2016

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

LocationClevedon, Auckland
Ministry of Education profile number10023
Licence typeFree Kindergarten
Licensed underEducation (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008
Number licensed for30 children, including up to 0 aged under 2
Service roll49
Gender compositionGirls 29 Boys 20
Ethnic composition

Māori

Pākehā

others

4

42

3

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%+

Based on funding rates

80% +
Reported ratios of staff to childrenOver 21:10Meets minimum requirements
Review team on siteJune 2016
Date of this report13 July 2016

Most recent ERO report(s)

 

Education ReviewJanuary 2013
Education ReviewMarch 2010
Education ReviewNovember 2006

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.

Clevedon Kindergarten - 25/01/2013

1 Evaluation of the Service

How well placed is the service to promote positive outcomes for children?

Clevedon Kindergarten is very well placed to promote positive outcomes for children. Effective practices are in place for governance, management, leadership, curriculum and teaching.

Context

Clevedon Kindergarten provides full day education and care for up to 30 children over two years of age in a semi-rural environment. The kindergarten is part of the Counties Manukau Kindergarten Association (CMKA). The Association’s clear vision sets the direction for the kindergarten. Strategies to achieve this vision include responsiveness to whānau contributions and bicultural practices. The Association has a commitment to high quality care and education.

The 2009 ERO report of Clevedon Kindergarten noted that very good quality, child-initiated learning programmes were provided in a well resourced learning environment. These positive features have been sustained and contribute to an effective learning culture. The report recommended that teachers further foster parents’ involvement in planning and assessment. The centre has made progress in this area.

This review was conducted as part of a cluster approach to reviews in six early childhood education services within the Counties Manukau Kindergarten Association (CMKA) umbrella organisation.

The Review Findings

The kindergarten is well governed and managed. Professional support for the well qualified team of registered teachers is ongoing and useful. Specific initiatives and personnel in both the Association and the kindergarten promote te reo me ōna tikanga Māori and are strengthening children’s understanding about te ao Māori.

The well-led teaching team works collegially, is highly reflective and has a commitment to professional learning. They use strategies gained from recent professional development to affirm children’s successes and extend their use of language and thinking skills. Teachers receive valuable feedback that helps them maintain a focus on high quality outcomes for children.

Positive relationships exist between teachers and children. Teachers are welcoming, caring and attentive with children. Effective teaching practices are evident. Teachers work with children in responsive ways that recognise their individual interests. Children are friendly, settled and secure. Teachers listen carefully to their suggestions and ideas. Children enjoy a print rich and stimulating environment where literacy, mathematics and science are integrated and well supported. Good quality resources invite exploration and imaginative play.

The kindergarten’s curriculum is responsive to children’s interests. The programme, which promotes the concept of lifelong learning, supports children within the centre effectively. Innovative developments are apparent in the programme and further contribute to positive outcomes for children. Examples of this can be seen in an information and communication technologies (ICT) initiative, the ‘Language of Teaching’ programme, and teachers’ focus on the value of respect.

The Association’s professional practice manager (PPM) team leads teachers in ongoing reflection on the quality of the kindergarten practices. Teachers are well positioned to continue developing self review processes that inform their practices

ERO, teachers and association personnel agree that next steps could include:

  • involving children more closely in planning for their own learning
  • continuing to build relationships with local schools
  • strengthening ongoing relationships with families.

2 Legal Requirements

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Clevedon Kindergarten completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

3 Next Review

When is ERO likely to review the early childhood service again?

ERO is likely to carry out the next review in three years.

Dale Bailey

National Manager Review Services Northern Region

25 January 2013

Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Clevedon, Auckland

Ministry of Education profile number

10023

Licence type

All Day Free Kindergarten

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

30 children, including up to 0 aged under 2 years

Service roll

54

Gender composition

Boys 32

Girls 22

Ethnic composition

NZ European/Pākehā

Māori

Other

48

5

1

Percentage of qualified teachers

80%

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

No children under 2

 
 

Over 2

1:10

Meets minimum requirements

Review team on site

November 2012

Date of this report

25 January 2013

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

Education Review

Education Review

March 2010

November 2006

December 2003

General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

About ERO Reviews

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the New Zealand government department that reviews schools and early childhood services throughout New Zealand.

Review focus

ERO's education reviews in early childhood services focus on the factors that contribute to positive learning outcomes for children. ERO evaluates how well placed the service is to make and sustain improvements for the benefit of all children at the service. To reach these findings ERO considers:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of self review and partnerships with parents and whānau.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews do not cover every aspect of service performance and each ERO report may cover different issues. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.